{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T11:05:10Z","timestamp":1780484710305,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,12]],"date-time":"2020-03-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583971200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,12]],"date-time":"2020-03-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583971200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Cardiovasc Interv and Ther"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>There is no established hemostasis method or protocol for the transdistal radial approach. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether \u201cthe PreludeSYNC DISTAL\u201d radial compression device (PSD; Merit Medical Systems, Inc., South Jordan, UT) can effectively prevent distal radial artery (dRA) occlusion following catheterization procedures. This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent hemostasis using the PSD from January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was occlusion or excessive stenosis of the radial artery (RA) 1\u00a0month after catheterization. Pulsatile blood flow and vessel diameters of the dRA and forearm RA (fRA) were measured using vascular ultrasound before and 1\u00a0month after catheterization to determine arterial damage. Secondary endpoints were achievement of hemostasis, bleeding, hematoma, aneurysm, neurological abnormality, and functional disturbance of the fingers or hand. Fifty patients (mean age, 70.9\u2009\u00b1\u200910.7\u00a0years; male, 72.0%) were enrolled in this study. Complete hemostasis was achieved in all cases. Total hemostasis time was 161\u2009\u00b1\u200945\u00a0min. No procedure-associated complications were noted. Pulsations of the dRA and fRA were maintained at 1\u00a0month. No functional disturbance or neurological abnormality was observed. Vessel diameters of the dRA and fRA were not significantly different before and 1\u00a0month after catheterization. No dissection, pseudoaneurysm, or occlusion\/stenosis was observed on ultrasound. Distal radial access with a unique device and protocol effectively achieved hemostasis and prevented injury and occlusion of the dRA and fRA.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12928-020-00656-4","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,12]],"date-time":"2020-03-12T05:40:41Z","timestamp":1583991641000},"page":"104-110","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":24,"title":["Impact of dedicated hemostasis device for distal radial arterial access with an adequate hemostasis protocol on radial arterial observation by ultrasound"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Yota","family":"Kawamura","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Fuminobu","family":"Yoshimachi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norihito","family":"Nakamura","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yoshiya","family":"Yamamoto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Takeaki","family":"Kudo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yuji","family":"Ikari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"656_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"733","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa025142","volume":"349","author":"HR Andersen","year":"2003","unstructured":"Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:733\u201342.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"656_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1713","DOI":"10.1016\/S0735-1097(02)01870-3","volume":"39","author":"CL Grines","year":"2002","unstructured":"Grines CL, Westerhausen DR, Grines LL, et al. A randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction: the Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1713\u20139.","journal-title":"J Am Coll Cardiol"},{"key":"656_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1053\/euhj.1999.1993","volume":"21","author":"P Widimsk\u00fd","year":"2000","unstructured":"Widimsk\u00fd P, Groch L, Zelizko M, Aschermann M, Bedn\u00e1\u0159 F, Suryapranata H. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:823\u201331.","journal-title":"Eur Heart J"},{"issue":"9775","key":"656_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1409","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(11)60404-2","volume":"377","author":"SS Jolly","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409\u201320.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"656_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2465","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(15)60292-6","volume":"385","author":"M Valgimigli","year":"2015","unstructured":"Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabr\u00f3 P, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385:2465\u201376.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"656_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"173","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1522-726X(199902)46:2<173::AID-CCD12>3.0.CO;2-4","volume":"46","author":"S Saito","year":"1999","unstructured":"Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:173\u20138.","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"656_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"660","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.22615","volume":"76","author":"S Rathore","year":"2010","unstructured":"Rathore S, Stables RH, Pauriah M, et al. A randomized comparison of TR band and radistop hemostatic compression devices after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:660\u20137.","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"656_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.21639","volume":"72","author":"S Pancholy","year":"2008","unstructured":"Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T, Roke Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion\u2014patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;72:335\u201340.","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"7","key":"656_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.4244\/EIJ-D-17-00079","volume":"13","author":"F Kiemeneij","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kiemeneij F. Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography (ldTRA) and interventions (ldTRI). EuroIntervention. 2017;13(7):851\u20137.","journal-title":"EuroIntervention"},{"issue":"5","key":"656_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.28155","volume":"94","author":"S Aoi","year":"2019","unstructured":"Aoi S, Htun WW, Freeo S, et al. Distal transradial artery access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography as an alternative access site for faster hemostasis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;94(5):651\u20137.","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"5","key":"656_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"844","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.27526","volume":"92","author":"A Aminian","year":"2018","unstructured":"Aminian A, Saito S, Takahashi A. Impact of sheath size and hemostasis time on radial artery patency after transradial coronary angiography and intervention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients: a substudy from\u00a0RAP\u00a0and\u00a0BEAT\u00a0(Radial Artery Patency and Bleeding, Efficacy, Adverse evenT) randomized multicenter trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92(5):844\u201351.","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"656_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1007\/s12928-015-0344-2","volume":"31","author":"F Yoshimachi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Yoshimachi F, Kiemeneij F, Masutani M, Matsukage T, Takahashi A, Ikari Y. Safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016;31:38\u201341.","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Interv Ther"},{"key":"656_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2736","DOI":"10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449","volume":"123","author":"R Mehran","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736\u201347.","journal-title":"Circulation"},{"key":"656_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"908","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2016.03.020","volume":"9","author":"MG Cohen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cohen MG, Ohman EM. Should the benefit of transradial access still be questioned? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:908\u201310.","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv"},{"key":"656_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1986","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjcard.2014.03.040","volume":"113","author":"S Takeshita","year":"2014","unstructured":"Takeshita S, Asano H, Hata T, et al. Comparison of frequency of radial artery occlusion after 4 Fr versus 6 Fr transradial coronary intervention (from the Novel Angioplasty USIng Coronary Accessor Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1986\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Cardiol"},{"key":"656_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1050","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcin.2018.03.042","volume":"11","author":"D Petroglou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Petroglou D, Didagelos M, Chalikias G, et al. Manual versus mechanical compression of the radial artery after transradial coronary angiography: the MEMORY multicenter randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1050\u20138.","journal-title":"JACC Cardiovasc Interv."},{"key":"656_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"467","DOI":"10.1002\/ccd.21900","volume":"73","author":"JM Cubero","year":"2009","unstructured":"Cubero JM, Lombardo J, Pedrosa C, Diaz D, et al. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73:467\u201372.","journal-title":"Catheter Cardiovasc Interv"},{"issue":"4","key":"656_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"312","DOI":"10.1007\/s12928-018-00567-5","volume":"34","author":"T Naito","year":"2019","unstructured":"Naito T, Sawaoka T, Sasaki K, Iida K, Sakuraba S, Yokohama K, Sato H, Soma Okamura E, Harada T, Yoshimachi F. Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019;34(4):312\u20136.","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Interv Ther"},{"key":"656_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1007\/s00270-014-0998-7","volume":"38","author":"MM Slattery","year":"2015","unstructured":"Slattery MM, Goh GS, Power S, Given MF, McGrath FP, Lee MJ. Comparison of ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-assisted antegrade common femoral artery puncture techniques. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2015;38:579\u201382.","journal-title":"Cardiovasc Interv Radiol"},{"key":"656_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"546","DOI":"10.5301\/jva.5000702","volume":"18","author":"N Gopalasingam","year":"2017","unstructured":"Gopalasingam N, Hansen MA, Thorn S, Sloth E, Juhl-Olsen P. Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterisation increases the success rate among anaesthesiology residents: a randomised study. J Vasc Access. 2017;18:546\u201351.","journal-title":"J Vasc Access."},{"issue":"7","key":"656_CR21","first-page":"318","volume":"27","author":"M Sobolev","year":"2015","unstructured":"Sobolev M, Slovut DP, Lee Chang A, Shiloh AL, Eisen LA. Ultrasound-Guided catheterization of the femoral artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27(7):318\u201323.","journal-title":"J Invasive Cardiol."},{"issue":"1","key":"656_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajem.2014.10.008","volume":"33","author":"YB Gao","year":"2015","unstructured":"Gao YB, Yan JH, Gao FQ, Pan L, Wang XZ, Lv CJ. Effects of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(1):50\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Emerg Med"}],"container-title":["Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12928-020-00656-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12928-020-00656-4\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12928-020-00656-4.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,12]],"date-time":"2021-03-12T01:24:23Z","timestamp":1615512263000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12928-020-00656-4"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,12]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}},"alternative-id":["656"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12928-020-00656-4","relation":{},"ISSN":["1868-4300","1868-4297"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1868-4300","type":"print"},{"value":"1868-4297","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 October 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 February 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 March 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with ethical standards"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study had been approved by the research ethics committee of Tokai University Hachioji Hospital.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Written\u00a0informed consent\u00a0was obtained from all patients in this study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}