{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,19]],"date-time":"2026-06-19T13:57:13Z","timestamp":1781877433051,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769212800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1769212800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Spine Deform"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Introduction<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The natural history of growth-friendly graduates treated with growing instrumentation but no final fusion is unknown. Two previous reports exist with one analyzing 30 growin g rod patients with no definitive fusion and another including 10 patients with growing rod removal, but no comprehensive data exist in the literature.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A multi-center database was queried for patients treated with TGR or VEPTR and at least 2 years of follow-up from their index procedure. Patients met inclusion criteria if they had not undergone a final fusion procedure but had completed planned interventions for early onset scoliosis and had sufficient follow-up. Kaplan\u2013Meier analysis was performed to model rates of UPROR and complications in patients with retained and removed implants over time.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Of 233 included patients, definitive treatment was implant maintenance in 203 (87%) and removal in 30 (13%). Patients with retained implants experienced 10 (5%) UPRORs and 41 (20%) complications after final lengthening. Patients with removed implants had 0 UPRORs and 10 (33%) complications after implant removal. Patients with available pre-definitive and follow-up measurements and whose implants were removed increased by a mean 14.3\u00b0 of coronal curvature compared to 19.0\u00b0 in those who retained implants at mean 3.8 and 3.7\u00a0year follow-up, respectively.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Growth-friendly graduates without final fusion demonstrate low rates of UPROR and complications following definitive lengthening or implant removal. However, those who undergo implant removal are more likely to experience complications. Coronal curve magnitude was moderately maintained in both cohorts, suggesting that avoidance of definitive fusion may be viable for some patients.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s43390-025-01187-9","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T18:10:15Z","timestamp":1769278215000},"page":"953-959","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Leave it alone: the natural history of growth-friendly graduates without a final fusion"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"14","author":[{"given":"Rayyan","family":"Abid","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bryan O.","family":"Ren","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert F.","family":"Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jeffrey R.","family":"Sawyer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John M.","family":"Flynn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John B.","family":"Emans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"John T.","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul D.","family":"Sponseller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Norman","family":"Ramirez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8643-6889","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christina K.","family":"Hardesty","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"Pediatric Spine Study Group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"1187_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1359","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.M.00253","volume":"96","author":"BA Williams","year":"2014","unstructured":"Williams BA, Matsumoto H, McCalla DJ et al (2014) Development and initial validation of the classification of early-onset scoliosis (C-EOS). J Bone Joint Surg 96:1359\u20131367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.M.00253","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"1187_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1242","DOI":"10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181714536","volume":"33","author":"MG Vitale","year":"2008","unstructured":"Vitale MG, Matsumoto H, Bye MR et al (2008) A retrospective cohort study of pulmonary function, radiographic measures, and quality of life in children with congenital scoliosis: an evaluation of patient outcomes after early spinal fusion. Spine 33:1242\u20131249. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/BRS.0b013e3181714536","journal-title":"Spine"},{"key":"1187_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-010-1622-z","volume":"469","author":"LA Karol","year":"2011","unstructured":"Karol LA (2011) Early definitive spinal fusion in young children: what we have learned. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1323\u20131329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-010-1622-z","journal-title":"Clin Orthop Relat Res"},{"key":"1187_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.00184","volume":"90","author":"LA Karol","year":"2008","unstructured":"Karol LA, Johnston C, Mladenov K, Schochet P, Walters P, Browne RH (2008) Pulmonary function following early thoracic fusion in non-neuromuscular scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1272\u20131281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.G.00184","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"1187_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"S109","DOI":"10.1016\/j.otsr.2014.06.032","volume":"101","author":"V Cunin","year":"2015","unstructured":"Cunin V (2015) Early-onset scoliosis: current treatment. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:S109. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.otsr.2014.06.032","journal-title":"Orthop Traumatol Surg Res"},{"key":"1187_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1913","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.15.01334","volume":"98","author":"C Poe-Kochert","year":"2016","unstructured":"Poe-Kochert C, Shannon C, Pawelek JB et al (2016) Final fusion after growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis: is it really final? J Bone Joint Surg 98:1913\u20131917","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"1187_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1745","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.01386","volume":"95","author":"JM Flynn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Flynn JM, Tomlinson LA, Pawelek J et al (2013) Growing-rod graduates: lessons learned from ninety-nine patients who completed lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg 95:1745\u20131750","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"1187_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1073","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.15.01241","volume":"98","author":"A Jain","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jain A, Sponseller PD, Flynn JM et al (2016) Avoidance of \u201cFinal\u201d surgical fusion after growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg 98:1073\u20131078. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.15.01241","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"1187_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1554","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.17.00031","volume":"99","author":"IA Kocyigit","year":"2017","unstructured":"Kocyigit IA, Olgun ZD, Demirkiran HG, Ayvaz M, Yazici M (2017) Graduation protocol after growing-rod treatment: removal of implants without new instrumentation is not a realistic approach. J Bone Joint Surg 99:1554\u20131564. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.17.00031","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"1187_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1007\/s43390-019-00024-0","volume":"8","author":"JB Anari","year":"2020","unstructured":"Anari JB, Flynn JM, Cahill PJ et al (2020) Unplanned return to OR (UPROR) for children with early onset scoliosis (EOS): a comprehensive evaluation of all diagnoses and instrumentation strategies. Spine Deform 8:295\u2013302. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43390-019-00024-0","journal-title":"Spine Deform"},{"key":"1187_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e406","DOI":"10.1097\/bpo.0000000000001454","volume":"40","author":"R El-Hawary","year":"2020","unstructured":"El-Hawary R, Morash K, Kadhim M et al (2020) Veptr treatment of early onset scoliosis in children without rib abnormalities: long-term results of a prospective, multicenter study. J Pediatr Orthop 40:e406\u2013e412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/bpo.0000000000001454","journal-title":"J Pediatr Orthop"},{"key":"1187_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2533","DOI":"10.2106\/jbjs.I.01471","volume":"92","author":"S Bess","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH et al (2010) Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg 92:2533\u20132543. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2106\/jbjs.I.01471","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg"},{"key":"1187_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2075","DOI":"10.1007\/s00586-020-06506-4","volume":"29","author":"S Basu","year":"2020","unstructured":"Basu S, Solanki AM, Srivastava A, Shetty AP, Rajasekaran S, Jayaswal A (2020) Unplanned return to operation room (OR) following growing spinal constructs (GSCs) in early onset scoliosis (EOS)-a multi-centric study. Eur Spine J 29:2075\u20132083. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00586-020-06506-4","journal-title":"Eur Spine J"},{"key":"1187_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1007\/s11420-019-09671-5","volume":"15","author":"TS Shen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Shen TS, Schairer W, Widmann R (2019) In patients with early-onset scoliosis, can growing rods be removed without further instrumentation? An evidenced-based review. HSS Journal\u00ae 15:201\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11420-019-09671-5","journal-title":"HSS Journal\u00ae"}],"container-title":["Spine Deformity"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43390-025-01187-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s43390-025-01187-9","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s43390-025-01187-9.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,19]],"date-time":"2026-06-19T13:35:28Z","timestamp":1781876128000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s43390-025-01187-9"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["1187"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s43390-025-01187-9","relation":{},"ISSN":["2212-134X","2212-1358"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2212-134X","type":"print"},{"value":"2212-1358","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 June 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"4 September 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"24 January 2026","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Individual authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. IRB approval was obtained from each institution participating in the Pediatric Spine Foundation Database.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}