{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]],"date-time":"2026-06-18T13:51:55Z","timestamp":1781790715624,"version":"3.54.5"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772150400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772150400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s44402-026-00033-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T14:27:49Z","timestamp":1772202469000},"page":"252-260","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Psychometric Validation of a Short-Form Spanish Low Vision Quality of Life Questionnaire (SF-SLVQOL) Using Rasch Analysis: From 25 to 6 Items"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8672-7803","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luis","family":"P\u00e9rez-Ma\u00f1\u00e1","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlos","family":"P\u00e9rez-Garmendia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5967-5000","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mariano","family":"Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"33_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcjo.2020.10.014","volume":"56","author":"M Nayeni","year":"2021","unstructured":"Nayeni M, Dang A, Mao AJ, Malvankar-Mehta MS. Quality of life of low vision patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Ophthalmol. 2021;56:151\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcjo.2020.10.014.","journal-title":"Can J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"33_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1016\/j.optom.2021.01.004","volume":"15","author":"L P\u00e9rez-Ma\u00f1\u00e1","year":"2022","unstructured":"P\u00e9rez-Ma\u00f1\u00e1 L, Cardona G, Pardo-Cladellas Y, P\u00e9rez-Ma\u00f1\u00e1 C, Amor\u00f3s-Mart\u00ednez J, Gonz\u00e1lez-Sanch\u00eds L, et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the low vision quality of life questionnaire. J Optom. 2022;15:199\u2013209. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.optom.2021.01.004.","journal-title":"J Optom"},{"key":"33_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1186\/s12955-023-02158-2","volume":"21","author":"F Huygen","year":"2023","unstructured":"Huygen F, Hagedorn JM, Falowski S, Schultz D, Vesper J, Heros RD, et al. Core patient-reported outcome measures for chronic pain patients treated with spinal cord stimulation or dorsal root ganglia stimulation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023;21:77 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12955-023-02158-2.","journal-title":"Health Qual Life Outcomes"},{"key":"33_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1873","DOI":"10.1177\/00491241221140139","volume":"53","author":"A Cernat","year":"2022","unstructured":"Cernat A, Sakshaug J, Christmann P, Gummer T. The impact of survey mode design and questionnaire length on measurement quality. Sociol Methods Res. 2022;53:1873\u2013904.","journal-title":"Sociol Methods Res"},{"key":"33_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1086\/346010","volume":"67","author":"A Holbrook","year":"2003","unstructured":"Holbrook A, Green M, Krosnick J. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires: comparisons of respondent satisficing and social desirability response bias. Public Opin Q. 2003;67:79\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/346010.","journal-title":"Public Opin Q"},{"key":"33_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"718","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.019","volume":"36","author":"K Pesudovs","year":"2010","unstructured":"Pesudovs K, Gothwal VK, Wright T, Lamoureux EL. Remediating serious flaws in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:718\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2009.11.019.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"33_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1305","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-011-0054-x","volume":"21","author":"CF Snyder","year":"2012","unstructured":"Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:1305\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-011-0054-x.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"33_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-024-00795-9","volume":"8","author":"V Lowry","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lowry V, Tremblay-Vaillancourt V, Beaupr\u00e9 P, Poirier MD, Perron M\u00c8, Bernier J, et al. How patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (PROMs and PREMs) are implemented in healthcare professional and patient organizations? An environmental scan. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024;8:133 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-024-00795-9.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"33_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-019-0130-5","volume":"3","author":"AM Stover","year":"2019","unstructured":"Stover AM, McLeod LD, Langer MM, Chen WH, Reeve BB. State of the psychometric methods: patient-reported outcome measure development and refinement using item response theory. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019;3:50 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-019-0130-5.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"33_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1097\/MLR.0000000000000413","volume":"53","author":"AC Carle","year":"2015","unstructured":"Carle AC, Riley W, Hays RD, Cella D. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult domain framework using item response theory scores. Med Care. 2015;53:894\u2013900. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/MLR.0000000000000413.","journal-title":"Med Care"},{"key":"33_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"648","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clinthera.2014.04.006","volume":"36","author":"JC Cappelleri","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cappelleri JC, Jason Lundy J, Hays RD. Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clin Ther. 2014;36:648\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clinthera.2014.04.006.","journal-title":"Clin Ther"},{"key":"33_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johansson M, Preuter M, Karlsson S, M\u00f6llerberg ML, Svensson H, Melin J. Valid and reliable? Basic and expanded recommendations for psychometric reporting and quality assessment. OSF. 2023. https:\/\/osf.io\/3htzc_v1.","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/3htzc"},{"key":"33_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"212","DOI":"10.1027\/1614-0001\/a000141","volume":"35","author":"B Rammstedt","year":"2014","unstructured":"Rammstedt B, Beierlein C. Can\u2019t we make it any shorter?. J Individ Differ. 2014;35:212\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1614-0001\/a000141.","journal-title":"J Individ Differ"},{"key":"33_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"767","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191118810057","volume":"26","author":"CJ Kemper","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kemper CJ, Trapp S, Kathmann N, Samuel DB, Ziegler M. Short versus long scales in clinical assessment: exploring the trade-off between resources saved and psychometric quality lost using two measures of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Assessment. 