{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T17:10:02Z","timestamp":1748711402216,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":64,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319213941"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319213958"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,1,1]],"date-time":"2016-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1451606400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-21395-8_28","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,1]],"date-time":"2015-12-01T06:20:46Z","timestamp":1448950846000},"page":"593-619","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["Reporting and Interpreting Intentions in Defamation Law"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","reference":[{"key":"28_CR2","volume-title":"Logics of conversation. Studies in natural language processing","author":"N Asher","year":"2003","unstructured":"Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Studies in natural language processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"28_CR3","first-page":"147","volume-title":"Blackwell. Guide to the philosophy of language","author":"K Bach","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bach, K. (2003). Speech acts and pragmatics. In M. Devitt & R. Hanley (Eds.), Blackwell. Guide to the philosophy of language (pp. 147\u2013167). Oxford: Blackwell."},{"issue":"423","key":"28_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/106.423.375","volume":"106","author":"A Bezuidenhout","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bezuidenhout, A. (1997). Pragmatics, semantic under determination and the referential\/attributive distinction. Mind, 106(423), 375\u2013407.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"28_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1163\/9789004320529","volume-title":"Galen on language and ambiguity","author":"R Blair Edlow","year":"1977","unstructured":"Blair Edlow, R. (1977). Galen on language and ambiguity. Leiden: E.J. Brill."},{"key":"28_CR6","volume-title":"Quotemanship","author":"P Boller","year":"1967","unstructured":"Boller, P. (1967). Quotemanship. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press."},{"key":"28_CR7","first-page":"1","volume":"12\u201313","author":"N Burton-Roberts","year":"2006","unstructured":"Burton-Roberts, N. (2006). Cancellation and intention. Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics, 12\u201313, 1\u201312.","journal-title":"Newcastle Working Papers in Linguistics"},{"key":"28_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.114.07cap","volume-title":"Perspectives on dialogue in the new millennium","author":"A Capone","year":"2003","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2003). Theories of presuppositions and presuppositional clitics. In P. K\u00fchnlein, H. Rieser, & H. Zeevat (Eds.), Perspectives on dialogue in the new millennium (pp. 111\u2013133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins."},{"issue":"1","key":"28_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1515\/IPRG.2009.003","volume":"6","author":"A Capone","year":"2009","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2009). Are explicatures cancellable? Toward a theory of the speaker\u2019s intentionality. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(1), 55\u201383.","journal-title":"Intercultural Pragmatics"},{"key":"28_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2009.06.013","volume":"42","author":"A Capone","year":"2010","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2010). On the social practice of indirect reports (further advances in the theory of pragmemes). Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 377\u2013391.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"2","key":"28_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1080\/07268602.2011.560827","volume":"31","author":"A Capone","year":"2011","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2011). The attributive\/referential distinction, pragmatics, modularity of mind and modularization. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 31(2), 153\u2013186.","journal-title":"Australian Journal of Linguistics"},{"key":"28_CR12","first-page":"153","volume-title":"Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics. Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy and psychology 2","author":"A Capone","year":"2013","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2013). The pragmatics of indirect reports and slurring. In A. Capone et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics. Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy and psychology 2 (pp. 153\u2013183). Berlin: Springer."},{"key":"28_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-663-11116-0_7","volume-title":"Pragmatik","author":"R Carston","year":"1997","unstructured":"Carston, R. (1997). Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed? In E. Rolf (Ed.), Pragmatik (pp. 103\u2013127). Wiesbaden: Springer."},{"key":"28_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470754603","volume-title":"Thoughts and utterances. The pragmatics of explicit communication","author":"R Carston","year":"2002","unstructured":"Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"key":"28_CR15","volume-title":"Introduction to logic","author":"I Copi","year":"1990","unstructured":"Copi, I., & Cohen, C. (1990). Introduction to logic (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan.","edition":"8"},{"key":"28_CR16","volume-title":"Paragraph structure inference","author":"E Crothers","year":"1979","unstructured":"Crothers, E. (1979). Paragraph structure inference. Norwood: Ablex."},{"key":"28_CR17","first-page":"281","volume-title":"The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature","author":"M De Grazia","year":"1995","unstructured":"De Grazia, M. (1995). Sanctioning voice: Quotation marks, the abolition of torture, and the fifth amendment. In M. Woodmansee & P. Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp. 281\u2013302). Durham & London: Duke University Press."},{"key":"28_CR18","volume-title":"Dire et ne pas dire","author":"O Ducrot","year":"1972","unstructured":"Ducrot, O. (1972). Dire et ne pas dire. Paris: Hermann."},{"key":"28_CR19","first-page":"79","volume-title":"De la m\u00e9taphysique \u00e0 la rh\u00e9torique","author":"O Ducrot","year":"1986","unstructured":"Ducrot, O., & Anscombre, J. C. (1986). Argumentativit\u00e9 et informativit\u00e9. In M. Michel (Ed.), De la m\u00e9taphysique \u00e0 la rh\u00e9torique (pp. 79\u201393). Bruxelles: \u00c9ditions de l'Universit\u00e9 de Bruxelles."},{"key":"28_CR20","volume-title":"Analyzing informal fallacies","author":"M Engel","year":"1980","unstructured":"Engel, M. (1980). Analyzing informal fallacies. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall."},{"key":"28_CR21","first-page":"64","volume-title":"The logic of grammar","author":"P Grice","year":"1975","unstructured":"Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), The logic of grammar (pp. 64\u201375). Encino: Dickenson."},{"key":"28_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110886474","volume-title":"The thread of discourse","author":"J Grimes","year":"1975","unstructured":"Grimes, J. (1975). The thread of discourse. The Hague: Mouton."},{"issue":"3","key":"28_CR23","first-page":"175","volume":"12","author":"B Grosz","year":"1986","unstructured":"Grosz, B., & Sidnert, C. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational. Linguistics, 12(3), 175\u2013204.","journal-title":"Linguistics"},{"key":"28_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog0301_4","volume":"3","author":"J Hobbs","year":"1979","unstructured":"Hobbs, J. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3, 67\u201390.","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"key":"28_CR25","unstructured":"Hobbs, J. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse. Report No. CSLI-85-37. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University."},{"key":"28_CR26","volume-title":"Discourse, beliefs and intentions","author":"K Jaszczolt","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, K. (1999). Discourse, beliefs and intentions. Oxford: Elsevier."},{"key":"28_CR27","first-page":"745","volume":"41","author":"R Kaltenbach","year":"1992","unstructured":"Kaltenbach, R. (1992). Fabricated quotes and the actual malice standard: Masson v. New Yorker magazine. Catholic University Law Review, 41, 745\u2013777.","journal-title":"Catholic University Law Review"},{"issue":"1","key":"28_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-968X.1973.tb01013.x","volume":"72","author":"R Kempson","year":"1973","unstructured":"Kempson, R. (1973). Presupposition: A problem for linguistic theory. Transactions of the Philological Society, 72(1), 29\u201354.","journal-title":"Transactions of the Philological Society"},{"key":"28_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.3115\/981344.981352","volume-title":"Proceedings to the 29th annual meeting of the association of computational linguistics (ACL91), Berkeley USA","author":"A Lascarides","year":"1991","unstructured":"Lascarides, A., & Asher, N. (1991). Discourse relations and defeasible knowledge. In Proceedings to the 29th annual meeting of the association of computational linguistics (ACL91), Berkeley USA (pp. 55\u201363). Stroudsburg: Association for Computational Linguistics."},{"issue":"2","key":"28_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v28i2.542","volume":"28","author":"F Macagno","year":"2008","unstructured":"Macagno, F. (2008). Dialectical relevance and dialogical context in Walton\u2019s pragmatic theory. Informal Logic, 28(2), 102\u2013128.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"2","key":"28_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9232-9","volume":"26","author":"F Macagno","year":"2012","unstructured":"Macagno, F. (2012). Presumptive reasoning in interpretation. Implicatures and conflicts of presumptions. Argumentation, 26(2), 233\u2013265.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"28_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v33i3.3679","volume":"33","author":"F Macagno","year":"2013","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Damele, G. (2013). The dialogical force of implicit premises: Presumptions in enthymemes. Informal Logic, 33(3), 365\u2013393.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"28_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-01011-3_9","volume-title":"Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy","author":"F Macagno","year":"2013","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2013). Implicatures as forms of argument. In A. Capone et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 203\u2013224). Berlin\/New York: Springer."},{"key":"28_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139565776","volume-title":"Emotive language in argumentation","author":"F Macagno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2014). Emotive language in argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"28_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-014-9329-z","volume":"28","author":"F Macagno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Zavatta, B. (2014). Reconstructing metaphorical meaning. Argumentation, 28(4), 453\u2013488.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"28_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2013.05.001","volume":"59","author":"S Oswald","year":"2013","unstructured":"Oswald, S., & Lewinski, M. (2013). When and how do we deal with straw men? A normative and cognitive pragmatic account. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 164\u2013177.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"28_CR38","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Dissensus and the search for common ground. OSSA proceedings","author":"F Paglieri","year":"2007","unstructured":"Paglieri, F. (2007). No more charity, please! Enthymematic parsimony and the pitfall of benevolence. In C. Tindale & H. Hansen (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground. OSSA proceedings (pp. 1\u201326). Windsor: University of Windsor."},{"key":"28_CR39","first-page":"1441","volume":"48","author":"E Raudenbush","year":"1991","unstructured":"Raudenbush, E. (1991). Variations on a theme: Application of Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc. to a spectrum of misquotation libel cases. Washington & Lee Law Review, 48, 1441\u20131475.","journal-title":"Washington & Lee Law Review"},{"key":"28_CR40","first-page":"45","volume-title":"The semantics\/pragmatics distinction","author":"F Recanati","year":"2004","unstructured":"Recanati, F. (2004). \u2018What is said\u2019 and the semantics\/pragmatics distinction. In C. Bianchi (Ed.), The semantics\/pragmatics distinction (pp. 45\u201364). Stanford: CSLI Publications, Stanford University."},{"key":"28_CR41","volume-title":"Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge","author":"N Rescher","year":"1977","unstructured":"Rescher, N. (1977). Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press."},{"key":"28_CR42","unstructured":"Rigotti, E. (2005). Congruity theory and argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, (Special Issue), 75\u201396."},{"key":"28_CR43","unstructured":"Rocci, A. (2005). Connective predicates in monologic and dialogic argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, (Special Issue), 97\u2013118."