{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T01:48:36Z","timestamp":1782870516365,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781481600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1781481600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001778","name":"Deakin University","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001778","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Community Genet"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The reproductive autonomy rationale endorses the provision of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to enable individuals to make decisions about their pregnancy in accordance with their personal values. While the personal values of healthcare professionals may promote autonomous reproductive decision-making in light of increasingly complex genetic information, they may also impinge upon reproductive autonomy through limiting patient access to care. This paper provides timely insight into genetic counsellors\u2019 perceptions and implementation of professional responsibilities as well as their views on potential conflicts between healthcare professionals\u2019 personal moral values and the provision of NIPT. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 23 genetic counsellors involved in the provision of NIPT in Australia. Data was analysed using inductive content analysis. Participants expressed a shared understanding of their primary professional responsibilities, however varied in their views around operationalising this responsibility in the context of personal value conflicts. Participants reported emerging conflicts in personal values where NIPT was used to detect conditions perceived to have mild phenotypes. Instances of NIPT provision being impacted by conscientious objections to abortion among colleagues were also reported. Participants empathised with concerns of disability discrimination arising from the provision of NIPT but suggested that this could be addressed through nuances in counselling practice. Participants viewed personal values that impeded patient access to care as incompatible with reproductive autonomy. This has important implications for how reproductive autonomy is operationalised in prenatal genetic counselling practice, particularly as the complexity and quantity of genetic information returned via NIPT continues to increase.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12687-026-00913-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]],"date-time":"2026-06-15T04:14:07Z","timestamp":1781496847000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Personal values, professional responsibilities and non-invasive prenatal testing: reflections of genetic counsellors in Australia"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Chanelle","family":"Warton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Danya F.","family":"Vears","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"913_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bayefsky MJ, Berkman BE (2021) Implementing expanded prenatal genetic testing: should parents have access to any and all fetal genetic information? Am J Bioeth 1\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15265161.2020.1867933","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2020.1867933"},{"key":"913_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1007\/s11017-008-9076-y","volume":"29","author":"DW Brock","year":"2008","unstructured":"Brock DW (2008) Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: who is obligated to do what, and why? Theor Med Bioeth 29:187\u2013200","journal-title":"Theor Med Bioeth"},{"issue":"3","key":"913_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1038\/s41431-024-01536-8","volume":"32","author":"Z Claesen-Bengtson","year":"2024","unstructured":"Claesen-Bengtson Z, Bowman-Smart H, Vermeersch E, Vermeesch JR, Henneman L, Borry P (2024) Should non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) be used for fetal sex determination? Perspectives and experiences of healthcare professionals. Eur J Hum Genet 32(3):309\u201316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41431-024-01536-8","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"913_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/s12687-018-0371-7","volume":"10","author":"AJ Clarke","year":"2019","unstructured":"Clarke AJ, Wallgren-Pettersson C (2019) Ethics in genetic counselling. J Community Genet 10(1):3\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12687-018-0371-7","journal-title":"J Community Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"913_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jgc4.70030","volume":"34","author":"F Coulston","year":"2025","unstructured":"Coulston F, Lynch F, Vears DF (2025) Collaborative coding in inductive content analysis: why, when, and how to do it. J Genet Couns 34(3):e70030. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jgc4.70030","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"key":"913_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ssaho.2025.101956","volume":"12","author":"J Decety","year":"2025","unstructured":"Decety J, Li J (2025) The value of empathy in medical practice: a neurobehavioral perspective. Soc Sci Humanit Open 12:101956. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ssaho.2025.101956","journal-title":"Soc Sci Humanit Open"},{"issue":"12","key":"913_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1060","DOI":"10.1136\/medethics-2021-107343","volume":"48","author":"L Dive","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dive L, Newson AJ (2022) Reproductive carrier screening: responding to the eugenics critique. J Med Ethics 48(12):1060\u20137","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"913_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ejhg.2015.56","author":"W Dondorp","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dondorp W, de Wert G, Bombard Y, Bianchi DW, Bergmann C, Borry P et al (2015) Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening. Summary and recommendations. Eur J Hum Genet. