{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T20:20:24Z","timestamp":1780431624007,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]],"date-time":"2019-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562630400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]],"date-time":"2019-07-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1562630400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s40292-019-00329-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]],"date-time":"2019-07-09T08:53:31Z","timestamp":1562662411000},"page":"293-303","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Attended Versus Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"26","author":[{"given":"Emmanuel A.","family":"Andreadis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Costas","family":"Thomopoulos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Charalampia V.","family":"Geladari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Vasilios","family":"Papademetriou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"329_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"721","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.12820","volume":"18","author":"MG Myers","year":"2016","unstructured":"Myers MG. A short history of automated office blood pressure\u201415\u00a0years to SPRINT. J Clin Hypertens. 2016;18:721\u20134.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens"},{"key":"329_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"491","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jhh.1000483","volume":"11","author":"MG Myers","year":"1997","unstructured":"Myers MG, Meglis G, Polemidiotis G. The impact of physician versus automated blood pressure readings on office-induced hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1997;11:491\u20133.","journal-title":"J Hum Hypertens."},{"key":"329_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2017.01.020","volume":"33","author":"J Jegatheswaran","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jegatheswaran J, Ruzicka M, Hiremath S, Cedric Edwards C. Are automated blood pressure monitors comparable to ambulatory blood pressure monitors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:644\u201352.","journal-title":"Can J Cardiol."},{"key":"329_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1097\/00126097-200106000-00007","volume":"6","author":"GS Mattu","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mattu GS, Perry TL Jr, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitoring (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:153\u20139.","journal-title":"Blood Press Monit"},{"key":"329_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1097\/00126097-200104000-00007","volume":"6","author":"WG White","year":"2001","unstructured":"White WG, Anwar YA. Evaluation of the overall efficacy of the OMRON office digital blood pressure HEM-907 monitor in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:107\u201310.","journal-title":"Blood Press Monit"},{"key":"329_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"661","DOI":"10.1038\/ajh.2011.38","volume":"24","author":"EA Andreadis","year":"2011","unstructured":"Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, Tsakanikas AP, Chaveles IA, Mousoulis GP. Automated office blood pressure and 24-h ambulatory measurements are equally associated with left ventricular mass index. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:661\u20136.","journal-title":"Am J Hypertens."},{"key":"329_CR7","first-page":"969","volume":"25","author":"EA Andreadis","year":"2012","unstructured":"Andreadis EA, Agaliotis GD, Angelopoulos ET, Tsakanikas AP, Kolyvas GN, Mousoulis GP. Automated office blood pressure is associated with urine albumin excretion in hypertensive subjects Am J Hypertens. 2012;25:969\u201373.","journal-title":"Automated office blood pressure is associated with urine albumin excretion in hypertensive subjects Am J Hypertens."},{"key":"329_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2013","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa1511939","volume":"373","author":"The SPRINT Research Group","year":"2015","unstructured":"The SPRINT Research Group. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2013\u2013116.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"329_CR9","unstructured":"Johnson KC, Whelton PK, Cushman WC, Cutler JA, Evans GW, Snyder JK. Blood pressure measurements in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT). \n                    http:\/\/abstractsonline.com\/pp8\/4412\/presentation\/52757\n                    \n                  . Accessed 13 Nov 2017."},{"issue":"15","key":"329_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2008","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.283.15.2008","volume":"283","author":"DF Stroup","year":"2000","unstructured":"Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008\u201312.","journal-title":"JAMA."},{"key":"329_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009","volume":"155","author":"PF Whiting","year":"2011","unstructured":"Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, QUADAS-2 Group, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529\u201336. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med."},{"key":"329_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.1080","volume":"4","author":"R Wade","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wade R, Corbett M, Eastwood A. Quality assessment of comparative diagnostic accuracy studies: our experience using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool. Res Synth Methods. 2013;4:280\u20136.","journal-title":"Res Synth Methods"},{"key":"329_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"98","DOI":"10.1097\/MBP.0000000000000088","volume":"20","author":"I Al-Karkhi","year":"2015","unstructured":"Al-Karkhi I, Al-Rubaiy R, Rosenqvist U, Falk M, Nystrom FH. Comparisons of automated blood pressures in a primary health care setting with self-measurements at the office and at home using the Omron i-C10 device. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20:98\u2013103. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MBP.0000000000000088\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Blood Press Monit."},{"key":"329_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e008994","DOI":"10.1161\/JAHA.118.008994","volume":"7","author":"EA Andreadis","year":"2018","unstructured":"Andreadis EA, Geladari CV, Angelopoulos ET, Savva FS, Georgantoni AI, Papademetriou V. Attended and unattended automated office blood pressure measurements have better agreement with ambulatory monitoring than conventional office readings. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e008994. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/JAHA.118.008994\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Am Heart Assoc."