2019;26:767\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1073191118810057.","journal-title":"Assessment"},{"key":"33_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"793","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(00)00610-3","volume":"130","author":"JS Wolffsohn","year":"2000","unstructured":"Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL. Design of the low vision quality-of-life questionnaire (LVQOL) and measuring the outcome of low-vision rehabilitation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:793\u2013802. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9394(00)00610-3.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"33_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"94","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x","volume":"8","author":"D Wild","year":"2005","unstructured":"Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"33_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1186\/s41687-024-00727-7","volume":"8","author":"EBM Elsman","year":"2024","unstructured":"Elsman EBM, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Beaton D, Gagnier JJ, Tricco AC, et al. Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024;8:64 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41687-024-00727-7.","journal-title":"J Patient Rep Outcomes"},{"key":"33_CR18","first-page":"328","volume":"7","author":"J Linacre","year":"1994","unstructured":"Linacre J. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Mes Trans. 1994;7:328.","journal-title":"Rasch Mes Trans"},{"key":"33_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"206","DOI":"10.1186\/s12911-021-01534-6","volume":"21","author":"JE Harrison","year":"2021","unstructured":"Harrison JE, Weber S, Jakob R, Chute CG. ICD-11: an international classification of diseases for the twenty-first century. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2021;21:206 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12911-021-01534-6.","journal-title":"BMC Med Inf Decis Mak"},{"key":"33_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"596","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2017.10.023","volume":"21","author":"JM Ramos-Go\u00f1i","year":"2018","unstructured":"Ramos-Go\u00f1i JM, Craig BM, Oppe M, Ramallo-Fari\u00f1a Y, Pinto-Prades JL, Luo N, et al. Handling data quality issues to estimate the Spanish EQ-5D-5L value set using a hybrid interval regression approach. Value Health. 2018;21:596\u2013604. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2017.10.023.","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"33_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-10-22","volume":"10","author":"LB Mokkink","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-10-22.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"33_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"737","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006","volume":"63","author":"LB Mokkink","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737\u201345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"33_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4042","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.12-9728","volume":"53","author":"J Khadka","year":"2012","unstructured":"Khadka J, McAlinden C, Gothwal VK, Lamoureux EL, Pesudovs K. The importance of rating scale design in the measurement of patient-reported outcomes using questionnaires or item banks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:4042\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.12-9728.","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"33_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1167\/tvst.9.4.23","volume":"9","author":"M Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez","year":"2020","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez M, P\u00e9rez-Garmendia C, Barrio AR, Garc\u00eda-Montero M, Antona B. Spanish cross-cultural adaptation and Rasch analysis of the convergence insufficiency symptom survey (CISS). Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:23 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/tvst.9.4.23.","journal-title":"Transl Vis Sci Technol"},{"key":"33_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4504","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.13-13818","volume":"55","author":"M Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez M, Susi R, Antona B, Barrio A, Gonz\u00e1lez E. The computer-vision symptom scale (CVSS17): development and initial validation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:4504\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.13-13818.","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"33_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0202173","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0202173","volume":"13","author":"M Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez M, Susi R, Barrio A, Antona B. Five levels of performance and two subscales identified in the computer-vision symptom scale (CVSS17) by Rasch, factor, and discriminant analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0202173 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0202173.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"33_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1326","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.13540","volume":"45","author":"M Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gonz\u00e1lez-P\u00e9rez M, Barrio A, Susi R, P\u00e9rez-Garmendia C, Antona B. Development and initial validation of DESCAQ: a Rasch-based computer-adaptive questionnaire for assessing digital eye strain. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025;45:1326\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/opo.13540.","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"33_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000000001","volume":"90","author":"J Khadka","year":"2013","unstructured":"Khadka J, McAlinden C, Pesudovs K. Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:720\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OPX.0000000000000001.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"33_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"663","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318141fe75","volume":"84","author":"K Pesudovs","year":"2007","unstructured":"Pesudovs K, Burr JM, Harley C, Elliott DB. The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:663\u201374. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OPX.0b013e318141fe75.