{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,14]],"date-time":"2025-04-14T09:12:23Z","timestamp":1744621943946},"reference-count":65,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,9]],"date-time":"2012-11-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1352419200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Argumentation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,8]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-012-9284-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,8]],"date-time":"2012-11-08T02:44:57Z","timestamp":1352342697000},"page":"225-243","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":28,"title":["What Students\u2019 Arguments Can Tell Us: Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"27","author":[{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Aikaterini","family":"Konstantinidou","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"9284_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-017-0781-7_3","volume-title":"Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments","author":"MJ Baker","year":"2003","unstructured":"Baker, M.J. 2003. Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments, ed. J. Andriessen, M. Baker, and D. Suthers, 47\u201378. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"issue":"8","key":"9284_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"797","DOI":"10.1080\/095006900412284","volume":"22","author":"P Bell","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bell, P., and M.C. Linn. 2000. Scientific arguments as learning artefacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education 22(8): 797\u2013817.","journal-title":"International Journal of Science Education"},{"issue":"2, 3","key":"9284_CR3","first-page":"101","volume":"19","author":"A Braet","year":"1999","unstructured":"Braet, A. 1999. The enthymeme in Aristotle\u2019s rhetoric: From argumentation theory to logic. Informal Logic 19(2, 3): 101\u2013117.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9284_CR4","volume-title":"How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school","year":"2000","unstructured":"Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cocking (eds.). 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council."},{"issue":"1","key":"9284_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/S0193-3973(99)00046-5","volume":"21","author":"S Carey","year":"2000","unstructured":"Carey, S. 2000. Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 21(1): 13\u201319.","journal-title":"Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology"},{"key":"9284_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"417","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-5032-9_32","volume-title":"Contributions from science education research","author":"M Castells","year":"2007","unstructured":"Castells, M., J. Enciso, J.M. Cerver\u00f3, P. L\u00f3pez, and M. Cabellos. 2007. What can we learn from a study of argumentation in the students\u2019 answers and group discussion to open physics\u2019 problems? In Contributions from science education research, ed. A.R. Pint\u00f3 and D. Couso, 417\u2013431. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9284_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1074","DOI":"10.1119\/1.12290","volume":"48","author":"AB Champagne","year":"1980","unstructured":"Champagne, A.B., L.E. Klopfer, and J.H. Anderson. 1980. Factors influencing the learning of classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics 48: 1074\u20131079.","journal-title":"American Journal of Physics"},{"key":"9284_CR8","first-page":"3","volume-title":"Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice","author":"MTH Chi","year":"2002","unstructured":"Chi, M.T.H., and R.D. Roscoe. 2002. The process and challenges of conceptual change. In Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice, ed. M. Limon and L. Mason, 3\u201327. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"key":"9284_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A","volume":"84","author":"R Driver","year":"2000","unstructured":"Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education 84: 287\u2013312.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"key":"9284_CR10","first-page":"263","volume-title":"New perspectives on conceptual change","author":"R Duit","year":"1999","unstructured":"Duit, R. 1999. Conceptual change approaches in science education. In New perspectives on conceptual change, ed. W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, and M. Carretero, 263\u2013282. Oxford: Pergamon."},{"key":"9284_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-6670-2_8","volume-title":"Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research","author":"R Duschl","year":"2007","unstructured":"Duschl, R. 2007. Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. In Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, ed. S. Erduran and M. Jim\u00e9nez-Aleixandre, 159\u2013175. Amsterdam: Springer."},{"key":"9284_CR11","unstructured":"Duschl, R.A., K. Ellenboger and S. Erduran. 1999. Promoting argumentation in middle school science classrooms: A project SEPIA evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching (March 28\u201331), Boston, MA."},{"key":"9284_CR13","volume-title":"Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research","year":"2007","unstructured":"Erduran, S., and M.P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (eds.). 2007. Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"issue":"6","key":"9284_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"915","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.20012","volume":"88","author":"S Erduran","year":"2004","unstructured":"Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne. 2004. TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin\u2019s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education 88(6): 915\u2013933.