{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,16]],"date-time":"2026-04-16T04:12:53Z","timestamp":1776312773341,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":96,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,1]],"date-time":"2012-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1335830400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Arch Gynecol Obstet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,4,30]],"date-time":"2012-04-30T10:16:10Z","timestamp":1335780970000},"page":"739-753","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":68,"title":["The Bishop Score as a determinant of labour induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"286","author":[{"given":"Cristina","family":"Teixeira","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Nuno","family":"Lunet","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Teresa","family":"Rodrigues","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Henrique","family":"Barros","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"573","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00017","volume":"49","author":"JM Crane","year":"2006","unstructured":"Crane JM (2006) Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):573\u2013584","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2341_CR2","unstructured":"RCOG (2001) Induction of Labour. Evidence-based Clinical Guideline Number 9, June 2001. City"},{"key":"2341_CR3","unstructured":"ACOG (2009) Practice bulletin no. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 114(2 Pt 1): 386\u2013397"},{"key":"2341_CR4","first-page":"1","volume":"176","author":"AB Caughey","year":"2009","unstructured":"Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, Cheng YW, Gienger A, Little SE, Lee JF, Wong L, Shaffer BL, Tran SH, Padula A, McDonald KM, Long EF, Owens DK, Bravata DM (2009) Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 176:1\u2013257","journal-title":"Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-199912000-00005","volume":"42","author":"FJ Zlatnik","year":"1999","unstructured":"Zlatnik FJ (1999) Elective induction of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol 42(4):757\u2013765","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"600","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(99)00377-4","volume":"94","author":"ST Seyb","year":"1999","unstructured":"Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, Dooley SL (1999) Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 94(4):600\u2013607","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","volume":"105","author":"FP Vrouenraets","year":"2005","unstructured":"Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ (2005) Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 105(4):690\u2013697","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1515\/JPM.2004.005","volume":"32","author":"A Ben-Haroush","year":"2004","unstructured":"Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Bar J, Glickman H, Kaplan B, Hod M (2004) Indicated labor induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 increases the risk of cesarean section even in multiparous women with no previous cesarean section. J Perinat Med 32(1):31\u201336","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"2341_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e3181ad9377","volume":"114","author":"L Pevzner","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pevzner L, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA (2009) Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. Obstet Gynecol 114(2 Pt 1):261\u2013267","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"989","DOI":"10.1530\/rep.1.00709","volume":"131","author":"IZ Mackenzie","year":"2006","unstructured":"Mackenzie IZ (2006) Induction of labour at the start of the new millennium. Reproduction 131(6):989\u2013998","journal-title":"Reproduction"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"564","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00016","volume":"49","author":"KA Baacke","year":"2006","unstructured":"Baacke KA, Edwards RK (2006) Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):564\u2013572","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"524","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00012","volume":"43","author":"H Hadi","year":"2000","unstructured":"Hadi H (2000) Cervical ripening and labor induction: clinical guidelines. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43(3):524\u2013536","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1016\/S1521-6934(03)00037-3","volume":"17","author":"GJ Hofmeyr","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hofmeyr GJ (2003) Induction of labour with an unfavourable cervix. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 17(5):777\u2013794","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"389","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2007.00762.x","volume":"47","author":"A Keepanasseril","year":"2007","unstructured":"Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, Aggarwal N (2007) Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 47(5):389\u2013393","journal-title":"Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"248","DOI":"10.1097\/00007611-199803000-00006","volume":"91","author":"NW Hendrix","year":"1998","unstructured":"Hendrix NW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN Jr, Devoe LD (1998) Bishop score: a poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. South Med J 91(3):248\u2013252","journal-title":"South Med J"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1159\/000089045","volume":"21","author":"G Daskalakis","year":"2006","unstructured":"Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, Mesogitis S, Papantoniou N, Antsaklis A (2006) Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther 21(1):34\u201338","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR17","first-page":"35","volume":"36","author":"PC Tan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J (2009) Transvaginal sonography of cervical length and Bishop score as predictors of successful induction of term labor: the effect of parity. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 36(1):35\u201339","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"52","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2007.07.014","volume":"100","author":"HM Tanir","year":"2008","unstructured":"Tanir HM, Sener T, Yildiz Z (2008) Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 100(1):52\u201355","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1007\/s00404-008-0915-x","volume":"280","author":"Y Uyar","year":"2009","unstructured":"Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y (2009) Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280(3):357\u2013362","journal-title":"Arch Gynecol Obstet"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2004.23.3.375","volume":"23","author":"SH Yang","year":"2004","unstructured":"Yang SH, Roh CR, Kim JH (2004) Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor. J Ultrasound Med 23(3):375\u2013382 quiz 384\u2013375","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1237","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123740","volume":"186","author":"DA Wing","year":"2002","unstructured":"Wing DA, Tran S, Paul RH (2002) Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(6):1237\u20131240 discussion 1240\u20131233","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2 Pt 1","key":"2341_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"227","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000196508.11431.c0","volume":"107","author":"E Peregrine","year":"2006","unstructured":"Peregrine E, O\u2019Brien P, Omar R, Jauniaux E (2006) Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 107(2 Pt 1):227\u2013233","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.5360","volume":"32","author":"TM Eggebo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA (2008) Ultrasound assessment of fetal head\u2013perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(2):199\u2013204","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(01)01386-2","volume":"98","author":"S Chandra","year":"2001","unstructured":"Chandra S, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC (2001) Transvaginal ultrasound and digital examination in predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 98(1):2\u20136","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR25","first-page":"51","volume":"80","author":"AM Bahar","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bahar AM, Archibong EI, Zaki ZM, Mahfouz AA (2003) Induction of labour using low and high dose regimens of prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets. East Afr Med J 80(1):51\u201355","journal-title":"East Afr Med J"},{"issue":"11","key":"2341_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1093","DOI":"10.1080\/j.0001-6349.2005.00881.x","volume":"84","author":"B Bueno","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bueno B, San-Frutos L, Salazar F, Perez-Medina T, Engels V, Archilla B, Izquierdo F, Bajo J (2005) Variables that predict the success of labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84(11):1093\u20131097","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"7","key":"2341_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701409858","volume":"86","author":"Gomez Laencina","year":"2007","unstructured":"Laencina Gomez (2007) Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(7):799\u2013804","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.4103\/1117-1936.177479","volume":"14","author":"VO Oboro","year":"2007","unstructured":"Oboro VO, Isawumi AI, Akinola SE, Komolafe JO, Tijani AM, Adesina AO (2007) Factors predicting failure of labour induction. Niger Postgrad Med J 14(2):137\u2013139","journal-title":"Niger Postgrad Med J"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR29","first-page":"495","volume":"28","author":"EA Friedman","year":"1966","unstructured":"Friedman EA, Niswander KR, Bayonet-Rivera NP, Sachtleben MR (1966) Relation of prelabor evaluation to inducibility and the course of labor. Obstet Gynecol 28(4):495\u2013501","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1447-0756.2008.00929.x","volume":"35","author":"KH Park","year":"2009","unstructured":"Park KH, Hong JS, Shin DM, Kang WS (2009) Prediction of failed labor induction in parous women at term: role of previous obstetric history, digital examination and sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35(2):301\u2013306","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol Res"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1008","volume":"23","author":"H Roman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L (2004) Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(4):357\u2013362","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2341_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1558","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2009.02255.x","volume":"116","author":"SJ Pretlove","year":"2009","unstructured":"Pretlove SJ, Fox CE, Khan KS, Kilbya MD (2009) Noninvasive methods of detecting fetal anaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 116:1558\u20131567","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"11","key":"2341_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1539","DOI":"10.1002\/sim.1186","volume":"21","author":"JP