{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]],"date-time":"2026-09-07T23:07:41Z","timestamp":1788822461722,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":31,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,12]],"date-time":"2021-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1626048000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,12]],"date-time":"2021-07-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1626048000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004769","name":"Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Pavia","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004769","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Adv Ther"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s12325-021-01811-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,12]],"date-time":"2021-07-12T11:02:42Z","timestamp":1626087762000},"page":"4403-4412","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":45,"title":["Efficacy and Safety of PreserFlo\u00ae MicroShunt After a Failed Trabeculectomy in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Retrospective Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"given":"Luciano","family":"Quaranta","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Eleonora","family":"Micheletti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roberto","family":"Carassa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlo","family":"Bruttini","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Riccardo","family":"Fausto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Katsanos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ivano","family":"Riva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"4","key":"1811_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"673","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9394(68)91288-9","volume":"66","author":"JE Cairns","year":"1968","unstructured":"Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66(4):673\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"12","key":"1811_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1573","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2013.5059","volume":"131","author":"E Rulli","year":"2013","unstructured":"Rulli E, Biagioli E, Riva I, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(12):1573\u201382.","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"Pt 4","key":"1811_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1038\/eye.2001.152","volume":"15","author":"B Edmunds","year":"2001","unstructured":"Edmunds B, Thompson JR, Salmon JF, Wormald RP. The National survey of trabeculectomy. II. Variations in operative technique and outcome. Eye (Lond). 2001;15(Pt 4):441\u20138.","journal-title":"Eye (Lond)"},{"issue":"3","key":"1811_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.116.3.286","volume":"116","author":"IU Scott","year":"1998","unstructured":"Scott IU, Greenfield DS, Schiffman J, et al. Outcomes of primary trabeculectomy with the use of adjunctive mitomycin. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(3):286\u201391.","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1811_CR5","first-page":"147","volume":"94","author":"JT Wilensky","year":"1996","unstructured":"Wilensky JT, Chen TC. Long-term results of trabeculectomy in eyes that were initially successful. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996;94:147\u201359 (discussion 60\u20134).","journal-title":"Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc"},{"issue":"9","key":"1811_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1742","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(99)90351-2","volume":"106","author":"AC Molteno","year":"1999","unstructured":"Molteno AC, Bosma NJ, Kittelson JM. Otago glaucoma surgery outcome study: long-term results of trabeculectomy\u20131976 to 1995. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(9):1742\u201350.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"5","key":"1811_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"685","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.05.032","volume":"148","author":"SK Law","year":"2009","unstructured":"Law SK, Shih K, Tran DH, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Long-term outcomes of repeat vs initial trabeculectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):685-95 e1.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1811_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"110","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2016.07.018","volume":"170","author":"P Hirunpatravong","year":"2016","unstructured":"Hirunpatravong P, Reza A, Romero P, et al. Same-site trabeculectomy revision for failed trabeculectomy: outcomes and risk factors for failure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:110\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1811_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S104220","volume":"11","author":"I Riva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Riva I, Roberti G, Oddone F, Konstas AG, Quaranta L. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:357\u201367.","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1811_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0000000000000643","volume":"31","author":"AT Do","year":"2020","unstructured":"Do AT, Parikh H, Panarelli JF. Subconjunctival microinvasive glaucoma surgeries: an update on the Xen gel stent and the PreserFlo MicroShunt. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31(2):132\u20138.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"9","key":"1811_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jfo.2015.05.005","volume":"38","author":"I Riss","year":"2015","unstructured":"Riss I, Batlle J, Pinchuk L, Kato YP, Weber BA, Parel JM. One-year results on the safety and efficacy of the InnFocus MicroShunt depending on placement and concentration of mitomycin C. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2015;38(9):855\u201360.","journal-title":"J Fr Ophtalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1811_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e58","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000000368","volume":"25","author":"JF Batlle","year":"2016","unstructured":"Batlle JF, Fantes F, Riss I, et al. Three-year follow-up of a novel aqueous humor microshunt. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(2):e58-65.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"key":"1811_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scheres LMJ, Kujovic-Aleksov S, Ramdas WD, et al. XEN((R)) Gel Stent compared to PRESERFLO MicroShunt implantation for primary open-angle glaucoma: two-year results. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(3):e433\u2013e440.","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.14602"},{"key":"1811_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Batlle JF, Corona A, Albuquerque R. Long-term results of the PRESERFLO(R) MicroShunt in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma from a single-center non-randomized study. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(3):281\u20136.","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001734"},{"issue":"4","key":"1811_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"402","DOI":"10.1177\/112067219600600411","volume":"6","author":"P Brusini","year":"1996","unstructured":"Brusini P. Clinical use of a new method for visual field damage classification in glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1996;6(4):402\u20137.","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1811_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.97","volume":"15","author":"P Brusini","year":"2006","unstructured":"Brusini P, Filacorda S. Enhanced glaucoma staging system (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(1):40\u20136.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"issue":"2","key":"1811_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2006.12.008","volume":"52","author":"P Brusini","year":"2007","unstructured":"Brusini P, Johnson CA. Staging functional damage in glaucoma: review of different classification methods. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(2):156\u201379.","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"1811_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1445","DOI":"10.1016\/S0161-6420(94)31171-7","volume":"101","author":"Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study","year":"1994","unstructured":"Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(8):1445\u201355.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"key":"1811_CR19","volume-title":"Clinical decisions in glaucoma","author":"E Hodapp","year":"1993","unstructured":"Hodapp E, Parrish RK, Anderson D. Clinical decisions in glaucoma. 1st ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1993.","edition":"1"},{"issue":"8","key":"1811_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0b013e31821dac66","volume":"21","author":"M Ng","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ng M, Sample PA, Pascual JP, et al. Comparison of visual field severity classification systems for glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(8):551\u201361.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"},{"issue":"1","key":"1811_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-017-19113-z","volume":"8","author":"E Rulli","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rulli E, Quaranta L, Riva I, et al. Visual field loss and vision-related quality of life in the Italian primary open angle glaucoma study. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):619.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"1811_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2014.11.010","volume":"159","author":"PV Le","year":"2015","unstructured":"Le PV, Zhang X, Francis BA, et al. Advanced imaging for glaucoma study: design, baseline characteristics, and inter-site comparison. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(2):393-403 e2.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1811_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"969","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.11.008","volume":"120","author":"KH Roh","year":"2013","unstructured":"Roh KH, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yoo BW, Kim DM. Long-term reproducibility of cirrus HD optical coherence tomography deviation map in clinically stable glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(5):969\u201377.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"5","key":"1811_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"774","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2017.10.037","volume":"125","author":"SJ Gedde","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gedde SJ, Chen PP, Heuer DK, et al. The primary tube versus trabeculectomy study: methodology of a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing tube shunt surgery and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(5):774\u201381.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1811_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1097\/ICU.0b013e32834ff2d1","volume":"23","author":"SJ Gedde","year":"2012","unstructured":"Gedde SJ, Singh K, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: interpretation of results and application to clinical practice. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(2):118\u201326.","journal-title":"Curr Opin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1811_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1016\/j.survophthal.2016.05.003","volume":"62","author":"SJ Gedde","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gedde SJ, Kornmann HL. Glaucoma surgery in pseudophakic eyes: tube shunt first. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017;62(1):108\u201312.","journal-title":"Surv Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1811_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"742","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2011.01.020","volume":"151","author":"J Caprioli","year":"2011","unstructured":"Caprioli J. The tube versus trabeculectomy study: why its findings may not change clinical practice? Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(5):742-4 e1.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1811_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2008.03.031","volume":"115","author":"DS Minckler","year":"2008","unstructured":"Minckler DS, Francis BA, Hodapp EA, et al. Aqueous shunts in glaucoma: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(6):1089\u201398.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"12","key":"1811_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3377","DOI":"10.1007\/s10792-020-01525-y","volume":"40","author":"N Nassiri","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nassiri N, Syeda S, Tokko H, et al. Three-year outcomes of trabeculectomy and Ahmed valve implant in patients with prior failed filtering surgeries. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(12):3377\u201391.","journal-title":"Int Ophthalmol"},{"key":"1811_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Durr GM, Schlenker MB, Samet S, Ahmed IIK. One-year outcomes of stand-alone ab externo SIBS microshunt implantation in refractory glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2020-317299.","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2020-317299"},{"issue":"10","key":"1811_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1097\/IJG.0000000000001044","volume":"27","author":"A Karimi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Karimi A, Hopes M, Martin KR, Lindfield D. Efficacy and safety of the ab-interno Xen Gel stent after failed trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(10):864\u20138.","journal-title":"J Glaucoma"}],"container-title":["Advances in Therapy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12325-021-01811-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12325-021-01811-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12325-021-01811-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,5]],"date-time":"2021-08-05T09:51:16Z","timestamp":1628157076000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12325-021-01811-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,12]]},"references-count":31,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["1811"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12325-021-01811-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0741-238X","1865-8652"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0741-238X","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-8652","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 April 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 May 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}