{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,7]],"date-time":"2026-10-07T16:06:12Z","timestamp":1791389172541,"version":"4.3.3"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]],"date-time":"2024-11-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1732492800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]],"date-time":"2024-11-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1732492800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001809","name":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["82171599"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["82171599"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Reprod. Sci."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s43032-024-01734-1","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]],"date-time":"2024-11-25T17:30:05Z","timestamp":1732555805000},"page":"1580-1588","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Sequential Transfer of Blastocysts on Day 5 and Day 6 in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"32","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2321-8953","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Qi","family":"Jin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Xiaohua","family":"Jiang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lu","family":"Zong","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tong","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Shengxia","family":"Zheng","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Limin","family":"Wu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bo","family":"Xu","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"1734_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1021","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.02.029","volume":"97","author":"M Das","year":"2012","unstructured":"Das M, Holzer HE. Recurrent implantation failure: gamete and embryo factors. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(5):1021\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2012.02.029.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"key":"1734_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Muter J, Lynch VJ, Mccoy RC, Brosens JJ. Human embryo implantation. Development. 2023;150(10). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1242\/dev.201507.","DOI":"10.1242\/dev.201507"},{"key":"1734_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1238251","DOI":"10.3389\/fendo.2023.1238251","volume":"14","author":"J Gao","year":"2023","unstructured":"Gao J, Yuan Y, Li J, et al. Sequential embryo transfer versus double cleavage-stage embryo or double blastocyst transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure with frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;14:1238251. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fendo.2023.1238251.","journal-title":"Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)"},{"issue":"3","key":"1734_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)61442-3","volume":"13","author":"R Machtinger","year":"2006","unstructured":"Machtinger R, Dor J, Margolin M, et al. Sequential transfer of day 3 embryos and blastocysts after previous IVF failures despite adequate ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(3):376\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1472-6483(10)61442-3.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"1","key":"1734_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1017\/S096719941100058X","volume":"21","author":"C Yazbeck","year":"2013","unstructured":"Yazbeck C, Ben JN, Hazout A, Cohen-Bacrie P, Junca AM, Rougier N. Advantages of the two-step embryo transfer strategy in human IVF\/ICSI cycles. Zygote. 2013;21(1):77\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S096719941100058X.","journal-title":"Zygote"},{"issue":"1","key":"1734_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"142","DOI":"10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y","volume":"19","author":"J Zhang","year":"2021","unstructured":"Zhang J, Wang C, Zhang H, Zhou Y. Sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and IVF outcomes: a systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021;19(1):142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12958-021-00824-y.","journal-title":"Reprod Biol Endocrinol"},{"key":"1734_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841437","DOI":"10.3389\/fphys.2022.841437","volume":"13","author":"Z Liu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Liu Z, Liu X, Wang M, et al. The clinical efficacy of personalized embryo transfer guided by the Endometrial Receptivity Array\/Analysis on IVF\/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2022;13:841437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fphys.2022.841437.","journal-title":"Front Physiol"},{"key":"1734_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e935634","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.935634","volume":"28","author":"Y Jia","year":"2022","unstructured":"Jia Y, Sha Y, Qiu Z, et al. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Endometrial Receptivity Analysis (ERA) to guide personalized embryo transfer with conventional frozen embryo transfer in 281 Chinese women with recurrent implantation failure. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e935634. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12659\/MSM.935634.","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"issue":"3","key":"1734_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoad023","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoad023","volume":"2023","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, de Los SM, Griesinger G, et al. ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod Open. 2023;2023(3):hoad023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoad023.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"3","key":"1734_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"194","DOI":"10.4103\/0974-1208.142481","volume":"7","author":"P Kaur","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kaur P, Swarankar ML, Maheshwari M, Acharya V. A comparative study between cleavage stage embryo transfer at day 3 and blastocyst stage transfer at day 5 in in-vitro fertilization\/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection on clinical pregnancy rates. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7(3):194\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/0974-1208.142481.","journal-title":"J Hum Reprod Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"305","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/deaa317","volume":"36","author":"D Cimadomo","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cimadomo D, Craciunas L, Vermeulen N, Vomstein K, Toth B. Definition, diagnostic and therapeutic options in recurrent implantation failure: an international survey of clinicians and embryologists. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(2):305\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/deaa317.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"6","key":"1734_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/s0015-0282(00)00518-5","volume":"73","author":"DK Gardner","year":"2000","unstructured":"Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(6):1155\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0015-0282(00)00518-5.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"338","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.03.027","volume":"114","author":"MJ Hill","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hill MJ, Eubanks AE, Csokmay JM, et al. Is transferring a lower-quality embryo with a good-quality blastocyst detrimental to the likelihood of live birth? Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):338\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.03.027.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"1","key":"1734_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13420","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-021-92955-w","volume":"11","author":"M Enciso","year":"2021","unstructured":"Enciso M, Aizpurua J, Rodriguez-Estrada B, et al. The precise determination of the window of implantation significantly improves ART outcomes. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13420. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-021-92955-w.","journal-title":"Sci Rep"},{"key":"1734_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1687583","DOI":"10.1155\/2018\/1687583","volume":"2018","author":"GS Stamenov","year":"2018","unstructured":"Stamenov GS, Parvanov DA, Chaushev TA. Successful pregnancy following mixed double embryo transfer in a patient with variable window of implantation. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:1687583. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2018\/1687583.","journal-title":"Case Rep Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoab011","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab011","volume":"2021","author":"M Ruiz-Alonso","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ruiz-Alonso M, Valbuena D, Gomez C, Cuzzi J, Simon C. Endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA): data versus opinions. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(2):hoab011. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoab011.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"416","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.04.005","volume":"114","author":"C Liu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Liu C, Yao W, Yao J, et al. Endometrial extracellular vesicles from women with recurrent implantation failure attenuate the growth and invasion of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):416\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.04.005.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"hoab010","DOI":"10.1093\/hropen\/hoab010","volume":"2021","author":"RZ Ben","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ben RZ. Endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) test: an unproven technology. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(2):hoab010. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/hropen\/hoab010.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod Open"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.04.003","volume":"39","author":"CB Bartels","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bartels CB, Ditrio L, Grow DR, et al. The window is wide: flexible timing for vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in natural cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;39(2):241\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2019.04.003.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"6","key":"1734_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"998","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.08.015","volume":"41","author":"MH Saxtorph","year":"2020","unstructured":"Saxtorph MH, Hallager T, Persson G, et al. Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41(6):998\u20131006. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2020.08.015.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"1734_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"249","DOI":"10.1002\/rmb2.12097","volume":"17","author":"S Ohgi","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ohgi S, Taga Y, Anakubo H, Kurata Y, Hatakeyama S, Yanaihara A. Morphologically poor blastocysts could affect the implantation rate of a morphologically good blastocyst during a double-blastocyst transfer for patients who have experienced repeated implantation failures. Reprod Med Biol. 2018;17(3):249\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/rmb2.12097.","journal-title":"Reprod Med Biol"},{"issue":"12","key":"1734_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1754","DOI":"10.1038\/nm.3012","volume":"18","author":"J Cha","year":"2012","unstructured":"Cha J, Sun X, Dey SK. Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat Med. 2012;18(12):1754\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nm.3012.","journal-title":"Nat Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"267","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.04.064","volume":"114","author":"HH Kim","year":"2020","unstructured":"Kim HH, Matevossian K. Are two better than one? Two sequential transfers of a single embryo may be better than a double-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2020;114(2):267\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2020.04.064.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tjog.2022.10.009","volume":"62","author":"S Salehpour","year":"2023","unstructured":"Salehpour S, Hosseini S, Razghandi Z, Hosseinirad H, Ziaee H. Comparing the effect of sequential embryo transfer versus double blastocyst embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in patients with repeated implantation failure: a randomized controlled trial. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62(2):264\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tjog.2022.10.009.","journal-title":"Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"11","key":"1734_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1365","DOI":"10.25122\/jml-2022-0041","volume":"15","author":"S Arefi","year":"2022","unstructured":"Arefi S, Ataei M, Maleki N, Yari N, Razi S, Amirajam S. Sequential (two-step) day 3\/day 5 frozen-thawed embryo transfer: does it improve the pregnancy rate of patients suffering recurrent implantation failure? J Med Life. 2022;15(11):1365\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25122\/jml-2022-0041.","journal-title":"J Med Life"},{"issue":"1","key":"1734_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.10.004","volume":"26","author":"C Fang","year":"2013","unstructured":"Fang C, Huang R, Li TT, Jia L, Li LL, Liang XY. Day-2 and day-3 sequential transfer improves pregnancy rate in patients with repeated IVF-embryo transfer failure: a retrospective case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(1):30\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.rbmo.2012.10.004.","journal-title":"Reprod Biomed Online"},{"issue":"3","key":"1734_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"390","DOI":"10.1093\/humrep\/dey004","volume":"33","author":"L Ferreux","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ferreux L, Bourdon M, Sallem A, et al. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(3):390\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/humrep\/dey004.","journal-title":"Hum Reprod"},{"issue":"8","key":"1734_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"469","DOI":"10.1038\/nri.2017.64","volume":"17","author":"G Mor","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mor G, Aldo P, Alvero AB. The unique immunological and microbial aspects of pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(8):469\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/nri.2017.64.","journal-title":"Nat Rev Immunol"},{"issue":"2","key":"1734_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.4049\/jimmunol.1800058","volume":"201","author":"A Schumacher","year":"2018","unstructured":"Schumacher A, Sharkey DJ, Robertson SA, Zenclussen AC. Immune cells at the Fetomaternal Interface: how the Microenvironment modulates Immune cells to Foster fetal development. J Immunol. 2018;201(2):325\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4049\/jimmunol.1800058.","journal-title":"J Immunol"},{"key":"1734_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"474","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2164-11-474","volume":"11","author":"CG Walker","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walker CG, Meier S, Littlejohn MD, Lehnert K, Roche JR, Mitchell MD. Modulation of the maternal immune system by the pre-implantation embryo. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:474. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2164-11-474.","journal-title":"BMC Genomics"},{"issue":"1","key":"1734_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.1002\/jum.14319","volume":"37","author":"J Wang","year":"2018","unstructured":"Wang J, Xia F, Zhou Y, Wei X, Zhuang Y, Huang Y. Association between Endometrial\/Subendometrial Vasculature and embryo transfer outcome: a Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(1):149\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jum.14319.","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"sup1","key":"1734_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1080\/09513590.2021.2006466","volume":"37","author":"V Fodina","year":"2021","unstructured":"Fodina V, Dudorova A, Erenpreiss J. Evaluation of embryo aneuploidy (PGT-A) and endometrial receptivity (ERA) testing in patients with recurrent implantation failure in ICSI cycles. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(sup1):17\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09513590.2021.2006466.","journal-title":"Gynecol Endocrinol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1734_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1071","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346","volume":"112","author":"S Munne","year":"2019","unstructured":"Munne S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1071\u2013e10797. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346.","journal-title":"Fertil Steril"},{"issue":"6","key":"1734_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1441","DOI":"10.1007\/s10815-021-02112-5","volume":"38","author":"R Makhijani","year":"2021","unstructured":"Makhijani R, Coulter M, Taggar A, et al. Reduction in multiple pregnancy rate in donor oocyte-recipient gestational carrier (GC) in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA with single-embryo transfer and preimplantation genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(6):1441\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10815-021-02112-5.","journal-title":"J Assist Reprod Genet"}],"container-title":["Reproductive Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01734-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01734-1\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01734-1.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,29]],"date-time":"2025-04-29T15:29:02Z","timestamp":1745940542000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01734-1"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,5]]}},"alternative-id":["1734"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43032-024-01734-1","relation":{},"ISSN":["1933-7191","1933-7205"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1933-7191","type":"print"},{"value":"1933-7205","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,11,25]]},"assertion":[{"value":"7 May 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"26 October 2024","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"25 November 2024","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The study was approved by the ethical committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC on April 17, 2023, IRB code NO.2023-RE-119.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical Approval"}},{"value":"All the patients signed informed consent before participating in the study. All procedures were conducted according to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Participate"}},{"value":"All authors gave consent for publication.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for Publication"}},{"value":"The authors have no conflicts of interest.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}}]}}