{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T15:14:42Z","timestamp":1783696482179,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":39,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]],"date-time":"2026-05-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779062400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]],"date-time":"2026-05-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779062400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Accurate axial length (AL) estimation is vital for monitoring myopia progression in children, especially in primary care where optical biometers are often unavailable. Prediction models with cycloplegic measurements may offer a reliable alternative.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To assess the effect of cycloplegia on the accuracy and repeatability of several AL prediction models in a paediatric sample and to identify which models maintain minimal bias under both cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic conditions.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Ninety-six children (mean age 12.5\u2009\u00b1\u20092.4 years) underwent repeated measurements of spherical equivalent refraction (SER), anterior corneal curvature (\n                      <jats:italic>K<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      ) and AL, pre- and post-cycloplegia, using the Myopia Master. Seven published prediction models incorporating SER,\n                      <jats:italic>K<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      , age and sex were evaluated. Agreement, bias, limits of agreement (LoA), coefficient of repeatability (CoR), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and regression analyses were used to assess performance and repeatability.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Cycloplegia induced a hyperopic shift (mean +0.79 D), most pronounced in emmetropic and hyperopic eyes. Measured AL and all models showed improved repeatability post-cycloplegia (measured AL CoR decreased from ~0.14\u2009mm to ~0.09\u2009mm; ICC\u2009&gt;\u20090.99). Pre-cycloplegia, models overestimated AL (mean differences from \u20130.87 to \u20130.24\u2009mm); these biases were reduced post-cycloplegia (mean differences from \u20130.56 to +0.10\u2009mm). Models by Morgan et al., Queir\u00f3s et al. and Lingham had the smallest bias (&lt;0.10\u2009mm) and narrowest LoA (&lt;0.84\u2009mm). Variation in SER accounted for ~97\u201399% of the change in predicted AL, while the\n                      <jats:italic>K<\/jats:italic>\n                      <jats:sub>mean<\/jats:sub>\n                      contributed \u22641.2%.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Cycloplegic refraction significantly enhanced both accuracy and repeatability of AL prediction models in children. Models by Morgan et al., Queir\u00f3s et al. and Lingham et al. performed best. Predictive models may be a valuable substitute in settings without access to optical biometers, provided cycloplegic measurements are used when possible.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1007\/s44402-026-00095-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]],"date-time":"2026-05-18T08:05:04Z","timestamp":1779091504000},"page":"695-705","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Influence of Cycloplegia on Axial Length Prediction Models in a Paediatric Sample"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6712-7514","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ivo","family":"Soares","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7304-8756","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ant\u00f3nio","family":"Baptista","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5808-7602","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Oscar","family":"Torrado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0471-0213","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pedro","family":"Serra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"95_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"376","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.15043","volume":"100","author":"S Gajjar","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gajjar S, Ostrin LA. A systematic review of near work and myopia: measurement, relationships, mechanisms and clinical corollaries. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100:376\u201387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aos.15043.","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"551","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.13403","volume":"95","author":"S Xiong","year":"2017","unstructured":"Xiong S, Sankaridurg P, Naduvilath T, Zang J, Zou H, Zhu J, et al. Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:551\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aos.13403.","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"501","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2020.0412","volume":"138","author":"X Jiang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Jiang X, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Cotter SA, Matsumura S, Mitchell P, Rose KA, et al. Association of parental myopia with higher risk of myopia among multiethnic children before school age. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138:501\u201309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2020.0412.","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2016.4009","volume":"134","author":"JW Tideman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Tideman JW, Snabel MC, Tedja MS, van Rijn GA, Wong KT, Kuijpers RW, et al. Association of axial length with risk of uncorrectable visual impairment for Europeans with myopia. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:1355\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jamaophthalmol.2016.4009.","journal-title":"JAMA Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1189","DOI":"10.1080\/02713683.2023.2250581","volume":"48","author":"X Han","year":"2023","unstructured":"Han X, Ruan X, Zhang Y, Lin H, Zhang M, Tan X, et al. Effect of myopia severity on the health-related quality of life in children and their parents. Curr Eye Res. 2023;48:1189\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02713683.2023.2250581.","journal-title":"Curr Eye Res"},{"key":"95_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-016-0382-2","volume":"16","author":"JB \u0141azarczyk","year":"2016","unstructured":"\u0141azarczyk JB, Urban B, Konarzewska B, Szulc A, Bakunowicz-\u0141azarczyk A, \u017bmudzka E, et al. The differences in level of trait anxiety among girls and boys aged 13\u201317 years with myopia and emmetropia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:201. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12886-016-0382-2.","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1159\/000317072","volume":"225","author":"W Meng","year":"2011","unstructured":"Meng W, Butterworth J, Malecaze F, Calvas P. Axial length of myopia: a review of current research. Ophthalmologica. 2011;225:127\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000317072.","journal-title":"Ophthalmologica"},{"key":"95_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"853","DOI":"10.1177\/1120672121998960","volume":"31","author":"J N\u00e9meth","year":"2021","unstructured":"N\u00e9meth J, Tapaszt\u00f3 B, Aclimandos WA, Kestelyn P, Jonas JB, De Faber J, et al. Update and guidance on management of myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in cooperation with International Myopia Institute. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:853\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1120672121998960.","journal-title":"Eur J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00006324-199409000-00005","volume":"71","author":"T Grosvenor","year":"1994","unstructured":"Grosvenor T, Scott R. Role of the axial length\/corneal radius ratio in determining the refractive state of the eye. Optom Vis Sci. 1994;71:573\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00006324-199409000-00005.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"95_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1155\/2024\/4981095","volume":"2024","author":"Y Fan","year":"2024","unstructured":"Fan Y, Huang Y, Huang X. Association between axial length to corneal curvature radius ratio and myopia in adult patients. J Ophthalmol. 2024;2024:1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2024\/4981095.","journal-title":"J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"949","DOI":"10.1136\/bjo.2008.156554","volume":"93","author":"PJ Buckhurst","year":"2009","unstructured":"Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93:949\u201353. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bjo.2008.156554.","journal-title":"Br J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Garcia Ardoy E, Mateos N, Roda L, Torrado Sierra O, Baptista AM, Serra PM. Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes. Clin Exp Optom. 2022;106:783\u201392. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08164622.2022.2152312.","DOI":"10.1080\/08164622.2022.2152312"},{"key":"95_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clae.2019.11.005","volume":"43","author":"PB Morgan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Morgan PB, McCullough SJ, Saunders KJ. Estimation of ocular axial length from conventional optometric measures. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2020;43:18\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.clae.2019.11.005.","journal-title":"Contact Lens Anterior Eye"},{"key":"95_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0210387","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0210387","volume":"14","author":"HS Kim","year":"2019","unstructured":"Kim HS, Yu DS, Cho HG, Moon BY, Kim SY. Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210387 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0210387.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"95_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0111766","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0111766","volume":"10","author":"X He","year":"2015","unstructured":"He X, Zou H, Lu L, Zhao R, Zhao H, Li Q, et al. Axial length\/corneal radius ratio: association with refractive state and role on myopia detection combined with visual acuity in Chinese schoolchildren. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0111766 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0111766.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"95_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-020-00214-2","volume":"7","author":"T Tang","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tang T, Yu Z, Xu Q, Peng Z, Fan Y, Wang K, et al. A machine learning-based algorithm used to estimate the physiological elongation of ocular axial length in myopic children. Eye Vis. 2020;7:50. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40662-020-00214-2.","journal-title":"Eye Vis"},{"key":"95_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6200","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm11206200","volume":"11","author":"A Queir\u00f3s","year":"2022","unstructured":"Queir\u00f3s A, Amorim-de-Sousa A, Fernandes P, Ribeiro-Queir\u00f3s MS, Villa-Collar C, Gonz\u00e1lez-M\u00e9ijome JM. Mathematical estimation of axial length increment in the control of myopia progression. J Clin Med. 2022;11:6200. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm11206200.","journal-title":"J Clin Med"},{"key":"95_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s40662-022-00299-x","volume":"9","author":"DDCS Dutt","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dutt DDCS, Yazar S, Charng J, Mackey DA, Chen FK, Sampson DM. Correcting magnification error in foveal avascular zone area measurements of optical coherence tomography angiography images with estimated axial length. Eye Vis. 2022;9:29. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40662-022-00299-x.","journal-title":"Eye Vis"},{"key":"95_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"664","DOI":"10.3390\/photonics11070664","volume":"11","author":"V Noya-Padin","year":"2024","unstructured":"Noya-Padin V, Nores-Palmas N, Castro-Giraldez A, Giraldez MJ, Pena-Verdeal H, Yebra-Pimentel E. A mathematical model for axial length estimation in a myopic pediatric population based on easily obtainable variables. Photonics. 2024;11:664. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/photonics11070664.","journal-title":"Photonics"},{"key":"95_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1038\/s41433-023-02899-w","volume":"38","author":"G Lingham","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lingham G, Loughman J, Panah DS, Harrington S, Saunders KJ, Ying GS, et al. The long and short of it: a comprehensive assessment of axial length estimation in myopic eyes from ocular and demographic variables. Eye. 2024;38:1333\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41433-023-02899-w.","journal-title":"Eye"},{"key":"95_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"152","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.13402","volume":"45","author":"E Mart\u00ednez-Plaza","year":"2025","unstructured":"Mart\u00ednez-Plaza E, L\u00f3pez-de la Rosa A, Molina-Mart\u00edn A, Bataille L, Pi\u00f1ero DP. Axial length association with corneoscleral sagittal height and scleral asymmetry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025;45:152\u201359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/opo.13402.","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"95_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Fotedar R, Rochtchina E, Morgan I, Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Rose KA. Necessity of cycloplegia for assessing refractive error in 12-year-old children: a population-based study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajo.2007.03.041.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2007.03.041"},{"key":"95_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Choong YF, Chen AH, Goh PP. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:68-74.e1. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.01.084","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajo.2006.01.084"},{"key":"95_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e633","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.13569","volume":"95","author":"P Sankaridurg","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sankaridurg P, He X, Naduvilath T, Lv M, Ho A, Smith III E, et al. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorising refractive error data in children\u2019. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e633\u2013e640. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aos.13569.","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12886-024-03529-z","volume":"24","author":"A Pe\u00f1aranda","year":"2024","unstructured":"Pe\u00f1aranda A, Torrado O, M\u00e1rquez A, Baptista AM, Serra PM. The effect of cycloplegia in the accuracy of autorefraction, keratometry and axial length using the Myopia Master. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024;24:321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12886-024-03529-z.","journal-title":"BMC Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9394(99)00455-9","volume":"129","author":"AD Negrel","year":"2000","unstructured":"Negrel AD, Maul E, Pokharel GP, Zhao J, Ellwein LB. Refractive error study in children: Sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:421\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0002-9394(99)00455-9.","journal-title":"Am J Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012","volume":"15","author":"TK Koo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcm.2016.02.012.","journal-title":"J Chiropr Med"},{"key":"95_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0117482","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0117482","volume":"10","author":"YY Hu","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hu YY, Wu JF, Lu TL, Wu H, Sun W, Wang XR, et al. Effect of cycloplegia on the refractive status of children: the Shandong Children Eye Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117482. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0117482.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"95_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Momeni-Moghaddam H, Maddah N, Wolffsohn JS, Etezad-Razavi M, Zarei-Ghanavati S, Rezayatet AA, et al. The effect of cycloplegia on the ocular biometric and anterior segment parameters: a cross-sectional study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2019;8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40123-019-0187-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s40123-019-0187-5"},{"key":"95_CR30","first-page":"452","volume":"73","author":"ML Rubin","year":"1975","unstructured":"Rubin ML. The induction of refractive errors by retinal detachment surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1975;73:452\u201390.","journal-title":"Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc"},{"key":"95_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1167\/8.4.29","volume":"8","author":"DA Atchison","year":"2008","unstructured":"Atchison DA, Markwell EL, Kasthurirangan S, Pope JM, Smith G, Swann PG. Age-related changes in optical and biometric characteristics of emmetropic eyes. J Vis. 2008;8:29 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1167\/8.4.29.","journal-title":"J Vis"},{"key":"95_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"819","DOI":"10.1097\/01.OPX.0000145028.53923.67","volume":"81","author":"K Zadnik","year":"2004","unstructured":"Zadnik K, Mutti D, Mitchell G, Jones L, Burr D, Moeschberger M. Normal eye growth in emmetropic schoolchildren. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:819\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/01.OPX.0000145028.53923.67.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"95_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1111\/aos.13603","volume":"96","author":"JWL Tideman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Tideman JWL, Polling JR, Vingerling JR, Jaddoe V, Williams C, Guggenheim JA, et al. Axial length growth and the risk of developing myopia in European children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:301\u201309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/aos.13603.","journal-title":"Acta Ophthalmol"},{"key":"95_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1002\/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03938.x","volume":"72","author":"M Rosenfield","year":"1995","unstructured":"Rosenfield M, Chiu NN. Repeatability of subjective and objective refraction. Optom Vis Sci. 1995;72:577\u201379.\u00a0https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03938.x.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"95_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Truckenbrod C, Meigen C, Brandt M, Vogel M, Sanz Diez P, Wahl S, et al. Longitudinal analysis of axial length growth in a German cohort of healthy children and adolescents. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41:532\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/opo.12817.","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.12817"},{"key":"95_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Chen H, et al. Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: a network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:697\u2013708. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ophtha.2015.11.010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ophtha.2015.11.010"},{"key":"95_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.12009","volume":"33","author":"RA Armstrong","year":"2013","unstructured":"Armstrong RA. Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33:7\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/opo.12009.","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"},{"key":"95_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"745","DOI":"10.1097\/OPX.0000000000002078","volume":"100","author":"S Chamarty","year":"2023","unstructured":"Chamarty S, Verkicharla PK. Accuracy and precision of new optical biometer designed for myopia management in measurement of ocular biometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2023;100:745\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/OPX.0000000000002078.","journal-title":"Optom Vis Sci"},{"key":"95_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1111\/opo.13401","volume":"45","author":"T Naduvilath","year":"2025","unstructured":"Naduvilath T, He X, Saunders K, Demir P, Leighton R, McCullough S, et al. Regional\/ethnic differences in ocular axial elongation and refractive error progression in myopic and non-myopic children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025;45:135\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/opo.13401.","journal-title":"Ophthalmic Physiol Opt"}],"container-title":["Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00095-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00095-3","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00095-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,10]],"date-time":"2026-07-10T14:36:02Z","timestamp":1783694162000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00095-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]]},"references-count":39,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]}},"alternative-id":["95"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s44402-026-00095-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0275-5408","1475-1313"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0275-5408","type":"print"},{"value":"1475-1313","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,18]]},"assertion":[{"value":"29 October 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 April 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"17 April 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"18 May 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing Interests"}},{"value":"Written informed consent was obtained for each participant from the parents or legal guardians.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Participate"}},{"value":"Not applicable.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent to Publish"}}]}}