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"key":"9284_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1007\/1-4020-3673-6_30","volume-title":"Research and the quality of science education","author":"S Erduran","year":"2005","unstructured":"Erduran, S., J. Osborne, and S. Simon. 2005. The role of argument in developing scientific literacy. In Research and the quality of science education, ed. K. Boersma, O. de Jong, H. Eijkelhof, and M. Goedhart, 381\u2013394. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers."},{"issue":"3","key":"9284_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9055-x","volume":"21","author":"M Finocchiaro","year":"2007","unstructured":"Finocchiaro, M. 2007. Arguments, meta-arguments, and metadialogues: A reconstruction of Krabbe, Govier, and Woods. Argumentation 21(3): 253\u2013268.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"9284_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"397","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-008-9398-3","volume":"172","author":"D Godden","year":"2010","unstructured":"Godden, D. 2010. The importance of belief in argumentation: Belief, commitment and the effective resolution of a difference of opinion. Synthese 172(3): 397\u2013414.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9284_CR18","volume-title":"Good reasoning matters","author":"L Groarke","year":"2004","unstructured":"Groarke, L., and C. Tindale. 2004. Good reasoning matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9284_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"117","DOI":"10.2307\/747886","volume":"28","author":"B Guzzetti","year":"1993","unstructured":"Guzzetti, B., T. Synder, G. Glass, and W. Gamas. 1993. Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly 28: 117\u2013155.","journal-title":"Reading Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"9284_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v26i1.428","volume":"26","author":"U Hahn","year":"2006","unstructured":"Hahn, U., and M. Oaksford. 2006. A normative theory of argument strength. Informal Logic 26(1): 1\u201324.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9284_CR21","volume-title":"A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation","author":"AC Hastings","year":"1963","unstructured":"Hastings, A.C. 1963. A reformulation of the modes of reasoning in argumentation. Evanston, IL: Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University."},{"key":"9284_CR22","unstructured":"Hewson, P. 1992. Conceptual change in science teaching and teacher education. Paper presented at a meeting on \u201cResearch and Curriculum Development in Science Teaching,\u201d National Center for Educational Research, Documentation, and Assessment, Ministry for Education and Science, Madrid, Spain."},{"key":"9284_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1078-8_6","volume-title":"Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argument","author":"D Hitchcock","year":"2003","unstructured":"Hitchcock, D. 2003. Toulmin\u2019s warrants. In Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argument, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, C.A. Willard, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, 69\u201382. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers."},{"issue":"6","key":"9284_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"757","DOI":"10.1002\/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F","volume":"84","author":"MP Jimenez-Aleizandre","year":"2000","unstructured":"Jimenez-Aleizandre, M.P., A.B. Rodriguez, and R.A. Duschl. 2000. \u201cDoing the lesson\u2019 or \u201cDoing science\u2019: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education 84(6): 757\u2013792.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"key":"9284_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Juthe, A. 2005. Argument by analogy. Argumentation 19:1\u201327.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-005-2314-9"},{"issue":"8","key":"9284_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I","volume":"36","author":"GJ Kelly","year":"1999","unstructured":"Kelly, G.J., and C. Chen. 1999. The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(8): 883\u2013915.","journal-title":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},{"key":"9284_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"314","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.10024","volume":"86","author":"G Kelly","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kelly, G., and A. Takao. 2002. Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students\u2019 use of evidence in writing. Science Education 86: 314\u2013342.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"9284_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.3660290107","volume":"29","author":"T Koballa","year":"1992","unstructured":"Koballa, T. 1992. Persuasion and attitude change in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(1): 63\u201380.","journal-title":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},{"key":"9284_CR28","first-page":"61","volume-title":"Contemporary science education research: Scientific literacy and social aspects of science","author":"A Konstantinidou","year":"2010","unstructured":"Konstantinidou, A., J.M. Cerver\u00f3, and M. Castells. 2010. Argumentation and scientific reasoning: The \u201cdouble hierarchy\u201d argument. In Contemporary science education research: Scientific literacy and social aspects of science, ed. M.F. Ta\u015far, and G. \u00c7akmakc\u0131, 61\u201370. Ankara, Turkey: Pegem Akademi."