{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,26]],"date-time":"2026-02-26T15:35:31Z","timestamp":1772120131113,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,9]],"date-time":"2022-03-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646784000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,9]],"date-time":"2022-03-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1646784000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmol Ther"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s40123-022-00486-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,9]],"date-time":"2022-03-09T03:02:21Z","timestamp":1646794941000},"page":"1047-1066","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"11","author":[{"given":"Juan","family":"Gros-Otero","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3878-7115","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Isabel","family":"Rodr\u00edguez-P\u00e9rez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Miguel A.","family":"Teus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andreas","family":"Katsanos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dimitrios G.","family":"Mikropoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Montserrat","family":"Garc\u00eda-Gonz\u00e1lez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,9]]},"reference":[{"issue":"12","key":"486_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2011.05.043","volume":"37","author":"ZH Zhang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Zhang ZH, Jin HY, Suo Y, et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(12):2151\u20139.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"486_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20111228-02","volume":"28","author":"S Chen","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chen S, Feng Y, Stojanovic A, et al. IntraLase femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(1):15\u201324.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"11","key":"486_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1925","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.05.027","volume":"36","author":"M Moshirfar","year":"2010","unstructured":"Moshirfar M, Gardiner JP, Schliesser JA, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(11):1925\u201333.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"4","key":"486_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"804","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2003.10.026","volume":"30","author":"GM Kezirian","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(4):804\u201311.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"486_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e5","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2012.08.013","volume":"120","author":"AA Farjo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Farjo AA, Sugar A, Schallhorn SC, et al. Femtosecond lasers for LASIK flap creation: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(3):e5\u201320.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"11","key":"486_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1484","DOI":"10.1001\/archopht.126.11.1484","volume":"126","author":"A Chan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Chan A, Ou J, Manche EE. Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical keratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(11):1484\u201390.","journal-title":"Arch Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"9","key":"486_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"880","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20071101-03","volume":"23","author":"FW Medeiros","year":"2007","unstructured":"Medeiros FW, Stapleton WM, Hammel J, et al. Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. J Refract Surg. 2007;23(9):880\u20137.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"486_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.10.037","volume":"31","author":"DB Tran","year":"2005","unstructured":"Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z, et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):97\u2013105.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"486_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"120","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.09.046","volume":"31","author":"DS Durrie","year":"2005","unstructured":"Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):120\u20136.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"486_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1756","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.05.032","volume":"35","author":"MQ Salomao","year":"2009","unstructured":"Salomao MQ, Ambrosio R Jr, Wilson SE. Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(10):1756\u201360.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"486_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"875","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20081101-04","volume":"24","author":"MC Knorz","year":"2008","unstructured":"Knorz MC, Vossmerbaeumer U. Comparison of flap adhesion strength using the Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase iFS femtosecond laser in rabbits. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(9):875\u20138.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"486_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.4321\/S0365-66912007000700006","volume":"82","author":"JM Sanchez-Pina","year":"2007","unstructured":"Sanchez-Pina JM, Arranz-Marquez E, Gil Ciganda N, et al. LASIK results of IntraLase femtosecond laser to correct myopia: efficacy, security and predictability. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007;82(7):423\u20138.","journal-title":"Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol"},{"issue":"2","key":"486_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2010.08.042","volume":"37","author":"H Ahn","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ahn H, Kim JK, Kim CK, et al. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 3 femtosecond lasers and a microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(2):349\u201357.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"486_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"427","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20101210-01","volume":"27","author":"JM Vetter","year":"2011","unstructured":"Vetter JM, Holzer MP, Teping C, et al. Intraocular pressure during corneal flap preparation: comparison among four femtosecond lasers in porcine eyes. J Refract Surg. 2011;27(6):427\u201333.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"486_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"328","DOI":"10.1097\/ICO.0000000000000361","volume":"34","author":"Y Zheng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zheng Y, Zhou Y, Zhang J, et al. Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps created by 2 femtosecond lasers. Cornea. 2015;34(3):328\u201333.","journal-title":"Cornea"},{"key":"486_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S99394","volume":"10","author":"A Huhtala","year":"2016","unstructured":"Huhtala A, Pietil\u00e4 J, M\u00e4kinen P, et al. Femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:393\u2013404.","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"5","key":"486_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2005.12.032","volume":"141","author":"T Lim","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lim T, Yang S, Kim M, et al. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):833\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"8","key":"486_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1482","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2006.10.057","volume":"114","author":"SV Patel","year":"2007","unstructured":"Patel SV, Maguire LJ, McLaren JW, et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK; a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1482\u201390.","journal-title":"Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"5","key":"486_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"833","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2008.12.038","volume":"35","author":"AM Rosa","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rosa AM, Neto Murta J, Quadrado MJ, et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(5):833\u20138.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"5","key":"486_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"785","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2009.12.023","volume":"149","author":"R Calvo","year":"2010","unstructured":"Calvo R, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after laser in situ keratomileusis: femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149(5):785\u201393.