{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,20]],"date-time":"2025-12-20T22:19:56Z","timestamp":1766269196889,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":90,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747180800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1747180800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100018693","name":"HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["Grant Agreement No. 101178821"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Grant Agreement No. 101178821"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100018693","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005855","name":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005855","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Argumentation"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Part of the business of argumentation theory involves resolving a conceptual dispute over what argumentation and argument are in the first place. This dispute has produced various \u201cconcepts of argument.\u201d The goal of this paper is twofold: (1) to develop a complete ontology of argumentative phenomena, capable of accounting for various conceptions of argument\u2014something, as I argue, that is badly wanting in argumentation theory; and, within this ontology, (2) to defend a position that there is but one concept of argument needed to grasp these diverse phenomena and conceptions of argument and argumentation. I move in four steps. First, I briefly sketch the discussion over arguments-as-activities and arguments-as-products. Second, I go back to the classic work of Twardowski on actions and products and adapt it for argumentation theory, producing a complex yet systematically organized conceptual ontology of argument and argumentation. This conceptual housekeeping allows me, third, to critically engage some of the recent, Frege-inspired philosophical literature on the concept of argument, while defending act-based approaches to argument(ation). Fourth, I present a positive proposal of a minimal, contrastivist concept of argument as <jats:italic>a set of reasons advanced to support a conclusion C<\/jats:italic>\n            <jats:sub>\n              <jats:italic>1<\/jats:italic>\n            <\/jats:sub>\n            <jats:italic> rather than another conclusion C<\/jats:italic>\n            <jats:sub>\n              <jats:italic>n<\/jats:italic>\n            <\/jats:sub>.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-025-09654-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T12:23:55Z","timestamp":1747225435000},"page":"393-418","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["One Concept of Argument"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"39","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7218-3948","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marcin","family":"Lewi\u0144ski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-009-9160-0","volume":"24","author":"A Aberdein","year":"2010","unstructured":"Aberdein, A. 2010. Virtue in argument. Argumentation 24 (2): 165\u2013179.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"5","key":"9654_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-020-09719-w","volume":"40","author":"S Aikin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Aikin, S. 2021. Argumentative adversariality, contrastive reasons, and the winners-and-losers problem. Topoi 40 (5): 837\u2013844.","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"issue":"134","key":"9654_CR3","first-page":"1","volume":"200","author":"S Aikin","year":"2022","unstructured":"Aikin, S., and J. Casey. 2022. Argumentation and the problem of agreement. Synthese 200 (134): 1\u201323.","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"9654_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ajdukiewicz, K. 1974. Pragmatic Logic. Trans. by O. Wojtasiewicz. Synthese Library, Vol. 62. Dordrecht: Reidel.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-010-2109-8"},{"key":"9654_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1761-9","volume-title":"Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory","author":"L Bermejo-Luque","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bermejo-Luque, L. 2011. Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9654_CR6","unstructured":"Betti, A. 2016. Kazimierz Twardowski. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition). Available online: https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/entries\/twardowski"},{"issue":"1","key":"9654_CR7","first-page":"1","volume":"33","author":"DS Birdsell","year":"1996","unstructured":"Birdsell, D.S., and L. Groarke. 1996. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 33 (1): 1\u201310.","journal-title":"Argumentation and Advocacy"},{"volume-title":"Contrastivism in philosophy","year":"2012","key":"9654_CR8","unstructured":"Blaauw, M., ed. 2012. Contrastivism in philosophy. New York: Routledge."},{"key":"9654_CR9","volume-title":"Critical thinking: An introduction to logic and scientific method","author":"M Black","year":"1946","unstructured":"Black, M. 1946. Critical thinking: An introduction to logic and scientific method. New York: Prentice-Hall."