},{"key":"28_CR44","volume-title":"Communication law in America","author":"P Siegel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Siegel, P. (2014). Communication law in America. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield."},{"key":"28_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/0195145283.001.0001","volume-title":"Beyond rigidity: The unfinished semantic agenda of naming and necessity","author":"S Soames","year":"2002","unstructured":"Soames, S. (2002). Beyond rigidity: The unfinished semantic agenda of naming and necessity. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"28_CR46","volume-title":"Speaking of crime. The language of criminal justice","author":"L Solan","year":"2005","unstructured":"Solan, L., & Tiersma, P. (2005). Speaking of crime. The language of criminal justice. Chicago\/London: The University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"28_CR47","volume-title":"Relevance","author":"D Sperber","year":"1986","unstructured":"Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"key":"28_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/XLVI.181.14","volume":"46","author":"CL Stevenson","year":"1937","unstructured":"Stevenson, C. L. (1937). The emotive meaning of ethical terms. Mind, 46, 14\u201331.","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"28_CR49","volume-title":"Ethics and language","author":"CL Stevenson","year":"1944","unstructured":"Stevenson, C. L. (1944). Ethics and language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press."},{"key":"28_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110885286","volume-title":"Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies","author":"A Trosborg","year":"1995","unstructured":"Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints, and apologies. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter."},{"key":"28_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion","author":"F Van Eemeren","year":"1984","unstructured":"Van Eemeren, F., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Foris."},{"key":"28_CR52","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach","author":"F van Eemeren","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"28_CR53","volume-title":"The dialectic of ambiguity: A contribution to the study of argumentation. Ph.D. dissertation","author":"JA Van Laar","year":"2003","unstructured":"Van Laar, J. A. (2003). The dialectic of ambiguity: A contribution to the study of argumentation. Ph.D. dissertation. Groningen: University of Groningen."},{"key":"28_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"25","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.77.03van","volume-title":"Essays in speech act theory","author":"D Vanderveken","year":"2002","unstructured":"Vanderveken, D. (2002). Universal grammar and speech act theory. In D. Vanderveken & S. Kubo (Eds.), Essays in speech act theory (pp. 25\u201362). Amsterdam: John Benjamins."},{"key":"28_CR55","volume-title":"Informal logic","author":"D Walton","year":"1989","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1989). Informal logic. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"28_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8632-0","volume-title":"Fallacies arising from ambiguity","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1996). Fallacies arising from ambiguity. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"key":"28_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3138\/9781442681859","volume-title":"The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument","author":"D Walton","year":"1998","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1998). The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"28_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v20i3.2280","volume":"20","author":"D Walton","year":"2000","unstructured":"Walton, D. (2000). New dialectical rules for ambiguity. Informal Logic, 20(3), 261\u2013274.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"28_CR59","volume-title":"Fundamentals of critical argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton, D. (2006). Fundamentals of critical argumentation. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"28_CR60","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Krabbe, E. (1995). Commitment in dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"28_CR1","first-page":"101","volume":"8","author":"D Walton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). Types of dialogue, dialectical relevance, and textual congruity. Anthropology & Philosophy, 8(1\u20132), 101\u2013121.","journal-title":"Anthropology & Philosophy"},{"key":"28_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-008-9110-2","volume":"23","author":"D Walton","year":"2009","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2009). Reasoning from classification and definition. Argumentation, 23, 81\u2013107.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"28_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-009-9157-8","volume":"24","author":"D Walton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2010). Wrenching from context: The manipulation of commitments. Argumentation, 24(3), 283\u2013317.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"1","key":"28_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v31i1.657","volume":"31","author":"D Walton","year":"2011","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2011). Quotations and presumptions \u2013 Dialogical effects of misquotations. Informal Logic, 31(1), 27\u201355.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"28_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"28_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-01011-3_17","volume-title":"Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy","author":"N Wieland","year":"2013","unstructured":"Wieland, N. (2013). Indirect reports and pragmatics. In A. Capone, F. Piparoand, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 389\u2013411). Dordrecht: Springer."}],"container-title":["Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology","Indirect Reports and Pragmatics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-21395-8_28","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,31]],"date-time":"2025-05-31T16:31:50Z","timestamp":1748709110000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-21395-8_28"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016]]},"ISBN":["9783319213941","9783319213958"],"references-count":64,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-21395-8_28","relation":{},"ISSN":["2214-3807","2214-3815"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2214-3807"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2214-3815"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016]]}}}