{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,26]],"date-time":"2025-06-26T04:08:06Z","timestamp":1750910886437,"version":"3.41.0"},"publisher-location":"Cham","reference-count":125,"publisher":"Springer International Publishing","isbn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"9783319625447"},{"type":"electronic","value":"9783319625454"}],"license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,1]],"date-time":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1483228800000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-62545-4_3","type":"book-chapter","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,11]],"date-time":"2017-09-11T18:45:35Z","timestamp":1505155535000},"page":"65-108","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Establishing Commitments Between Ambiguity and Misquotation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Douglas","family":"Walton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2017,9,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"3_CR1","volume-title":"L\u2019argumentation dans la langue","author":"J-C Anscombre","year":"1983","unstructured":"Anscombre, J.-C., & Ducrot, O. (1983). L\u2019argumentation dans la langue. Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga."},{"key":"3_CR2","volume-title":"Philosophy without ambiguity: A logico-linguistic essay","author":"JD Atlas","year":"1989","unstructured":"Atlas, J. D. (1989). Philosophy without ambiguity: A logico-linguistic essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press."},{"key":"3_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atlas, J. D. (2005). Logic, meaning, and conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195133004.001.0001","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195133004.001.0001"},{"key":"3_CR4","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Radical pragmatics","author":"JD Atlas","year":"1981","unstructured":"Atlas, J. D., & Levinson, S. (1981). It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 1\u201362). New York: Academic."},{"key":"3_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1075\/slcs.80.03bac","volume-title":"Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn","author":"K Bach","year":"2006","unstructured":"Bach, K. (2006). The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In B. Birner & G. Ward (Eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 21\u201330). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing."},{"key":"3_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1057\/9780230292352_8","volume-title":"Explicit communication","author":"K Bach","year":"2010","unstructured":"Bach, K. (2010). Impliciture vs Explicature: What\u2019s the difference? In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication (pp. 126\u2013137). Palgrave: Macmillan Publishing Company."},{"issue":"6","key":"3_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(98)00058-7","volume":"31","author":"C Bazzanella","year":"1999","unstructured":"Bazzanella, C., & Damiano, R. (1999). The interactional handling of misunderstanding in everyday conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(6), 817\u2013836. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-2166(98)00058-7","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(97)88001-0","volume":"27","author":"DM Bell","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bell, D. M. (1997). Innuendo. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(1), 35\u201359. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-2166(97)88001-0","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"3_CR9","first-page":"37","volume-title":"Empirical issues in syntax and semantics","author":"C Beyssade","year":"2006","unstructured":"Beyssade, C., & Marandin, J.-M. (2006). The speech act assignment problem revisited: Disentangling speaker\u2019s commitment from speaker\u2019s call on addressee. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics (Vol. 6, pp. 37\u201368). Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris Sorbonne."},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.3917\/lf.162.0089","volume":"162","author":"C Beyssade","year":"2009","unstructured":"Beyssade, C., & Marandin, J.-M. (2009). Commitment: une attitude dialogique. Langue Fran\u00e7aise, 162(2), 89. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/lf.162.0089","journal-title":"Langue Fran\u00e7aise"},{"issue":"423","key":"3_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/106.423.375","volume":"106","author":"A Bezuidenhout","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bezuidenhout, A. (1997). Pragmatics, semantic undetermination and the referential\/attributive distinction. Mind, 106(423), 375\u2013409. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/106.423.375","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"3_CR12","first-page":"107","volume-title":"Misunderstandings in social life","author":"S Blum-Kulka","year":"2014","unstructured":"Blum-Kulka, S., & Weizman, E. (2014). Misunderstandings in political interviews. In J. House, G. Kasper, & S. Ross (Eds.), Misunderstandings in social life (pp. 107\u2013128). London: Routledge."},{"key":"3_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"19","DOI":"10.1075\/bjl.29.01bou","volume":"29","author":"K Boulat","year":"2016","unstructured":"Boulat, K. (2016). Hearer-oriented processes of strength assignment: A pragmatic model of commitment. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 29, 19\u201340. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/bjl.29.01bou","journal-title":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics"},{"key":"3_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1057\/9780230292352_9","volume-title":"Explicit communication. Robyn Carston\u2019s pragmatics","author":"N Burton-Roberts","year":"2010","unstructured":"Burton-Roberts, N. (2010). Cancellation and intention. In S. Belen & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication. Robyn Carston\u2019s pragmatics (pp. 138\u2013155). New York: Palgrave."},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.11.008","volume":"48","author":"N Burton-Roberts","year":"2013","unstructured":"Burton-Roberts, N. (2013). On Grice and cancellation. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1), 17\u201328. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.11.008","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00279.x","volume":"21","author":"E Camp","year":"2006","unstructured":"Camp, E. (2006). Contextualism, metaphor and what is said. Mind and Language, 21(3), 280\u2013309. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-0017.2006.00280.x","journal-title":"Mind and Language"},{"issue":"9","key":"3_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1355","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2005.01.013","volume":"37","author":"A Capone","year":"2005","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2005). Pragmemes (a study with reference to English and Italian). Journal of Pragmatics, 37(9), 1355\u20131371. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2005.01.013","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1515\/IPRG.2009.003","volume":"6","author":"A Capone","year":"2009","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2009). Are explicatures cancellable? Toward a theory of the speaker\u2019s intentionality. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(1), 55\u201383. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/IPRG.2009.003","journal-title":"Intercultural Pragmatics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1080\/07268602.2011.560827","volume":"31","author":"A Capone","year":"2011","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2011). The attributive\/referential distinction, pragmatics, modularity of mind and modularization. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 31(2), 153\u2013186. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07268602.2011.560827","journal-title":"Australian Journal of Linguistics"},{"key":"3_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-01011-3","volume-title":"Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology 2","author":"A Capone","year":"2013","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2013a). Explicatures are NOT cancellable. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology 2 (pp. 131\u2013151). Cham: Springer."},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.21.2.08cap","volume":"21","author":"A Capone","year":"2013","unstructured":"Capone, A. (2013b). The role of pragmatics in (re)constructing the rational law-maker. Pragmatics & Cognition, 21(2), 399\u2013414.","journal-title":"Pragmatics & Cognition"},{"key":"3_CR22","first-page":"155","volume-title":"Mental representations: The interface between language and reality","author":"R Carston","year":"1988","unstructured":"Carston, R. (1988). Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In R. Kempson (Ed.), Mental representations: The interface between language and reality (pp. 155\u2013181). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"1&2","key":"3_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0017.00192","volume":"17","author":"R Carston","year":"2002","unstructured":"Carston, R. (2002a). Linguistic meaning, communicated meaning and cognitive pragmatics. Mind and Language, 17(1&2), 127\u2013148. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0017.00192","journal-title":"Mind and Language"},{"key":"3_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470754603","volume-title":"Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication","author":"R Carston","year":"2002","unstructured":"Carston, R. (2002b). Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.."},{"key":"3_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"817","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195136975.003.0040","volume-title":"Semantics: A reader","author":"R Carston","year":"2004","unstructured":"Carston, R. (2004a). Explicature and semantics. In S. Davis & B. Gillon (Eds.), Semantics: A reader (pp. 817\u2013845). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"3_CR26","first-page":"633","volume-title":"The handbook of pragmatics","author":"R Carston","year":"2004","unstructured":"Carston, R. (2004b). Relevance theory and the saying\/implicating distinction. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 633\u2013656). Oxford: Blackwell."},{"key":"3_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199673667.003.0010","volume-title":"Law and language: Current legal issues","author":"R Carston","year":"2013","unstructured":"Carston, R. (2013). Legal texts and canons of construction: A view from current pragmatic theory. In M. Freeman & F. Smith (Eds.), Law and language: Current legal issues (Vol. 15, pp. 8\u201333). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"3_CR28","first-page":"243","volume-title":"Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension","author":"H Clark","year":"1977","unstructured":"Clark, H. (1977). Inferences in comprehension. In D. LaBerge & J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 243\u2013263). Hillsdale: Erlbaum."},{"key":"3_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"153","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-4104-4_9","volume-title":"Meaning and use","author":"M Dascal","year":"1979","unstructured":"Dascal, M. (1979). Conversational relevance. In A. Margalit (Ed.), Meaning and use (pp. 153\u2013174). Dordrecht: Reidel."},{"key":"3_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.21.04das","volume-title":"(on) Searle on conversation","author":"M Dascal","year":"1992","unstructured":"Dascal, M. (1992). On the pragmatic structure of conversation. In H. Parret & J. Verschueren (Eds.), (on) Searle on conversation (pp. 35\u201357). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing."},{"key":"3_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1075\/z.120","volume-title":"Interpretation and understanding","author":"M Dascal","year":"2003","unstructured":"Dascal, M. (2003). Interpretation and understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company."},{"key":"3_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511663796","volume-title":"Implicature: Intention, convention, and principle in the failure of Gricean theory","author":"W Davis","year":"1998","unstructured":"Davis, W. (1998). Implicature: Intention, convention, and principle in the failure of Gricean theory. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"3_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007838727096","volume":"14","author":"A Deppermann","year":"2000","unstructured":"Deppermann, A. (2000). Semantic shifts in argumentative processes: A step beyond the \u201cfallacy of equivocation.\u201d. Argumentation, 14, 17\u201330. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1007838727096","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"3_CR34","first-page":"825","volume":"25","author":"M Franklin","year":"1983","unstructured":"Franklin, M., & Bussel, D. (1983). The plaintiff\u2019s burden in defamation: Awareness and falsity. William and Mary Law Review, 25, 825\u2013889.","journal-title":"William and Mary Law Review"},{"key":"3_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139164054","volume-title":"Intentions in the experience of meaning","author":"R Gibbs","year":"1999","unstructured":"Gibbs, R. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"699","DOI":"10.2307\/1771962","volume":"6","author":"R Giora","year":"1985","unstructured":"Giora, R. (1985). Notes towards a theory of text coherence. Poetics Today, 6(4), 699. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1771962","journal-title":"Poetics Today"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"3_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-2166(88)90048-3","volume":"12","author":"R Giora","year":"1988","unstructured":"Giora, R. (1988). On the informativeness requirement. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(5\u20136), 547\u2013565. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0378-2166(88)90048-3","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-2166(95)00065-8","volume":"27","author":"R Giora","year":"1997","unstructured":"Giora, R. (1997). Discourse coherence and theory of relevance: Stumbling blocks in search of a unified theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 27(1), 17\u201334. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0378-2166(95)00065-8","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"3_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195136166.001.0001","volume-title":"On our mind. Salience, context, and figurative language","author":"R Giora","year":"2003","unstructured":"Giora, R. (2003). On our mind. Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195136166.001.0001"},{"key":"3_CR40","volume-title":"Studies in the way of words","author":"P Grice","year":"1989","unstructured":"Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR41","first-page":"175","volume":"12","author":"B Grosz","year":"1986","unstructured":"Grosz, B., & Sidner, C. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175\u2013204.","journal-title":"Computational Linguistics"},{"key":"3_CR42","first-page":"175","volume":"1974","author":"JK Gundel","year":"2004","unstructured":"Gundel, J. K., & Fretheim, T. (2004). Topic and focus. The Handbook of Pragmatics, 1974, 175\u2013196. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9780470756959.ch8","journal-title":"The Handbook of Pragmatics"},{"key":"3_CR43","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen."},{"key":"3_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110240078","volume-title":"Im\/politeness implicatures","author":"M Haugh","year":"2015","unstructured":"Haugh, M. (2015). Im\/politeness implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter."},{"key":"3_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog0301_4","volume":"3","author":"JR Hobbs","year":"1979","unstructured":"Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3, 67\u201390. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15516709cog0301_4","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"key":"3_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1163\/187731009X455820","volume":"1","author":"L Horn","year":"2009","unstructured":"Horn, L. (2009). Implicature, truth, and meaning. International Review of Pragmatics, 1, 3\u201334.","journal-title":"International Review of Pragmatics"},{"key":"3_CR47","first-page":"121","volume-title":"Considering pragma-dialectics","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2006","unstructured":"Jacobs, S., & Jackson, S. (2006). Derailments of argumentation: It takes two to tango. In P. Houtlosser & A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering pragma-dialectics (pp. 121\u2013133). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"3_CR48","volume-title":"Discourse, beliefs and intentions","author":"K Jaszczolt","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, K. (1999). Discourse, beliefs and intentions. Oxford: Elsevier."},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR49","first-page":"169","volume":"4","author":"L Karttunen","year":"1973","unstructured":"Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), 169\u2013193.","journal-title":"Linguistic Inquiry"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004","volume":"40","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kecskes, I. (2008). Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 385\u2013406. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"11","key":"3_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2889","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2010.06.008","volume":"42","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kecskes, I. (2010a). Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(11), 2889\u20132897. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2010.06.008","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1075\/ps.1.1.04kec","volume":"1","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kecskes, I. (2010b). The paradox of communication: Socio-cognitive approach to pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society, 1(1), 50\u201373. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/ps.1.1.04kec","journal-title":"Pragmatics and Society"},{"key":"3_CR53","volume-title":"Intercultural pragmatics","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kecskes, I. (2013). Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"3_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1163\/18773109-00702002","volume":"7","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2015","unstructured":"Kecskes, I. (2015). Intracultural communication and intercultural communication: Are they different? International Review of Pragmatics, 7, 171\u2013194. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/18773109-00702002","journal-title":"International Review of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec","volume":"17","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kecskes, I., & Zhang, F. (2009). Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(2), 331\u2013355. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec","journal-title":"Pragmatics & Cognition"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"344","DOI":"10.5840\/monist197357314","volume":"57","author":"E Keenan","year":"1973","unstructured":"Keenan, E. (1973). Presupposition in natural logic. The Monist, 57(3), 344\u2013370. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.5840\/monist197357314","journal-title":"The Monist"},{"key":"3_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139022453.010","volume-title":"Cambridge handbook of pragmatics","author":"M Kissine","year":"2012","unstructured":"Kissine, M. (2012). Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. In K. Allan & K. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 169\u2013190). New York: Cambridge University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/cbo9781139022453.010"},{"key":"3_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00986208","volume":"16","author":"A Lascarides","year":"1993","unstructured":"Lascarides, A., & Asher, N. (1993). Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy, 16, 437\u2013493. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00986208","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog0104_2","volume":"1","author":"J Levin","year":"1977","unstructured":"Levin, J., & Moore, J. (1977). Dialogue-games: Metacommunication structures for natural language interaction. Cognitive Science, 1(4), 395\u2013420. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0364-0213(77)80016-5","journal-title":"Cognitive Science"},{"key":"3_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511813313","volume-title":"Pragmatics","author":"S Levinson","year":"1983","unstructured":"Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"3_CR61","first-page":"66","volume-title":"Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings","author":"S Levinson","year":"1992","unstructured":"Levinson, S. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 66\u2013100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"3_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5526.001.0001","volume-title":"Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature","author":"S Levinson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press."},{"key":"3_CR63","volume-title":"Semantics","author":"J Lyons","year":"1977","unstructured":"Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v28i2.542","volume":"28","author":"F Macagno","year":"2008","unstructured":"Macagno, F. (2008). Dialectical relevance and dialogical context in walton\u2019s pragmatic theory. Informal Logic, 28(2), 102. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v28i2.542","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v31i4.3326","volume":"31","author":"F Macagno","year":"2011","unstructured":"Macagno, F. (2011). The presumptions of meaning. Hamblin and equivocation. Informal Logic, 31(4), 367. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v31i4.3326","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"103","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.2014.11821842","volume":"51","author":"F Macagno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Macagno, F. (2014). Manipulating emotions. Value-based reasoning and emotive language. Argumentation & Advocacy, 51(2), 103\u2013122.","journal-title":"Argumentation & Advocacy"},{"key":"3_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijer.2016.07.002","volume":"79","author":"F Macagno","year":"2016","unstructured":"Macagno, F. (2016a). Argument relevance and structure. Assessing and developing students\u2019 uses of evidence. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 180\u2013194. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijer.2016.07.002","journal-title":"International Journal of Educational Research"},{"key":"3_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-21395-8_28","volume-title":"Indirect reports and pragmatics","author":"F Macagno","year":"2016","unstructured":"Macagno, F. (2016b). Reporting and interpreting intentions in defamation law. In A. Capone, F. Kiefer, & F. Lo Piparo (Eds.), Indirect reports and pragmatics (pp. 593\u2013619). Cham: Springer. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-21395-8"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-015-9347-5","volume":"30","author":"F Macagno","year":"2016","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Capone, A. (2016). Interpretative disputes, explicatures, and argumentative reasoning. Argumentation, 30(4), 399\u2013422. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-015-9347-5","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v33i3.3679","volume":"33","author":"F Macagno","year":"2013","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Damele, G. (2013). The dialogical force of implicit premises. Presumptions in enthymemes. Informal Logic, 33(3), 361. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v33i3.3679","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"3_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139565776","volume-title":"Emotive language in argumentation","author":"F Macagno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Walton, D. (2014). Emotive language in argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781139565776"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"453","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-014-9329-z","volume":"28","author":"F Macagno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Macagno, F., & Zavatta, B. (2014). Reconstructing metaphorical meaning. Argumentation, 28(4), 453\u2013488. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-014-9329-z","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"511","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00128990","volume":"2","author":"W Mann","year":"1988","unstructured":"Mann, W. (1988). Dialogue games: Conventions of human interaction. Argumentation, 2(4), 511\u2013532. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00128990","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"3_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.37.09mat","volume-title":"Relevance theory: Applications and implications","author":"T Matsui","year":"1998","unstructured":"Matsui, T. (1998). Assessing a scenario-based account of bridging reference assignment. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 123\u2013160). Amsterdam\/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing."},{"key":"3_CR75","volume-title":"Pragmatics. An introduction","author":"J Mey","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(02)00139-X","volume":"35","author":"J Mey","year":"2003","unstructured":"Mey, J. (2003). Context and (dis)ambiguity: A pragmatic view. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(3), 331\u2013347. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-2166(02)00139-X","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"3_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.77.15moe","volume-title":"Essays in speech act theory","author":"J Moeschler","year":"2002","unstructured":"Moeschler, J. (2002). Speech act theory and the analysis of conversation. In D. Vandervecken & S. Kubo (Eds.), Essays in speech act theory (pp. 239\u2013261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company."},{"key":"3_CR78","first-page":"407","volume-title":"Cognitive pragmatics","author":"J Moeschler","year":"2012","unstructured":"Moeschler, J. (2012). Conversational and conventional implicatures. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (pp. 407\u2013434). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter."},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.11.019","volume":"48","author":"J Moeschler","year":"2013","unstructured":"Moeschler, J. (2013). Is a speaker-based pragmatics possible? Or how can a hearer infer a speaker\u2019s commitment? Journal of Pragmatics, 48(1), 84\u201397. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2012.11.019","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"3_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1075\/bjl.22.10mor","volume":"22","author":"P Morency","year":"2008","unstructured":"Morency, P., Oswald, S., & de Saussure, L. (2008). Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: A cognitive pragmatic approach. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 197\u2013219.","journal-title":"Belgian Journal of Linguistics"},{"key":"3_CR81","first-page":"685","volume":"42","author":"D Patterson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Patterson, D. (2004). Interpretation in law. San Diego Law Review, 42, 685\u2013710.","journal-title":"San Diego Law Review"},{"key":"3_CR82","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Computing natural language","author":"J Perry","year":"1998","unstructured":"Perry, J. (1998). Indexicals, contexts and unarticulated constituents. In A. Aliseda-Llera, R. Van Glabbeek, & D. Westerst\u00e5hl (Eds.), Computing natural language (pp. 1\u201311). Stanford: CSLI Publications."},{"key":"3_CR83","volume-title":"Meaning and force : The pragmatics of performative utterances","author":"F Recanati","year":"1987","unstructured":"Recanati, F. (1987). Meaning and force : The pragmatics of performative utterances. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"299","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1015267930510","volume":"25","author":"F Recanati","year":"2002","unstructured":"Recanati, F. (2002). No title. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25(3), 299\u2013345. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1015267930510","journal-title":"Linguistics and Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR85","first-page":"53","volume":"27","author":"T Reinhart","year":"1981","unstructured":"Reinhart, T. (1981). Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics in pragmatics and philosophy. Philosophica, 27(1), 53\u201394.","journal-title":"Philosophica"},{"key":"3_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511498848","volume-title":"Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition","author":"N Rescher","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rescher, N. (2006). Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511498848"},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR87","first-page":"306","volume":"47","author":"SJL Review","year":"1972","unstructured":"Review, S. J. L. (1972). Perjury\u2013lie by negative implication (United States v. Bronston). St John\u2019s Law Review, 47(2), 306\u2013312.","journal-title":"St John\u2019s Law Review"},{"key":"3_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1057\/9780230286825","volume-title":"Context and connection in metaphor","author":"D Ritchie","year":"2006","unstructured":"Ritchie, D. (2006). Context and connection in metaphor. New York: Palgrave."