{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,24]],"date-time":"2026-01-24T05:08:13Z","timestamp":1769231293506,"version":"3.49.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":21,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"value":"9783030885823","type":"print"},{"value":"9783030885830","type":"electronic"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,1,1]],"date-time":"2021-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1609459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]],"date-time":"2021-10-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1634860800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":294,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>The research on software startups has increased lately, focusing on describing how these companies\u2019 unique context influences development practices. The next step for research is the creation of specific practices for these companies grounded in scientific results. An obstacle in this path is which dependent variable these novel practices should improve. A natural answer is these companies\u2019 success. This position paper reviews the literature on new ventures and startups\u2019 success to show that telling if a startup is successful or not is a complex issue. As a solution to this problem, this paper proposes a conceptual framework, suggesting that novel practices should improve success determinants or reduce inhibitors rather than focusing on the startups\u2019 success. Three examples illustrate the framework\u2019s use: hypotheses engineering, microservices, and BizDev. The identification of contributors and inhibitors for success of software startups could enrich the framework and indicate possible avenues for the creation of development practices specific tailored for these companies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-88583-0_15","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]],"date-time":"2021-10-22T15:46:34Z","timestamp":1634917594000},"page":"155-164","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Towards a Framework to Guide the\u00a0Creation of Development Practices for\u00a0Software Startups"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1303-4173","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jorge","family":"Melegati","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"15_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atkinson, R.: Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Project Manag. 17(6), 337\u2013342 (1999)","DOI":"10.1016\/S0263-7863(98)00069-6"},{"key":"15_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bajwa, S.S., Wang, X., Nguyen Duc, A., Abrahamsson, P.: \u201cFailures\u201d to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups. Empirical Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2373\u20132408 (2017)","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-016-9458-0"},{"key":"15_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bano, M., Zowghi, D., da Rimini, F.: User satisfaction and system success: an empirical exploration of user involvement in software development. Empirical Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2339\u20132372 (2017)","DOI":"10.1007\/s10664-016-9465-1"},{"key":"15_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berg, V., Birkeland, J., Nguyen-Duc, A., Pappas, I.O., Jaccheri, L.: Software startup engineering: a systematic mapping study. J. Syst. Softw. 144, 255\u2013274 (2018)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2018.06.043"},{"key":"15_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cantamessa, M., Gatteschi, V., Perboli, G., Rosano, M.: Startups\u2019 roads to failure. Sustainability 10(7), 2346 (2018)","DOI":"10.3390\/su10072346"},{"key":"15_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cheng, B.H.C., Atlee, J.M., Joanne, M.: Research directions in requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Future of Software Engineering, FOSE 2007, pp. 285\u2013303 (2007)","DOI":"10.1109\/FOSE.2007.17"},{"key":"15_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Lipusch, N., Popp, K.M., Leimeister, J.M.: Finding the unicorn: predicting early stage startup success through a hybrid intelligence method. In: ICIS 2017: Transforming Society with Digital Innovation (2018)","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3159123"},{"key":"15_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ebert, C., Gallardo, G., Hernantes, J., Serrano, N.: DevOps. IEEE Softw. 33(3), 94\u2013100 (2016). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1109\/MS.2016.68","DOI":"10.1109\/MS.2016.68"},{"key":"15_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ewens, M., Farre-Mensa, J.: The Evolution of the Private Equity Market and the Decline in IPOs (2017)","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.3017610"},{"key":"15_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J.: Continuous software engineering: a roadmap and agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 123, 176\u2013189 (2017)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jss.2015.06.063"},{"key":"15_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giardino, C., Paternoster, N., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., Abrahamsson, P.: Software development in startup companies: the greenfield startup model. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 42(6), 585\u2013604 (2016)","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2015.2509970"},{"key":"15_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kakati, M.: Success criteria in high-tech new ventures. Technovation 23(5), 447\u2013457 (2003)","DOI":"10.1016\/S0166-4972(02)00014-7"},{"key":"15_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klotins, E., et al.: A progression model of software engineering goals, challenges, and practices in start-ups. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 47(3), 498\u2013521 (2021)","DOI":"10.1109\/TSE.2019.2900213"},{"key":"15_CR14","unstructured":"Lewis, J., Fowler, M.: Microservices (2014). https:\/\/martinfowler.com\/articles\/microservices.html. Accessed 30 June 2021"},{"key":"15_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Melegati, J., Chanin, R., Sales, A., Prikladnicki, R.: Towards specific software engineering practices for early-stage startups. In: Paasivaara, M., Kruchten, P. (eds.) XP 2020. LNBIP, vol. 396, pp. 18\u201322. Springer, Cham (2020). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-58858-8_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-58858-8_2"},{"key":"15_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Melegati, J., Wang, X., Abrahamsson, P.: Hypotheses engineering: first essential steps of experiment-driven software development. In: IEEE\/ACM Joint 4th International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering and 1st International Workshop on Data-Driven Decisions, Experimentation and Evolution (RCoSE\/DDrEE), pp. 16\u201319 (2019)","DOI":"10.1109\/RCoSE\/DDrEE.2019.00011"},{"key":"15_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ralph, P., Kelly, P.: The dimensions of software engineering success. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering - ICSE 2014, no. 1, pp. 24\u201335. ACM Press, New York (2014)","DOI":"10.1145\/2568225.2568261"},{"key":"15_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shenhar, A.J., et al.: Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Plan. 34(6), 699\u2013725 (2001)","DOI":"10.1016\/S0024-6301(01)00097-8"},{"key":"15_CR19","unstructured":"Unterkalmsteiner, M., et al.: Software startups - a research agenda. e-Inform. Softw. Eng. J. 10(1), 1\u201328 (2016)"},{"key":"15_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yli-Huumo, J., et al.: The Relationship Between Business Model Experimentation and Technical Debt, vol. 210, pp. 17\u201329 (2015)","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-19593-3_2"},{"key":"15_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaheer, H., Breyer, Y., Dumay, J., Enjeti, M.: Straight from the horse\u2019s mouth: founders\u2019 perspectives on achieving \u2018traction\u2019 in digital start-ups. Comput. Hum. Behav. 95, 262\u2013274 (2019)","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2018.03.002"}],"container-title":["Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing","Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming \u2013 Workshops"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-030-88583-0_15","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,10,22]],"date-time":"2021-10-22T15:56:05Z","timestamp":1634918165000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-030-88583-0_15"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"ISBN":["9783030885823","9783030885830"],"references-count":21,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-88583-0_15","relation":{},"ISSN":["1865-1348","1865-1356"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1865-1348","type":"print"},{"value":"1865-1356","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"assertion":[{"value":"22 October 2021","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ChapterHistory","label":"Chapter History"}},{"value":"XP","order":1,"name":"conference_acronym","label":"Conference Acronym","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"International Conference on Agile Software Development","order":2,"name":"conference_name","label":"Conference Name","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"2021","order":5,"name":"conference_year","label":"Conference Year","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"14 June 2021","order":7,"name":"conference_start_date","label":"Conference Start Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"18 June 2021","order":8,"name":"conference_end_date","label":"Conference End Date","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"22","order":9,"name":"conference_number","label":"Conference Number","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"xpu2021","order":10,"name":"conference_id","label":"Conference ID","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"https:\/\/www.agilealliance.org\/xp2021\/","order":11,"name":"conference_url","label":"Conference URL","group":{"name":"ConferenceInfo","label":"Conference Information"}},{"value":"Single-blind","order":1,"name":"type","label":"Type","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"EasyChair","order":2,"name":"conference_management_system","label":"Conference Management System","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"38","order":3,"name":"number_of_submissions_sent_for_review","label":"Number of Submissions Sent for Review","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"11","order":4,"name":"number_of_full_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Full Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2","order":5,"name":"number_of_short_papers_accepted","label":"Number of Short Papers Accepted","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"29% - The value is computed by the equation \"Number of Full Papers Accepted \/ Number of Submissions Sent for Review * 100\" and then rounded to a whole number.","order":6,"name":"acceptance_rate_of_full_papers","label":"Acceptance Rate of Full Papers","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"3.1","order":7,"name":"average_number_of_reviews_per_paper","label":"Average Number of Reviews per Paper","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"2.8","order":8,"name":"average_number_of_papers_per_reviewer","label":"Average Number of Papers per Reviewer","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"Yes","order":9,"name":"external_reviewers_involved","label":"External Reviewers Involved","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}},{"value":"For the workshops, 18 papers were accepted for publication from 37 submissions.","order":10,"name":"additional_info_on_review_process","label":"Additional Info on Review Process","group":{"name":"ConfEventPeerReviewInformation","label":"Peer Review Information (provided by the conference organizers)"}}]}}