{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T01:50:02Z","timestamp":1791597002436,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791504000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1791504000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Updates Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Repeat hepatectomies are challenging due to adhesions and altered anatomy. Robotic surgery, with enhanced dexterity and visualization, may expand the role of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in this setting. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and efficacy of robotic repeat hepatectomy. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing repeat robotic (R-RLR), laparoscopic (L-RLR), and open liver resections (O-RLR) performed between January 2019 and December 2024. The primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion to laparotomy, use of Pringle maneuver, blood loss, hospital stay and postoperative mortality. For oncologic efficacy, rates of negative surgical margins (R0) or equivalent (R1 vascular), recurrences and survival were assessed. Forty-two patients underwent repeat hepatectomy (O-RLR = 15, L-RLR = 13, R-RLR = 14). Over time, O-RLR and L-RLR declined in favor of R-RLR. Main indications were colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Groups had similar age and comorbidities; however, cirrhosis and portal hypertension were more frequent in R-RLR. Mean Iwate scores were 6 (O-RLR), 4 (L-RLR), and 5 (R-RLR) (p = 0.240). Postoperative morbidity was significantly lower in L-RLR (7.6%) and R-RLR (7.7%) compared to O-RLR (40%) (p = 0.030). Mean Comprehensive Complication Index was 11.7 (O-RLR), 0.7 (L-RLR), and 0.6 (R-RLR) (p = 0.025). Two L-RLR cases required conversion. Pringle maneuver, blood loss, and hospital stay decreased progressively from O-RLR to L-RLR to R-RLR. There was no postoperative mortality.R0 resection was achieved in 73% (O-RLR), 100% (L-RLR), and 78.5% (R-RLR); R1 vascular rates were 13.3%, 0%, and 21.5%, respectively (p = 0.14). The three groups had similar overall and hepatic recurrence rates; survival (recurrence-free and overall) was also similar. Repeat robotic hepatectomy is safe and provides good oncologic outcomes. The robotic approach may allow MILS in more complex cases, including patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s13304-026-02878-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T12:56:44Z","timestamp":1791550604000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Safety and efficacy of robotic repeat hepatectomy compared to laparoscopic and open repeat hepatectomy: a retrospective comparative study"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-8660-7613","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eleonora","family":"Garosi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lorenzo","family":"Bernardi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raffaello","family":"Roesel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gioia","family":"Pozza","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Francesco","family":"Mongelli","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pietro","family":"Majno-Hurst","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alessandra","family":"Cristaudi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"2878_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002353","volume":"267","author":"\u00c5A Fretland","year":"2018","unstructured":"Fretland \u00c5A, Dagenborg VJ, Bj\u00f8rnelv GMW et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267(2):199\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002353","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"15","key":"2878_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1799","DOI":"10.1200\/JCO.23.01019","volume":"42","author":"RS Fichtinger","year":"2024","unstructured":"Fichtinger RS, Aldrighetti LA, Abu Hilal M et al (2024) Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: the ORANGE II PLUS multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 42(15):1799\u20131809. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1200\/JCO.23.01019","journal-title":"J Clin Oncol"},{"issue":"19","key":"2878_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers13194800","volume":"13","author":"E Birgin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Birgin E, Kaslow SR, Hetjens S, Correa-Gallego C, Rahbari NN (2021) Minimally invasive versus open liver resection for stage I\/II hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers 13(19):4800. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/cancers13194800","journal-title":"Cancers"},{"key":"2878_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-024-16491-3","author":"K Kobayashi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kobayashi K, Inoue Y, Oba A et al (2024) Strategies for recurrent colorectal liver metastases based on prognostic factors and resectability: potential benefit of multidisciplinary treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-024-16491-3","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2878_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.1007\/s12328-021-01394-7","volume":"14","author":"M Tampaki","year":"2021","unstructured":"Tampaki M, Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas E (2021) Intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an update. Clin J Gastroenterol 14(3):699\u2013713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12328-021-01394-7","journal-title":"Clin J Gastroenterol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2878_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"162","DOI":"10.1016\/j.hbpd.2021.08.005","volume":"21","author":"PF Costa","year":"2022","unstructured":"Costa PF, Coelho FF, Jeismann VB et al (2022) Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastases: a comparative analysis of short- and long-term results. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 21(2):162\u2013167. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.hbpd.2021.08.005","journal-title":"Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int"},{"issue":"4","key":"2878_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"544","DOI":"10.4240\/wjgs.v15.i4.544","volume":"15","author":"D Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang D, Xiao M, Wan ZM, Lin X, Li QY, Zheng SS (2023) Surgical treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and challenges. World J Gastrointest Surg 15(4):544\u2013552. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4240\/wjgs.v15.i4.544","journal-title":"World J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2878_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001194","volume":"263","author":"Y Mise","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mise Y, Aloia TA, Brudvik KW, Schwarz L, Vauthey JN, Conrad C (2016) Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy in colorectal liver metastasis improves salvageability and survival. Ann Surg 263(1):146\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000001194","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2878_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12957-023-03127-1","volume":"21","author":"K Wang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Wang K, Liu Y, Hao M et al (2023) Clinical outcomes of parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 21(1):241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12957-023-03127-1","journal-title":"World J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2878_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1076","DOI":"10.1007\/s11605-017-3397-y","volume":"21","author":"D Moris","year":"2017","unstructured":"Moris D, Ronnekleiv-Kelly S, Rahnemai-Azar AA et al (2017) Parenchymal-sparing versus anatomic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 21(6):1076\u20131085. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11605-017-3397-y","journal-title":"J Gastrointest Surg"},{"issue":"12","key":"2878_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3175","DOI":"10.1007\/s00268-014-2728-3","volume":"38","author":"VG Shelat","year":"2014","unstructured":"Shelat VG, Serin K, Samim M et al (2014) Outcomes of repeat laparoscopic liver resection compared to the primary resection. World J Surg 38(12):3175\u20133180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00268-014-2728-3","journal-title":"World J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2878_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"783","DOI":"10.1002\/bjs.11096","volume":"106","author":"MJ Van Der Poel","year":"2019","unstructured":"Van Der Poel MJ, Barkhatov L, Fuks D et al (2019) Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 106(6):783\u2013789. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bjs.11096","journal-title":"Br J Surg"},{"key":"2878_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.03.052","volume":"79","author":"Y Liang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liang Y, Lin C, Zhang B et al (2020) Perioperative outcomes comparing laparoscopic with open repeat liver resection for post-hepatectomy recurrent liver cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 79:17\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijsu.2020.03.052","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"2878_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"479","DOI":"10.4254\/wjh.v10.i7.479","volume":"10","author":"Z Morise","year":"2018","unstructured":"Morise Z (2018) Status and perspective of laparoscopic repeat liver resection. World J Hepatol 10(7):479\u2013484. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4254\/wjh.v10.i7.479","journal-title":"World J Hepatol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2878_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2837","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-023-13203-1","volume":"30","author":"F Procopio","year":"2023","unstructured":"Procopio F, Branciforte B, Torzilli G (2023) ASO author reflections: moving toward the future: minimal access R1 vascular surgery for colorectal liver metastases at the Caval confluence. Ann Surg Oncol 30(5):2837\u20132838. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-023-13203-1","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2878_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2836","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-022-12952-9","volume":"30","author":"F Procopio","year":"2023","unstructured":"Procopio F, Cimino M, Milana F, Franchi E, Branciforte B, Torzilli G (2023) Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided R1 vascular liver resection for colorectal liver metastases at caval confluence. Ann Surg Oncol 30(5):2836\u20132836. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-022-12952-9","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2878_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1352","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-015-5009-y","volume":"23","author":"L Vigan\u00f2","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vigan\u00f2 L, Procopio F, Cimino MM et al (2016) Is tumor detachment from vascular structures equivalent to R0 resection in surgery for colorectal liver metastases? An observational cohort. Ann Surg Oncol 23(4):1352\u20131360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-015-5009-y","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2878_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"897","DOI":"10.1016\/j.surg.2018.12.002","volume":"165","author":"M Donadon","year":"2019","unstructured":"Donadon M, Terrone A, Procopio F et al (2019) Is R1 vascular hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma oncologically adequate? Analysis of 327 consecutive patients. Surgery 165(5):897\u2013904. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.surg.2018.12.002","journal-title":"Surgery"},{"issue":"2","key":"2878_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.869","volume":"29","author":"R Ciria","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ciria R, Berardi G, Alconchel F et al (2022) The impact of robotics in liver surgery: a worldwide systematic review and short\u2010term outcomes meta\u2010analysis on 2728 cases. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29(2):181\u2013197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbp.869","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"2878_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1067","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-021-01343-z","volume":"16","author":"I Sucandy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sucandy I, Shapera E, Crespo K et al (2021) The effect of the robotic platform in hepatectomy after prior liver and non-liver abdominal operations: a comparative study of clinical outcomes. J Robot Surg 16(5):1067\u20131072. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-021-01343-z","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"2878_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1296","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-10645-2","volume":"38","author":"E Birgin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Birgin E, Abdelhadi S, Seyfried S et al (2024) Robotic or laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy after open hepatectomy: a cohort study. Surg Endosc 38(3):1296\u20131305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-023-10645-2","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"2878_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.109376","volume":"51","author":"S Vancoillie","year":"2025","unstructured":"Vancoillie S, Willems E, De Meyere C, Parmentier I, Verslype C, D\u2019Hondt M (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy: a comparative single-center study of perioperative outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 51(1):109376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejso.2024.109376","journal-title":"Eur J Surg Oncol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2878_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3151","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000001268","volume":"110","author":"R Rashid","year":"2024","unstructured":"Rashid R, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A et al (2024) The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case\u2013control studies in surgery. Int J Surg 110(6):3151\u20133165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000001268","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"2878_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"801","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annonc.2021.02.014","volume":"32","author":"A Vogel","year":"2021","unstructured":"Vogel A, Martinelli E, Vogel A et al (2021) Updated treatment recommendations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol 32(6):801\u2013805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.annonc.2021.02.014","journal-title":"Ann Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2878_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6","DOI":"10.1002\/jhbp.1091","volume":"29","author":"G Wakabayashi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2020) The Tokyo 2020 terminology of liver anatomy and resections: updates of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29(1):6\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbp.1091","journal-title":"J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci"},{"issue":"4","key":"2878_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.21037\/hbsn.2016.03.03","volume":"5","author":"G Wakabayashi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wakabayashi G (2016) What has changed after the Morioka consensus conference 2014 on laparoscopic liver resection? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(4):281\u2013289. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21037\/hbsn.2016.03.03","journal-title":"Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr"},{"issue":"1","key":"2878_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002176","volume":"267","author":"Y Kawaguchi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267(1):13\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0000000000002176","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"2878_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"8123","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-023-10358-6","volume":"37","author":"E Balzano","year":"2023","unstructured":"Balzano E, Bernardi L, Roesel R et al (2023) Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resections: propensity-matched comparison of two-center experience. Surg Endosc 37(10):8123\u20138132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-023-10358-6","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"},{"issue":"1","key":"2878_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3595","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-024-54253-z","volume":"14","author":"L Bernardi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bernardi L, Balzano E, Roesel R et al (2024) Concomitant training in robotic and laparoscopic liver resections of low-to-intermediate difficulty score: a retrospective analysis of the learning curve. Sci Rep 14(1):3595. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-024-54253-z","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"issue":"2","key":"2878_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b6dcab","volume":"250","author":"PA Clavien","year":"2009","unstructured":"Clavien PA, Strasberg SM (2009) Severity grading of surgical complications. Ann Surg 250(2):197\u2013198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e3181b6dcab","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"2878_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318296c732","volume":"258","author":"K Slankamenac","year":"2013","unstructured":"Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA (2013) The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 258(1):1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/SLA.0b013e318296c732","journal-title":"Ann Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"2878_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"963","DOI":"10.1097\/JS9.0000000000000305","volume":"109","author":"ZQ Xiang","year":"2023","unstructured":"Xiang ZQ, Zhu FF, Zhao SQ et al (2023) Laparoscopic versus open repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score-matched cohort studies. Int J Surg 109(4):963\u2013971. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/JS9.0000000000000305","journal-title":"Int J Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"2878_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3886","DOI":"10.1245\/s10434-025-18922-1","volume":"33","author":"F Procopio","year":"2026","unstructured":"Procopio F, Memeo R, Del Fabbro D et al (2026) Oncological adequacy of R1 vascular margin in minimally invasive liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 33(5):3886\u20133898. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1245\/s10434-025-18922-1","journal-title":"Ann Surg Oncol"},{"key":"2878_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-024-11476-5","author":"S Abdelhadi","year":"2024","unstructured":"Abdelhadi S, Sandra-Petrescu F, Vassilev G, Birgin E, Rahbari NN, Reissfelder C (2024) Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive R1 vascular surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study. Surg Endosc. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00464-024-11476-5","journal-title":"Surg Endosc"}],"container-title":["Updates in Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13304-026-02878-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13304-026-02878-2","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s13304-026-02878-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,10]],"date-time":"2026-10-10T01:02:08Z","timestamp":1791594128000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s13304-026-02878-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"references-count":34,"alternative-id":["2878"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13304-026-02878-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2038-131X","2038-3312"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2038-131X","type":"print"},{"value":"2038-3312","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"27 November 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 September 2026","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 October 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors did not receive any financial support, equipment or drugs for the research, authorship and\/or publication of this article.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}