{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,27]],"date-time":"2025-03-27T20:33:36Z","timestamp":1743107616969,"version":"3.40.3"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":35,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783030495589"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783030495596"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-49559-6_3","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,25]],"date-time":"2020-06-25T16:04:55Z","timestamp":1593101095000},"page":"50-73","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Analysis and Detection of Unreliable Users in Twitter: Two Case Studies"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2854-2891","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nuno","family":"Guimaraes","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0507-7504","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Alvaro","family":"Figueira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6892-8871","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Luis","family":"Torgo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"3_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Working Paper 23089, National Bureau of Economic Research, January 2017. \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3386\/w23089\n\n. \nhttp:\/\/www.nber.org\/papers\/w23089","DOI":"10.3386\/w23089"},{"key":"3_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Antoniadis, S., Litou, I., Kalogeraki, V.: A model for identifying misinformation in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the Confederated International Conferences: CoopIS, ODBASE, and C&TC 2015, Rhodes, Greece, 26\u201330 October 2015, vol. 9415, pp. 473\u2013482 (2015). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-26148-5\n\n. \nhttp:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-26148-5","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-26148-5"},{"key":"3_CR3","unstructured":"BBC: Public perceptions of the impartiality and trustworthiness of the BBC (2015). Accessed 31 May 2017"},{"key":"3_CR4","unstructured":"Benevenuto, F., Magno, G., Rodrigues, T., Almeida, V.: Detecting spammers on Twitter. In: Collaboration, Electronic Messaging, Anti-Abuse and Spam Conference (CEAS), vol. 6, p. 12 (2010). \nhttp:\/\/citeseerx.ist.psu.edu\/viewdoc\/summary?doi=10.1.1.297.5340"},{"key":"3_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (2011)","DOI":"10.1145\/1963405.1963500"},{"issue":"6","key":"3_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1109\/TDSC.2012.75","volume":"9","author":"Z Chu","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., Jajodia, S.: Detecting automation of Twitter accounts: are you a human, bot, or cyborg? IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 9(6), 811\u2013824 (2012). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/TDSC.2012.75","journal-title":"IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput."},{"key":"3_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Dickerson, J.P., Kagan, V., Subrahmanian, V.S.: Using sentiment to detect bots on Twitter: are humans more opinionated than bots? In: ASONAM 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE\/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 620\u2013627 (2014). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/ASONAM.2014.6921650","DOI":"10.1109\/ASONAM.2014.6921650"},{"key":"3_CR8","series-title":"Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-31232-3_9","volume-title":"New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies","author":"A Figueira","year":"2016","unstructured":"Figueira, A., Sandim, M., Fortuna, P.: An approach to relevancy detection: contributions to the automatic detection of relevance in social networks. In: Rocha, \u00c1., Correia, A., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Mendon\u00e7a Teixeira, M. (eds.) New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. AISC, vol. 444, pp. 89\u201399. Springer, Cham (2016). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-31232-3_9"},{"key":"3_CR9","unstructured":"Forster, K.: Revealed: How dangerous fake health news conquered facebook (2018). \nhttps:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/life-style\/health-and-families\/health-news\/fake-news-health-facebook-cruel-damaging-social-media-mike-adams-natural-health-ranger-conspiracy-a7498201.html\n\n. Accessed 22 May 2018"},{"key":"3_CR10","unstructured":"Gottfried, B.Y.J., Shearer, E.: News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017. Pew Research Center, September 2017 (News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017), 17 (2017). \nhttp:\/\/www.journalism.org\/2017\/09\/07\/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2017\/"},{"key":"3_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guimar\u00e3es., N., \u00c1lvaro Figueira., Torgo., L.: Contributions to the detection of unreliable Twitter accounts through analysis of content and behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 1, KDIR, pp. 92\u2013101. INSTICC, SciTePress (2018). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.5220\/0006932800920101","DOI":"10.5220\/0006932800920101"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1145\/1656274.1656278","volume":"11","author":"M Hall","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11(1), 10\u201318 (2009). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/1656274.1656278\n\n. \nhttp:\/\/doi.acm.org\/10.1145\/1656274.1656278","journal-title":"SIGKDD Explor. Newsl."},{"key":"3_CR13","unstructured":"Haynie, D.: The U.S. and U.K. are the world\u2019s most influential countries, survey finds (2015). \nwww.usnews.com\/news\/best-countries\/best-international-influence\n\n. Accessed 23 May 2016"},{"key":"3_CR14","unstructured":"Help, T.: About verified accounts (2018). \nhttps:\/\/help.twitter.com\/en\/managing-your-account\/about-twitter-verified-accounts\n\n. Accessed 14 May 2018"},{"key":"3_CR15","unstructured":"Hern, A.: Google acts against fake news on search engine (2017). \nhttps:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2017\/apr\/25\/google-launches-major-offensive-against-fake-news\n\n. Accessed 13 Apr 2018"},{"key":"3_CR16","unstructured":"Hern, A.: New facebook controls aim to regulate political ads and fight fake news (2018). \nhttps:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2018\/apr\/06\/facebook-launches-controls-regulate-ads-publishers\n\n. Accessed 13 Apr 2018"},{"key":"3_CR17","unstructured":"Hutto, C.J., Gilbert, E.: Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Adar, E., Resnick, P., Choudhury, M.D., Hogan, B., Oh, A.H. (eds.) ICWSM. The AAAI Press (2014). \nhttp:\/\/dblp.uni-trier.de\/db\/conf\/icwsm\/icwsm2014.html#HuttoG14"},{"key":"3_CR18","unstructured":"Klein, R.: An army of sophisticated bots is influencing the debate around education (2017). \nhttps:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/common-core-debate-bots_us_58bc8bf3e4b0d2821b4ee059\n\n. Accessed 07 May 2018"},{"issue":"6380","key":"3_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1094","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aao2998","volume":"359","author":"DMJ Lazer","year":"2018","unstructured":"Lazer, D.M.J., et al.: The science of fake news. Science 359(6380), 1094\u20131096 (2018). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aao2998\n\n. \nhttp:\/\/science.sciencemag.org\/content\/359\/6380\/1094","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"3_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Loper, E., Bird, S.: NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Effective Tools and Methodologies for Teaching Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics - Volume 1, ETMTNLP 2002, pp. 63\u201370. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2002). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3115\/1118108.1118117","DOI":"10.3115\/1118108.1118117"},{"key":"3_CR21","series-title":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"175","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-23496-5_13","volume-title":"Autonomic and Trusted Computing","author":"M McCord","year":"2011","unstructured":"McCord, M., Chuah, M.: Spam detection on twitter using traditional classifiers. In: Calero, J.M.A., Yang, L.T., M\u00e1rmol, F.G., Garc\u00eda Villalba, L.J., Li, A.X., Wang, Y. (eds.) ATC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6906, pp. 175\u2013186. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-642-23496-5_13"},{"key":"3_CR22","unstructured":"Nichols, L.: Poll: Majority find major media outlets credible (2016). \nhttps:\/\/morningconsult.com\/2016\/12\/07\/poll-majority-find-major-media-outlets-credible\/\n\n. Accessed 31 May 2017"},{"key":"3_CR23","unstructured":"OpenSources: Media bias\/fact check -the most comprehensive media bias resources. \nhttps:\/\/mediabiasfactcheck.com\/\n\n. Accessed 03 May 2018"},{"key":"3_CR24","unstructured":"OpenSources: Opensources - professionally curated lists of online sources, available free for public use. \nhttp:\/\/www.opensources.co\/\n\n. Accessed 03 May 2018"},{"key":"3_CR25","unstructured":"dos Reis, J.C., Benevenuto, F., de Melo, P.O.S.V., Prates, R.O., Kwak, H., An, J.: Breaking the news: first impressions matter on online news. CoRR abs\/1503.07921 (2015). \nhttp:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1503.07921"},{"key":"3_CR26","unstructured":"Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G.L., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Hoaxy: a platform for tracking online misinformation. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pp. 745\u2013750 (2016). \nhttps:\/\/dl.acm.org\/doi\/10.1145\/2872518.2890098"},{"key":"3_CR27","unstructured":"Souppouris, A.: Clickbait, fake news and the power of feeling (2016). \nhttps:\/\/www.engadget.com\/2016\/11\/21\/clickbait-fake-news-and-the-power-of-feeling\/\n\n. Accessed 07 May 2018"},{"key":"3_CR28","unstructured":"Statista: Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2018, ranked by number of active users (2018). (in millions). \nhttps:\/\/www.statista.com\/statistics\/272014\/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users\/\n\n. Accessed 17 May 2018"},{"key":"3_CR29","unstructured":"Sysmonos: An in-depth look at the most active Twitter user data (2009). \nhttps:\/\/sysomos.com\/inside-twitter\/most-active-twitter-user-data\/\n\n. Accessed 17 May 2018"},{"key":"3_CR30","unstructured":"Tacchini, E., Ballarin, G., Della Vedova, M.L., Moret, S., de Alfaro, L.: Some Like it Hoax: automated fake news detection in social networks. arXiv e-prints, April 2017"},{"key":"3_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tambuscio, M., Ruffo, G., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Fact-checking effect on viral hoaxes: a model of misinformation spread in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2015, Companion, pp. 977\u2013982. ACM, New York (2015). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/2740908.2742572","DOI":"10.1145\/2740908.2742572"},{"key":"3_CR32","unstructured":"Twitter: Twitter - search api (2018). \nhttps:\/\/developer.twitter.com\/en\/docs\/tweets\/search\/api-reference\/get-search-tweets\n\n. Accessed 07 Mar 2018"},{"key":"3_CR33","unstructured":"Twitter: Twitter verified (2018). \nhttps:\/\/twitter.com\/verified\n\n. Accessed 17 Mar 2018"},{"key":"3_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Vargo, C.J., Guo, L., Amazeen, M.A.: The agenda-setting power of fake news: a big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media Soc., 146144481771208 (2017). \nhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1461444817712086","DOI":"10.1177\/1461444817712086"},{"key":"3_CR35","unstructured":"Weisman, J.: Anti-semitism is rising. why aren\u2019t American jews speaking up? (2018). \nhttps:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2018\/03\/17\/sunday-review\/anti-semitism-american-jews.html\n\n. Accessed 07 May 2018"}],"container-title":["Communications in Computer and Information Science","Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-49559-6_3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,25]],"date-time":"2020-06-25T16:06:06Z","timestamp":1593101166000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-49559-6_3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"ISBN":["9783030495589","9783030495596"],"references-count":35,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-49559-6_3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-0929","1865-0937"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1865-0929"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1865-0937"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 June 2020","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"IC3K","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering, and Knowledge Management","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Seville","order":3,"name":"conference_city","label":"Conference City","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Spain","order":4,"name":"conference_country","label":"Conference Country","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2018","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18 September 2018","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"20 September 2018","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"10","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"ic3k2018","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"http:\/\/www.ic3k.org\/?y=2018","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Double-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"PRIMORIS","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"167","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"12","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"0","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"7% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"No","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}