{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,1]],"date-time":"2026-03-01T05:46:22Z","timestamp":1772343982478,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":78,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1751328000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005765","name":"Universidade de Lisboa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005765","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Argumentation"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>In numerous communicative practices, particularly in social media communication, it has become common to encounter messages pursuing a multiplicity of possible functions. They provide information, but sharing it is not their only or most important purpose. They appear to advocate for a particular viewpoint, yet no specific conclusion is stated, no argumentative or persuasive context surrounds them, and no dialectical exchanges follow or precede them. From a practical perspective, such messages, designated as \u201cinfo-arguments,\u201d are powerful strategies for advancing reasons, enabling the speaker to avoid the corresponding burden of proof. From a theoretical perspective, they challenge the pragmatic theories of meaning underlying argument reconstruction. Absent a specific context and considering the composite nature of an audience characterized by diverse backgrounds, how can we establish and justify that an info-argument conveys an argument? This paper proposes an analytical framework based on a dynamic and dialectical approach to meaning. In this view, the meaning of an info-argument is not represented as a pre-existing speaker\u2019s intention manifested in a clear communication setting. Instead, it is regarded as a set of distinct, least defeasible interpretations characterizing various possible scenarios defined by several factors (or presumptions) that vary depending on the interlocutors\u2019 backgrounds and values.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-025-09667-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T07:52:04Z","timestamp":1751356324000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Info-arguments: Dialogical Ambiguity, Argument Interpretation, and the Problem of Meaning in Argumentation"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0712-421X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"9667_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"229","DOI":"10.1515\/IP.2008.012","volume":"5","author":"Robert Arundale","year":"2008","unstructured":"Arundale, Robert. 2008. Against (Gricean) intentions at the heart of human interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics 5:229\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/IP.2008.012","journal-title":"Intercultural Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR2","unstructured":"Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus. 2004. Boethius\u2019s De topicis differentiis. Edited by Eleonore Stump. Ithaca, IL and London, UK: Cornell University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511813085","volume-title":"Politeness: Some universals in Language usage","author":"Penelope Brown","year":"1987","unstructured":"Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in Language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1037\/10096-006","volume-title":"Perspectives on socially shared cognition","author":"Herbert Clark","year":"1991","unstructured":"Clark, Herbert, Susan Brennan. 1991. Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on socially shared cognition, ed. Lauren Resnick, John Levine, and Stephanie Teasley. 127\u2013149. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association."},{"key":"9667_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511620539","volume-title":"Using Language","author":"Herbert Clark","year":"1996","unstructured":"Clark, Herbert. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Drew, Paul, Traci Walker, and Richard Ogden. 2013. Self-repair and action construction. In Conversational repair and human understanding, ed. Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell. 71\u201394. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511757464.003"},{"key":"9667_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2023.09.014","volume":"218","author":"Chi-H\u00e9 Elder","year":"2023","unstructured":"Elder, Chi-H\u00e9, Michael Haugh. 2023. Exposing and avoiding unwanted inferences in conversational interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 218:115\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2023.09.014","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2018-0021","volume":"15","author":"Chi-H\u00e9 Elder","year":"2018","unstructured":"Elder, Chi-H\u00e9, and Michael Haugh. 2018. The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal account of conversational inference. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:593\u2013625. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2018-0021","journal-title":"Intercultural Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2024-3004","volume":"21","author":"Chi-H\u00e9 Elder","year":"2024","unstructured":"Elder, Chi-H\u00e9, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt. 2024. Towards a dynamic functional proposition for dynamic discourse meaning. Intercultural Pragmatics 21:379\u2013402. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2024-3004","journal-title":"Intercultural Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR10","volume-title":"Problems in argument analysis and evaluation","author":"Trudy Govier","year":"2018","unstructured":"Govier, Trudy. 2018. Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Windsor, ON: Windsor Studies in Argumentation."},{"key":"9667_CR11","first-page":"41","volume-title":"Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts","author":"Paul Grice","year":"1975","unstructured":"Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, ed. Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan. 41\u201358. New York, NY: Academic Press."},{"key":"9667_CR12","volume-title":"Studies in the way of words","author":"Paul Grice","year":"1989","unstructured":"Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR13","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"Charles Leonard Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin, Charles Leonard. 1970. Fallacies. London, UK: Methuen."},{"key":"9667_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-41431-2","volume-title":"Foundations of computational linguistics, human-computer communication in natural Language","author":"Roland Hausser","year":"2014","unstructured":"Hausser, Roland. 2014. Foundations of computational linguistics, human-computer communication in natural Language. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer."},{"key":"9667_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.323.02ili","volume-title":"Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures","author":"Cornelia Ilie","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ilie, Cornelia. 2021. Evasive answers vs. aggressive questions. Parliamentary confrontational practices in prime minister\u2019s questions. In Questioning and answering practices across contexts and cultures, ed. Cornelia Ilie. 35\u201369. Amsterdam, Netherlands-Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pbns.323.02ili"},{"key":"9667_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.04.004","volume":"194","author":"Cornelia Ilie","year":"2022","unstructured":"Ilie, Cornelia. 2022. Meta-questions and meta-answers: The interplay of metadialogic practices in PMQs. Journal of Pragmatics 194:71\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.04.004","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jackson, Sally, and Scott Jacobs. 1980. Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech 66: 251\u2013265.","DOI":"10.1080\/00335638009383524"},{"key":"9667_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jacobs, Scott. 1989. Speech acts and arguments. Argumentation 3: 345\u2013365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00182603","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00182603"},{"key":"9667_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jacobs, Scott. 2000. Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation 14:261\u2013286.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007853013191"},{"key":"9667_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v36i2.4661","volume":"36","author":"Scott Jacobs","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jacobs Scott (2016) Employing and exploiting the presumptions of communication in argumentation: An application of normative pragmatics. Informal Logic 36:159\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v36i2.4661","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9667_CR21","volume-title":"Discourse, beliefs and intentions","author":"Kasia Jaszczolt","year":"1999","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 1999. Discourse, beliefs and intentions. Oxford, UK: Elsevier."},{"key":"9667_CR22","first-page":"128","volume-title":"Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of Language and linguistics","author":"Kasia Jaszczolt","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2005. Default semantics. In Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of Language and linguistics, ed. Alex Barber, and Robert Stainton. 128\u2013130. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.15.1.06jas","volume":"15","author":"Kasia Jaszczolt","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2007. The syntax-pragmatics merger: Belief reports in the theory of default semantics. Pragmatics & Cognition 15:41\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pc.15.1.06jas","journal-title":"Pragmatics & Cognition"},{"key":"9667_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110270679.11","volume-title":"Salience and defaults in utterance processing","author":"Kasia Jaszczolt","year":"2011","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2011. Salient meanings, default meanings, and automatic processing. In Salience and defaults in utterance processing, ed. Kasia Jaszczolt, and Keith Allan. 11\u201333. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter."},{"key":"9667_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2020.10.010","volume":"171","author":"Kasia Jaszczolt","year":"2021","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2021. Functional proposition: A new concept for representing discourse meaning? Journal of Pragmatics 171:200\u2013214. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2020.10.010","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/9781108589338","volume-title":"Semantics, pragmatics, philosophy. A journey through meaning","author":"Kasia Jaszczolt","year":"2023","unstructured":"Jaszczolt, Kasia. 2023. Semantics, pragmatics, philosophy. A journey through meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johnson, Ralph. 1984. Charity Begins at Home. Informal Logic 3:4\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v3i3.2791","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v3i3.2791"},{"key":"9667_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004","volume":"40","author":"Istvan Kecskes","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 40:385\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec","volume":"17","author":"Istvan Kecskes","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics & Cognition 17:331\u2013355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec","journal-title":"Pragmatics & Cognition"},{"key":"9667_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2889","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2010.06.008","volume":"42","author":"Istvan Kecskes","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42:2889\u20132897. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2010.06.008","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9781614513735","volume-title":"Intercultural pragmatics","author":"Istvan Kecskes","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan. 2013. Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2013. On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition. In Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy & psychology, ed. Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza. 375\u2013395. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-01014-4_15"},{"key":"9667_CR33","volume-title":"Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure","author":"Eva Feder Kittay","year":"1989","unstructured":"Kittay, Eva Feder. 1989. Metaphor: Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lee, James, and Steven Pinker. 2010. Rationales for indirect speech: The theory of the strategic speaker. Psychological Review 117: 785\u2013807. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0019688","DOI":"10.1037\/a0019688"},{"key":"9667_CR35","volume-title":"Principles of pragmatics","author":"Geoffrey Leech","year":"1983","unstructured":"Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London, UK: Longman."},{"key":"9667_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5526.001.0001","volume-title":"Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature","author":"Stephen Levinson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Levinson, Stephen. 2000. Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press."