{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T20:11:46Z","timestamp":1788639106766,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":40,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784505600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784505600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Universidade Federal De Rond\u00f4nia"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Radiol Phys Technol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>This study evaluated organ-specific absorbed doses and sex-dependent dosimetric variations in 15-year-old patients undergoing panoramic radiography across different units technologies. ICRP 156 mesh-type reference computational phantoms (MRCPs) were coupled with the PHITS Monte Carlo code for this analysis. Three panoramic units with distinct kinematics and exposure protocols were simulated: Unit A (fixed isocentric rotation, constant parameters) and Units B and C (sliding rotation axis, dynamic kV\/mA modulation). Absolute absorbed doses were estimated using experimentally derived air kerma-area product conversion factors. Salivary glands and oral mucosa received the highest absorbed doses, ranging from 270 to 640 \u00b5Gy, depending mainly on the tube voltage protocols. Sex-specific dosimetric disparities appeared due to anatomical variations interacting with beam geometry. The female MRCP absorbed 26% to 28% higher doses in the head lymph nodes due to smaller craniofacial dimensions, increasing scattered radiation contribution. Male phantoms systematically received 12% to 13% higher doses to the extrathoracic lymph nodes across all systems, due to a larger cervical circumference intersecting the divergent primary beam. Patient anatomy dictated the relative dose distribution, but the unit\u2019s operational protocol, particularly dynamic modulation and beam energy, determined the absolute exposure magnitude. These findings emphasize that 15-year-old patients require age-specific protocol optimization. Using highly realistic MRCPs with dynamic exposure parameters shows that unit technology is the main determinant of patient risk, offering a framework for ALARA implementation in adolescent dental radiology.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12194-026-01100-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T08:07:43Z","timestamp":1784534863000},"page":"1224-1240","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Organ dose assessment in 15-year-old patients undergoing panoramic radiography: a Monte Carlo study using mesh-type phantoms and realistic modelling"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4614-8209","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Rosangela","family":"Soares","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Wilson Otto","family":"Batista","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jacqueline Machado Gurj\u00e3o","family":"Rios","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"1100_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40368-019-00493-x","author":"J K\u00fchnisch","year":"2020","unstructured":"K\u00fchnisch J, Anttonen V, Duggal MS, Spyridonos ML, Rajasekharan S, Sobczak M, et al. Best clinical practice guidance for prescribing dental radiographs in children and adolescents: an EAPD policy document. Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40368-019-00493-x.","journal-title":"Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry"},{"key":"1100_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s40368-019-00478-w","author":"K Tsiklakis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tsiklakis K, Mitsea A, Tsichlaki A, Pandis N. A systematic review of relative indications and contra-indications for prescribing panoramic radiographs in dental paediatric patients. Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40368-019-00478-w.","journal-title":"Eur Archives Pediatr Dentistry"},{"key":"1100_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Joh BJ, Lee SS, Yeom HG, Jo GD, Kim JE, Huh KH, et al. A novel method for measuring the direction and angle of central ray and predicting rotation centre via panorama phantom. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. Volume 53. Oxford University Press; 2024. pp. 573\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/dmfr\/twae050.","DOI":"10.1093\/dmfr\/twae050"},{"key":"1100_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/bjr.20151052","author":"C Granlund","year":"2016","unstructured":"Granlund C, Thilander-Klang A, Ylhan B, Lofthag-Hansen S, Ekestubbe A. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations. Br J Radiol. 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/bjr.20151052.","journal-title":"Br J Radiol"},{"key":"1100_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Elmorabit N, Ennibi OK. Radiation dose and risk in dental panoramic radiography: literature review. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1051\/e3sconf\/202131901031","DOI":"10.1051\/e3sconf\/202131901031"},{"key":"1100_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-019-46157-0","author":"C Lee","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lee C, Park B, Lee SS, Kim JE, Han SS, Huh KH, et al. Efficacy of the Monte Carlo method and dose reduction strategies in paediatric panoramic radiography. Sci Rep. 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-019-46157-0.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"1100_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/6924314","author":"H Lee","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lee H, Badal A. A review of doses for dental imaging in 2010\u20132020 and development of a web dose calculator. Radiol Res Pract. 2010. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2021\/6924314.","journal-title":"Radiol Res Pract"},{"key":"1100_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20140223","author":"AT Davis","year":"2015","unstructured":"Davis AT, Safi H, Maddison SM. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr.20140223.","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"1100_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1590\/2446-4740.03717","author":"KR Heiden","year":"2018","unstructured":"Heiden KR, da Rocha ASPS, Filipov D, Salazar CB, Fernandes \u00c2, Westphalen FH, et al. Absorbed doses in salivary and thyroid glands from panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Res Biomed Eng. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/2446-4740.03717.","journal-title":"Res Biomed Eng"},{"key":"1100_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.13075\/ijomeh.1896.00960","author":"M Wrzesie\u0144","year":"2017","unstructured":"Wrzesie\u0144 M, Olszewski J. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13075\/ijomeh.1896.00960.","journal-title":"Int J Occup Med Environ Health"},{"key":"1100_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncaa196","author":"Y Li","year":"2020","unstructured":"Li Y, Huang B, Cao J, Fang T, Liu G, Li X, et al. Estimating radiation dose to major organs in dental X-ray examinations: a phantom study. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncaa196.","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"1100_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1088\/1361-6560\/acbbb6","author":"D Coleman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Coleman D, Griffin KT, Dewji SA. Stylized versus voxel phantoms: quantification of internal organ chord length distances. Phys Med Biol. 2023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1361-6560\/acbbb6.","journal-title":"Phys Med Biol"},{"key":"1100_CR13","unstructured":"ICRP. ICRP Publication 110: Adult reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2008;39."},{"key":"1100_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0146645319893605","author":"CH Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim CH, Yeom YS, Petoussi-Henss N, Zankl M, Bolch WE, Lee C, et al. ICRP publication 145: adult mesh-type reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146645319893605.","journal-title":"Ann ICRP"},{"key":"1100_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"ICRP, Paediatric mesh-type reference, computational phantoms. ICRP Publication 156. Ann ICRP. 2024;53. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01466453231210649.","DOI":"10.1177\/01466453231210649"},{"key":"1100_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.61186\/ijrr.23.1.193","author":"H Eren","year":"2025","unstructured":"Eren H, Deniz Y, Ata GC, Sessiz R. Comparison of pediatric doses of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in three age groups. Int J Radiat Res. 2025. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.61186\/ijrr.23.1.193.","journal-title":"Int J Radiat Res"},{"key":"1100_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.apradiso.2019.01.022","author":"GE Campillo-Rivera","year":"2019","unstructured":"Campillo-Rivera GE, V\u00e1zquez-Ba\u00f1uelos J, Garc\u00eda-Duran \u00c1, Escalona-Llaguno MI, Arteaga MV, Vega-Carrillo HR. Doses in eye lens, thyroid, salivary glands, mammary glands, and gonads, due to radiation scattered in dental orthopantomography. Appl Radiat Isot. 2019. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.apradiso.2019.01.022.","journal-title":"Appl Radiat Isot"},{"key":"1100_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"246","DOI":"10.1007\/s11282-016-0267-3","volume":"33","author":"T Kanzaki","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kanzaki T, Takahashi Y, Yarita K. Absorbed dose to the eye lens during dental radiography. Oral Radiol. 2017;33:246\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11282-016-0267-3.","journal-title":"Oral Radiol"},{"key":"1100_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18502\/fbt.v9i2.8851","author":"R Omidi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Omidi R, Zamani H, Parach AA, Hazbavi M, Dalvand S, Ezoddini-Ardakani F, et al. Entrance surface dose measurement at thyroid and parotid gland regions in cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography. Front Biomed Technol. 2022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18502\/fbt.v9i2.8851.","journal-title":"Front Biomed Technol"},{"key":"1100_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejmp.2017.07.016","author":"MK O\u2019Connor","year":"2017","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor MK. Risk of low-dose radiation and the BEIR VII report: a critical review of what it does and doesn\u2019t say. Physica Med. 2017. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejmp.2017.07.016.","journal-title":"Physica Med"},{"key":"1100_CR21","unstructured":"Toossi MTB, Akbari F, Roodi SB. Radiation exposure to critical organs in panoramic dental examination. Acta Med Iran. 2012;50."},{"key":"1100_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0146645320915031","author":"WE Bolch","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bolch WE, Eckerman K, Endo A, Hunt JGS, Jokisch DW, Kim CH, et al. ICRP Publication 143: Paediatric Reference Computational Phantoms. Ann ICRP. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146645320915031.","journal-title":"Ann ICRP"},{"key":"1100_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oooo.2015.10.030","author":"C Lee","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lee C, Lee SS, Kim JE, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, et al. Comparison of dosimetry methods for panoramic radiography: thermoluminescent dosimeter measurement versus personal computer-based Monte Carlo method calculation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.oooo.2015.10.030.","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol"},{"key":"1100_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.icrp.2007.10.003","author":"The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection","year":"2007","unstructured":"The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP. 2007;37. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.icrp.2007.10.003. ICRP publication 103."},{"key":"1100_CR25","unstructured":"Radcal. Radcal [Internet]. https:\/\/radcal.com\/radiation-measurement-digitizers\/. 2025 [cited 2025 Nov 22]. https:\/\/radcal.com\/radiation-measurement-digitizers\/. Accessed 22 Nov 2025."},{"key":"1100_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00223131.2023.2275736","author":"T Sato","year":"2024","unstructured":"Sato T, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, Ogawa T, Furuta T, Abe SI, et al. Recent improvements of the particle and heavy ion transport code system\u2013PHITS version 3.33. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00223131.2023.2275736.","journal-title":"J Nucl Sci Technol"},{"key":"1100_CR27","unstructured":"Vorbau R, Poludniowski G. https:\/\/spekpy.smile.ki.se\/. SpekPy ver. 2.0.8. 2022."},{"key":"1100_CR28","unstructured":"Canon Medical Systems Corporation. Stationary Anode X-ray tubes [Internet]. 2018 Nov. https:\/\/etd.canon\/en\/product\/pdf\/xray\/PE-D-0510_S_SB_2018-11.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2025."},{"key":"1100_CR29","unstructured":"Pereira da Silva W. Pereira da Silva C. https:\/\/www.labfit.net\/. 2025."},{"key":"1100_CR30","volume-title":"PENELOPE \u2013 A Code System for Monte Carlo Simulation of Electron and Photon Transport","author":"F Salvat","year":"2015","unstructured":"Salvat F, Fern M. PENELOPE \u2013 A code system for monte carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. Nuclear Energy Agency; 2015."},{"key":"1100_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"827","DOI":"10.1016\/j.nima.2006.02.125","volume":"562","author":"C Theis","year":"2006","unstructured":"Theis C, Buchegger KH, Brugger M, Forkel-Wirth D, Roesler S, Vincke H. Interactive three-dimensional visualization and creation of geometries for Monte Carlo calculations. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2006;562:827\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.nima.2006.02.125.","journal-title":"Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A"},{"key":"1100_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.61092\/iaea.ve7q-y94k","volume-title":"Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy","author":"IAEA","year":"2024","unstructured":"IAEA. Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy. Vienna: International atomic energy agency; 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.61092\/iaea.ve7q-y94k."},{"key":"1100_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/dmfr.20180007","author":"D Benchimol","year":"2018","unstructured":"Benchimol D, Koivisto J, Kadesj\u00f6 N, Shi XQ. Effective dose reduction using collimation function in digital panoramic radiography and possible clinical implications in dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1259\/dmfr.20180007.","journal-title":"Dentomaxillofac Radiol"},{"key":"1100_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncae206","author":"G Chen","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chen G, Yin Y, Sun L, Tang Z, Chen J. Monte Carlo simulation study of the effect of thyroid shielding on radiation dose in dental cone beam CT in an adult male phantom. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncae206.","journal-title":"Radiat Prot Dosim"},{"key":"1100_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5624\/isd.2013.43.2.77","author":"GS Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee GS, Kim JS, Seo YS, Kim JD. Effective dose from direct and indirect digital panoramic units. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5624\/isd.2013.43.2.77.","journal-title":"Imaging Sci Dent"},{"key":"1100_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Shatskiy I. Effective doses and radiation risks from common dental radiographic, panoramic and cbct examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. Volume 195. Oxford University Press; 2021. pp. 296\u2013305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/rpd\/ncab069.","DOI":"10.1093\/rpd\/ncab069"},{"key":"1100_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3938\/jkps.73.1377","author":"KH Lee","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lee KH, Kim MS, Kweon DC, Choi J. Comparative study of the effective dose from panoramic radiography in dentistry measured using a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter and an optically stimulated luminescence detector. J Korean Phys Soc. 2018. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3938\/jkps.73.1377.","journal-title":"J Korean Phys Soc"},{"key":"1100_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ahmadi A, Negarestani A, Sina S, Sarshough S. Measurement of entrance skin dose and the dose received by different organs in panoramic dental imaging. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2020;10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31661\/jbpe.v0i0.878.","DOI":"10.31661\/jbpe.v0i0.878"},{"key":"1100_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oooo.2023.09.002","author":"AK Dorsey","year":"2024","unstructured":"Dorsey AK, Mol A, Green P, Ludlow J, Johnson B. Radiation doses in extraoral bitewing radiography compared with intraoral bitewing and panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.oooo.2023.09.002.","journal-title":"Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol"},{"key":"1100_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/tomography10080092","author":"D MacDonald","year":"2024","unstructured":"MacDonald D, Telyakova V. An overview of cone-beam computed tomography and dental panoramic radiography in dentistry in the community. Tomography. 2024. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/tomography10080092.","journal-title":"Tomography"}],"container-title":["Radiological Physics and Technology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01100-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01100-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01100-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T20:03:34Z","timestamp":1788638614000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01100-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]]},"references-count":40,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["1100"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12194-026-01100-7","relation":{"references":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1016\/j.icrp.2007.10.003","asserted-by":"subject"}]},"ISSN":["1865-0333","1865-0341"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1865-0333","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-0341","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1 April 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 June 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 July 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"20 July 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This research relies exclusively on computational Monte Carlo simulations using established reference computational phantoms (ICRP Publication 156 MRCPs). No human or animal subjects were involved; therefore, formal ethical approval was not required.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethical approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent to participate","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Consent for publication","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}