{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T01:56:43Z","timestamp":1762999003281},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]],"date-time":"2013-12-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1387497600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Argumentation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-013-9307-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,19]],"date-time":"2013-12-19T06:25:03Z","timestamp":1387434303000},"page":"161-185","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":57,"title":["Argumentative Polylogues in a Dialectical Framework: A Methodological Inquiry"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Marcin","family":"Lewi\u0144ski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Aakhus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"9307_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aakhus, M. 2003. Neither naive nor critical reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation 17(3): 265\u2013290.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1025112227381"},{"key":"9307_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aakhus, M. 2007. Communication as design. Communication Monographs 74(1): 112\u2013117.","DOI":"10.1080\/03637750701196383"},{"key":"9307_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aakhus, M. 2013. Deliberation digitized: Designing disagreement space through communication information services. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2(1): 101\u2013113.","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.2.1.05aak"},{"key":"9307_CR4","unstructured":"Aakhus, M., and S. Jackson. 2005. Technology, interaction and design. In Handbook of language and social interaction, ed. K. Fitch, and R. Sanders, 411\u2013433. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"issue":"2","key":"9307_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007768503175","volume":"12","author":"JA Blair","year":"1998","unstructured":"Blair, J.A. 1998. The limits of the dialogue model of argument. Argumentation 12(2): 325\u2013339.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"2","key":"9307_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.5325\/philrhet.45.2.0148","volume":"45","author":"JA Blair","year":"2012","unstructured":"Blair, J.A. 2012. Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic as related to argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric 45(2): 148\u2013164.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Rhetoric"},{"issue":"4","key":"9307_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026311002268","volume":"17","author":"D Bonevac","year":"2003","unstructured":"Bonevac, D. 2003. Pragma-dialectics and beyond. Argumentation 17(4): 451\u2013459.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9307_CR13","first-page":"542","volume-title":"Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation","author":"DE Brashers","year":"1989","unstructured":"Brashers, D.E., and R.A. Meyers. 1989. Tag-team argument and group decision-making: A preliminary investigation. In Spheres of argument: Proceedings of the Sixth SCA\/AFA Conference on Argumentation, ed. B.E. Gronbeck, 542\u2013550. Annandale: Speech Communication Association."},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(03)00037-7","volume":"36","author":"S Bruxelles","year":"2004","unstructured":"Bruxelles, S., and C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni. 2004. Coalitions in polylogues. Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 75\u2013113.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"18","DOI":"10.1080\/10417948709372710","volume":"53","author":"DJ Canary","year":"1987","unstructured":"Canary, D.J., B.G. Brossmann, and D.R. Seibold. 1987. Argument structures in decision-making groups. Southern Speech Communication Journal 53(1): 18\u201337.","journal-title":"Southern Speech Communication Journal"},{"key":"9307_CR17","volume-title":"Arenas of language use","author":"HH Clark","year":"1992","unstructured":"Clark, H.H. 1992. Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9307_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1353\/lan.1982.0042","volume":"58","author":"HH Clark","year":"1982","unstructured":"Clark, H.H., and T.B. Carlson. 1982. Hearers and speech acts. Language 58(2): 332\u2013373.","journal-title":"Language"},{"key":"9307_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"27","DOI":"10.1075\/cvs.6.03das","volume-title":"Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory","author":"M Dascal","year":"2008","unstructured":"Dascal, M. 2008. Dichotomies and types of debate. In Controversy and Confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory, ed. F.H. van Eemeren, and B. Garssen, 27\u201349. Amsterdam: John Benjamins."},{"key":"9307_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-9219-2","volume-title":"Fundamentals of legal argumentation","author":"ET Feteris","year":"1999","unstructured":"Feteris, E.T. 1999. Fundamentals of legal argumentation. Dordrecht: Kluwer."},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v7i1.2696","volume":"7","author":"RJ Fogelin","year":"1985","unstructured":"Fogelin, R.J. 1985. The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Logic 7(1): 1\u20138.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9307_CR30","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen."},{"issue":"2","key":"9307_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007743830491","volume":"12","author":"S Jackson","year":"1998","unstructured":"Jackson, S. 1998. Disputation by design. Argumentation 12(2): 183\u2013198.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"9307_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1080\/00335638009383524","volume":"66","author":"S Jackson","year":"1980","unstructured":"Jackson, S., and S. Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66(3): 251\u2013265.","journal-title":"Quarterly Journal of Speech"},{"key":"9307_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacobs, S., and M. Aakhus. 2002. What mediators do with words: Implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly 20(4): 177\u2013204.","DOI":"10.1002\/crq.3890200205"},{"key":"9307_CR35","first-page":"121","volume-title":"Considering pragma-dialectics","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2006","unstructured":"Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 2006. Derailments of argumentation: It takes two to tango. In Considering pragma-dialectics, ed. P. Houtlosser, and M.A. van Rees, 121\u2013133. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"issue":"2","key":"9307_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9039-x","volume":"21","author":"D Jacquette","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jacquette, D. 2007. Two sides of any issue. Argumentation 21(2): 115\u2013127.","journal-title":"Two sides of any issue. Argumentation"},{"key":"9307_CR37","volume-title":"Manifest rationality","author":"R Johnson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Johnson, R. 2000. Manifest rationality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1075\/prag.7.1.01ker","volume":"7","author":"C Kerbrat-Orecchioni","year":"1997","unstructured":"Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1997. A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7(1): 1\u201320.","journal-title":"Pragmatics"},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(03)00034-1","volume":"36","author":"C Kerbrat-Orecchioni","year":"2004","unstructured":"Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 2004. Introducing polylogue. Journal of Pragmatics 36(1): 1\u201324.","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9307_CR40","first-page":"25","volume-title":"JFAK: Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th birthday","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"1999","unstructured":"Krabbe, E.C.W. 1999. Profiles of Dialogue. In JFAK: Essays dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the occasion of his 50th birthday, ed. J. Gerbrandy, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema, 25\u201336. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9307_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007888626395","volume":"14","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"2000","unstructured":"Krabbe, E.C.W. 2000. Meeting in the house of Callias: Rhetoric and dialectic. Argumentation 14(3): 205\u2013217.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"4","key":"9307_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"309","DOI":"10.1016\/0039-3681(74)90007-7","volume":"4","author":"I Lakatos","year":"1974","unstructured":"Lakatos, I. 1974. The role of crucial experiments in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 4(4): 309\u2013325.","journal-title":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science"},{"key":"9307_CR44","first-page":"161","volume-title":"Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order","author":"SC Levinson","year":"1988","unstructured":"Levinson, S.C. 1988. Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman\u2019s concepts of participation. In Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, ed. P. Drew, and A. Wootton, 161\u2013227. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press."},{"key":"9307_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski, M. 2010. Collective argumentative criticism in informal online discussion forums. Argumentation and Advocacy 47(2): 86\u2013105.","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.2010.11821740"},{"key":"9307_CR6","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski, M. 2012. Public deliberation as a polylogue: Challenges of argumentation analysis and evaluation. In Inside arguments: Logic and the study of argumentation, ed. H. J. Ribeiro, 223\u2013245. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing."},{"key":"9307_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski, M. 2013a. Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: Sides, positions, and cases. Journal of Argumentation in Context 2(1): 151\u2013177.","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.2.1.07lew"},{"key":"9307_CR8","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski, M. 2013b. Polylogical fallacies: Are there any? In Virtues of argumentation. Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the ontario society for the study of argumentation (OSSA), 22\u201326 May 2013, ed. D. Mohammed, and M. Lewi\u0144ski, 1\u201318. Windsor, ON: OSSA."},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"95","DOI":"10.1002\/int.20191","volume":"22","author":"P McBurney","year":"2007","unstructured":"McBurney, P., D. Hitchcock, and S. Parsons. 2007. The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 22(1): 95\u2013132.","journal-title":"International Journal of Intelligent Systems"},{"key":"9307_CR46","unstructured":"Mohammed, D. 2011. Strategic manoeuvring in simultaneous discussions. In F. Zenker (Ed.), Argumentation: Cognition and community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1\u201311). CD-ROM. Windsor, ON: OSSA."},{"key":"9307_CR47","unstructured":"Perelman, Ch., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (transl. by J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958)."},{"key":"9307_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"281","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_14","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"H Prakken","year":"2009","unstructured":"Prakken, H. 2009. Models of persuasion dialogue. In Argumentation in artificial intelligence, ed. I. Rahwan, and G.R. Simari, 281\u2013300. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"issue":"3","key":"9307_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-004-0313-2","volume":"19","author":"W Rehg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rehg, W., P. McBurney, and S. Parsons. 2005. Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: Assessing deliberative legitimacy. AI & SOCIETY 19(3): 203\u2013229.","journal-title":"AI & SOCIETY"},{"key":"9307_CR53","volume-title":"Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge","author":"N Rescher","year":"1977","unstructured":"Rescher, N. 1977. Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge. Albany: State University of New York Press."},{"key":"9307_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"696","DOI":"10.2307\/412243","volume":"50","author":"H Sacks","year":"1974","unstructured":"Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696\u2013735.","journal-title":"Language"},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v17i1.2393","volume":"17","author":"MH Salmon","year":"1995","unstructured":"Salmon, M.H., and C.M. Zeitz. 1995. Analyzing conversational reasoning. Informal Logic 17(1): 1\u201323.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9307_CR57","volume-title":"Analysing complex argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion","author":"AF Snoeck Henkemans","year":"1992","unstructured":"Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. 