},{"issue":"3","key":"9654_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007768503175","volume":"12","author":"JA Blair","year":"1998","unstructured":"Blair, J.A. 1998. The limits of the dialogue model of argument. Argumentation 12 (3): 325\u2013339.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9654_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bobryk, J. 2009. The genesis and history of Twardowski\u2019s theory of actions and products. In S. Lapointe, et al. (eds.), The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy. Kazimierz Twardowski\u2019s Philosophical Legacy (pp. 33\u201342). Berlin: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-2401-5_3"},{"key":"9654_CR12","volume-title":"Ancient formal logic","author":"IM Boche\u0144ski","year":"1951","unstructured":"Boche\u0144ski, I.M. 1951. Ancient formal logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company."},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR88","first-page":"636","volume":"44","author":"P Bodlovi\u0107","year":"2024","unstructured":"Bodlovi\u0107, P., and M. Lewi\u0144ski. 2024. How do explanations justify? An extended scheme for the Inference to the Best (causal) Explanation. Informal Logic  44 (4): 636\u2013682.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9654_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boghossian, P. 2014. What is inference? Philosophical Studies, 169(1), 1\u201318.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-012-9903-x"},{"key":"9654_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brandl., J. L. & Wole\u0144ski, J. 1999. Introduction. In K. Twardowski, On Actions, Products, and Other Topics in Philosophy (pp. 7\u201314), ed. by J. L. Brandl & J. Wole\u0144ski. Amsterdam: Rodopi.","DOI":"10.1163\/9789004457676_002"},{"key":"9654_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118609088","volume-title":"Rationality through reasoning","author":"Broome, J.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Broome, J. 2013. Rationality through reasoning. Oxford: Blackwell."},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"535","DOI":"10.1111\/jtsb.12382","volume":"53","author":"LJ Buhagiar","year":"2023","unstructured":"Buhagiar, L.J., and G. Sammut. 2023. The Minimal Model of Argumentation: Qualitative data analysis for epistemic speech, text and policy. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 53 (4): 535\u2013559.","journal-title":"Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour"},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"515","DOI":"10.1215\/00318108-1334478","volume":"120","author":"DJ Chalmers","year":"2011","unstructured":"Chalmers, D.J. 2011. Verbal disputes. Philosophical Review 120 (4): 515\u2013556.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"key":"9654_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199315192.003.0011","volume-title":"Weighing reasons","author":"R Chang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Chang, R. 2016. Comparativism: The grounds of rational choice. In Weighing reasons, ed. E. Lord and B. McGuire, 213\u2013240. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"179\u2013180","key":"9654_CR19","first-page":"309","volume":"45","author":"I Dove","year":"2002","unstructured":"Dove, I. 2002. Can pictures prove? Logique and Analyse 45 (179\u2013180): 309\u2013340.","journal-title":"Logique and Analyse"},{"issue":"24","key":"9654_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1007","DOI":"10.2307\/2024710","volume":"67","author":"F Dretske","year":"1970","unstructured":"Dretske, F. 1970. Epistemic operators. Journal of Philosophy 67 (24): 1007\u20131023.","journal-title":"Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.2307\/2183886","volume":"81","author":"F Dretske","year":"1972","unstructured":"Dretske, F. 1972. Contrastive statements. Philosophical Review 81 (4): 411\u2013437.","journal-title":"Philosophical Review"},{"key":"9654_CR22","volume-title":"Origins of analytical philosophy","author":"M Dummett","year":"1993","unstructured":"Dummett, M. 1993. Origins of analytical philosophy. London: Duckworth."},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung, P.M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77 (2): 321\u2013357.","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"9654_CR24","unstructured":"Dutilh Novaes, C. 2021. Argument and argumentation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition). Available online: https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/fall2021\/entries\/argument\/."},{"key":"9654_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-90-481-9473-5","volume-title":"Handbook of argumentation theory","author":"FH van Eemeren","year":"2014","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., B. Garssen, E.C.W. Krabbe, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, B. Verheij, and J.H.M. Wagemans. 2014. Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9654_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion","author":"FH van Eemeren","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht: Foris."},{"key":"9654_CR27","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach","author":"FH Eemeren","year":"2004","unstructured":"Eemeren, F.H., and van & Grootendorst, R. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9654_CR28","volume-title":"Critical thinking","author":"RH Ennis","year":"1996","unstructured":"Ennis, R.H. 1996. Critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall."},{"key":"#cr-split#-9654_CR29.1","unstructured":"Frege, G. 1892\/1948. \u00dcber Sinn und Bedeutung, in\u00a0Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25-50"},{"key":"#cr-split#-9654_CR29.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"translated as 'On Sense and Reference' by M. Black in The Philosophical Review, 57(3), (1948), 209-230.","DOI":"10.2307\/2181485"},{"key":"#cr-split#-9654_CR30.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frege, G. 1918\/1956. Der Gedanke. Eine Logische Untersuchung, in\u00a0Beitr\u00e4ge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus, I (1918-1919): 58-77","DOI":"10.1515\/bgsl.1918.1918.43.219"},{"key":"#cr-split#-9654_CR30.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"translated as 'The Thought: A Logical Inquiry' by A. M. Quinton & M. Quinton in Mind, 65(259), (1956), 289-311.","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/65.1.289"},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"155","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-018-9454-1","volume":"32","author":"J\u00c1 Gasc\u00f3n","year":"2018","unstructured":"Gasc\u00f3n, J.\u00c1. 2018. Virtuous arguers: Responsible and reliable. Argumentation 32 (2): 155\u2013173.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9654_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gilbert, M.A. 1995. The delimitation of argument. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 15(1), 63\u201375.","DOI":"10.5840\/inquiryctnews199515136"},{"key":"9654_CR33","unstructured":"Goddu, G.C. 2009. Refining Hitchcock\u2018s Definition of \u2018Argument\u2019. In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument Cultures: Proceedings of OSSA 09, CD-ROM (pp. 1\u201315). Windsor, ON: OSSA."},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"75","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v31i2.3098","volume":"31","author":"GC Goddu","year":"2011","unstructured":"Goddu, G.C. 2011a. Is \u2018argument\u2019 subject to the product\/process ambiguity? Informal Logic 31 (2): 75\u201388.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9654_CR35","unstructured":"Goddu, G.C. 2011b. Commentary on \u2018Arguments as abstract objects\u2019 by Paul Simard-Smith and Andrei Moldovan. In Proceedings of the 9th OSSA Conference: Argumentation: Cognition & Community, University of Windsor."},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"589","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-018-9457-y","volume":"32","author":"J Goodman","year":"2018","unstructured":"Goodman, J. 2018. On defining \u2018argument.\u2019 Argumentation 32 (4): 589\u2013602.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"1","key":"9654_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v27i1.465","volume":"27","author":"Goodwin, J.","year":"2007","unstructured":"Goodwin, J. 2007. Argument has no function. Informal Logic 27 (1): 69\u201390.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"49","key":"9654_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.2478\/slgr-2014-0003","volume":"36","author":"J Goodwin","year":"2014","unstructured":"Goodwin, J. 2014. Conceptions of speech acts in the theory and practice of argumentation: A case study of a debate about advocating. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (49): 79\u201398.","journal-title":"Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric"},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-014-9336-0","volume":"29","author":"L Groarke","year":"2015","unstructured":"Groarke, L. 2015. Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation 29 (2): 133\u2013155.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"418","DOI":"10.1177\/17456916231198479","volume":"19","author":"U Hahn","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hahn, U. 2024. Individuals, collectives, and individuals in collectives: The ineliminable role of dependence. Perspectives on Psychological Science 19 (2): 418\u2013431.","journal-title":"Perspectives on Psychological Science"},{"key":"9654_CR41","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen."},{"issue":"1","key":"9654_CR42","first-page":"1","volume":"18","author":"D Hample","year":"1985","unstructured":"Hample, D. 1985. A third perspective on argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric 18 (1): 1\u201322.","journal-title":"Philosophy and Rhetoric"},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"141","DOI":"10.1007\/s11098-007-9080-5","volume":"134","author":"\ufeffHanks, P.","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hanks, P. 2007. The content\u2013force distinction. Philosophical Studies 134 (2): 141\u2013164.