{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,29]],"date-time":"2026-09-29T17:18:09Z","timestamp":1790702289041,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]],"date-time":"2022-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641945600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]],"date-time":"2022-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1641945600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-022-00849-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]],"date-time":"2022-01-12T15:04:47Z","timestamp":1641999887000},"page":"761-767","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Office Operative Hysteroscopy for the Management of Retained Products of Conception"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"29","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9818-3041","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aya","family":"Mohr-Sasson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tomer","family":"Gur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raanan","family":"Meyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roy","family":"Mashiach","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David","family":"Stockheim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"849_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2017.08.009","volume":"25","author":"CA Salazar","year":"2018","unstructured":"Salazar CA, Isaacson KB. Office operative hysteroscopy: an update. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):199\u2013208.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"849_CR2","first-page":"126","volume":"68","author":"G Centini","year":"2016","unstructured":"Centini G, Troia L, Lazzeri L, Petraglia F, Luisi S. Modern operative hysteroscopy. Minerva Ginecol. 2016;68(2):126\u201332.","journal-title":"Minerva Ginecol"},{"key":"849_CR3","unstructured":"ACOG Technology Assessment No. 13: hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(5):e151-e6."},{"key":"849_CR4","first-page":"177","volume":"28","author":"M Wortman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wortman M. \u201cSee-and-treat\u201d hysteroscopy in the management of endometrial polyps. Surg Technol Int. 2016;28:177\u201384.","journal-title":"Surg Technol Int"},{"issue":"2","key":"849_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"270","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199235020-00009","volume":"35","author":"RJ Gimpelson","year":"1992","unstructured":"Gimpelson RJ. Office hysteroscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992;35(2):270\u201381.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"849_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jogoh.2018.12.005","volume":"48","author":"P Capmas","year":"2019","unstructured":"Capmas P, Lobersztajn A, Duminil L, Barral T, Pourcelot AG, Fernandez H. Operative hysteroscopy for retained products of conception: efficacy and subsequent fertility. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(3):151\u20134.","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"4","key":"849_CR7","first-page":"507","volume":"81","author":"R Achiron","year":"1993","unstructured":"Achiron R, Goldenberg M, Lipitz S, Mashiach S. Transvaginal duplex Doppler ultrasonography in bleeding patients suspected of having residual trophoblastic tissue. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(4):507\u201311.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.11010054.x","volume":"11","author":"JL Alc\u00e1zar","year":"1998","unstructured":"Alc\u00e1zar JL. Transvaginal ultrasonography combined with color velocity imaging and pulsed Doppler to detect residual trophoblastic tissue. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11(1):54\u20138.","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"143","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.08.024","volume":"171","author":"D Vitner","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vitner D, Filmer S, Goldstein I, Khatib N, Weiner Z. A comparison between ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine pathology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171(1):143\u20135.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"11","key":"849_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1575","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2011.01577.x","volume":"37","author":"S Dasgupta","year":"2011","unstructured":"Dasgupta S, Sharma PP, Mukherjee A, Ghosh TK. Ultrasound assessment of endometrial cavity in perimenopausal women on oral progesterone for abnormal uterine bleeding: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of imaging with hysteroscopy-guided biopsy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37(11):1575\u201381.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"849_CR11","first-page":"764","volume":"7","author":"A Babacan","year":"2014","unstructured":"Babacan A, Gun I, Kizilaslan C, Ozden O, Muhcu M, Mungen E, et al. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of uterine pathologies. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(3):764\u20139.","journal-title":"Int J Clin Exp Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00336.x","volume":"45","author":"I Cepni","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cepni I, Ocal P, Erkan S, Saricali FS, Akbas H, Demirkiran F, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography and hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine cavity pathologies. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;45(1):30\u20135.","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"66","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmig.2009.11.002","volume":"17","author":"I Levin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Levin I, Almog B, Ata B, Ratan G, Many A. Clinical and sonographic findings in suspected retained trophoblast after pregnancy do not predict the disorder. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(1):66\u20139.","journal-title":"J Minim Invasive Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"849_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60577-4","volume":"8","author":"SB Cohen","year":"2001","unstructured":"Cohen SB, Kalter-Ferber A, Weisz BS, Zalel Y, Seidman DS, Mashiach S, et al. Hysteroscopy may be the method of choice for management of residual trophoblastic tissue. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001;8(2):199\u2013202.","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"key":"849_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2013.11.020","volume":"173","author":"N Smorgick","year":"2014","unstructured":"Smorgick N, Barel O, Fuchs N, Ben-Ami I, Pansky M, Vaknin Z. Hysteroscopic management of retained products of conception: meta-analysis and literature review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;173:19\u201322.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR16","first-page":"26","volume":"42","author":"M Goldenberg","year":"1997","unstructured":"Goldenberg M, Schiff E, Achiron R, Lipitz S, Mashiach S. Managing residual trophoblastic tissue. Hysteroscopy for directing curettage. J Reprod Med. 1997;42(1):26\u20138.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"849_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"500","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60083-7","volume":"11","author":"G Garuti","year":"2004","unstructured":"Garuti G, Cellani F, Colonnelli M, Grossi F, Luerti M. Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in 237 patients: feasibility of a one-stop \u201csee-and-treat\u201d procedure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(4):500\u20134.","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"issue":"2","key":"849_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2007.11.008","volume":"139","author":"P Litta","year":"2008","unstructured":"Litta P, Cosmi E, Saccardi C, Esposito C, Rui R, Ambrosini G. Outpatient operative polypectomy using a 5 mm-hysteroscope without anaesthesia and\/or analgesia: advantages and limits. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):210\u20134.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"849_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2009.11.024","volume":"20","author":"C Gulumser","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gulumser C, Narvekar N, Pathak M, Palmer E, Parker S, Saridogan E. See-and-treat outpatient hysteroscopy: an analysis of 1109 examinations. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(3):423\u20139.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"849_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00064.x","volume":"111","author":"F Marsh","year":"2004","unstructured":"Marsh F, Kremer C, Duffy S. Delivering an effective outpatient service in gynaecology. A randomised controlled trial analysing the cost of outpatient versus daycase hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2004;111(3):243\u20138.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1016\/S1074-3804(05)60012-6","volume":"11","author":"S Bettocchi","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bettocchi S, Ceci O, Nappi L, Di Venere R, Masciopinto V, Pansini V, et al. Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(1):59\u201361.","journal-title":"J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc"},{"issue":"10","key":"849_CR22","first-page":"749","volume":"29","author":"JG Tchabo","year":"1984","unstructured":"Tchabo JG. Use of contact hysteroscopy in evaluating postpartum bleeding and incomplete abortion. J Reprod Med. 1984;29(10):749\u201351.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"849_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-013-2932-7","volume":"288","author":"F Romani","year":"2013","unstructured":"Romani F, Guido M, Morciano A, Martinez D, Gaglione R, Lanzone A, et al. The use of different size-hysteroscope in office hysteroscopy: our experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(6):1355\u20139.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR24","first-page":"45","volume":"50","author":"S Rullo","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rullo S, Sorrenti G, Marziali M, Ermini B, Sesti F, Piccione E. Office hysteroscopy: comparison of 2.7- and 4-mm hysteroscopes for acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(1):45\u20138.","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"849_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"37","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-015-3836-5","volume":"293","author":"AAS Paulo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Paulo AAS, Solheiro MHR, Paulo COS, Afreixo VMA. What proportion of women refers moderate to severe pain during office hysteroscopy with a mini-hysteroscope? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;293(1):37\u201346.","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-022-00849-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s43032-022-00849-7\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-022-00849-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,2,22]],"date-time":"2022-02-22T09:06:36Z","timestamp":1645520796000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s43032-022-00849-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,3]]}},"alternative-id":["849"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-022-00849-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1933-7191","1933-7205"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1933-7191","type":"print"},{"value":"1933-7205","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 September 2021","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 January 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 January 2022","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study protocol was approved by the \u201cSheba Medical Center\u201d Review Board (ID 5200\u201318 SMC) on June 24, 2018.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"N\/A","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Participate"}},{"value":"All authors gave consent for publication.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for Publication"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}}]}}