},{"key":"9284_CR29","first-page":"641","volume-title":"Proceedings of the fifth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"2003","unstructured":"Krabbe, E.C.W. 2003. Metadialogues. In Proceedings of the fifth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, C.A. Willard, and A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, 641\u2013644. Amsterdam: Sic Sat."},{"issue":"3","key":"9284_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9052-0","volume":"21","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"2007","unstructured":"Krabbe, E.C.W. 2007. On how to get beyond the opening stage. Argumentation 21(3): 233\u2013242.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9284_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v17i1.2396","volume":"17","author":"D Levi","year":"1995","unstructured":"Levi, D. 1995. The case of the missing premise. Informal Logic 17: 67\u201388.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"2","key":"9284_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"154","DOI":"10.1353\/par.0.0034","volume":"42","author":"F Macagno","year":"2009","unstructured":"Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2009. Argument from analogy in law, the classical tradition, and recent theories. Philosophy and Rhetoric 42(2): 154\u2013182.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Rhetoric"},{"key":"9284_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v30i1.692","volume":"30","author":"F Macagno","year":"2010","unstructured":"Macagno, F., and D. Walton. 2010. Defeasible classifications and inferences from definitions. Informal Logic 30: 34\u201361.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9284_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1007\/0-306-47639-8_25","volume-title":"Research in science education\u2014past, present, and future","author":"I Martins","year":"2001","unstructured":"Martins, I., E. Mortimer, J. Osborne, C. Tsatsarelis, and M.P. Jim\u00e9nez Aleixandre. 2001. Rhetoric and science education. In Research in science education\u2014past, present, and future, ed. H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Gr\u00e4ber, M. Komorek, A. Kross, and P. Reiska, 189\u2013198. Amsterdam: Kluwer."},{"key":"9284_CR35","first-page":"31","volume-title":"Teacher enhancement for elementary and secondary science and mathematics: Status, issues, and problems","author":"JP Mestre","year":"1994","unstructured":"Mestre, J.P. 1994. Cognitive aspects of learning and teaching science. In Teacher enhancement for elementary and secondary science and mathematics: Status, issues, and problems, ed. S.J. Fitzsimmons, and L.C. Kerpelman, 31\u201353. Arlington: National Science Foundation."},{"issue":"2","key":"9284_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"84","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2011.558816","volume":"46","author":"M Nussbaum","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nussbaum, M. 2011. Argumentation, dialogue theory, and probability modeling: Alternative frameworks for argumentation research in education. Educational Psychologist 46(2): 84\u2013106.","journal-title":"Educational Psychologist"},{"key":"9284_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1007\/1-4020-3673-6_29","volume":"7","author":"J Osborne","year":"2005","unstructured":"Osborne, J. 2005. The role of argument in science education. Research and the Quality of Science Education 7: 367\u2013380.","journal-title":"Research and the Quality of Science Education"},{"issue":"10","key":"9284_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.20035","volume":"41","author":"J Osborne","year":"2004","unstructured":"Osborne, J., S. Erduran, and S. Simon. 2004. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(10): 994\u20131020.","journal-title":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},{"key":"9284_CR39","volume-title":"Persuading science","author":"M Pera","year":"1991","unstructured":"Pera, M., and W. Shea. 1991. Persuading science. Canton, MA: Science History Publications."},{"issue":"2","key":"9284_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.3730660207","volume":"66","author":"G Posner","year":"1982","unstructured":"Posner, G., K. Strike, P. Hewson, and W. Gertzog. 1982. Accommodation of s scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education 66(2): 211\u2013227.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"9284_CR41","first-page":"3","volume":"14","author":"E Rigotti","year":"1995","unstructured":"Rigotti, E. 1995. Verit\u00e0 e Persuasione. Il Nuovo Areopago 14(1): 3\u201314.","journal-title":"Il Nuovo Areopago"},{"key":"9284_CR42","first-page":"37","volume-title":"Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda","author":"J Roschelle","year":"1995","unstructured":"Roschelle, J. 1995. Learning in interactive environments: Prior knowledge and new experience. In Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda, ed. J.H. Falk and L.D. Dierking, 37\u201351. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums."},{"issue":"3","key":"9284_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"447","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.20276","volume":"92","author":"V Sampson","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sampson, V., and D. Clark. 2008. Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education 92(3): 447\u2013472.","journal-title":"Science Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"9284_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci2301_2","volume":"23","author":"W Sandoval","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sandoval, W., and K. Millwood. 