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9654_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199684892.001.0001","volume-title":"Propositional content","author":"\ufeffHanks, P.","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hanks, P. 2015. Propositional content. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9654_CR45","first-page":"123","volume-title":"New work on speech acts","author":"P Hanks","year":"2018","unstructured":"Hanks, P. 2018. Types of speech acts. In New work on speech acts, ed. D.W. Harris, D. Fogal, and M. Moss, 123\u2013143. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-023-09900-x","volume":"42","author":"A Haro Marchal","year":"2023","unstructured":"Haro Marchal, A. 2023. Argumentation as a speech act: Two levels of analysis. Topoi 42 (2): 481\u2013494.","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"key":"9654_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-044451541-4\/50007-5","volume-title":"Philosophy of Logic","author":"D Hitchcock","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hitchcock, D. 2007. Informal logic and the concept of argument. In Philosophy of Logic, ed. D. Jaquette, 101\u2013129. Amsterdam: Elsevier."},{"key":"9654_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/phc3.12788","volume":"16","author":"T Hodgson","year":"2021","unstructured":"Hodgson, T. 2021. Act-type theories of propositions. Philosophy Compass 16: e12788.","journal-title":"Philosophy Compass"},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"631","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-018-9553-5","volume":"38","author":"S Jackson","year":"2019","unstructured":"Jackson, S. 2019. Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi 38 (4): 631\u2013643.","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00182603","volume":"3","author":"S Jacobs","year":"1989","unstructured":"Jacobs, S. 1989. Speech acts and arguments. Argumentation 3 (4): 345\u2013365.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1269","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-024-10086-z","volume":"43","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2024","unstructured":"Jacobs, S. 2024. Arguments and speech acts reconsidered. Topoi 43 (4): 1269\u20131286.","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1080\/10570318109374035","volume":"45","author":"S Jacobs","year":"1981","unstructured":"Jacobs, S., and S. Jackson. 1981. Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation. The Western Journal of Speech Communication 45 (2): 118\u2013132.","journal-title":"The Western Journal of Speech Communication"},{"key":"9654_CR53","volume-title":"Manifest rationality","author":"R Johnson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Johnson, R. 2000. Manifest rationality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"issue":"1","key":"9654_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1010361210072","volume":"104","author":"\ufeffJubien, M.","year":"2001","unstructured":"Jubien, M. 2001. Propositions and the objects of thought. Philosophical Studies 104 (1): 47\u201362.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9654_CR55","volume-title":"Thinking fast and slow","author":"\ufeffKahneman, D.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking fast and slow. NY: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux."},{"issue":"63","key":"9654_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.52685\/cjp.21.63.1","volume":"21","author":"\ufeffLabinaz, P.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Labinaz, P. 2021. Argumentation as a speech act: A (provisional) balance. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 21 (63): 357\u2013374.","journal-title":"Croatian Journal of Philosophy"},{"key":"9654_CR57","first-page":"73","volume":"8","author":"E Lalumera","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lalumera, E. 2014. On the explanatory value of the concept-conception distinction. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Del Linguaggio 8: 73\u201381.","journal-title":"Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Del Linguaggio"},{"issue":"3","key":"9654_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v41i3.6855","volume":"41","author":"\ufeffLewi\u0144ski. M.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski. M. 2021. Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic 41 (3): 421\u2013451.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"volume-title":"Argumentation in complex communication: Managing disagreement in a polylogue","year":"2023","key":"9654_CR87","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski, M., and M. Aakhus. 2023. Argumentation in complex communication: Managing disagreement in a polylogue. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"561","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-0068.2007.00663.x","volume":"41","author":"E Margolis","year":"2007","unstructured":"Margolis, E., and S. Laurence. 2007. The ontology of concepts\u2014Abstract objects or mental representations? No\u00fbs 41 (4): 561\u2013593.","journal-title":"No\u00fbs"},{"key":"9654_CR60","unstructured":"Margolis, E., and S. Laurence. 