{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T14:58:52Z","timestamp":1791212332967,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":32,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770076800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1770076800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001537","name":"University of Auckland","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["3729014"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["3729014"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001537","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Behav Analysis Practice"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>For people with dementia, meaningful engagement with preferred activities is a vital component in maintaining quality of life. Preference assessments have been found to identify preferred and reinforcing stimuli for people with dementia. However, because they have been predominantly validated for individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities, there are likely aspects of the assessment that need to be adapted. We implemented standard stimulus preference assessments for four people with dementia, and designed some adaptations based on objective measures of their choice, affect, verbal responding, and the input of the participants. We then compared the standard and the adapted versions in a multielement design. We found that both the standard and adapted assessments resulted in similar selections of stimuli. We observed an increase in indices of happiness and a decrease in indices of unhappiness for three out of four participants during the adapted version compared to the standard version. Family, staff, and the people with dementia reported both the standard and adapted preference assessments to be socially valid. One participant reported better understanding what they were being asked to do in the adapted assessment, and a staff member reported the adapted assessment to be more effective. We also found a decrease in the frequency of statements that were off-topic, socially polite, or about items being \u201csold\u201d to them across all four participants in the adapted assessment. We further extended the work of Reid and Green (1996) by incorporating indices of confusion to capture a broader range of affect. On the basis of our results, we give some examples of how to make preference assessments more acceptable for people with dementia.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s40617-025-01145-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T14:58:57Z","timestamp":1770130737000},"page":"1361-1377","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Making Preference Assessments More Acceptable and Effective for People with Dementia"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"19","author":[{"given":"Lily","family":"Bigwood","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Elin","family":"Staples","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6732-6708","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rebecca A.","family":"Sharp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]]},"reference":[{"key":"1145_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1176\/appi.books.9780890425596","volume-title":"Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders","author":"American Psychiatric Association","year":"2013","unstructured":"American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed). American Psychiatric Publishing.","edition":"5th ed"},{"issue":"5","key":"1145_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"906","DOI":"10.1016\/S0005-7894(77)80160-3","volume":"8","author":"R Bittle","year":"1977","unstructured":"Bittle, R., & Hake, D. F. (1977). A multielement design model for component analysis and cross-setting assessment of a treatment package. Behavior Therapy, 8(5), 906\u2013914. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0005-7894(77)80160-3","journal-title":"Behavior Therapy"},{"issue":"4","key":"1145_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/bin.70031","volume":"40","author":"DJ Cox","year":"2025","unstructured":"Cox, D. J., Weil, L., Sosine, J., Jennings, A. M., & Santos, C. (2025). Getting more from your IOA data: Alternative measures to total, occurrence, and non-occurrence agreement. Behavioral Interventions, 40(4), Article e70031. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bin.70031","journal-title":"Behavioral Interventions"},{"issue":"4","key":"1145_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"519","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1996.29-519","volume":"29","author":"IG DeLeon","year":"1996","unstructured":"DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519\u2013533. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.1996.29-519","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"key":"1145_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"782","DOI":"10.1007\/s40617-021-00648-7","volume":"15","author":"MN Ford","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ford, M. N., Bayles, M. W., & Bruzek, J. L. (2022). Assessing preference and stability of preference for individuals with neurocognitive disorder. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 15, 782\u2013795. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40617-021-00648-7","journal-title":"Behavior Analysis in Practice"},{"issue":"1","key":"1145_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"78","DOI":"10.1037\/bar0000045","volume":"18","author":"S Garcia","year":"2018","unstructured":"Garcia, S., Feliciano, L., & Ilem, A. A. (2018). Preference assessments in older adults with dementia. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(1), 78. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/bar0000045","journal-title":"Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice"},{"issue":"1","key":"1145_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1996.29-67","volume":"29","author":"CW Green","year":"1996","unstructured":"Green, C. W., & Reid, D. H. (1996). Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(1), 67\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.1996.29-67","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"key":"1145_CR8","unstructured":"Haahr, M. (2025).\u00a0True random number service. Random.org. https:\/\/www.random.org\/"},{"issue":"7","key":"1145_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"873","DOI":"10.1177\/0269216311412227","volume":"26","author":"A Jordan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jordan, A., Regnard, C., O\u2019brien, J. T., & Hughes, J. C. (2012). Pain and distress in advanced dementia: Choosing the right tools for the job. Palliative Medicine, 26(7), 873\u2013878. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0269216311412227","journal-title":"Palliative Medicine"},{"issue":"2","key":"1145_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"430","DOI":"10.1002\/jaba.897","volume":"55","author":"NA Kanaman","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kanaman, N. A., Hubbs, A. L., Dozier, C. L., Jones, B. A., Foley, E., & Brandt, J. A. (2022). Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(2), 430\u2013450. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jaba.897","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"issue":"4","key":"1145_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"835","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.2011.44-835","volume":"44","author":"S Kang","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kang, S., O\u2019Reilly, M. F., Fragale, C. L., Aguilar, J. M., Rispoli, M., & Lang, R. (2011). Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 835\u2013846. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.2011.44-835","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"issue":"1","key":"1145_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"306","DOI":"10.1007\/s40617-023-00842-9","volume":"17","author":"FR Kronfli","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kronfli, F. R., Morris, S. L., & Vollmer, T. R. (2024). A continuum of methods for assessing preference for conversation topics. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17(1), 306\u2013315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40617-023-00842-9","journal-title":"Behavior Analysis in Practice"},{"key":"1145_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1007\/s10882-019-09668-2","volume":"32","author":"JB Leaf","year":"2020","unstructured":"Leaf, J. B., Milne, C., Aljohani, W. A., Ferguson, J. L., Cihon, J. H., Oppenheim-Leaf, M. L., & Leaf, R. (2020). Training change agents how to implement formal preference assessments: A review of the literature. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32, 41\u201356. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10882-019-09668-2","journal-title":"Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities"},{"issue":"3","key":"1145_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"542","DOI":"10.1002\/jaba.1092","volume":"57","author":"ES Leif","year":"2024","unstructured":"Leif, E. S., Kelenc-Gasior, N., Bloomfield, B. S., Furlonger, B., & Fox, R. A. (2024). A systematic review of social-validity assessments in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis: 2010\u20132020. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 57(3), 542\u2013559. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jaba.1092","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"issue":"4","key":"1145_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1144","DOI":"10.1007\/s40617-020-00539-3","volume":"14","author":"JD Lill","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lill, J. D., Shriver, M. D., & Allen, K. D. (2021). Stimulus preference assessment decision-making system (SPADS): A decision-making model for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4), 1144\u20131156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40617-020-00539-3","journal-title":"Behavior Analysis in Practice"},{"issue":"1","key":"1145_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1093\/geront\/37.1.40","volume":"37","author":"RG Logsdon","year":"1997","unstructured":"Logsdon, R. G., & Teri, L. (1997). The Pleasant Events Schedule-AD: Psychometric properties and relationship to depression and cognition in Alzheimer\u2019s disease patients. The Gerontologist, 37(1), 40\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/geront\/37.1.40","journal-title":"The Gerontologist"},{"key":"1145_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1780","DOI":"10.1002\/jaba.679","volume":"53","author":"ZR Lucock","year":"2020","unstructured":"Lucock, Z. R., Sharp, R. A., & Jones, R. S. (2020). Preference for leisure items over edible items in individuals with dementia: A replication. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53, 1780\u20131788. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jaba.679","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"key":"1145_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1080\/07317115.2011.539516","volume":"34","author":"GR Mesman","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mesman, G. R., Buchanan, J. A., Husfeldt, J. D., & Berg, T. M. (2011). Identifying preferences in persons with dementia: Systematic preference testing vs. caregiver and family member report. Clinical Gerontologist, 34, 154\u2013159. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07317115.2011.539516","journal-title":"Clinical Gerontologist"},{"key":"1145_CR19","unstructured":"Ministry of Social Development. (n.d.).\u00a0Supported decision making. New Zealand Ministry of Social Development. Retrieved July 11, 2025, from https:\/\/www.msd.govt.nz\/about-msd-and-our-work\/work-programmes\/accessibility\/supported-decision-making.html"},{"key":"1145_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1007\/s40616-014-0018-7","volume":"30","author":"CR Oleson","year":"2014","unstructured":"Oleson, C. R., & Baker, J. C. (2014). Teaching mands to older adults with dementia. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 113\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40616-014-0018-7","journal-title":"The Analysis of Verbal Behavior"},{"issue":"3","key":"1145_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1985.18-249","volume":"18","author":"GM Pace","year":"1985","unstructured":"Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(3), 249\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.1985.18-249","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"key":"1145_CR22","unstructured":"Pei\u0107, D. & Hern\u00e1ndez, V. (2020). Countee\u2014Data collection system for behavioral data (2.2.1) [Mobile Phone Application]. https:\/\/itunes.apple.com"},{"issue":"1","key":"1145_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1037\/bar0000070","volume":"18","author":"MJ Quick","year":"2018","unstructured":"Quick, M. J., Baker, J. C., & Ringdahl, J. E. (2018). Assessing the validity of engagement-based and selection-based preference assessments in elderly individuals with neurocognitive disorder. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(1), 92\u2013102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/bar0000070","journal-title":"Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice"},{"issue":"4","key":"1145_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"765","DOI":"10.1002\/jaba.88","volume":"46","author":"PB Raetz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Raetz, P. B., LeBlanc, L. A., Baker, J. C., & Hilton, L. C. (2013). Utility of the multiple-stimulus without replacement procedure and stability of preferences of older adults with dementia. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(4), 765\u2013780. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jaba.88","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"issue":"4","key":"1145_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2788.2006.00875.x","volume":"51","author":"C Regnard","year":"2007","unstructured":"Regnard, C., Reynolds, J., Watson, B., Matthews, D., Gibson, L., & Clarke, C. (2007). Understanding distress in people with severe communication difficulties: Developing and assessing the Disability Distress Assessment Tool (DisDAT). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 51(4), 277\u2013292. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1365-2788.2006.00875.x","journal-title":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research"},{"issue":"2","key":"1145_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1991.24-189","volume":"24","author":"IS Schwartz","year":"1991","unstructured":"Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 189\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.1991.24-189","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"issue":"1","key":"1145_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"124","DOI":"10.1093\/geront\/31.1.124","volume":"31","author":"L Teri","year":"1991","unstructured":"Teri, L., & Logsdon, R. G. (1991). Identifying pleasant activities for Alzheimer\u2019s disease patients: The pleasant events schedule\u2013AD. The Gerontologist, 31(1), 124\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/geront\/31.1.124","journal-title":"The Gerontologist"},{"issue":"4","key":"1145_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.2006.56-05","volume":"39","author":"JL Tessing","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tessing, J. L., Napolitano, D. A., McAdam, D. B., DiCesare, A., & Axelrod, S. (2006). The effects of providing access to stimuli following choice making during vocal preference assessments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(4), 501\u2013506. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.2006.56-05","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"issue":"9","key":"1145_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/healthcare12090896","volume":"12","author":"C Uceda-Portillo","year":"2024","unstructured":"Uceda-Portillo, C., Aranda-Valero, S., & Moruno-Miralles, P. (2024). Occupational therapy interventions to improve the quality of life of older adults with dementia living in nursing homes: A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel), 12(9), Article 896. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/healthcare12090896","journal-title":"Healthcare (Basel)"},{"issue":"2","key":"1145_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1002\/jaba.302","volume":"49","author":"AL Verriden","year":"2016","unstructured":"Verriden, A. L., & Roscoe, E. M. (2016). A comparison of preference-assessment methods. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 49(2), 265\u2013285. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jaba.302","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"},{"issue":"3","key":"1145_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1080\/07317115.2019.1670313","volume":"43","author":"S Wagner","year":"2020","unstructured":"Wagner, S., Buchanan, J. A., Bailey, J., Andresen, F. J., & Omlie, C. (2020). The use of stimulus preference assessments for persons with neurocognitive disorder: A literature review. Clinical Gerontologist, 43(3), 243\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07317115.2019.1670313","journal-title":"Clinical Gerontologist"},{"issue":"2","key":"1145_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1901\/jaba.1978.11-203","volume":"11","author":"MM Wolf","year":"1978","unstructured":"Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart 1. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1901\/jaba.1978.11-203","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis"}],"container-title":["Behavior Analysis in Practice"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40617-025-01145-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s40617-025-01145-x","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40617-025-01145-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,5]],"date-time":"2026-10-05T14:49:55Z","timestamp":1791211795000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s40617-025-01145-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]]},"references-count":32,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["1145"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40617-025-01145-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1998-1929","2196-8934"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1998-1929","type":"print"},{"value":"2196-8934","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"18 March 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"2 December 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 February 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Data Availability","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was reviewed and approved by the Health and Disability Research Ethics Committee (reference HREC19653) and performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"We obtained informed consent from each participant in the study.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","label":"Informed Consent","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"We obtained assent from the participant prior to each session.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","label":"Assent","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This study was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (12624000226505)","order":5,"name":"Ethics","label":"Clinical Trial Registry","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","label":"Conflict of interest","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}]}}