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/ejhg.2015.56","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"key":"913_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2017.07.023","volume":"216","author":"C Fiala","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fiala C, Arthur JH (2017) There is no defence for \u2018conscientious objection\u2019in reproductive health care. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 216:254\u20138","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"913_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.1920","volume":"28","author":"E Garcia","year":"2008","unstructured":"Garcia E, Timmermans D, van Leeuwen E (2008) Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making. Prenat Diagn 28:115\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pd.1920","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"913_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12910-020-0455-x","author":"H Haidar","year":"2020","unstructured":"Haidar H, Vanstone M, Laberge AM, Bibeau G, Ghulmiyyah L, Ravitsky V (2020) Implementation challenges for an ethical introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals\u2019 views from Lebanon and Quebec. BMC Med Ethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12910-020-0455-x","journal-title":"BMC Med Ethics"},{"issue":"1","key":"913_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1007\/s10897-011-9417-2","volume":"21","author":"C Hippman","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hippman C, Inglis A, Austin J (2012) What is a \u201cbalanced\u201d description? Insight from parents of individuals with Down syndrome. J Genet Couns 21(1):35\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10897-011-9417-2","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"issue":"2","key":"913_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1007\/s10897-005-4067-x","volume":"14","author":"J Hodgson","year":"2005","unstructured":"Hodgson J, Spriggs M (2005) A practical account of autonomy: why genetic counseling is especially well suited to the facilitation of informed autonomous decision making. J Genet Couns 14(2):89\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10897-005-4067-x","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"key":"913_CR14","unstructured":"Human Genetics Society of Australasia (2022a) Scope of practice for genetic counsellors [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 8]. Available from: https:\/\/www.hgsa.org.au\/common\/Uploaded\/files\/pdfs\/policies\/position\/statements\/and\/guidelines\/genetic\/counselling\/Scope\/of\/Practice\/for\/GC.pdf"},{"key":"913_CR15","unstructured":"Human Genetics Society of Australiasia (2022b) Competency standards for genetic counsellors [Internet]. [cited 2025 May 8]. Available from: https:\/\/www.hgsa.org.au\/common\/Uploaded\/files\/pdfs\/policies\/position\/statements\/and\/guidelines\/genetic\/counselling\/Competency\/Standards\/for\/GCs.pdf"},{"issue":"5","key":"913_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1002\/jgc4.1207","volume":"29","author":"L Jamal","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jamal L, Schupmann W, Berkman BE (2020) An ethical framework for genetic counseling in the genomic era. J Genet Couns 29(5):718\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jgc4.1207","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"issue":"2","key":"913_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1080\/15265161.2021.2013991","volume":"22","author":"E Kleiderman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kleiderman E, Rahimzadeh V, Knoppers B, Roy MC, Laberge AM, Ravitsky V (2022) The serious factor in expanded prenatal genetic testing. Am J Bioeth 22(2):23\u20135","journal-title":"Am J Bioeth"},{"issue":"2","key":"913_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1038\/s41431-024-01681-0","volume":"33","author":"E Kleiderman","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kleiderman E, Boardman F, Newson AJ, Laberge AM, Knoppers BM, Ravitsky V (2025) Unpacking the notion of \u201cserious\u201d genetic conditions: towards implementation in reproductive decision-making? Eur J Hum Genet 33(2):158\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41431-024-01681-0","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"1","key":"913_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2011.043646","volume":"38","author":"M Magelssen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Magelssen M (2012) When should conscientious objection be accepted? J Med Ethics 38(1):18\u201321","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"913_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1136\/jme.2009.034645","volume":"36","author":"J Malek","year":"2010","unstructured":"Malek J (2010) Deciding against disability: does the use of reproductive genetic technologies express disvalue for people with disabilities? J Med Ethics 36(4):217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jme.2009.034645","journal-title":"J Med Ethics"},{"key":"913_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1037\/0000252-004","volume-title":"Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design","author":"K Malterud","year":"2021","unstructured":"Malterud K, Siersma V, Guassora AD (2021) Information power: Sample content and size in qualitative studies. Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design, 2nd ed. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, pp 67\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0000252-004","edition":"2nd ed"},{"key":"913_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare8010026","volume":"8","author":"M Moudatsou","year":"2020","unstructured":"Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A, Philalithis A, Koukouli S (2020) The role of empathy in health and social care professionals. Healthcare (Basel) 8:26","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"key":"913_CR23","unstructured":"Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2017) Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues [Internet]. London [cited 2021 May 12]. p. 169. Available from: https:\/\/www.nuffieldbioethics.org\/publications\/non-invasive-prenatal-testing"},{"key":"913_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm11090937","author":"M Orzechowski","year":"2021","unstructured":"Orzechowski M, Timmermann C, Woniak K, Kosenko O, Mikirtichan GL, Lichtshangof AZ et al (2021) Access to prenatal testing and ethically informed counselling in Germany, Poland and Russia. J Pers Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jpm11090937","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"913_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/mrdd.10056","volume":"9","author":"E Parens","year":"2003","unstructured":"Parens E, Asch A (2003) Disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: Reflections and recommendations. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 9(1):40\u201347 Located at: Academic Search Complete","journal-title":"Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev"},{"key":"913_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Pawlikowski J (2018) Chapter 8 conscientious objection of health care workers in the context of genetic testing. In: Soniewicka M, (ed). The Ethics of reproductive genetics: between utility, principles, and virtues [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; pp. 103\u201316. Available from: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-60684-2_8","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-60684-2_8"},{"key":"913_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ravitsky V (2017) The Shifting landscape of prenatal testing: between reproductive autonomy and public health. Hastings Cent Rep 34\u201340. Located at: Philosopher\u2019s Index","DOI":"10.1002\/hast.793"},{"issue":"1","key":"913_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1472-6963-4-26","volume":"4","author":"A Schattner","year":"2004","unstructured":"Schattner A, Rudin D, Jellin N (2004) Good physicians from the perspective of their patients. BMC Health Serv Res 4(1):26. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1472-6963-4-26","journal-title":"BMC Health Serv Res"},{"key":"913_CR29","unstructured":"Slokenberga S et al (2019) Analysis of the legal and human rights requirements for genomics in and outside the EU [Internet]. Available from: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/research\/participants\/documents\/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5c2e1586f&appId=PPGMS"},{"issue":"2","key":"913_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1038\/s41431-024-01684-x","volume":"33","author":"M Taylor-Sands","year":"2025","unstructured":"Taylor-Sands M, Johnston M, Mills C (2025) Should the scope of NIPT be limited by a \u2018threshold of seriousness\u2019? Eur J Hum Genet 33(2):189\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41431-024-01684-x","journal-title":"Eur J Hum Genet"},{"issue":"3","key":"913_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"522","DOI":"10.1007\/s10897-016-0012-4","volume":"26","author":"RV van Schendel","year":"2017","unstructured":"van Schendel RV, Kater-Kuipers A, van Vliet-Lachotzki EH, Dondorp WJ, Cornel MC, Henneman L (2017) What do parents of children with Down Syndrome think about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)? J Genet Couns 26(3):522\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10897-016-0012-4","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"issue":"1","key":"913_CR32","first-page":"111","volume":"23","author":"DF Vears","year":"2022","unstructured":"Vears DF, Gillam L (2022) Inductive content analysis: a guide for beginning qualitative researchers. Focus Health Prof Educ 23(1):111\u201327","journal-title":"Focus Health Prof Educ"},{"key":"913_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Warton C, Vears D (2025) Healthcare professionals\u2019 perspectives on and experiences with non-invasive prenatal testing: A systematic review","DOI":"10.1007\/s00439-025-02736-y"},{"key":"913_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jgc4.1682","author":"C Warton","year":"2023","unstructured":"Warton C, Johnston M, Mills C (2023) Reproductive deliberation: supporting autonomous decision making in prenatal genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jgc4.1682","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"issue":"3","key":"913_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1023234802124","volume":"12","author":"J Weil","year":"2003","unstructured":"Weil J (2003) Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. J Genet Couns 12(3):199\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1023234802124","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"},{"issue":"2","key":"913_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1007\/s10897-005-9008-1","volume":"15","author":"J Weil","year":"2003","unstructured":"Weil J, Ormond K, Peters J, Peters K, Biesecker BB, LeRoy B (2003) The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference. J Genet Couns 15(2):85\u201393","journal-title":"J Genet Couns"}],"container-title":["Journal of Community Genetics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12687-026-00913-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12687-026-00913-8","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12687-026-00913-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T01:12:20Z","timestamp":1782868340000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12687-026-00913-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["913"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12687-026-00913-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1868-6001"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1868-6001","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"14 May 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"10 June 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 June 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (#35590). Informed consent was provided by each participant at the outset of the interview.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}],"article-number":"75"}}