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"486_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"740","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2014.06.038","volume":"41","author":"CQ Yu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yu CQ, Manche EE. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for flap creation in myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(4):740\u20138.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"6","key":"486_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"954","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2011.05.009","volume":"152","author":"JL Alio","year":"2011","unstructured":"Alio JL, Vega-Estrada A, Pi\u00f1ero DP. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis in high levels of myopia with the amaris excimer laser using optimized aspherical profiles. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(6):954\u201363.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"486_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"788","DOI":"10.1136\/bjophthalmol-2011-300073","volume":"96","author":"C Winkler von Mohrenfels","year":"2012","unstructured":"Winkler von Mohrenfels C, Khoramnia R, Salgado J, et al. First clinical results with a new 200 kHz femtosecond laser system. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(6):788\u201392.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"486_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S40454","volume":"7","author":"AJ Kanellopoulos","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Long-term bladeless LASIK outcomes with the FS200 Femtosecond and EX500 Excimer Laser workstation: the Refractive Suite. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:261\u20139.","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"9","key":"486_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"620","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20120815-06","volume":"28","author":"DS Durrie","year":"2012","unstructured":"Durrie DS, Brinton JP, Avila MR, et al. Evaluating the speed of visual recovery following thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(9):620\u20134.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"486_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S821","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20121005-02","volume":"28","author":"JD Au","year":"2012","unstructured":"Au JD, Krueger RR. Optimized femto-LASIK maintains preexisting spherical aberration independent of refractive error. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:S821\u20135.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"7","key":"486_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"650","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.12333","volume":"92","author":"J Pietil\u00e4","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pietil\u00e4 J, Huhtala A, M\u00e4kinen P, et al. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap creation with the three-dimensional, transportable Ziemer FEMTO LDV model Z6 I femtosecond laser. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92(7):650\u20135.","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"11 suppl","key":"486_CR28","first-page":"S815","volume":"28","author":"R Shetty","year":"2012","unstructured":"Shetty R, Malhotra C, D\u2019Souza S, et al. WaveLight FS200 vs Hansatome LASIK: intraoperative determination of flap characteristics and predictability by hand-held bioptigen spectral domain ophthalmic imaging system. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(11 suppl):S815\u201320.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"486_CR29","first-page":"69","volume":"5","author":"XX Zhang","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zhang XX, Zhong XW, Wu JS, et al. Corneal flap morphological analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond lasers versus mechanical microkeratome. Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(1):69\u201373.","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"6","key":"486_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"335","DOI":"10.1590\/S0004-27492013000600002","volume":"76","author":"AR Hasimoto","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hasimoto AR, Gomes MF, de Siqueira MA, et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK flap creation. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2013;76(6):335\u20138.","journal-title":"Arq Bras Oftalmol"},{"issue":"7","key":"486_CR31","first-page":"1006","volume":"9","author":"Q Liu","year":"2016","unstructured":"Liu Q, Zhou YH, Zhang J, et al. Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(7):1006\u201310.","journal-title":"Int J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"486_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1639","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S110626","volume":"10","author":"A Meidani","year":"2016","unstructured":"Meidani A, Tzavara C. Comparison of efficacy, safety, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis using two laser suites. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1639\u201346.","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"1","key":"486_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20111213-01","volume":"28","author":"M Tomita","year":"2012","unstructured":"Tomita M, Chiba A, Matsuda J, et al. Evaluation of LASIK treatment with the Femto LDV in patients with corneal opacity. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(1):25\u201330.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"key":"486_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.2147\/OPTH.S47341","volume":"7","author":"M Tomita","year":"2013","unstructured":"Tomita M, Sotoyama Y, Yukawa S, et al. Comparison of DLK incidence after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with two femtosecond lasers: Femto LDV and IntraLase FS60. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1365\u201371.","journal-title":"Clin Ophthalmol"},{"issue":"4","key":"486_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"798","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2004.01.001","volume":"30","author":"KA Walter","year":"2004","unstructured":"Walter KA, Stevenson AW. Effect of environmental factors on myopic LASIK enhancement rates. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(4):798\u2013803.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"486_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.3928\/1081-597X-20070301-16","volume":"23","author":"PE Dantas","year":"2007","unstructured":"Dantas PE, Martins CL, de Souza LB, et al. Do environmental factors influence excimer laser pulse fluence and efficacy? J Refract Surg. 2007;23(3):307\u20139.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"10","key":"486_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S833","DOI":"10.3928\/1081597X-20100921-12","volume":"26","author":"M Mrochen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mrochen M, W\u00fcllner C, Krause J, et al. Technical aspects of the WaveLight FS200 femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg. 2010;26(10):S833\u201340.","journal-title":"J Refract Surg"},{"issue":"3","key":"486_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2012.10.041","volume":"39","author":"AB Cummings","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cummings AB, Cummings BK, Kelly GE. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(3):378\u201385.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmology and Therapy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40123-022-00486-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s40123-022-00486-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40123-022-00486-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,5,17]],"date-time":"2022-05-17T13:54:20Z","timestamp":1652795660000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s40123-022-00486-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,9]]},"references-count":38,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,6]]}},"alternative-id":["486"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40123-022-00486-y","relation":{"has-preprint":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.21203\/rs.2.9378\/v1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2193-8245","2193-6528"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2193-8245","type":"print"},{"value":"2193-6528","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,3,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 January 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 February 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 March 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}