},{"key":"9667_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v41i3.6855","volume":"41","author":"Marcin Lewinski","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lewinski, Marcin. 2021. Speech act pluralism in argumentative polylogues. Informal Logic 41:421\u2013451. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v41i3.6855","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9667_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2012. Presumptive reasoning in interpretation. Implicatures and conflicts of presumptions. Argumentation 26: 233\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-011-9232-9.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9232-9"},{"key":"9667_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2018. A dialectical approach to presupposition. Intercultural Pragmatics 15: 291\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2018-0008.","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2018-0008"},{"key":"9667_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017a. Defaults and inferences in interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 117: 280\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2017.06.005.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2017.06.005"},{"key":"9667_CR41","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2017b. The logical and pragmatic structure of arguments from analogy. Logique et Analyse 60: 465\u2013490. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2143\/LEA.240.0.3254093."},{"key":"9667_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio. 2022. Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 191: 67\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.01.022.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.01.022"},{"key":"9667_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio, and Ana Trevisan. 2023. Strategic communication in the Covid-19 pandemics. Uses of arguments and manipulative tactics in institutional social media communication. In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and Counter-Manipulation in Times of Crisis, ed. Cornelia Ilie. 240\u2013283. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.","DOI":"10.1075\/pbns.339.08mac"},{"key":"9667_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2017. Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotation and reporting. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-62545-4"},{"key":"9667_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio, Douglas Walton, and Christopher Tindale. 2017. Analogical arguments: Inferential structures and defeasibility conditions. Argumentation 31: 221\u2013243. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-016-9406-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-016-9406-6"},{"key":"9667_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio, and Douglas Walton. 2018. Practical reasoning arguments: A modular approach. Argumentation 32: 519\u2013547. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-018-9450-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-018-9450-5"},{"key":"9667_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno, Fabrizio, and Sarah Bigi. 2020. Analyzing dialogue moves in chronic care communication\u2013 Dialogical intentions and customization of recommendations for the assessment of medical deliberation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 9: 167\u2013198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/jaic.18044.mac.","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.18044.mac"},{"key":"9667_CR48","volume-title":"Pragmatics: An introduction","author":"Jacob Mey","year":"2001","unstructured":"Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell."},{"key":"9667_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(99)00132-0","volume":"33","author":"Brigitte Nerlich","year":"2001","unstructured":"Nerlich, Brigitte, and David Clarke. 2001. Ambiguities we live by: Towards a pragmatics of polysemy. Journal of Pragmatics 33:1\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-2166(99)00132-0","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR50","first-page":"17","volume-title":"The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion","author":"Steve Oswald","year":"2016","unstructured":"Oswald, Steve. 2016. Commitment attribution and the reconstruction of arguments. In The psychology of argument: Cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion, ed. Fabio Paglieri, Laura Bonelli, and Silvia Felletti. 17\u201332. London, UK: College Publications."},{"key":"9667_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.12.001","volume":"203","author":"Steve Oswald","year":"2023","unstructured":"Oswald, Steve. 2023. Pragmatics for argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 203:144\u2013156. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.12.001","journal-title":"Journal of Pragmatics"},{"key":"9667_CR52","unstructured":"Paglieri, Fabio. 2007. No More Charity, Please! Enthymematic Parsimony and the Pitfall of Benevolence. In Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 7. Windsor, ON: Ossa Archives."},{"key":"9667_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1086\/290789","volume":"61","author":"Cha\u00efm Perelman","year":"1951","unstructured":"Perelman, Cha\u00efm, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. 1951. Act and person in argument. Ethics 61:251\u2013269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/290789","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"key":"9667_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-023-09615-8","volume":"37","author":"Jakub Pru\u015b","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pru\u015b, Jakub, and Piotr Sikora. 2023. The dialectical principle of charity: A procedure for a critical discussion. Argumentation 37:577\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-023-09615-8","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9667_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511498848","volume-title":"Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition","author":"Nicholas Rescher","year":"2006","unstructured":"Rescher, Nicholas. 2006. Presumption and the practices of tentative cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9780511498848"},{"key":"9667_CR56","volume-title":"Reasoning","author":"Michael Scriven","year":"1976","unstructured":"Scriven, Michael. 1976. Reasoning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill."},{"key":"9667_CR57","volume-title":"Relevance: Communication and cognition","author":"Dan Sperber","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd."},{"key":"9667_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"439","DOI":"10.2307\/2183301","volume":"73","author":"Peter Strawson","year":"1964","unstructured":"Strawson, