{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,17]],"date-time":"2026-07-17T17:41:45Z","timestamp":1784310105106,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,11]],"date-time":"2021-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1610323200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,11]],"date-time":"2021-01-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1610323200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-021-00458-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,12]],"date-time":"2021-01-12T02:17:06Z","timestamp":1610417826000},"page":"2208-2215","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Transfer of Day 6 Frozen-Thawed Blastocysts on Day 5 Compared with Day 6: Catching Up with the Window of Implantation\u2014a Retrospective Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5440-7530","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Asaf","family":"Bilgory","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Yael","family":"Kalma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Rotem","family":"Kopel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Foad","family":"Azem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"458_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dem339","volume":"23","author":"EG Papanikolaou","year":"2008","unstructured":"Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, et al. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:91\u20139.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"458_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2011.11.013","volume":"24","author":"J Stanger","year":"2012","unstructured":"Stanger J, Wong J, Conceicao J, Yovich J. Vitrification of human embryos previously cryostored by either slow freezing or vitrification results in high pregnancy rates. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012;24:314\u201320.","journal-title":"Reprod BioMed Online"},{"key":"458_CR3","first-page":"139","volume":"23","author":"L Rienzi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:139\u201355.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"458_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1126","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)01771-X","volume":"75","author":"BS Shapiro","year":"2001","unstructured":"Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:1126\u201330.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049","volume":"83","author":"G Barrenetxea","year":"2005","unstructured":"Barrenetxea G, L\u00f3pez de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jim\u00e9nez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:49\u201353.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dex059","volume":"32","author":"V Poulsen","year":"2017","unstructured":"Poulsen V, Ingerslev HJ, Kirkegaard K. Elective embryo transfers on day 6 reduce implantation compared with transfers on day 5. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:1238\u201343.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"458_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1111","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-012-9837-4","volume":"29","author":"E Elgindy","year":"2012","unstructured":"Elgindy E, Elsedeek MS-E-A. Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;29:1111\u20135.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"458_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2006.01.029","volume":"86","author":"J Liebermann","year":"2006","unstructured":"Liebermann J, Tucker MJ. Comparison of vitrification and conventional cryopreservation of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts during clinical application. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:20\u20136.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1370","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1095","volume":"106","author":"N Desai","year":"2016","unstructured":"Desai N, Ploskonka S, Goodman L, Attaran M, Goldberg JM, Austin C, et al. Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1370\u20138.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1553","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-016-0818-x","volume":"33","author":"J Haas","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haas J, Meriano J, Laskin C, Bentov Y, Barzilay E, Casper RF, et al. Clinical pregnancy rate following frozen embryo transfer is higher with blastocysts vitrified on day 5 than on day 6. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1553\u20137.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"458_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-1097-x","volume":"35","author":"A Tubbing","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tubbing A, Shaw-Jackson C, Ameye L, Colin J, Rozenberg S, Autin C. Increased live births after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:417\u201324.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"458_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"697","DOI":"10.1016\/S0015-0282(01)03267-8","volume":"77","author":"B Behr","year":"2002","unstructured":"Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki AA. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:697\u20139.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2138","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2007.10.029","volume":"90","author":"ED Levens","year":"2008","unstructured":"Levens ED, Whitcomb BW, Hennessy S, James AN, Yauger BJ, Larsen FW. Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2138\u201343.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"684","DOI":"10.1017\/S0967199415000696","volume":"24","author":"X Wang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wang X, Zhen J, Sun Z, Yu Q, Deng C, Zhou Y, et al. Effects of fifth day (D5) or sixth day (D6) frozen-thawed blastocysts on neonatal outcomes. Zygote. 2016;24:684\u201391.","journal-title":"Zygote."},{"key":"458_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"913","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-017-0940-4","volume":"34","author":"L Kaye","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kaye L, Will EA, Bartolucci A, Nulsen J, Benadiva C, Engmann L. Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:913\u20139.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"458_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2015.04.018","volume":"104","author":"R Boostanfar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Boostanfar R, Shapiro B, Levy M, Rosenwaks Z, Witjes H, Stegmann BJ, et al. Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:94\u2013103.e1.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1985","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2011.02.009","volume":"95","author":"C Racowsky","year":"2011","unstructured":"Racowsky C, Stern JE, Gibbons WE, Behr B, Pomeroy KO, Biggers JD. National collection of embryo morphology data into Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System: associations among day 3 cell number, fragmentation and blastomere asymmetry, and live birth rate. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1985\u20139.