2023. Concepts. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition), https:\/\/plato.stanford.edu\/archives\/fall2023\/entries\/concepts\/."},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X10000968","volume":"34","author":"H Mercier","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mercier, H., and D. Sperber. 2011. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2): 57\u201374.","journal-title":"Behavioral and Brain Sciences"},{"key":"9654_CR62","first-page":"161","volume-title":"Act-based conceptions of propositional content: Contemporary and historical perspectives","author":"WA Miskiewicz","year":"2017","unstructured":"Miskiewicz, W.A. 2017. On Actions and Products (1911) by Kazimierz Twardowski: Its historical genesis and philosophical impact. In Act-based conceptions of propositional content: Contemporary and historical perspectives, ed. F. Moltmann and M. Textor, 161\u2013177. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9654_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-015-9370-6","volume":"30","author":"D Mohammed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mohammed, D. 2016. Goals in argumentation: A proposal for the analysis and evaluation of public political arguments. Argumentation 30 (3): 221\u2013245.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"5\u20136","key":"9654_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"679","DOI":"10.1080\/00455091.2014.892770","volume":"43","author":"F Moltmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Moltmann, F. 2013. Propositions, attitudinal objects, and the distinction between actions and products. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5\u20136): 679\u2013701.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Philosophy"},{"volume-title":"Act-based conceptions of propositional content: Contemporary and historical perspectives","year":"2017","key":"9654_CR65","unstructured":"Moltmann, F., and M. Textor, eds. 2017. Act-based conceptions of propositional content: Contemporary and historical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9654_CR66","first-page":"121","volume":"13","author":"DJ O\u2019Keefe","year":"1977","unstructured":"O\u2019Keefe, D.J. 1977. Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association 13 (3): 121\u2013128.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Forensic Association"},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.2307\/2940886","volume":"93","author":"T Parsons","year":"1996","unstructured":"Parsons, T. 1996. What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy 93 (4): 164\u2013185.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"9654_CR68","first-page":"1","volume":"31","author":"\ufeffPatterson, S.W.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Patterson, S.W. 2011. Functionalism, normativity and the concept of argumentation. Informal Logic 31 (1): 1\u201326.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9654_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Popper, K.R. 1968. Epistemology without a knowing subject. In B. Van Rootselaar & J.F. Staal (Eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III (pp. 333\u2013373). Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, volume 52. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0049-237X(08)71204-7"},{"key":"9654_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110325706.35","volume-title":"Actions, Products and Things: Brentano and Polish Philosophy","author":"M van der Schaar","year":"2006","unstructured":"van der Schaar, M. 2006. On the ambiguities of the term judgment: An evaluation of Twardowski\u2019s distinction between action and product. In Actions, Products and Things: Brentano and Polish Philosophy, ed. A. Chrudzimski and D. \u0141ukasiewicz, 35\u201353. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag."},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9654_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.1023\/B:PHIL.0000029351.56460.8c","volume":"119","author":"J Schaffer","year":"2004","unstructured":"Schaffer, J. 2004. From contextualism to contrastivism. Philosophical Studies 119 (1\u20132): 73\u2013103.","journal-title":"Philosophical Studies"},{"key":"9654_CR72","volume-title":"The construction of social reality","author":"JR Searle","year":"1995","unstructured":"Searle, J.R. 1995. The construction of social reality. London: Penguin Books."},{"key":"9654_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:osobl\/9780195396171.001.0001","volume-title":"Making the social world: The structure of human civilization","author":"JR Searle","year":"2010","unstructured":"Searle, J.R. 2010. Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"2","key":"9654_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9063-x","volume":"22","author":"H Siegel","year":"2008","unstructured":"Siegel, H., and J. Biro. 2008. Rationality, reasonableness, and critical rationalism: Problems with the pragma-dialectical view. Argumentation 22 (2): 191\u2013203.