},{"key":"329_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10026","volume":"71","author":"F Bauer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bauer F, Seibert FS, Rohn B, Bauer KAR, Rolshoven E, Babel N, et al. Attended versus unattended blood pressure measurements in a real life setting. Hypertension. 2018;71:243\u20139. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10026\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Hypertension."},{"key":"329_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1097\/MBP.0b013e328352ae44","volume":"17","author":"M Greiver","year":"2012","unstructured":"Greiver M, David White D, Kaplan DM, Katz K, Moineddin R, Dolabchian E. Where should automated blood pressure measurements be taken? Pilot RCT of BpTRU measurements taken in private or nonprivate areas of a primary care office. Blood Press Monit. 2012;17:137\u20138.","journal-title":"Blood Press Monit"},{"key":"329_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1097\/MBP.0b013e328355fe14","volume":"17","author":"D Hong","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hong D, Su H, Li J, Xu J, Peng Q, Yang Q, et al. The effect of physician presence on blood pressure. Blood Press Monit. 2012;17:145\u20138.","journal-title":"Blood Press Monit"},{"key":"329_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1411","DOI":"10.1111\/jch.13371","volume":"10","author":"V Papademetriou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Papademetriou V, Tsioufis C, Chung A, Geladari C, Andreadis EA. Unobserved automated office BP is similar to other clinic BP measurements: a prospective randomized study. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;10:1411\u20136.","journal-title":"J Clin Hypertens."},{"key":"329_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1639","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cjca.2017.09.011","volume":"33","author":"F Rinfret","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rinfret F, Cloutier L, Wistaff R, Birnbaum LM, Ng Cheong N, Laskine M, et al. Comparison of different automated office blood pressure measurement devices: evidence of nonequivalence and clinical implications. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:1639\u201344. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cjca.2017.09.011\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Can J Cardiol."},{"key":"329_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2259","DOI":"10.1097\/00004872-200312000-00013","volume":"21","author":"GS Stergiou","year":"2003","unstructured":"Stergiou GS, Efstathiou SP, Alamara CV, Mastorantonakis SE, Roussias LG. Home or self-blood pressure measurement? What is the correct term? J Hypertens. 2003;21:2259\u201364.","journal-title":"J Hypertens."},{"key":"329_CR21","first-page":"e218","volume":"35","author":"J Polonia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Polonia J, Rouxinol-Dias A, Araujo S, Silva J, Barbosa L. Association between ambulatory blood pressure values and central aortic pressure in large population of normotensive and hypertensive subjects. J Hypertens. 2017;35:e218.","journal-title":"J Hypertens"},{"key":"329_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1097\/HJH.0b013e328342eeeb","volume":"29","author":"CA Martin","year":"2011","unstructured":"Martin CA, Cameron JD, Chen SS, McGrath BP. Two hour glucose post loading: a biomarker of cardiovascular risk in isolated clinic hypertension. J Hypertens. 2011;29:749\u201357. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/HJH.0b013e328342eeeb\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Hypertens."},{"key":"329_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"645","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09464","volume":"70","author":"M Siddiqui","year":"2017","unstructured":"Siddiqui M, Judd EK, Oparil S, Calhoun DA. White-coat effect is uncommon in patients with refractory hypertension. Hypertension. 2017;70:645\u201351. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09464\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"Hypertension."},{"key":"329_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijcard.2018.06.056","author":"A Paini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Paini A, Bertacchini F, Stassaldi D, Aggiusti C, Maruelli G, Arnoldi C, et al. Unattended versus attended blood pressure measurement: Mean values and determinants of the difference. Int J Cardiol. 2018. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijcard.2018.06.056\n                    \n                  \n                           (Epub ahead of print).","journal-title":"Int J Cardiol."},{"key":"329_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"813","DOI":"10.1161\/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.10850","volume":"71","author":"G Stergiou","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stergiou G, Kollias A, Parati G, O\u2019Brien E. Office blood pressure measurement. The weak cornerstone of hypertension diagnosis. Hypertension. 2018;71:813\u20135.","journal-title":"Hypertension"},{"key":"329_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e112","DOI":"10.1097\/01.hjh.0000539295.55926.c5","volume":"36","author":"M Salvetti","year":"2018","unstructured":"Salvetti M, Paini A, Bertacchini F, Stassaldi D, Maruelli G, Cappellini S, et al. Relationship between unattended and attended BP values and preclinical organ damage. J Hypertens. 2018;36:e112. \n                    https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.hjh.0000539295.55926\n                    \n                  .","journal-title":"J Hypertens"}],"container-title":["High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40292-019-00329-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s40292-019-00329-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40292-019-00329-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,7]],"date-time":"2020-07-07T19:40:33Z","timestamp":1594150833000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s40292-019-00329-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,8]]}},"alternative-id":["329"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40292-019-00329-1","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.3410\/f.736601819.793578594","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["1120-9879","1179-1985"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1120-9879","type":"print"},{"value":"1179-1985","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,7,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 June 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 July 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 July 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"We received no funding for this work.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Funding"}},{"value":"CT declares consultancy fees from Astra Zeneca, Menarini and lecture honoraria from Sanofi, MSD, Menarini and Servier. The other authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this review and meta-analysis.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}}]}}