1992. Analysing complex argumentation: The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Amsterdam: SicSat."},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR59","first-page":"89","volume":"35","author":"R Sylvan","year":"1985","unstructured":"Sylvan, R. 1985. Introducing polylogue theory. Philosophica 35(1): 89\u2013112.","journal-title":"Philosophica"},{"key":"9307_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1075\/aic.2","volume-title":"Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2010","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H. 2010. Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins."},{"key":"9307_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Foris."},{"issue":"2","key":"9307_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00178026","volume":"2","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1988","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1988. Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 2(2): 271\u2013291.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9307_CR22","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"9307_CR23","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9307_CR24","volume-title":"Reconstructing argumentative discourse","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1993","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson, and S. Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press."},{"key":"9307_CR26","first-page":"75","volume-title":"The uses of argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2005","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 2005. Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In The uses of argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University, ed. D. Hitchcock, 75\u201384. Hamilton, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation."},{"key":"9307_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-6244-5","volume-title":"Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2007","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., P. Houtlosser, and A.F.S. Henkemans. 2007. Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"issue":"2","key":"9307_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"343","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00721965","volume":"9","author":"MA Rees van","year":"1995","unstructured":"van Rees, M.A. 1995. Analyzing and evaluating problem-solving discussions. Argumentation 9(2): 343\u2013362.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"4","key":"9307_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1012023601906","volume":"15","author":"MA Rees van","year":"2001","unstructured":"van Rees, M.A. 2001. The diagnostic power of the stages of critical discussion in the analysis and evaluation of problem-solving discussions. Argumentation 15(4): 457\u2013470.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9307_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Rees, M.A. 2003. Within pragma-dialectics: Comments on Bonevac. Argumentation 17(4): 461\u2013464.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1026312519106"},{"key":"9307_CR60","volume-title":"Logical dialogue-games and fallacies","author":"DN Walton","year":"1984","unstructured":"Walton, D.N. 1984. Logical dialogue-games and fallacies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America Inc."},{"key":"9307_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3138\/9781442681859","volume-title":"The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument","author":"DN Walton","year":"1998","unstructured":"Walton, D.N. 1998. The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press."},{"issue":"1","key":"9307_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007738812877","volume":"13","author":"DN Walton","year":"1999","unstructured":"Walton, D.N. 1999. Profiles of dialogue for evaluating arguments from ignorance. Argumentation 13(1): 53\u201371.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9307_CR63","volume-title":"Relevance in argumentation","author":"DN Walton","year":"2004","unstructured":"Walton, D.N. 2004. Relevance in argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"9307_CR64","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning","author":"DN Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton, D.N., and E.C.W. Krabbe. 1995. Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9307_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"283","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-009-9157-8","volume":"24","author":"DN Walton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walton, D.N., and F. Macagno. 2010. Wrenching from context: The manipulation of commitments. Argumentation 24(3): 283\u2013317.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9307_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"DN Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, D.N., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9307_CR69","unstructured":"Wenzel, J. W. 1990. Three perspectives on argument: Rhetoric, dialectic, logic. In Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede, ed. J. Schuetz, and R. Trapp, 9\u201326. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland."},{"issue":"3","key":"9307_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-008-9096-9","volume":"22","author":"D Zarefsky","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zarefsky, D. 2008. Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation. Argumentation 22(3): 317\u2013330.","journal-title":"Argumentation"}],"container-title":["Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-013-9307-x.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10503-013-9307-x\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-013-9307-x","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2019,8,5]],"date-time":"2019-08-05T00:31:53Z","timestamp":1564965113000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10503-013-9307-x"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2014,5]]}},"alternative-id":["9307"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-013-9307-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0920-427X","1572-8374"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0920-427X","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8374","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,12,20]]}}}