{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T14:12:35Z","timestamp":1740147155934,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":41,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,11]],"date-time":"2024-07-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1720656000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,11]],"date-time":"2024-07-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1720656000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003483","name":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003483","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study aims to investigate whether trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in women with antepartum fetal death, is associated with an elevated risk of maternal morbidity. A retrospective multicenter. TOLAC of singleton pregnancies following a single low-segment incision were included. Maternal adverse outcomes were compared between women with antepartum fetal death and women with a viable fetus. Controls were matched with cases in a 1:4 ratio based on their previous vaginal births and induction of labor rates. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. During the study period, 181 women experienced antepartum fetal death and were matched with 724 women with viable fetuses. Univariate analysis revealed that women with antepartum fetal death had significantly lower rates of TOLAC failure (4.4% vs. 25.1%, p\u2009&lt;\u20090.01), but similar rates of composite adverse maternal outcomes (6.1% vs. 8.0%, p\u2009=\u20090.38) and uterine rupture (0.6% vs. 0.3%, p\u2009=\u20090.56). Multivariable analyses controlling for confounders showed that an antepartum fetal death vs. live birth isn't associated with the composite adverse maternal outcomes (aOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.21\u20134.44, p\u2009=\u20090.95). TOLAC in women with antepartum fetal death is not associated with an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes while showing high rates of successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-024-01645-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,11]],"date-time":"2024-07-11T17:01:29Z","timestamp":1720717289000},"page":"3183-3190","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Maternal Morbidity following Trial of Labor after Cesarean in Women Experiencing Antepartum Fetal Death"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"31","author":[{"given":"Ela","family":"Kadish","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tzuria","family":"Peled","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Hen Y.","family":"Sela","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ari","family":"Weiss","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Shaked","family":"Shmaya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sorina","family":"Grisaru-Granovsky","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4875-1455","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Misgav","family":"Rottenstreich","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"1645_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.3886\/icpsr28162.v1","volume":"1\u201320","author":"MJ Hall","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ, Williams SN, Golosinskiy A, Schwartzman A. National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2007 summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010;1\u201320:24. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3886\/icpsr28162.v1.","journal-title":"Natl Health Stat Report"},{"key":"1645_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. National Vital Statistics Reports: Births: Final Data for 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/003231879404600109.","DOI":"10.1177\/003231879404600109"},{"key":"1645_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343","volume":"11","author":"AP Betr\u00e1n","year":"2016","unstructured":"Betr\u00e1n AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, G\u00fclmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, regional and national estimates: 1990\u20132014. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0148343.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"1645_CR4","first-page":"1","volume":"67","author":"JA Martin","year":"2018","unstructured":"Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final Data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018;67:1\u201350.","journal-title":"Natl Vital Stat Rep"},{"key":"1645_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.011","volume":"38","author":"AL Shanks","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shanks AL, Cahill AG. Delivery after prior cesarean: success rate and factors. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38:233\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clp.2011.03.011.","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"1645_CR6","unstructured":"Gupta JK, Smith GC, Chodankar RR.\u00a0Birth after previous caesarean birth: green-top guideline no. 45. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2015."},{"key":"1645_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"450","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251","volume":"116","author":"ACOG","year":"2010","unstructured":"ACOG. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:450.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol."},{"key":"1645_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1111\/jog.14154","volume":"46","author":"LC Machado Junior","year":"2020","unstructured":"Machado Junior LC, Fam\u00e1 EAB, Zamboni JW, Awada PF, Ara\u00fajo TA, Nascimento-Ferreira MV, et al. Risk score for failed trial of vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section including data of labor course. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46:93\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jog.14154.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"key":"1645_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"583.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.013","volume":"196","author":"YY El-Sayed","year":"2007","unstructured":"El-Sayed YY, Watkins MM, Fix M, Druzin ML, Pullen KM, Caughey AB. Perinatal outcomes after successful and failed trials of labor after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:583.e1-5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.03.013. (discussion 583.e5).","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1002\/ijgo.13798","volume":"157","author":"E Ashwal","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ashwal E, Lavie A, Blecher Y, Attali E, Aviram A, Hadar E, et al. Intrapartum cesarean delivery and the risk of perinatal complications in women with and without a single prior cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;157:359\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ijgo.13798.","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"1645_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1146","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001152","volume":"126","author":"MF MacDorman","year":"2015","unstructured":"MacDorman MF, Reddy UM, Silver RM. Trends in Stillbirth by Gestational Age in the United States, 2006\u20132012. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126:1146\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001152.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"208","DOI":"10.3109\/01443615.2015.1050646","volume":"36","author":"KJ Gold","year":"2016","unstructured":"Gold KJ, Mozurkewich EL, Puder KS, Treadwell MC. Maternal complications associated with stillbirth delivery: A cross-sectional analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36:208\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3109\/01443615.2015.1050646.","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol J Inst Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"1645_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"825","DOI":"10.1055\/s-0030-1254548","volume":"27","author":"MM Ramirez","year":"2010","unstructured":"Ramirez MM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, Varner MW, et al. Mode of delivery in women with antepartum fetal death and prior cesarean delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2010;27:825\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1055\/s-0030-1254548.","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"1645_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.14423\/SMJ.0000000000001267","volume":"114","author":"AM Ramseyer","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ramseyer AM, Whittington JR, Magann EF, Ounpraseuth S, Nembhard WN. Cesarean Delivery Management of Stillbirth: In-Depth Analysis of 75 Cases in a Rural State. South Med J. 2021;114:384\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14423\/SMJ.0000000000001267.","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"key":"1645_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078","volume":"133","author":"V Birth","year":"2019","unstructured":"Birth V, Cesarean A. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e110-27. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003078.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"130","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.05.004","volume":"179","author":"M Guiliano","year":"2014","unstructured":"Guiliano M, Closset E, Therby D, LeGoueff F, Deruelle P, Subtil D. Signs, symptoms and complications of complete and partial uterine ruptures during pregnancy and delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;179:130\u20134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2014.05.004.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"1645_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1016","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066","volume":"193","author":"MB Landon","year":"2005","unstructured":"Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Bloom S, Varner MW, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1016\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.066.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rotem R, Sela HY, Hirsch A, Samueloff A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Rottenstreich M. The use of a strict protocol in the trial of labor following two previous cesarean deliveries: maternal and neonatal results. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:387\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.07.016.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.07.016"},{"key":"1645_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rotem R, Hirsch A, Sela HY, Samueloff A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Rottenstreich M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following trial of labor after two previous cesareans: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(4):1092\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1.","DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-020-00378-1"},{"key":"1645_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"426","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001246","volume":"127","author":"RD Higgins","year":"2016","unstructured":"Higgins RD, Saade G, Polin RA, Grobman WA, Buhimschi IA, Watterberg K, et al. Evaluation and Management of Women and Newborns With a Maternal Diagnosis of Chorioamnionitis: Summary of a Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:426\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001246.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200109000-00018","volume":"44","author":"E Lieberman","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lieberman E. Risk factors for uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;44:609\u201321.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/J.AJOG.2008.03.039","volume":"199","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2008","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, Spong CY, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:30.e1-30.e5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.AJOG.2008.03.039.","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"157","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.12449","volume":"121","author":"JR Scott","year":"2014","unstructured":"Scott JR. Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121:157\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.12449.","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"1645_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Hamoud Y, Ghesquiere L, Drumez E, Clouqueur E, Subtil D, Houfflin-Debarge V, et al. Efficacy and safety of induction of labour in case of pregnancy termination or intrauterine fetal death in patients with a scarred uterus: a retrospective cohort study. Authorea Prepr 2020. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22541\/AU.158802196.68063526.","DOI":"10.22541\/AU.158802196.68063526"},{"key":"1645_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.013","volume":"157","author":"M Cayrac","year":"2011","unstructured":"Cayrac M, Faillie J-L, Flandrin A, Boulot P. Second- and third-trimester management of medical termination of pregnancy and fetal death in utero after prior caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157:145\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2011.03.013.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"1645_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e110","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003719","volume":"135","author":"Management of Stillbirth","year":"2020","unstructured":"Management of Stillbirth. Obstetric Care Consensus No, 10. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135:e110\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000003719.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"594","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00019","volume":"49","author":"JG Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith JG, Merrill DC. Oxytocin for induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:594\u2013608. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00019.","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S190","DOI":"10.1016\/J.IJGO.2007.09.010","volume":"99","author":"G\u00f3mez Ponce","year":"2007","unstructured":"Ponce G\u00f3mez, de Le\u00f3n R, Wing D, Fiala C. Misoprostol for intrauterine fetal death. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;99:S190-3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.IJGO.2007.09.010.","journal-title":"Int J Gynecol Obstet"},{"key":"1645_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"693","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001935","volume":"129","author":"A Boyle","year":"2017","unstructured":"Boyle A, Preslar JP, Hogue CJR, Silver RM, Reddy UM, Goldenberg RL, et al. Route of Delivery in Women With Stillbirth: Results From the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:693\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0000000000001935.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1117","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819dbfe2","volume":"113","author":"V Goyal","year":"2009","unstructured":"Goyal V. Uterine rupture in second-trimester misoprostol-induced abortion after cesarean delivery: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1117\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31819dbfe2.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1151","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02190.x","volume":"116","author":"V Berghella","year":"2009","unstructured":"Berghella V, Airoldi J, O\u2019Neill AM, Einhorn K, Hoffman M. Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: a systematic review. BJOG. 2009;116:1151\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02190.x.","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"1645_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101","volume":"345","author":"M Ona","year":"2001","unstructured":"Ona M. Ydon -R Ochelle L, Olt ILH, Asterling HRE, Artin PM. Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery. 2001;345:3\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJM200107053450101.","journal-title":"Risk of Uterine Rupture during Labor among Women with a Prior Cesarean Delivery"},{"key":"1645_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"780","DOI":"10.1111\/1471-0528.13394","volume":"123","author":"I Al-Zirqi","year":"2016","unstructured":"Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Fors\u00e9n L, Daltveit AK, Vangen S. Uterine rupture: trends over 40 years. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123:780\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1471-0528.13394.","journal-title":"BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"1645_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beshar I, Thomson K, Byrne J. Misoprostol-augmented induction of labour for third trimester fetal demise in a patient with prior hysterotomies. BMJ Case Rep 2021;14. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bcr-2020-239872.","DOI":"10.1136\/bcr-2020-239872"},{"key":"1645_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/J.EJOGRB.2015.10.019","volume":"197","author":"D Desseauve","year":"2016","unstructured":"Desseauve D, Bonifazi-Grenouilleau M, Fritel X, Lath\u00e9lize J, Sarreau M, Pierre F. Fetal heart rate abnormalities associated with uterine rupture: a case\u2013control study: A new time-lapse approach using a standardized classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;197:16\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.EJOGRB.2015.10.019.","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"1645_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinane.2019.04.023","volume":"58","author":"WE Lane","year":"2019","unstructured":"Lane WE, Cobert J, Horres CR, Strouch Z, Mehdiratta J. Undetected uterine rupture during induction of labor for intrauterine fetal demise using epidural anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2019;58:20\u20131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinane.2019.04.023.","journal-title":"J Clin Anesth"},{"key":"1645_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rottenstreich M, Rotem R, Hirsch A, Farkash R, Rottenstreich A, Samueloff A, et al. Delayed diagnosis of intrapartum uterine rupture\u2013maternal and neonatal consequences. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2019;0:1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2019.1613366.","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2019.1613366"},{"key":"1645_CR38","unstructured":"Haider G, Zehra N, Munir AA, Haider A. Frequency and indications of cesarean section in a tertiary care hospital.\u00a0Pak J Med Sci. 2009;25(5):791\u20136."},{"key":"1645_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0B013E31821E5F65","volume":"118","author":"EL Barber","year":"2011","unstructured":"Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:29\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/AOG.0B013E31821E5F65.","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"1645_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Rottenstreich M, Rotem R, Samueloff A, Sela HY, Grisaru-Granovsky S. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery in grand multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(14):2629\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14767058.2020.1790518.","DOI":"10.1080\/14767058.2020.1790518"},{"key":"1645_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Atia O, Rotem R, Reichman O, Jaffe A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Sela HY, Rottenstreich M. Number of prior vaginal deliveries and trial of labor after cesarean success. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;256:189\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.009.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2020.11.009"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01645-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01645-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01645-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,28]],"date-time":"2024-09-28T14:12:02Z","timestamp":1727532722000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01645-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,11]]},"references-count":41,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1645"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01645-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1933-7191","1933-7205"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1933-7191"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1933-7205"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,11]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 August 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 July 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"11 July 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors report no conflict of interest.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Disclosure statement"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose and that they have no financial or non-financial conflict of interest.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflicts of interest\/Competing interests"}},{"value":"All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and\/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. The Shaare Zedek Medical Center institutional review board approved the study (0036\u201323-SZMC), with full waiver of informed consent due to the retrospective, observational design of the study.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"Not available.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to participate"}},{"value":"Not available.","order":6,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}}]}}