Higgins","year":"2002","unstructured":"Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539\u20131558","journal-title":"Stat Med"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR34","first-page":"108","volume":"64","author":"AA Orhue","year":"1984","unstructured":"Orhue AA, Unuigbe JA, Ezimokhai M, Ojo VA (1984) Outcome of induced labor in 931 term pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 64(1):108\u2013114","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.3109\/00016348709015731","volume":"66","author":"O Bakos","year":"1987","unstructured":"Bakos O, Backstrom T (1987) Induction of labor: a prospective, randomized study into amniotomy and oxytocin as induction methods in a total unselected population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66(6):537\u2013541","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1987.tb01015.x","volume":"27","author":"K Dhall","year":"1987","unstructured":"Dhall K, Mittal SC, Kumar A (1987) Evaluation of preinduction scoring systems. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 27(4):309\u2013311","journal-title":"Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(91)90039-N","volume":"40","author":"S Paterson-Brown","year":"1991","unstructured":"Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM, Edmonds DK, Rodeck CH (1991) Preinduction cervical assessment by Bishop\u2019s score and transvaginal ultrasound. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 40(1):17\u201323","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(91)90288-3","volume":"165","author":"P Schreyer","year":"1991","unstructured":"Schreyer P, Bar-Natan N, Sherman DJ, Arieli S, Caspi E (1991) Fetal breathing movements before oxytocin induction in prolonged pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165(3):577\u2013581","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6 Pt 1","key":"2341_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1690","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(92)91558-R","volume":"166","author":"JA Macer","year":"1992","unstructured":"Macer JA, Macer CL, Chan LS (1992) Elective induction versus spontaneous labor: a retrospective study of complications and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166(6 Pt 1):1690\u20131696 discussion 1696\u20131697","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.1515\/jpme.1994.22.5.399","volume":"22","author":"KT Schneider","year":"1994","unstructured":"Schneider KT, Luftner D, Rath W (1994) Efficacy and safety of a 2-tier prostaglandin labor induction schedule. J Perinat Med 22(5):399\u2013407","journal-title":"J Perinat Med"},{"issue":"1 Pt 1","key":"2341_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"262","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70405-2","volume":"174","author":"G Blanch","year":"1996","unstructured":"Blanch G, Olah KS, Walkinshaw S (1996) The presence of fetal fibronectin in the cervicovaginal secretions of women at term\u2013its role in the assessment of women before labor induction and in the investigation of the physiologic mechanisms of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174(1 Pt 1):262\u2013266","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR42","first-page":"61","volume":"24","author":"S Alberico","year":"1997","unstructured":"Alberico S, Fadalti M, Grimaldi E, De Seta F, Mazza S, Guaschino S (1997) Eligibility criteria for labor induction with prostaglandins. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 24(2):61\u201366","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR43","first-page":"386","volume":"26","author":"P Panel","year":"1997","unstructured":"Panel P, Bascou V, de Meeus JB, Magnin G (1997) Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 26(4):386\u2013394","journal-title":"J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"235","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(97)00259-7","volume":"90","author":"EM Xenakis","year":"1997","unstructured":"Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O (1997) Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 90(2):235\u2013239","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1177\/030006059702500306","volume":"25","author":"A Caruso","year":"1997","unstructured":"Caruso A, De Santis L, Carducci B, Ferrazzani S, De Carolis S, Mancuso S (1997) The use of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening in patients requiring induction of labour. J Int Med Res 25(3):159\u2013166","journal-title":"J Int Med Res"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1016\/S0929-8266(98)00042-1","volume":"7","author":"R Gonen","year":"1998","unstructured":"Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A (1998) Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Eur J Ultrasound 7(3):183\u2013187","journal-title":"Eur J Ultrasound"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70133-4","volume":"179","author":"AH Nassar","year":"1998","unstructured":"Nassar AH, Adra AM, Chakhtoura N, Gomez-Marin O, Beydoun S (1998) Severe preeclampsia remote from term: labor induction or elective cesarean delivery? Am J Obstet Gynecol 179(5):1210\u20131213","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"49","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(98)00228-8","volume":"64","author":"HS Liu","year":"1999","unstructured":"Liu HS, Chu TY, Chang YK, Yu MH, Chen WH (1999) Intracervical misoprostol as an effective method of labor induction at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 64(1):49\u201353","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR49","first-page":"22","volume":"26","author":"P