},{"key":"3_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/1-4020-5857-8","volume-title":"How to think about meaning","author":"P Saka","year":"2007","unstructured":"Saka, P. (2007). How to think about meaning. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"issue":"2","key":"3_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"228","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0068.00369","volume":"36","author":"JM Saul","year":"2002","unstructured":"Saul, J. M. (2002). Speaker meaning, what is said, and what is implicated. Nous, 36(2), 228\u2013248. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0068.00369","journal-title":"Nous"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1017\/S0047404500006837","volume":"5","author":"J Searle","year":"1976","unstructured":"Searle, J. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1\u201323. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0047404500006837","journal-title":"Language in Society"},{"key":"3_CR92","volume-title":"Foundations of illocutionary logic","author":"J Searle","year":"1985","unstructured":"Searle, J., & Vanderveken, D. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"3_CR93","first-page":"109","volume-title":"Logic, thought and action","author":"J Searle","year":"2005","unstructured":"Searle, J., & Vanderveken, D. (2005). Speech acts and illocutionary logic. InLogic, thought and action (pp. 109\u2013132). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands."},{"key":"3_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199795383.001.0001","volume-title":"The language of perjury cases","author":"R Shuy","year":"2011","unstructured":"Shuy, R. (2011). The language of perjury cases. New York: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"3_CR95","first-page":"373","volume":"46","author":"M Sinclair","year":"1985","unstructured":"Sinclair, M. (1985). Law and language: The role of pragmatics in statutory interpretation. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 46, 373\u2013420.","journal-title":"University of Pittsburgh Law Review"},{"key":"3_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/0195145283.001.0001","volume-title":"Beyond rigidity: The unfinished semantic agenda of naming and necessity","author":"S Soames","year":"2002","unstructured":"Soames, S. (2002). Beyond rigidity: The unfinished semantic agenda of naming and necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"3_CR97","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"180","DOI":"10.1057\/9780230522770_11","volume-title":"Language in the legal process","author":"L Solan","year":"2002","unstructured":"Solan, L. (2002). The Clinton scandal: Some legal lessons from linguistics. In J. Cotterill (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 180\u2013195). New York: Palgrave."},{"key":"3_CR98","first-page":"859","volume":"79","author":"L Solan","year":"2004","unstructured":"Solan, L. (2004). Pernicious ambiguity in contracts and statutes. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 79, 859\u2013888.","journal-title":"Chicago-Kent Law Review"},{"key":"3_CR99","volume-title":"Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice","author":"L Solan","year":"2005","unstructured":"Solan, L., & Tiersma, P. (2005). Speaking of crime: The language of criminal justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press."},{"key":"3_CR100","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780199572120.001.0001","volume-title":"The oxford handbook of language and law","author":"L Solan","year":"2012","unstructured":"Solan, L., & Tiersma, P. (2012). The language of crime. In L. Solan & P. Tiersma (Eds.), The oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 340\u2013353). Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"3_CR101","volume-title":"The law of evidence in Canada","author":"J Sopinka","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sopinka, J., Lederman, S., & Bryant, A. (2009). The law of evidence in Canada. LexisNexis: Markham."},{"key":"3_CR102","volume-title":"Relevance: Communication and cognition","author":"D Sperber","year":"1986","unstructured":"Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR103","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00262951","volume":"2","author":"R Stalnaker","year":"1973","unstructured":"Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 447\u2013457. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/bf00262951","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophical Logic"},{"key":"3_CR104","first-page":"197","volume-title":"Semantics and philosophy","author":"R Stalnaker","year":"1974","unstructured":"Stalnaker, R. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. Munitz & P. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (pp. 197\u2013214). New York: New York University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/0198237073.003.0003"},{"key":"3_CR105","volume-title":"Inquiry","author":"R Stalnaker","year":"1984","unstructured":"Stalnaker, R. (1984). Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press."},{"issue":"181","key":"3_CR106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"14","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/XLVI.181.14","volume":"XLVI","author":"C Stevenson","year":"1937","unstructured":"Stevenson, C. (1937). The emotive meaning of ethical terms. Mind, XLVI(181), 14\u201331. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/mind\/XLVI.181.14","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"3_CR107","volume-title":"Ethics and language","author":"C Stevenson","year":"1944","unstructured":"Stevenson, C. (1944). Ethics and language. New Haven: Yale University Press."