2005. The quality of students\u2019 use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction 23(1): 23\u201355.","journal-title":"Cognition and Instruction"},{"key":"9284_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.1007\/s11412-007-9020-6","volume":"2","author":"B Schwarz","year":"2007","unstructured":"Schwarz, B., and R. De Groot. 2007. Argumentation in a changing world. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2: 297\u2013313.","journal-title":"Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning"},{"issue":"3","key":"9284_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1080\/17437270802417176","volume":"31","author":"S Simon","year":"2008","unstructured":"Simon, S. 2008. Using toulmin\u2019s argument pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 31(3): 277\u2013289.","journal-title":"International Journal of Research and Method in Education"},{"key":"9284_CR47","volume-title":"Persuasion in society","author":"H Simons","year":"2001","unstructured":"Simons, H., J. Morreale, and B. Gronbeck. 2001. Persuasion in society. Thousand Oaks: Sage."},{"key":"9284_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Songer, N., and Linn, M.C. 1991. How do students\u2019 views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(9): 761\u2013787.","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.3660280905"},{"issue":"4","key":"9284_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1011913813847","volume":"13","author":"S Southerland","year":"2001","unstructured":"Southerland, S., G. Sinatra, and M. Matthews. 2001. Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review 13(4): 325\u2013351.","journal-title":"Educational Psychology Review"},{"key":"9284_CR49","first-page":"143","volume-title":"Research in science education in Europe","author":"C Sutton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Sutton, C. 1996. The scientific model as a form of speech. In Research in science education in Europe, ed. G. Welford, J. Osborne, and P. Scott, 143\u2013152. London: Falmer Press."},{"key":"9284_CR50","volume-title":"The uses of argument","author":"S Toulmin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Toulmin, S. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9284_CR51","volume-title":"An introduction to reasoning","author":"S Toulmin","year":"1984","unstructured":"Toulmin, S., R. Rieke, and A. Janik. 1984. An introduction to reasoning, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.","edition":"2"},{"key":"9284_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Floris Publications."},{"key":"9284_CR54","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"9284_CR55","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9284_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst and F. Snoek-Henkemans. 2002. Argumentation. Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781410602442"},{"key":"9284_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.1995.11951608","volume":"31","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1994","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., K. van de Glopper, R. Grootendorst, and R. Oostdam. 1994. Student performance in identifying unexpressed premisses and argumentation schemes. Argumentation and Advocacy 31: 151\u2013162.","journal-title":"Argumentation and Advocacy"},{"key":"9284_CR57","first-page":"165","volume-title":"Crucial concepts in argumentation theory","author":"MA Rees van","year":"2001","unstructured":"van Rees, M.A. 2001. Argument interpretation and reconstruction. In Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, 165\u2013199. Amsterdam: SicSat."},{"key":"9284_CR58","volume-title":"Logical dialogue-games and fallacies","author":"D Walton","year":"1984","unstructured":"Walton, D. 1984. Logical dialogue-games and fallacies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc."},{"key":"9284_CR59","volume-title":"A pragmatic theory of fallacy","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton, D. 1995. A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa and London: The University of Alabama Press."},{"key":"9284_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511619311","volume-title":"Media argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walton, D. 2007. Media argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9284_CR60","unstructured":"Walton, D. and F. Macagno. 2006. Argumentative reasoning patterns. In Proceedings of ECAI conference 2006. Riva del Garda, 28 August\u20132 September 2006 (pp. 1\u20135). Amsterdam: IOS Press."},{"key":"9284_CR62","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton, D., and E. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press."},{"key":"9284_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. New York: Cambridge University Press."}],"container-title":["Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-012-9284-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10503-012-9284-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-012-9284-5","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,6,26]],"date-time":"2023-06-26T17:09:12Z","timestamp":1687799352000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10503-012-9284-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,9]]},"references-count":65,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,8]]}},"alternative-id":["9284"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-012-9284-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0920-427X","1572-8374"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0920-427X","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8374","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,11,9]]}}}