Scollo","year":"1999","unstructured":"Scollo P (1999) Epidemiology of cesarean sections: prolonged pregnancy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 26(1):22\u201326","journal-title":"Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.2002.00643.x","volume":"19","author":"R Gabriel","year":"2002","unstructured":"Gabriel R, Darnaud T, Chalot F, Gonzalez N, Leymarie F, Quereux C (2002) Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19(3):254\u2013257","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1565","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.458","volume":"188","author":"DP Johnson","year":"2003","unstructured":"Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ (2003) Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188(6):1565\u20131569 discussion 1569\u20131572","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.166","volume":"22","author":"SM Rane","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH (2003) Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of the need for Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(1):45\u201348","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.165","volume":"22","author":"SM Rane","year":"2003","unstructured":"Rane SM, Pandis GK, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH (2003) Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22(1):40\u201344","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"538","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1100","volume":"24","author":"SM Rane","year":"2004","unstructured":"Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH (2004) The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(5):538\u2013549","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1076","volume":"23","author":"H Roman","year":"2004","unstructured":"Roman H, Verspyck E, Vercoustre L, Degre S, Col JY, Firmin JM, Caron P, Marpeau L (2004) The role of ultrasound and fetal fibronectin in predicting the length of induced labor when the cervix is unfavorable. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23(6):567\u2013573","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR56","first-page":"180","volume":"55","author":"J Ara","year":"2005","unstructured":"Ara J, Noorani M (2005) Induction of labour with oral misoprostol for prelabour rupture of membranes at term. J Pak Med Assoc 55(5):180\u2013183","journal-title":"J Pak Med Assoc"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050500139604","volume":"18","author":"PE Nielsen","year":"2005","unstructured":"Nielsen PE, Howard BC, Hill CC, Larson PL, Holland RH, Smith PN (2005) Comparison of elective induction of labor with favorable Bishop scores versus expectant management: a randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 18(1):59\u201364","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"2341_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/j.gyobfe.2004.11.006","volume":"33","author":"P Rozenberg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Ville Y (2005) Comparison of pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 33(1\u20132):17\u201322","journal-title":"Gynecol Obstet Fertil"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"192","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2004.00549.x","volume":"112","author":"P Rozenberg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Chastang C, Ville Y (2005) Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. BJOG 112(2):192\u2013196","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"350","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000227746.35565.d9","volume":"108","author":"JM Dodd","year":"2006","unstructured":"Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Robinson JS (2006) Morning compared with evening induction of labor: a nested randomized controlled trial. A nested randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 108(2):350\u2013360","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"311","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610600594922","volume":"26","author":"MR Elghorori","year":"2006","unstructured":"Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E (2006) A way to lend objectivity to Bishop score. J Obstet Gynaecol 26(4):311\u2013316","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340500451101","volume":"85","author":"W Szczesny","year":"2006","unstructured":"Szczesny W, Kjollesdal M, Karlsson B, Nielsen S (2006) Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(5):579\u2013582","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"505","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2006.00650.x","volume":"46","author":"PC Tan","year":"2006","unstructured":"Tan PC, Suguna S, Vallikkannu N, Hassan J (2006) Ultrasound and clinical predictors for caesarean delivery after labour induction at term. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 46(6):505\u2013509","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"41e41","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.07.049","volume":"196","author":"A Cromi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Tomera S, Scandroglio S, Colombo G, Bolis P (2007) Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(1):41e41\u201341e47","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"722","DOI":"10.3346\/jkms.2007.22.4.722","volume":"22","author":"KH Park","year":"2007","unstructured":"Park KH (2007) Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women. J Korean Med Sci 22(4):722\u2013727","journal-title":"J Korean Med Sci"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.05.039","volume":"132","author":"N Rizzo","year":"2007","unstructured":"Rizzo N, Banzola I, Concu M, Morano D, Sekizawa A, Giommi F, Vagnoni S, Gabrielli S, Tempesta A, Carinci P, Farina A (2007) PLAC1 mRNA levels in maternal blood at induction of labor correlate negatively with induction-delivery interval. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132(2):177\u2013181","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"568","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.4018","volume":"29","author":"PC Tan","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J (2007) Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29(5):568\u2013573","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"4","key":"2341_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"748","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02849968","volume":"24","author":"A Yanik","year":"2007","unstructured":"Yanik A, Gulumser C, Tosun M (2007) Ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length in predicting mode of delivery after oxytocin induction. Adv Ther 24(4):748\u2013756","journal-title":"Adv Ther"},{"key":"2341_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2393-9-40","volume":"9","author":"RP Jokhi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jokhi RP, Brown BH, Anumba DO (2009) The role of cervical Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in the prediction of the course and outcome of induced labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9:40","journal-title":"BMC Pregnancy Childbirth"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.6219","volume":"33","author":"M Meijer-Hoogeveen","year":"2009","unstructured":"Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH (2009) Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(2):213\u2013220","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"25","key":"2341_CR71","first-page":"21","volume":"7","author":"RT Rayamajhi","year":"2009","unstructured":"Rayamajhi RT, Karki C, Shrestha N, Padhye SM (2009) Indication for labour induction and predictors for failed induction at KMCTH. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 7(25):21\u201325","journal-title":"Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.7315","volume":"34","author":"CJ Verhoeven","year":"2009","unstructured":"Verhoeven CJ, Oudenaarden A, Hermus MA, Porath MM, Oei SG, Mol BW (2009) Validation of models that predict Cesarean section after induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(3):316\u2013321","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"12","key":"2341_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1406","DOI":"10.3109\/14767051003678135","volume":"23","author":"CW Cheung","year":"2010","unstructured":"Cheung CW, Leung TY, Sahota DS, Chan OK, Chan LW, Fung TY, Lau TK (2010) Outcome of induction of labour using maternal characteristics, ultrasound assessment and biochemical state of the cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 23(12):1406\u20131412","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"585","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200609000-00018","volume":"49","author":"MG Lin","year":"2006","unstructured":"Lin MG, Rouse DJ (2006) What is a failed labor induction? Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):585\u2013593","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(92)90209-H","volume":"47","author":"J Lyndrup","year":"1992","unstructured":"Lyndrup J, Legarth J, Weber T, Nickelsen C, Guldbaek E (1992) Predictive value of pelvic scores for induction of labor by local PGE2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 47(1):17\u201323","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2006.09.002","volume":"132","author":"WA Grobman","year":"2007","unstructured":"Grobman WA, Simon C (2007) Factors associated with the length of the latent phase during labor induction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 132(2):163\u2013166","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1002\/uog.1813","volume":"25","author":"JL Bartha","year":"2005","unstructured":"Bartha JL, Romero-Carmona R, Martinez-Del-Fresno P, Comino-Delgado R (2005) Bishop score and transvaginal ultrasound for preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized clinical trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25(2):155\u2013159","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"440","DOI":"10.1097\/00003081-200009000-00004","volume":"43","author":"RK Edwards","year":"2000","unstructured":"Edwards RK, Richards DS (2000) Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43(3):440\u2013446","journal-title":"Clin Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(03)00531-3","volume":"102","author":"LJ Heffner","year":"2003","unstructured":"Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC (2003) Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol 102(2):287\u2013293","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694 e691","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.026","volume":"198","author":"DV Coonrod","year":"2008","unstructured":"Coonrod DV, Drachman D, Hobson P, Manriquez M (2008) Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):694 e691\u2013694 e611 discussion 694 e611","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(00)00862-0","volume":"96","author":"JM Alexander","year":"2000","unstructured":"Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ (2000) Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 96(2):291\u2013294","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"2341_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.2147\/IJWH.S13333","volume":"2","author":"C Kim","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim C (2010) Gestational diabetes: risks, management, and treatment options. Int J Womens Health 2:339\u2013351","journal-title":"Int J Womens Health"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"190","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1985.tb00641.x","volume":"25","author":"S Arulkumaran","year":"1985","unstructured":"Arulkumaran S, Gibb DM, TambyRaja RL, Heng SH, Ratnam SS (1985) Failed induction of labour. Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol 25(3):190\u2013193","journal-title":"Aust NZJ Obstet Gynaecol"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.07.001","volume":"191","author":"DA Luthy","year":"2004","unstructured":"Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW (2004) Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191(5):1511\u20131515","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"990","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(96)00321-3","volume":"88","author":"WJ Watson","year":"1996","unstructured":"Watson WJ, Stevens D, Welter S, Day D (1996) Factors predicting successful labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 88(6):990\u2013992","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR86","first-page":"137","volume":"60","author":"AP Lange","year":"1982","unstructured":"Lange AP, Secher NJ, Westergaard JG, Skovgard I (1982) Prelabor evaluation of inducibility. Obstet Gynecol 60(2):137\u2013147","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1016\/S0301-2115(03)00336-1","volume":"112","author":"EF Faltin-Traub","year":"2004","unstructured":"Faltin-Traub EF, Boulvain M, Faltin DL, Extermann P, Irion O (2004) Reliability of the Bishop score before labour induction at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 112(2):178\u2013181","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.3109\/01443619209013646","volume":"79","author":"GM Jackson","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jackson GM, Ludmir J, Bader TJ (1992) The Accuracy of Digital Examination and Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Cervical Length. Obstet Gynecol 79(2):214\u2013218","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"10","key":"2341_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"683","DOI":"10.1097\/00006254-200210000-00022","volume":"57","author":"WF Rayburn","year":"2002","unstructured":"Rayburn WF (2002) Preinduction cervical ripening: basis and methods of current practice. Obstet Gynecol Surv 57(10):683\u2013692","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"issue":"6","key":"2341_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"920","DOI":"10.3923\/pjbs.2007.920.923","volume":"10","author":"Z Tabasi","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tabasi Z, Behrashi M, Mahdian M (2007) Vaginal misoprostol versus high dose of oxytocin for labor induction: a comparative study. Pak J Biol Sci 10(6):920\u2013923","journal-title":"Pak J Biol Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2010.02.004","volume":"110","author":"O Balci","year":"2010","unstructured":"Balci O, Mahmoud AS, Ozdemir S, Acar A (2010) Induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 110(1):64\u201367","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"1","key":"2341_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(00)00253-8","volume":"71","author":"B Kemp","year":"2000","unstructured":"Kemp B, Winkler M, Rath W (2000) Induction of labor by prostaglandin E(2) in relation to the Bishop score. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 71(1):13\u201317","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"273","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.126202","volume":"187","author":"JE Ferguson II","year":"2002","unstructured":"Ferguson JE II, Head BH, Frank FH, Frank ML, Singer JS, Stefos T, Mari G (2002) Misoprostol versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening: a prospective, randomized, double-masked trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(2):273\u2013279 discussion 279\u2013280","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"3","key":"2341_CR94","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00275-3","volume":"83","author":"A Beigi","year":"2003","unstructured":"Beigi A, Kabiri M, Zarrinkoub F (2003) Cervical ripening with oral misoprostol at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 83(3):251\u2013255","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"issue":"5","key":"2341_CR95","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1080\/14767050410001702195","volume":"15","author":"JM Crane","year":"2004","unstructured":"Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC (2004) Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 15(5):319\u2013323","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"issue":"2","key":"2341_CR96","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"186","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.04.050","volume":"197","author":"AS Hatfield","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hatfield AS, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM (2007) Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(2):186\u2013192","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,22]],"date-time":"2023-06-22T10:37:18Z","timestamp":1687430238000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,1]]},"references-count":96,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,9]]}},"alternative-id":["2341"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00404-012-2341-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0932-0067","1432-0711"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0932-0067","type":"print"},{"value":"1432-0711","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,5,1]]}}}