},{"key":"3_CR108","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/3839.003.0018","volume-title":"Intentions in communication","author":"R Thomason","year":"1990","unstructured":"Thomason, R. (1990). Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 325\u2013364). Cambridge: MIT Press."},{"key":"3_CR109","first-page":"373","volume":"63","author":"P Tiersma","year":"1990","unstructured":"Tiersma, P. (1990). The language of perjury: Literal truth, ambiguity, and the false statement requirement. Southern California Law Review, 63, 373\u2013431.","journal-title":"Southern California Law Review"},{"key":"3_CR110","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective","author":"F Eemeren van","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"3_CR111","volume-title":"The dialectic of ambiguity","author":"JA Laar van","year":"2003","unstructured":"van Laar, J. A. (2003). The dialectic of ambiguity. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen."},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR112","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v21i3.2248","volume":"21","author":"JA Laar Van","year":"2001","unstructured":"Van Laar, J. A. (2001). Ambiguity in a dialectical perspective. Informal Logic, 21(3), 245\u2013266. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v21i3.2248","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR113","first-page":"49","volume":"18","author":"J Villafranco","year":"2004","unstructured":"Villafranco, J., Colbath, B., & Horvath, A. (2004). The lanham act defendant\u2019s burden post-novartis. Antitrust Magazine, 18(3), 49\u201352.","journal-title":"Antitrust Magazine"},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR114","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x","volume":"22","author":"K Fintel von","year":"2008","unstructured":"von Fintel, K. (2008). What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives, 22(1), 137\u2013170. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1520-8583.2008.00144.x","journal-title":"Philosophical Perspectives"},{"key":"3_CR115","volume-title":"Informal logic","author":"D Walton","year":"1989","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1989). Informal logic. New York: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"3_CR116","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1995). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah: Routledge. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203811160"},{"key":"3_CR117","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8632-0","volume-title":"Fallacies arising from ambiguity","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, D. (1996). Fallacies arising from ambiguity. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers."},{"issue":"1","key":"3_CR118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.14.1.03wal","volume":"14","author":"D Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton, D. (2006). Using conversation policies to solve problems of ambiguity in argumentation and artificial intelligence. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(1), 3\u201336. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pc.14.1.03wal","journal-title":"Pragmatics & Cognition"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"3_CR119","first-page":"101","volume":"8","author":"D Walton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2007). Types of dialogue, dialectical relevance and textual congruity. Anthropology & Philosophy, 8(1\u20132), 101\u2013119.","journal-title":"Anthropology & Philosophy"},{"issue":"3","key":"3_CR120","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-009-9157-8","volume":"24","author":"D Walton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2010). Wrenching from context: The manipulation of commitments. Argumentation, 24(3), 283\u2013317. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-009-9157-8","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"4","key":"3_CR121","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v36i4.4586","volume":"36","author":"D Walton","year":"2016","unstructured":"Walton, D., & Macagno, F. (2016). Profiles of dialogue for relevance. Informal Logic, 36(4), 523. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v36i4.4586","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"3_CR122","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511802034"},{"key":"3_CR123","volume-title":"The Oxford handbook of pragmatics","author":"D Wilson","year":"2016","unstructured":"Wilson, D. (2016). Relevance theory. In Y. Huang (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pbns.37"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"3_CR124","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/0024-3841(93)90058-5","volume":"90","author":"D Wilson","year":"1993","unstructured":"Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1993). Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua, 90(1\u20132), 1\u201325.","journal-title":"Lingua"},{"key":"3_CR125","first-page":"607","volume-title":"Handbook of pragmatics","author":"D Wilson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607\u2013632). Oxford: Blackwell. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2009.09.021"}],"container-title":["Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology","Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/978-3-319-62545-4_3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,25]],"date-time":"2025-06-25T17:52:17Z","timestamp":1750873937000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/978-3-319-62545-4_3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017]]},"ISBN":["9783319625447","9783319625454"],"references-count":125,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-62545-4_3","relation":{},"ISSN":["2214-3807","2214-3815"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2214-3807"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2214-3815"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017]]}}}