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"33_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"187","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x","volume":"30","author":"WM Yen","year":"1993","unstructured":"Yen WM. Scaling performance assessments: strategies for managing local item dependence. J Educ Meas. 1993;30:187\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00423.x.","journal-title":"J Educ Meas"},{"key":"33_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1177\/00131644221075580","volume":"83","author":"X Liu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liu X, Cao P, Lai X, Wen J, Yang Y. Assessing essential unidimensionality of scales and structural coefficient bias. Educ Psychol. Meas. 2023;83:28\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00131644221075580.","journal-title":"Educ Psychol. Meas"},{"key":"33_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2197","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-021-02822-4","volume":"30","author":"JJ Gagnier","year":"2021","unstructured":"Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30:2197\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-021-02822-4.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"33_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.1016\/j.oftal.2018.05.017","volume":"93","author":"C Alvarez-Peregrina","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alvarez-Peregrina C, S\u00e1nchez-Tena MA, Caball\u00e9-Fontanet D, Thuissard-Vasallo IJ, Gacimart\u00edn-Garc\u00eda MB, Orduna-Mag\u00e1n C. Crosscultural adaptation and validation into Spanish of the questionnaire National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2018;93:586\u201391. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.oftal.2018.05.017.","journal-title":"Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol"},{"key":"33_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.1177\/00131644221128341","volume":"83","author":"I Liu","year":"2023","unstructured":"Liu I, Suesse T, Harvey S, Gu PY, Fernandez D, Randal J. Generalized Mantel-Haenszel estimators for simultaneous differential item functioning tests. Educ Psychol Meas. 2023;83:1007\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00131644221128341.","journal-title":"Educ Psychol Meas"},{"key":"33_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/09286586.2016.1246667","volume":"24","author":"C Bradley","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bradley C, Massof RW. Validating translations of rating scale questionnaires using Rasch analysis. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017;24:1\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09286586.2016.1246667.","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Epidemiol"},{"key":"33_CR36","unstructured":"Wright BD. Separation, reliability and skewed distributions: statistically different levels of performance. Rasch Meas Trans. 2001. https:\/\/www.rasch.org\/rmt\/rmt144k.htm."},{"key":"33_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"330","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x","volume":"31","author":"C McAlinden","year":"2011","unstructured":"McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31:330\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x.","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"33_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000001465","volume":"97","author":"A Carkeet","year":"2020","unstructured":"Carkeet A. A review of the use of confidence intervals for Bland-Altman limits of agreement in optometry and vision science. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97:3 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OPX.0000000000001465.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"33_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jval.2011.06.003","volume":"14","author":"S Rolstad","year":"2011","unstructured":"Rolstad S, Adler J, Ryd\u00e9n A. Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health. 2011;14:1101\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jval.2011.06.003.","journal-title":"Value Health"},{"key":"33_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6971","DOI":"10.1167\/iovs.11-7423","volume":"52","author":"J Khadka","year":"2011","unstructured":"Khadka J, Pesudovs K, McAlinden C, Vogel M, Kernt M, Hirneiss C. Reengineering the glaucoma quality of life-15 questionnaire with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6971\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/iovs.11-7423.","journal-title":"Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci"},{"key":"33_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"874","DOI":"10.1177\/02646196231195695","volume":"42","author":"H Momeni Moghaddam","year":"2024","unstructured":"Momeni Moghaddam H, Heravian Shandiz J, Wolffsohn JS, Karimpour M. Reliability testing of the Persian low-vision quality-of-life questionnaire based on Rasch analysis. Br J Vis Impair. 2024;42:874\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/02646196231195695.","journal-title":"Br J Vis Impair"},{"key":"33_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.14712\/18059694.2021.19","volume":"64","author":"I Mylona","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mylona I, Aletras V, Ziakas N, Tsinopoulos I. Rasch validation of the LVQOL scale. Acta Med. 2021;64:108\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14712\/18059694.2021.19.","journal-title":"Acta Med"},{"key":"33_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2598","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.06.029","volume":"41","author":"C McAlinden","year":"2015","unstructured":"McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2598 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrs.2015.06.029.","journal-title":"J Cataract Refract Surg"},{"key":"33_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1171","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-017-1765-4","volume":"27","author":"LB Mokkink","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mokkink LB, De Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:1171\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11136-017-1765-4.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"33_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1016\/j.measurement.2019.07.035","volume":"146","author":"DC Briggs","year":"2019","unstructured":"Briggs DC. Interpreting and visualizing the unit of measurement in the Rasch model. Measurement. 2019;146:961\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.measurement.2019.07.035.","journal-title":"Measurement"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00033-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00033-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00033-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,18]],"date-time":"2026-06-18T13:01:54Z","timestamp":1781787714000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00033-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["33"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00033-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0275-5408","1475-1313"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0275-5408","type":"print"},{"value":"1475-1313","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"3 January 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 January 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 February 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}}]}}