{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,2]],"date-time":"2026-11-02T22:40:53Z","timestamp":1793659253063,"version":"4.5.1"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]],"date-time":"2022-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1668470400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]],"date-time":"2022-11-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1668470400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100008235","name":"Peking Union Medical College Hospital","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["2020YFC2002702"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["2020YFC2002702"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100008235","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Updates Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Robotic surgery has become a promising surgical method in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery due to its three-dimensional visualization, tremor filtration, motion scaling, and better ergonomics. Numerous studies have explored the benefits of RDP over LDP in terms of perioperative safety and feasibility, but no consensus has been achieved yet. This article aimed to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of RDP and LDP for perioperative outcomes. By June 2022, all studies comparing RDP to LDP in the PubMed, the Embase, and the Cochrane Library database were systematically reviewed. According to the heterogeneity, fix or random-effects models were used for the meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Odds ratio (OR), weighted mean differences (WMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A sensitivity analysis was performed to explore potential sources of high heterogeneity and a trim and fill analysis was used to evaluate the impact of publication bias on the pooled results. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. RDP provides greater benefit than LDP for higher spleen preservation (OR 3.52 95% CI 2.62\u20134.73, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.0001) and Kimura method (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.42\u20132.62, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.0001) in benign and low-grade malignant tumors. RDP is associated with lower conversion to laparotomy (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33\u20130.52, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009&lt;\u20090.00001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (WMD \u2212\u20090.57, 95% CI \u2212\u20090.92 to \u2212\u20090.21, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.002), but it is more costly. In terms of postoperative complications, there was no difference between RDP and LDP except for 30-day mortality (RDP versus LDP, 0.1% versus 1.0%, <jats:italic>p<\/jats:italic>\u2009=\u20090.03). With the exception of its high cost, RDP appears to outperform LDP on perioperative outcomes and is technologically feasible and safe. High-quality prospective randomized controlled trials are advised for further confirmation as the quality of the evidence now is not high.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-022-01413-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]],"date-time":"2022-11-15T15:09:47Z","timestamp":1668524987000},"page":"7-21","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":43,"title":["Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"75","author":[{"given":"Pengyu","family":"Li","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hanyu","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lixin","family":"Chen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tiantong","family":"Liu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Menghua","family":"Dai","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"1413_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002979","volume":"269","author":"T de Rooij","year":"2019","unstructured":"de Rooij T, van Hilst J, van Santvoort H, Boerma D, van den Boezem P, Daams F, van Dam R, Dejong C, van Duyn E, Dijkgraaf M et al (2019) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 269:2\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002979","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-021-06306-x","volume":"46","author":"J Raghupathy","year":"2022","unstructured":"Raghupathy J, Lee C-Y, Huan SKW, Koh Y-X, Tan E-K, Teo J-Y, Cheow P-C, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF, Chan C-Y, Goh BKP (2022) Propensity-score matched analyses comparing clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomies: a single-center experience. World J Surg 46:207\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-021-06306-x","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"323","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2020.10.022","volume":"23","author":"M Korrel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Korrel M, Vissers FL, van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Dijkgraaf MG, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Busch OR, Luyer MD, Sandstr\u00f6m P, Abu Hilal M, Besselink MG, Bj\u00f6rnsson B (2021) Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy: an individual patient data meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 23:323\u2013330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2020.10.022","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"key":"1413_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/sla.0000000000003590","volume":"271","author":"HJ Asbun","year":"2020","unstructured":"Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL et al (2020) The miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg 271:1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/sla.0000000000003590","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.1209","author":"GB Levi Sandri","year":"2022","unstructured":"Levi Sandri GB, Abu Hilal M, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Hackert T, Keck T, Khatkov I, Besselink MG, Boggi U (2022) Figures do matter: a literature review on 4,587 robotic pancreatic resections and their implications on training. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbp.1209","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"1413_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1636","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6079-2","volume":"32","author":"BS Peters","year":"2018","unstructured":"Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32:1636\u20131655. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6079-2","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-021-08805-3","author":"MJW Zwart","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zwart MJW, Jones LR, Fuente I et al (2021) Performance with robotic surgery versus 3D- and 2D-laparoscopy during pancreatic and biliary anastomoses in a biotissue model: pooled analysis of two randomized trials. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-021-08805-3","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1000097","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","volume":"6","author":"D Moher","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000097","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"1413_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","volume":"161","author":"C Bassi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C et al (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2016.11.014","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"1413_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1097\/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae","volume":"240","author":"D Dindo","year":"2004","unstructured":"Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205\u2013213","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"557","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.327.7414.557","volume":"327","author":"JPT Higgins","year":"2003","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557\u2013560","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"1413_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","volume":"315","author":"M Egger","year":"1997","unstructured":"Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629\u2013634","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"1413_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"459","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-019-01786-x","volume":"404","author":"S Alfieri","year":"2019","unstructured":"Alfieri S, Butturini G, Boggi U, Pietrabissa A, Morelli L, Vistoli F, Damoli I, Peri A, Fiorillo C, Pugliese L, Ramera M, De Lio N, Di Franco G, Esposito A, Landoni L, Rosa F, Menghi R, Doglietto GB, Quero G (2019) Short-term and long-term outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs): a multicenter comparative study. Langenbeck\u2019s Arch Surg 404:459\u2013468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-019-01786-x","journal-title":"Langenbeck's Arch Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-013-0438-8","volume":"8","author":"EI Benizri","year":"2014","unstructured":"Benizri EI, Germain A, Ayav A, Bernard JL, Zarnegar R, Benchimol D, Bresler L, Brunaud L (2014) Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Robot Surg 8:125\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-013-0438-8","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3163","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-4043-3","volume":"29","author":"G Butturini","year":"2015","unstructured":"Butturini G, Damoli I, Crepaz L, Malleo G, Marchegiani G, Daskalaki D, Esposito A, Cingarlini S, Salvia R, Bassi C (2015) A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 29:3163\u20133170. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-014-4043-3","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3507","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-015-4101-5","volume":"29","author":"S Chen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Chen S, Zhan Q, Chen JZ, Jin JB, Deng XX, Chen H, Shen BY, Peng CH, Li HW (2015) Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:3507\u20133518. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-015-4101-5","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2022\/7302222","author":"P Chen","year":"2022","unstructured":"Chen P, Zhou B, Wang T, Hu X, Ye Y, Guo W (2022) Comparative efficacy of robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single-center comparative study. J Healthc Eng. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2022\/7302222","journal-title":"J Healthc Eng"},{"key":"1413_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"947","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-020-00927-y","volume":"73","author":"A Chopra","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chopra A, Nassour I, Zureikat A, Paniccia A (2021) Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Updates Surg 73:947\u2013953. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-020-00927-y","journal-title":"Updates Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"128","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31825fff08","volume":"257","author":"M Daouadi","year":"2013","unstructured":"Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, Choudry H, Tsung A, Bartlett DL, Hughes SJ, Lee KK, Moser AJ, Zeh HJ (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e31825fff08","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.1569","volume":"10","author":"H Duran","year":"2014","unstructured":"Duran H, Ielpo B, Caruso R, Ferri V, Quijano Y, Diaz E, Fabra I, Oliva C, Olivares S, Vicente E (2014) Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int J Med Robot 10:280\u2013285. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.1569","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"key":"1413_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"406","DOI":"10.1159\/000444269","volume":"33","author":"S Eckhardt","year":"2016","unstructured":"Eckhardt S, Schicker C, Maurer E, Fendrich V, Bartsch DK (2016) Robotic-assisted approach improves vessel preservation in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Dig Surg 33:406\u2013413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000444269","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.1733","author":"BKP Goh","year":"2017","unstructured":"Goh BKP, Chan CY, Soh HL, Lee SY, Cheow PC, Chow PKH, Ooi LLPJ, Chung AYF (2017) A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.1733","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2465","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-019-07047-8","volume":"34","author":"S Hong","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hong S, Song KB, Madkhali AA, Hwang K, Yoo D, Lee JW, Youn WY, Alshammary S, Park Y, Lee W, Kwon J, Lee JH, Hwang DW, Kim SC (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic tumors: a single surgeon\u2019s experience of 228 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 34:2465\u20132473. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-019-07047-8","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2017.10.075","volume":"48","author":"B Ielpo","year":"2017","unstructured":"Ielpo B, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Caruso R, Malav\u00e9 L, Ferri V, Nu\u00f1ez J, Ruiz-Oca\u00f1a A, Jorge E, Lazzaro S, Kalivaci D, Quijano Y, Vicente E (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs analysis. Int J Surg 48:300\u2013304. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2017.10.075","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5166","DOI":"10.21037\/tcr-19-2121","volume":"9","author":"Y Jiang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jiang Y, Zheng K, Zhang S, Shao Z, Cheng P, Zhang Y, Jin G, He T (2020) Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy improves spleen preservation rate versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant lesions of the pancreas. Transl Cancer Res 9:5166\u20135172. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/tcr-19-2121","journal-title":"Transl Cancer Res"},{"key":"1413_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.4103\/jmas.JMAS-163-20","volume":"18","author":"S Kamarajah","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kamarajah S, Sutandi N, Sen G, Hammond J, Manas D, French J, White S (2022) Comparative analysis of open, laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatic resection: the United Kingdom\u2032s first single-centre experience. J Minimal Access Surg 18:77\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/jmas.JMAS-163-20","journal-title":"J Minimal Access Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2004","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-010-1504-1","volume":"25","author":"CM Kang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ, Chi HS (2011) Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg Endosc 25:2004\u20132009. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-010-1504-1","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2347","DOI":"10.1002\/rcs.2347","volume":"18","author":"J Kwon","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kwon J, Lee JH, Park SY, Park Y, Lee W, Song KB, Hwang DW, Kim SC (2022) A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: propensity score matching analysis. Int J Med Robot 18:e2347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rcs.2347","journal-title":"Int J Med Robot"},{"key":"1413_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"356","DOI":"10.1007\/s11684-015-0404-0","volume":"9","author":"EC Lai","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lai EC, Tang CN (2015) Robotic distal pancreatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study for short-term outcomes. Front Med 9:356\u2013360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11684-015-0404-0","journal-title":"Front Med"},{"key":"1413_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.004","volume":"220","author":"SY Lee","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lee SY, Allen PJ, Sadot E, D\u2019Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP (2015) Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution\u2019s experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. J Am Coll Surg 220:18\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.004","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.14701\/ahbps.2020.24.3.283","volume":"24","author":"SQ Lee","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lee SQ, Kabir T, Koh YX, Teo JY, Lee SY, Kam JH, Cheow PC, Jeyaraj PR, Chow PKH, Ooi LL, Chung AYF, Chan CY, Goh BKP (2020) A single institution experience with robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 24:283\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14701\/ahbps.2020.24.3.283","journal-title":"Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"461","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.24676","volume":"116","author":"R Liu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Liu R, Liu Q, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Gao YX, Zhao GD (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. J Surg Oncol 116:461\u2013469. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.24676","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"1413_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.05.024","volume":"55","author":"L Qu","year":"2018","unstructured":"Qu L, Zhiming Z, Xianglong T, Yuanxing G, Yong X, Rong L, Yee LW (2018) Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched study. Int J Surg 55:81\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2018.05.024","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znaa039","volume":"108","author":"S Lof","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lof S, van der Heijde N, Abuawwad M et al (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis. Br J Surg 108:188\u2013195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znaa039","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2991","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6565-6","volume":"33","author":"WB Lyman","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lyman WB, Passeri M, Sastry A, Cochran A, Iannitti DA, Vrochides D, Baker EH, Martinie JB (2019) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic left pancreatectomy at a high-volume, minimally invasive center. Surg Endosc 33:2991\u20133000. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6565-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1172","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2018.05.014","volume":"20","author":"DR Magge","year":"2018","unstructured":"Magge DR, Zenati MS, Hamad A, Rieser C, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME (2018) Comprehensive comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness and perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20:1172\u20131180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2018.05.014","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"key":"1413_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1159\/000501428","volume":"37","author":"MV Marino","year":"2020","unstructured":"Marino MV, Mirabella A, Gomez Ruiz M, Komorowski AL (2020) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: the results of a case-matched analysis from a tertiary care center. Dig Surg 37:229\u2013239. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000501428","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-020-01966-z","volume":"50","author":"N Najafi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Najafi N, Mintziras I, Wiese D, Albers MB, Maurer E, Bartsch DK (2020) A retrospective comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal resection and enucleation for potentially benign pancreatic neoplasms. Surg Today 50:872\u2013880. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00595-020-01966-z","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"key":"1413_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1420","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-020-07528-1","volume":"35","author":"M De Pastena","year":"2021","unstructured":"De Pastena M, Esposito A, Paiella S, Surci N, Montagnini G, Marchegiani G, Malleo G, Secchettin E, Casetti L, Ricci C, Landoni L, Bovo C, Bassi C, Salvia R (2021) Cost-effectiveness and quality of life analysis of laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study. Surg Endosc 35:1420\u20131428. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-020-07528-1","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"651","DOI":"10.1002\/jso.25170","volume":"118","author":"M Raoof","year":"2018","unstructured":"Raoof M, Nota CLMA, Melstrom LG, Warner SG, Woo Y, Singh G, Fong Y (2018) Oncologic outcomes after robot-assisted versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Surg Oncol 118:651\u2013656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jso.25170","journal-title":"J Surg Oncol"},{"key":"1413_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.21037\/hbsn.2018.09.03","volume":"7","author":"M Rodriguez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rodriguez M, Memeo R, Leon P, Panaro F, Tzedakis S, Perotto O, Varatharajah S, de Angelis N, Riva P, Mutter D, Navarro F, Marescaux J, Pessaux P (2018) Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 7:345\u2013352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/hbsn.2018.09.03","journal-title":"Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr"},{"key":"1413_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hbpd.2022.06.001","author":"D Shin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Shin D, Kwon J, Lee JH, Park SY, Park Y, Lee W, Song KB, Hwang DW, Kim SC (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hbpd.2022.06.001","journal-title":"Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int"},{"key":"1413_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3562","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-018-6080-9","volume":"32","author":"R Souche","year":"2018","unstructured":"Souche R, Herrero A, Bourel G, Chauvat J, Pirlet I, Guillon F, Nocca D, Borie F, Mercier G, Fabre JM (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis. Surg Endosc 32:3562\u20133569. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-018-6080-9","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1442","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-017-3463-5","volume":"21","author":"D Xourafas","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xourafas D, Ashley SW, Clancy TE (2017) Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of 1815 patients from the ACS-NSQIP procedure-targeted pancreatectomy database. J Gastrointest Surg 21:1442\u20131452. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-017-3463-5","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"188","DOI":"10.21037\/atm.2020.01.80","volume":"8","author":"SJ Yang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Yang SJ, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Lee WJ (2020) Revisiting the potential advantage of robotic surgical system in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy over conventional laparoscopic approach. Ann Transl Med 8:188. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/atm.2020.01.80","journal-title":"Ann Transl Med"},{"key":"1413_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"33872","DOI":"10.18632\/oncotarget.17513","volume":"8","author":"J Zhang","year":"2017","unstructured":"Zhang J, Jin J, Chen S, Gu J, Zhu Y, Qin K, Zhan Q, Cheng D, Chen H, Deng X, Shen B, Peng C (2017) Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for PNETs: laparoscopic or robotic approach? Oncotarget 8:33872\u201333883. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18632\/oncotarget.17513","journal-title":"Oncotarget"},{"key":"1413_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.11.005","volume":"12","author":"PD Sinwar","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sinwar PD (2014) Overwhelming post splenectomy infection syndrome\u2014review study. Int J Surg 12:1314\u20131316. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2014.11.005","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2013.11.017","volume":"12","author":"EP Weledji","year":"2014","unstructured":"Weledji EP (2014) Benefits and risks of splenectomy. Int J Surg 12:113\u2013119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2013.11.017","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.1213","author":"W Lee","year":"2022","unstructured":"Lee W, Hwang DW, Han H-S et al (2022) Comparison of infectious complications after spleen preservation versus splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbp.1213","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"1413_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pan.2022.07.012","author":"F \u0218andra-Petrescu","year":"2022","unstructured":"\u0218andra-Petrescu F, Tzatzarakis E, Mansour Basha M, R\u00fcckert F, Reissfelder C, Birgin E, Rahbari NN (2022) Impact of spleen preservation on the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: is less more? Pancreatology. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pan.2022.07.012","journal-title":"Pancreatology"},{"key":"1413_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.02.020","volume":"21","author":"SK Kamarajah","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kamarajah SK, Sutandi N, Robinson SR, French JJ, White SA (2019) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 21:1107\u20131118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2019.02.020","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"key":"1413_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.2217\/cer-2019-0124","volume":"9","author":"Y-H Hu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hu Y-H, Qin Y-F, Yu D-D, Li X, Zhao Y-M, Kong D-J, Jin W, Wang H (2020) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Comp Eff Res 9:201\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2217\/cer-2019-0124","journal-title":"J Comp Eff Res"},{"key":"1413_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/jpm11060552","author":"G Rompianesi","year":"2021","unstructured":"Rompianesi G, Montalti R, Ambrosio L, Troisi RI (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomies: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jpm11060552","journal-title":"J Pers Med"},{"key":"1413_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-015-1273-3","volume":"400","author":"X Yu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yu X, Li H, Jin C, Fu D, Di Y, Hao S, Li J (2015) Splenic vessel preservation versus Warshaw\u2019s technique during spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:183\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00423-015-1273-3","journal-title":"Langenbecks Arch Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1136","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318212c1e2","volume":"253","author":"CR Ferrone","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ferrone CR, Konstantinidis IT, Sahani DV, Wargo JA, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL (2011) Twenty-three years of the Warshaw operation for distal pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen. Ann Surg 253:1136\u20131139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318212c1e2","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2020.11.046","volume":"170","author":"KS Chan","year":"2021","unstructured":"Chan KS, Wang ZK, Syn N, Goh BKP (2021) Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic pancreas resections: a systematic review. Surgery 170:194\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2020.11.046","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"1413_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"770","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.1010","volume":"28","author":"G Deiro","year":"2021","unstructured":"Deiro G, De Pastena M, Paiella S, Balduzzi A, Montagnini G, Andreotti E, Casetti L, Landoni L, Salvia R, Esposito A (2021) Assessment of difficulty in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a modification of the Japanese difficulty scoring system\u2014a single-center high-volume experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 28:770\u2013777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbp.1010","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"1413_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"489","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.578","volume":"25","author":"T Ohtsuka","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ohtsuka T, Ban D, Nakamura Y et al (2018) Difficulty scoring system in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:489\u2013497. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbp.578","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"key":"1413_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1766","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hpb.2020.04.002","volume":"22","author":"S Partelli","year":"2020","unstructured":"Partelli S, Ricci C, Rancoita PMV, Montorsi R, Andreasi V, Ingaldi C, Arru G, Pecorelli N, Crippa S, Alberici L, Di Serio C, Casadei R, Falconi M (2020) Preoperative predictive factors of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy difficulty. HPB (Oxford) 22:1766\u20131774. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hpb.2020.04.002","journal-title":"HPB (Oxford)"},{"key":"1413_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"752236","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2021.752236","volume":"11","author":"Q Feng","year":"2021","unstructured":"Feng Q, Jiang C, Feng X, Du Y, Liao W, Jin H, Liao M, Zeng Y, Huang J (2021) Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 11:752236. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2021.752236","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"1413_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3722","DOI":"10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","volume":"25","author":"H Kawaida","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kawaida H, Kono H, Hosomura N, Amemiya H, Itakura J, Fujii H, Ichikawa D (2019) Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 25:3722\u20133737. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3748\/wjg.v25.i28.3722","journal-title":"World J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"1413_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1110","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003205","volume":"272","author":"TF Seykora","year":"2020","unstructured":"Seykora TF, Liu JB, Maggino L, Pitt HA, Vollmer CM (2020) Drain management following distal pancreatectomy: characterization of contemporary practice and impact of early removal. Ann Surg 272:1110\u20131117. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000003205","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-022-09489-z","author":"L Qian","year":"2022","unstructured":"Qian L, Hu B, Wang J, Lu X, Deng X, Chai W, Xu Z, Wang W, Shen B (2022) Impact of the transection plan on postoperative pancreatic fistulas occurring after robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy for nonmalignant pancreatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-022-09489-z","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"1413_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2019.02.016","volume":"166","author":"A Pulvirenti","year":"2019","unstructured":"Pulvirenti A, Landoni L, Borin A, De Pastena M, Fontana M, Pea A, Esposito A, Casetti L, Tuveri M, Paiella S, Marchegiani G, Malleo G, Salvia R, Bassi C (2019) Reinforced stapler versus ultrasonic dissector for pancreatic transection and stump closure for distal pancreatectomy: a propensity matched analysis. Surgery 166:271\u2013276. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2019.02.016","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"key":"1413_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/bjs\/znac204","author":"A Giani","year":"2022","unstructured":"Giani A, van Ramshorst T, Mazzola M et al (2022) Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy: European multicentre study. Br J Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjs\/znac204","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005601","author":"PC M\u00fcller","year":"2022","unstructured":"M\u00fcller PC, Breuer E, Nickel F et al (2022) Robotic distal pancreatectomy, a novel standard of care? Benchmark values for surgical outcomes from 16 international expert centers. Ann Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000005601","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"key":"1413_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","volume":"14","author":"X Wan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Wan X, Wang W, Liu J, Tong T (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and\/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-14-135","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"1413_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1785","DOI":"10.1177\/0962280216669183","volume":"27","author":"D Luo","year":"2018","unstructured":"Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T (2018) Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and\/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res 27:1785\u20131805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0962280216669183","journal-title":"Stat Methods Med Res"}],"container-title":["Updates in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13304-022-01413-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13304-022-01413-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13304-022-01413-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,11]],"date-time":"2023-01-11T09:45:04Z","timestamp":1673430304000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s13304-022-01413-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,1]]}},"alternative-id":["1413"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-022-01413-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2038-131X","2038-3312"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2038-131X","type":"print"},{"value":"2038-3312","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"13 July 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 October 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 November 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This study does not have these statements.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Research involving human participants and\/or animals"}},{"value":"For this type of study formal consent is not required.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}