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379.e371","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2018.11.1103","volume":"220","author":"M Irani","year":"2019","unstructured":"Irani M, Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z, Xu K. Does maternal age at retrieval influence the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:379.e371\u20137.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"458_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.06.014","volume":"98","author":"L Kroener","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kroener L, Ambartsumyan G, Briton-Jones C, Dumesic D, Surrey M, Munn\u00e9 S, et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:876\u201380.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1173","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deu033","volume":"29","author":"A Capalbo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1173\u201381.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"key":"458_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2014.06.001","volume":"29","author":"TH Taylor","year":"2014","unstructured":"Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Wilson JM, Crain JL, Griffin DK. Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:305\u201310.","journal-title":"Reprod BioMed Online"},{"key":"458_CR22","unstructured":"Gasser RF. Atlas of human embryos. 1st ed: Medical Dept; 1975."},{"key":"458_CR23","unstructured":"O\u2019Rahilly RR, M\u00fcller F. Human Embryology and Teratology. 3rd ed: Wiley; 2001."},{"key":"458_CR24","volume-title":"Medical physiology: a cellular and molecular approach","author":"WF Boron","year":"2005","unstructured":"Boron WF, Boulpaep EL. Medical physiology: a cellular and molecular approach. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005.","edition":"1"},{"key":"458_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/S0950-3552(05)80092-6","volume":"6","author":"MJ Harper","year":"1992","unstructured":"Harper MJ. The implantation window. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;6:351\u201371.","journal-title":"Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"458_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1796","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199906103402304","volume":"340","author":"AJ Wilcox","year":"1999","unstructured":"Wilcox AJ, Baird DD, Weinberg CR. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1796\u20139.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"458_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1093\/humupd\/dml046","volume":"13","author":"JA Horcajadas","year":"2007","unstructured":"Horcajadas JA, Pellicer A, Sim\u00f3n C. Wide genomic analysis of human endometrial receptivity: new times, new opportunities. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13:77\u201386.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Update"},{"key":"458_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2010.04.063","volume":"95","author":"P D\u00edaz-Gimeno","year":"2011","unstructured":"D\u00edaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Mart\u00ednez-Conejero JA, Esteban FJ, Alam\u00e1 P, Pellicer A, et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:50\u201360 60.e1.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"818","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2013.05.004","volume":"100","author":"M Ruiz-Alonso","year":"2013","unstructured":"Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, D\u00edaz-Gimeno P, G\u00f3mez E, Fern\u00e1ndez-S\u00e1nchez M, Carranza F, et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:818\u201324.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"508","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.09.046","volume":"99","author":"P D\u00edaz-Gimeno","year":"2013","unstructured":"D\u00edaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Bosch N, Mart\u00ednez-Conejero JA, Alam\u00e1 P, et al. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:508\u201317.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"458_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1901","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-019-01535-5","volume":"36","author":"AR Neves","year":"2019","unstructured":"Neves AR, Devesa M, Mart\u00ednez F, Garcia-Martinez S, Rodriguez I, Polyzos NP, et al. What is the clinical impact of the endometrial receptivity array in PGT-A and oocyte donation cycles? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:1901\u20138.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"458_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1301","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-018-1190-9","volume":"35","author":"R Bassil","year":"2018","unstructured":"Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, Hsieh T-B, Barzilay E, Orvieto R, et al. Does the endometrial receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:1301\u20135.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"},{"key":"458_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoy022","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoy022","volume":"2018","author":"JM Franasiak","year":"2018","unstructured":"Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Patounakis G, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, et al. Investigating the impact of the timing of blastulation on implantation: management of embryo-endometrial synchrony improves outcomes. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018:hoy022.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"key":"458_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2803","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dew263","volume":"31","author":"M Montagut","year":"2016","unstructured":"Montagut M, Santos-Ribeiro S, De Vos M, Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Mackens S, et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: the search for the best protocol continues. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2803\u201310.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00458-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00458-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00458-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,19]],"date-time":"2021-07-19T15:18:26Z","timestamp":1626707906000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00458-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,11]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["458"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00458-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["1933-7191","1933-7205"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1933-7191","type":"print"},{"value":"1933-7205","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"10 September 2020","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 January 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 January 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Compliance with Ethical Standards"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}},{"value":"Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Patients or the public were not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination of our research.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics Approval"}}]}}