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"3","key":"9654_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"230","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v31i3.3401","volume":"31","author":"P Simard-Smith","year":"2011","unstructured":"Simard-Smith, P., and A. Moldovan. 2011. Arguments as abstract objects. Informal Logic 31 (3): 230\u2013261.","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"issue":"3","key":"9654_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1080\/02691720802546120","volume":"22","author":"W Sinnott-Armstrong","year":"2008","unstructured":"Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2008. A contrastivist manifesto. Social Epistemology 22 (3): 257\u2013270.","journal-title":"Social Epistemology"},{"issue":"6","key":"9654_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1111\/phc3.12231","volume":"10","author":"J Snedegar","year":"2015","unstructured":"Snedegar, J. 2015. Contrastivism about reasons and ought. Philosophy Compass 10 (6): 379\u2013388.","journal-title":"Philosophy Compass"},{"issue":"1","key":"9654_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.2478\/slgr-2014-0002","volume":"36","author":"\ufeffSnoeck Henkemans, A. F.","year":"2014","unstructured":"Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. 2014. Speech act theory and the study of argumentation. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 36 (1): 41\u201358.","journal-title":"Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric"},{"key":"9654_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctt21668hs","volume-title":"Rethinking language, mind, and meaning","author":"S Soames","year":"2015","unstructured":"Soames, S. 2015. Rethinking language, mind, and meaning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"9654_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-019-09505-y","volume":"34","author":"V Svoboda","year":"2020","unstructured":"Svoboda, V. 2020. On defining \u2018argument\u2019: comments on Goodman. Argumentation 34 (4): 537\u2013542.","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9654_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199759446.001.0001","volume-title":"Rethinking the good: Moral ideals and the nature of practical reasoning","author":"LS Temkin","year":"2012","unstructured":"Temkin, L.S. 2012. Rethinking the good: Moral ideals and the nature of practical reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9654_CR82","volume-title":"Fiction and metaphysics","author":"A Thomasson","year":"1999","unstructured":"Thomasson, A. 1999. Fiction and metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9654_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781316181645","volume-title":"The philosophy of argument and audience reception","author":"CW Tindale","year":"2015","unstructured":"Tindale, C.W. 2015. The philosophy of argument and audience reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9654_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Twardowski, K. 1999. Actions and products. Some remarks on the borderline of psychology, grammar, and logic. In K. Twardowski, On Actions, Products, and Other Topics in Philosophy (pp. 103\u2013132), ed. by J. L. Brandl & J. Wole\u0144ski; transl. A. Szylewicz. Amsterdam: Rodopi. [Original work published in Polish in 1912.]","DOI":"10.1163\/9789004457676_010"},{"issue":"8","key":"9654_CR85","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.2307\/2026735","volume":"87","author":"DN Walton","year":"1990","unstructured":"Walton, D.N. 1990. What is reasoning? What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy 87 (8): 399\u2013419.","journal-title":"The Journal of Philosophy"},{"issue":"1","key":"9654_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-023-09598-6","volume":"38","author":"F Zenker","year":"2024","unstructured":"Zenker, F., J.A. van Laar, B. Cepollaro, et al. 2024. Norms of public argumentation and the ideals of correctness and participation. Argumentation 38 (1): 7\u201340.","journal-title":"Argumentation"}],"container-title":["Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09654-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09654-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09654-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,17]],"date-time":"2025-09-17T11:05:27Z","timestamp":1758107127000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09654-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]]},"references-count":90,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,9]]}},"alternative-id":["9654"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09654-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["0920-427X","1572-8374"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0920-427X"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8374"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 March 2025","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"14 May 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This is a theoretical study which does not involve any human or animal participants (other than the author themselves), nor does it involve any potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial).","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}