{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T14:11:49Z","timestamp":1740147109591,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":43,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,21]],"date-time":"2021-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1626825600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,21]],"date-time":"2021-07-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1626825600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-021-00697-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,21]],"date-time":"2021-07-21T13:05:25Z","timestamp":1626872725000},"page":"557-563","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Trial of Labor After Cesarean of Small for Gestational Age Neonates Among Women with No Prior Vaginal Delivery \u2014 a Retrospective Study"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"given":"Raanan","family":"Meyer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Yoav","family":"Yinon","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alon","family":"Ben-David","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joshua I.","family":"Rosenbloom","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Simcha","family":"Yagel","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1282-5379","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriel","family":"Levin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,21]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"697_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","volume":"133","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No","year":"2019","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e110\u201327.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"697_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"262.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2011.06.035","volume":"205","author":"NE Marshall","year":"2011","unstructured":"Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):262.e1-8.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"697_CR3","first-page":"1","volume":"27","author":"FG Cunningham","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cunningham FG, et al. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Stat. 2010;27(3):1\u201342.","journal-title":"NIH Consens State Sci Stat"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"917","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000257121.56126.fe","volume":"109","author":"JM Alexander","year":"2007","unstructured":"Alexander JM, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):917\u201321.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"697_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1256","DOI":"10.1111\/aogs.12240","volume":"92","author":"A Studsgaard","year":"2013","unstructured":"Studsgaard A, et al. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(11):1256\u201363.","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"25","key":"697_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2581","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa040405","volume":"351","author":"MB Landon","year":"2004","unstructured":"Landon MB, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581\u20139.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"697_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"689","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199609053351001","volume":"335","author":"MJ McMahon","year":"1996","unstructured":"McMahon MJ, et al. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(10):689\u201395.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"697_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e97","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003070","volume":"133","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No","year":"2019","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e97\u2013109.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"697_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.15884","volume":"48","author":"SJ Gordijn","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gordijn SJ, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):333\u20139.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"16","key":"697_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1234","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199904223401603","volume":"340","author":"DD McIntire","year":"1999","unstructured":"McIntire DD, et al. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(16):1234\u20138.","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"697_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2008.00941.x","volume":"49","author":"AW Shand","year":"2009","unstructured":"Shand AW, et al. Small for gestational age preterm infants and relationship of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler blood flow to perinatal mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(1):52\u20138.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"697_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1016\/S0306-3356(21)00521-5","volume":"11","author":"RA Jones","year":"1984","unstructured":"Jones RA, Roberton NR. Problems of the small-for-dates baby. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;11(2):499\u2013524.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"18","key":"697_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3051","DOI":"10.3109\/14767058.2015.1114084","volume":"29","author":"AL Turitz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Turitz AL, Friedman AM, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Trial of labor after cesarean versus repeat cesarean in women with small-for-gestational age neonates: a secondary analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(18):3051\u20135.","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"697_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"forMaternal-FetalMedicin, A.C.o.O.a.G.C.o.P.B.O.a.t.S. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e97-e109","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003070"},{"issue":"5","key":"697_CR15","first-page":"311","volume":"7","author":"S Dollberg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dollberg S, et al. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7(5):311\u20134.","journal-title":"Isr Med Assoc J"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"806","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000259312.36053.02","volume":"109","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Grobman WA, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806\u201312.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"697_CR17","first-page":"e1","volume":"133","author":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No","year":"2019","unstructured":"ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 202: Gestational Hypertension and Preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e1\u201325.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"Suppl 1","key":"697_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S11","DOI":"10.2337\/dc11-S011","volume":"34","author":"AD Association","year":"2011","unstructured":"Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes\u20142011. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(Suppl 1):S11-61.","journal-title":"Diabetes Care"},{"issue":"7","key":"697_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"768","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(82)90349-0","volume":"144","author":"MW Carpenter","year":"1982","unstructured":"Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144(7):768\u201373.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"948","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000000744","volume":"125","author":"TD Metz","year":"2015","unstructured":"Metz TD, et al. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):948\u201352.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2012.01.022","volume":"206","author":"E Berkley","year":"2012","unstructured":"Berkley E, et al. Doppler assessment of the fetus with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):300\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"697_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.20850","volume":"55","author":"C Nwabuobi","year":"2020","unstructured":"Nwabuobi C, et al. Risk factors for Cesarean delivery in pregnancy with small-for-gestational-age fetus undergoing induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(6):799\u2013805.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"460","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.14758","volume":"46","author":"T Prior","year":"2015","unstructured":"Prior T, et al. Are fetuses that fail to achieve their growth potential at increased risk of intrapartum compromise? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(4):460\u20134.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"697_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"134.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2017.10.022","volume":"218","author":"E Kalafat","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kalafat E, et al. Risk of operative delivery for intrapartum fetal compromise in small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term: an internally validated prediction model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):134.e1-134.e8.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"697_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0685-5","volume":"279","author":"S Maslovitz","year":"2009","unstructured":"Maslovitz S, et al. Outcome of induced deliveries in growth-restricted fetuses: second thoughts about the vaginal option. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279(2):139\u201343.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"10","key":"697_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0029-1239494","volume":"26","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2009","unstructured":"Grobman WA, et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(10):693\u2013701.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1271214","volume":"28","author":"MM Costantine","year":"2011","unstructured":"Costantine MM, et al. Does information available at delivery improve the accuracy of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean? Validation of the published models in an independent patient cohort. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(4):293\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"697_CR28","unstructured":"Meyer R, et al. Implementation of machine learning models for the prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;1\u20137"},{"issue":"4 Pt 1","key":"697_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"976","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90452-W","volume":"165","author":"JM Piper","year":"1991","unstructured":"Piper JM, Bolling DR, Newton ER. The second stage of labor: factors influencing duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):976\u20139.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"697_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2015.11.021","volume":"134","author":"A Abdel Aziz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Abdel Aziz A, et al. Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134(1):75\u20138.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"697_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-017-1392-7","volume":"17","author":"S Parisi","year":"2017","unstructured":"Parisi S, et al. Evidence of lower oxygen reserves during labour in the growth restricted human foetus: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):209.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1019","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000002855","volume":"132","author":"SP Chauhan","year":"2018","unstructured":"Chauhan SP, et al. Intrapartum fetal heart rate tracing among small-for-gestational age compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(4):1019\u201325.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"697_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6140982","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/6140982","volume":"2018","author":"A Thapsamuthdechakorn","year":"2018","unstructured":"Thapsamuthdechakorn A, Sekararithi R, Tongsong T. Factors associated with successful trial of labor after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study. J Pregnancy. 2018;2018:6140982.","journal-title":"J Pregnancy"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"499","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2014.12.014","volume":"55","author":"S Lurie","year":"2016","unstructured":"Lurie S, et al. The changing indications and rates of cesarean section in one academic center over a 16-year period (1997\u20132012). Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;55(4):499\u2013502.","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"697_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3476(67)80066-0","volume":"71","author":"FC Battaglia","year":"1967","unstructured":"Battaglia FC, Lubchenco LO. A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. J Pediatr. 1967;71(2):159\u201363.","journal-title":"J Pediatr"},{"issue":"3","key":"697_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1515\/jpm-2016-0382","volume":"46","author":"S Grisaru-Granovsky","year":"2018","unstructured":"Grisaru-Granovsky S, et al. Epidural analgesia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC): a significant adjunct to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). J Perinat Med. 2018;46(3):261\u20139.","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"697_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"498","DOI":"10.1186\/s12884-019-2648-1","volume":"19","author":"J Sun","year":"2019","unstructured":"Sun J, et al. Effect of epidural analgesia in trial of labor after cesarean on maternal and neonatal outcomes in China: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):498.","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"6","key":"697_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1524","DOI":"10.1097\/00000539-200106000-00034","volume":"92","author":"JM Alexander","year":"2001","unstructured":"Alexander JM, et al. Intensity of labor pain and cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(6):1524\u20138.","journal-title":"Anesth Analg"},{"issue":"4","key":"697_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-200304000-00024","volume":"98","author":"MK Panni","year":"2003","unstructured":"Panni MK, Segal S. Local anesthetic requirements are greater in dystocia than in normal labor. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(4):957\u201363.","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"3","key":"697_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"288","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12966","volume":"122","author":"EN Grant","year":"2015","unstructured":"Grant EN, et al. Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future. BJOG. 2015;122(3):288\u201393.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"697_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(83)90076-5","volume":"147","author":"SM Shnider","year":"1983","unstructured":"Shnider SM, et al. Maternal catecholamines decrease during labor after lumbar epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147(1):13\u20135.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"697_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"495","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(78)90742-1","volume":"132","author":"RP Lederman","year":"1978","unstructured":"Lederman RP, et al. The relationship of maternal anxiety, plasma catecholamines, and plasma cortisol to progress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(5):495\u2013500.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"697_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1267","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181df925f","volume":"115","author":"JM Guise","year":"2010","unstructured":"Guise JM, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1267\u201378.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00697-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00697-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00697-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,10,28]],"date-time":"2022-10-28T17:05:12Z","timestamp":1666976712000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00697-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,21]]},"references-count":43,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,2]]}},"alternative-id":["697"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-021-00697-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["1933-7191","1933-7205"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1933-7191"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1933-7205"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,21]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 March 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 July 2021","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"21 July 2021","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study protocol was approved by the Sheba Medical Center and the Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center review boards (7145\u201320-SMC, 30\/09\/2020 and HMO-0240\u201319).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethics approval and consent to participate"}},{"value":"All authors consented for publication of this manuscript.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}