{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,9]],"date-time":"2026-10-09T00:40:04Z","timestamp":1791506404130,"version":"4.3.4"},"reference-count":30,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,13]],"date-time":"2020-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1605225600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,13]],"date-time":"2020-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1605225600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,13]],"date-time":"2020-11-13T15:02:38Z","timestamp":1605279758000},"page":"1092-1100","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Following Trial of Labor After Two Previous Cesareans: a Retrospective Cohort Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4063-5911","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Reut","family":"Rotem","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ayala","family":"Hirsch","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hen Y.","family":"Sela","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Arnon","family":"Samueloff","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Sorina","family":"Grisaru-Granovsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Misgav","family":"Rottenstreich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,13]]},"reference":[{"issue":"10155","key":"378_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1341","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31928-7","volume":"392","author":"T Boerma","year":"2018","unstructured":"Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"issue":"4","key":"378_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.058","volume":"203","author":"J Zhang","year":"2010","unstructured":"Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):326.e1\u2013326.e10. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2010.06.058.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"378_CR3","first-page":"1226","volume":"107","author":"RM Silver","year":"2006","unstructured":"Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Repeat Cesarean Deliveries. 2006;107(6):1226\u201332.","journal-title":"Repeat Cesarean Deliveries"},{"issue":"10155","key":"378_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1349","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31930-5","volume":"392","author":"J Sandall","year":"2018","unstructured":"Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GHA, Homer CSE, et al. Optimising caesarean section use 2 short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349\u201357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)31930-5.","journal-title":"Lancet."},{"issue":"3","key":"378_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.23750\/abm.v90i3.7623","volume":"90","author":"G Trojano","year":"2019","unstructured":"Trojano G, Damiani GR, Olivieri C, et al. VBAC: antenatal predictors of success. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(3):300\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.23750\/abm.v90i3.7623.","journal-title":"Acta Biomed"},{"issue":"1","key":"378_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/0020-7292(95)90280-5","volume":"48","author":"R No","year":"1995","unstructured":"No R, Practice O. Vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean birth. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1995;48(1):127\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0020-7292(95)90280-5.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"6","key":"378_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13149.x","volume":"101","author":"SK Chattopadhyay","year":"1994","unstructured":"Chattopadhyay SK, Sherbeeni MM, Anokute CC. Planned vaginal delivery after two previous caesarean sections. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(6):498\u2013500. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13149.x.","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"378_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1994.22.1.13","volume":"22","author":"S Granovsky-Grisaru","year":"1994","unstructured":"Granovsky-Grisaru S, Shaya M, Diamant YZ. The management of labor in women with more than one uterine scar: is a repeat cesarean section really the only \u201csafe\u201d option? J Perinat Med. 1994;22(1):13\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/jpme.1994.22.1.13.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"378_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0","volume":"181","author":"AB Caughey","year":"1999","unstructured":"Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop CM, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(4):872\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70317-0.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"378_CR10","first-page":"255","volume":"84","author":"DA Miller","year":"1994","unstructured":"Miller DA, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(2):255\u20138.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"378_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","volume":"133","author":"V Birth","year":"2019","unstructured":"Birth V, Cesarean A. ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"378_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20164467","volume":"4","author":"H Patel","year":"2016","unstructured":"Patel H, Patel P, Shah DK. Relaparotomy in general surgery department of tertiary care hospital of Western India. Int Surg J. 2016;4(1):344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18203\/2349-2902.isj20164467.","journal-title":"Int Surg J"},{"issue":"5","key":"378_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e106","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.14178","volume":"124","author":"Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage","year":"2017","unstructured":"Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage. Green-top Guideline No. 52. BJOG. 2017;124(5):e106\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.14178.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"378_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Visser GHA, Ayres-de-Campos D, Barnea ER, de Bernis L, di Renzo GC, Vidarte MFE, et al. FIGO position paper: how to stop the caesarean section epidemic. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1286\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32113-5.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(18)32113-5"},{"key":"378_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"HOLMGREN CM. Uterine rupture associated with VBAC. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;55(4):978\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31826fd9b0.","DOI":"10.1097\/GRF.0b013e31826fd9b0"},{"issue":"1","key":"378_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3","volume":"108","author":"MB Landon","year":"2006","unstructured":"Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E, Hauth JC, Bloom SL, Varner MW, et al. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):12\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"378_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.082","volume":"192","author":"GA Macones","year":"2005","unstructured":"Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E, Stamilio DM, Ratcliffe S, Stevens E, et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(4):1223\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.12.082.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"378_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"924","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00078-6","volume":"85","author":"H Asakura","year":"1995","unstructured":"Asakura H, Myers SA. More than one previous cesarean delivery: a 5-year experience with 435 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(6):924\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00078-6.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"378_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x","volume":"117","author":"S Tahseen","year":"2010","unstructured":"Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2) - a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;117(1):5\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x.","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol."},{"issue":"3 Pt 2","key":"378_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","volume":"193","author":"MB Landon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. The MFMU Cesarean registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1016\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"378_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1226","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84","volume":"107","author":"RM Silver","year":"2006","unstructured":"Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226\u201332.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"378_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"85","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12010","volume":"120","author":"JR Cook","year":"2013","unstructured":"Cook JR, Jarvis S, Knight M, Dhanjal MK. Multiple repeat caesarean section in the UK: incidence and consequences to mother and child. A national, prospective, cohort study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(1):85\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12010.","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol."},{"issue":"25","key":"378_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMoa040405.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"378_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop C, Cohen A, Lieherman E. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery: the effect of previous vaginal delivery. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 179: Mosby Inc.; 1998. p. 938\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70192-9.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70192-9"},{"issue":"2, Part 1","key":"378_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"285","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9","volume":"111","author":"BM Mercer","year":"2008","unstructured":"Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2, Part 1):285\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31816102b9.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"378_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1312","DOI":"10.1016\/j.mayocp.2013.07.009","volume":"88","author":"JR Jensen","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jensen JR, White WM, Coddington CC. Maternal and neonatal complications of elective early-term deliveries. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(11):1312\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.mayocp.2013.07.009.","journal-title":"Mayo Clin Proc"},{"key":"378_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming WK, Ellervik C. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12884-019-2517-y.","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2517-y"},{"issue":"2 PART 1","key":"378_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c915da","volume":"115","author":"N Jastrow","year":"2010","unstructured":"Jastrow N, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, et al. Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(2 PART 1):338\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181c915da.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"378_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"824","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.186","volume":"188","author":"MA Elkousy","year":"2003","unstructured":"Elkousy MA, Sammel M, Stevens E, Peipert JF, Macones G. The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(3):824\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/mob.2003.186.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"76","key":"378_CR30","first-page":"168","volume":"133","author":"ACOG","year":"2019","unstructured":"ACOG. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician \u2013 gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(76):168\u201386.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,3,5]],"date-time":"2021-03-05T17:30:54Z","timestamp":1614965454000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,13]]},"references-count":30,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,4]]}},"alternative-id":["378"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1933-7191","1933-7205"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1933-7191","type":"print"},{"value":"1933-7205","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 September 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 October 2020","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 November 2020","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the local institutional ethics committee in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (IRB: 001-20-SZMC).","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interests"}}]}}