{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T22:05:01Z","timestamp":1771279501425,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,6]],"date-time":"2025-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754438400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,6]],"date-time":"2025-08-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754438400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Updates Surg"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-025-02300-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,6]],"date-time":"2025-08-06T16:48:39Z","timestamp":1754498919000},"page":"63-70","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Comparison of postoperative reflux esophagitis in different digestive tract reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer patients: a network meta-analysis and systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"78","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3339-8700","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Junjie","family":"Zhu","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fei","family":"Tan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Kai","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jiadi","family":"Xing","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Xiangqian","family":"Su","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR1","first-page":"209","volume":"71","author":"H Sung","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209\u2013249","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1016\/j.semradonc.2012.09.008","volume":"23","author":"MF Buas","year":"2013","unstructured":"Buas MF, Vaughan TL (2013) Epidemiology and risk factors for gastroesophageal junction tumors: understanding the rising incidence of this disease. Semin Radiat Oncol 23(1):3\u20139","journal-title":"Semin Radiat Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.5230\/jgc.2016.16.3.131","volume":"16","author":"Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association","year":"2016","unstructured":"Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association (2016) Korean gastric cancer association nationwide survey on gastric cancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer 16(3):131\u2013140","journal-title":"J Gastric Cancer"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1053\/j.gastro.2020.02.068","volume":"159","author":"M Arnold","year":"2020","unstructured":"Arnold M, Abnet CC, Neale RE et al (2020) Global burden of 5 major types of gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology 159(1):335-349.e15","journal-title":"Gastroenterology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"56","DOI":"10.1186\/s12885-024-11827-4","volume":"24","author":"B Li","year":"2024","unstructured":"Li B, Wang Y, Li B et al (2024) Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life of reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 24(1):56","journal-title":"BMC Cancer"},{"issue":"8","key":"2300_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1761","DOI":"10.4240\/wjgs.v15.i8.1761","volume":"15","author":"LQ Pang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pang LQ, Zhang J, Shi F et al (2023) Anti-reflux effects of a novel esophagogastric asymmetric anastomosis technique after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1761\u20131773","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"2300_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.7326\/M14-2385","volume":"162","author":"B Hutton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM et al (2015) The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162(11):777\u2013784","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"2300_CR8","unstructured":"Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5 (updated August 2024) [Internet]. Cochrane; 2024. Available from: Available from www.training.cochrane.org\/handbook."},{"issue":"2","key":"2300_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1136\/gutjnl-2023-330616","volume":"73","author":"CP Gyawali","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R et al (2024) Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: lyon consensus 2.0. Gut 73(2):361\u201371","journal-title":"Gut"},{"issue":"10","key":"2300_CR10","first-page":"983","volume":"27","author":"CGC Association","year":"2024","unstructured":"Association CGC (2024) Chinese consensus on digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy (2024 edition). Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Chin J Gastrointest Surg 27(10):983\u2013995","journal-title":"Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi Chin J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2300_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1054","volume":"3","author":"G van Valkenhoef","year":"2012","unstructured":"van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B et al (2012) Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 3(4):285\u2013299","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"issue":"11","key":"2300_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4848","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-017-5539-4","volume":"31","author":"T Aburatani","year":"2017","unstructured":"Aburatani T, Kojima K, Otsuki S et al (2017) Double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy using detachable ENDO-PSD. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 31(11):4848\u20134856","journal-title":"Surg Endosc Interv Tech"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR13","first-page":"40","volume":"2","author":"Y Adachi","year":"1999","unstructured":"Adachi Y, Inoue T, Hagino Y et al (1999) Surgical results of proximal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: jejunal interposition and gastric tube reconstruction. Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc 2(1):40\u201345","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"738","DOI":"10.1007\/s10620-011-1920-7","volume":"57","author":"XF Chen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen XF, Zhang B, Chen ZX et al (2012) Gastric tube reconstruction reduces postoperative gastroesophageal reflux in adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Dig Dis Sci 57(3):738\u2013745","journal-title":"Dig Dis Sci"},{"issue":"15","key":"2300_CR15","first-page":"E25453","volume":"100","author":"BW Eom","year":"2021","unstructured":"Eom BW, Park JY, Park KB et al (2021) Comparison of nutrition and quality of life of esophagogastrostomy and the double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Med U S 100(15):E25453","journal-title":"Med U S"},{"issue":"12","key":"2300_CR16","first-page":"905","volume":"36","author":"Hu Li","year":"2021","unstructured":"Li Hu, Rihong Z, Xiaowei S (2021) Long-term quality-of-life comparison between three reconstruction methods after gastrectomy in patients with stage I proximal gastric cancer. Chin J Gen Surg 36(12):905\u2013909","journal-title":"Chin J Gen Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"784","DOI":"10.4143\/crt.2020.1064","volume":"53","author":"X Ji","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ji X, Jin C, Ji K et al (2021) Double tract reconstruction reduces reflux esophagitis and improves quality of life after radical proximal gastrectomy for patients with upper gastric or esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 53(3):784\u2013794","journal-title":"Cancer Res Treat"},{"key":"2300_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0247636","author":"T Kumamoto","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kumamoto T, Sasako M, Ishida Y et al (2021) Clinical outcomes of proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparison between the double-flap technique and jejunal interposition. PLoS ONE. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0247636","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2014.02.015","volume":"156","author":"M Nakamura","year":"2014","unstructured":"Nakamura M, Nakamori M, Ojima T et al (2014) Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: an analysis of our 13-year experience. Surgery 156(1):57\u201363","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"38","DOI":"10.1007\/s00595-018-1699-7","volume":"49","author":"E Nomura","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nomura E, Kayano H, Lee SW et al (2019) Functional evaluations comparing the double-tract method and the jejunal interposition method following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an investigation including laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Today 49(1):38\u201348","journal-title":"Surg Today"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.011","volume":"209","author":"S Sakuramoto","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S et al (2009) Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis. J Am Coll Surg 209(3):344\u2013351","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"123","key":"2300_CR22","first-page":"616","volume":"60","author":"A Seshimo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Seshimo A, Miyake K, Amano K et al (2013) Clinical outcome of esophagogastrotomy after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 60(123):616\u2013619","journal-title":"Hepatogastroenterology"},{"issue":"6","key":"2300_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1159\/000321224","volume":"27","author":"R Takagawa","year":"2010","unstructured":"Takagawa R, Kunisaki C, Kimura J et al (2010) A pilot study comparing jejunal pouch and jejunal interposition reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy. Dig Surg 27(6):502\u2013508","journal-title":"Dig Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"2300_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1473","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-007-9459-7","volume":"32","author":"M Tokunaga","year":"2008","unstructured":"Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Hiki N et al (2008) Endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy: comparison between esophagogastric anastomosis and jejunal interposition. World J Surg 32(7):1473\u20131477","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1393","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-5127-z","volume":"31","author":"Y Toyomasu","year":"2017","unstructured":"Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, Suzuki M et al (2017) Restoration of gastrointestinal motility ameliorates nutritional deficiencies and body weight loss of patients who undergo laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 31(3):1393\u20131401","journal-title":"Surg Endosc Interv Tech"},{"issue":"6","key":"2300_CR26","first-page":"689","volume":"20","author":"W Xiaona","year":"2021","unstructured":"Xiaona W, Baogui W, Ning L et al (2021) Clinical efficacy of radical proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy and double-tract anastomosis for upper gastric cancer. Chin J Dig Surg 20(6):689\u2013694","journal-title":"Chin J Dig Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2300_CR27","first-page":"850","volume":"18","author":"A Yasuda","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yasuda A, Yasuda T, Imamoto H et al (2015) A newly modified esophagogastrostomy with a reliable angle of His by placing a gastric tube in the lower mediastinum in laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc 18(4):850\u2013858","journal-title":"Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc"},{"key":"2300_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-021-01390-1","author":"Z Saze","year":"2021","unstructured":"Saze Z, Kase K, Nakano H et al (2021) Functional benefits of the double flap technique after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. BMC Surg. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12893-021-01390-1","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-024-02748-x","volume":"25","author":"Y Xia","year":"2025","unstructured":"Xia Y, Sheng N, Wang Z et al (2025) The comparison of post-proximal gastrectomy digestive tract reconstruction methods. BMC Surg 25(1):1","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"key":"2300_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2024.1414120","author":"CY Wu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wu CY, Huang QZ, Ye K (2024) Comparison of short-term clinical efficacy between modified Kamikawa anastomosis and double tract anastomosis after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Front Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fonc.2024.1414120","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"key":"2300_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1167177","DOI":"10.3389\/fonc.2023.1167177","volume":"13","author":"W Meng","year":"2023","unstructured":"Meng W, Ya-di H, Wei-Bo C et al (2023) Clinical effect and follow-up of laparoscopic radical proximal gastrectomy for upper gastric carcinoma. Front Oncol 13:1167177","journal-title":"Front Oncol"},{"issue":"9","key":"2300_CR32","first-page":"838","volume":"60","author":"L Yang","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yang L, Wu JZ, You J et al (2022) A multicenter retrospective study on the efficacy of different anti-reflux reconstruction methods after proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 60(9):838\u2013845","journal-title":"Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101204","DOI":"10.4240\/wjgs.v17.i1.101204","volume":"17","author":"M Wang","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wang M, Zhang LL, Wang G et al (2025) Comparative study of clinical efficacy of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 17(1):101204\u2013101204","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1089","DOI":"10.1007\/s12029-024-01050-6","volume":"55","author":"T Hasegawa","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hasegawa T, Kubo N, Sakurai K et al (2024) Study of short-term and long-term outcomes between esophagogastrostomy and double-tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Cancer 55(3):1089\u20131097","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Cancer"},{"issue":"7","key":"2300_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5243","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-021-08902-3","volume":"36","author":"B Yu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Yu B, Park KB, Park JY et al (2022) Double tract reconstruction versus double flap technique: short-term clinical outcomes after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 36(7):5243\u20135256","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"key":"2300_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.109482","author":"Z Tian","year":"2025","unstructured":"Tian Z, Cheng Y, Wang Y et al (2025) A 3-Arm case-matched analysis of anti-reflux reconstruction methods after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy\u2014single tract jejunal interposition vs double tract reconstruction vs tube-like stomach reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.109482","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1186\/s12893-023-02219-9","volume":"23","author":"J Chen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chen J, Wang F, Gao S et al (2023) Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for upper-third gastric cancer: esophagogastrostomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and double-tract reconstruction. BMC Surg 23(1):309","journal-title":"BMC Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1523","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-10663-0","volume":"38","author":"B Li","year":"2024","unstructured":"Li B, Wang Y, Wu Z et al (2024) Safety and short-term outcomes of a modified valvuloplastic esophagogastrostomy versus gastric tube anastomosis after laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 38(3):1523\u20131532","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"4","key":"2300_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.346","volume":"41","author":"S Tominaga","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tominaga S, Ojima T, Hayata K et al (2023) Esophagogastrostomy with fundoplication versus double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 41(4):346","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-019-1762-x","volume":"17","author":"Z Li","year":"2019","unstructured":"Li Z, Dong J, Huang Q et al (2019) Comparison of three digestive tract reconstruction methods for the treatment of Siewert II and III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a prospective, randomized controlled study. World J Surg Oncol 17(1):209","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101871","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gassur.2024.10.026","volume":"29","author":"R Peng","year":"2025","unstructured":"Peng R, Shi Y, Zhang H et al (2025) Tunnel anastomosis: a modified flap technique in esophagogastrostomy as a novel antireflux technique after proximal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 29(1):101871","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract"},{"issue":"2","key":"2300_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jamcollsurg.2016.04.041","volume":"223","author":"S Kuroda","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kuroda S, Nishizaki M, Kikuchi S et al (2016) Double-flap technique as an antireflux procedure in esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 223(2):e7-13","journal-title":"J Am Coll Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"96","DOI":"10.1002\/ags3.12216","volume":"3","author":"S Kuroda","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kuroda S, Choda Y, Otsuka S et al (2019) Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-flap technique as antireflux esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy (rD-FLAP Study). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 3(1):96\u2013103","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"2300_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0121","DOI":"10.1097\/MD.0000000000010121","volume":"97","author":"S Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang S, Lin S, Wang H et al (2018) Reconstruction methods after radical proximal gastrectomy: a systematic review. Medicine 97(11):e0121","journal-title":"Medicine"},{"issue":"6","key":"2300_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2255","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-024-01830-6","volume":"76","author":"CY Wu","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wu CY, Zhong WJ, Ye K (2024) Comparison of the efficacy, safety and postoperative quality of life between modified side overlap anastomosis and double-tract anastomosis after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy. Updat Surg 76(6):2255\u20132265","journal-title":"Updat Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1002\/ags3.12859","volume":"9","author":"Y Kurokawa","year":"2025","unstructured":"Kurokawa Y, Saito T, Yamamoto K et al (2025) y-shaped side overlap esophagogastrostomy in proximal gastrectomy. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 9(1):205\u2013210","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2300_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"289","DOI":"10.21147\/j.issn.1000-9604.2022.03.08","volume":"34","author":"Z Xu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Xu Z, Hu C, Zhang Y et al (2022) Efficacy analysis of Cheng\u2019s GIRAFFE reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Chin J Cancer Res 34(3):289\u2013297","journal-title":"Chin J Cancer Res"},{"issue":"1","key":"2300_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"502","DOI":"10.1016\/j.asjsur.2023.09.017","volume":"47","author":"Y Wang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wang Y, Li B, Shan F et al (2024) A modified esophagogastric reconstruction method after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a technical note with video vignette. ASIAN J Surg 47(1):502\u2013504","journal-title":"ASIAN J Surg"}],"container-title":["Updates in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13304-025-02300-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13304-025-02300-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13304-025-02300-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,16]],"date-time":"2026-02-16T21:03:24Z","timestamp":1771275804000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s13304-025-02300-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,6]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,2]]}},"alternative-id":["2300"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-025-02300-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2038-131X","2038-3312"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2038-131X","type":"print"},{"value":"2038-3312","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 May 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 June 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 August 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors declare no conflict of interest in this study.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"Ethical approval was not required because of this work is based solely on secondary analysis of published literature.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Informed consent was not required for this study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}}]}}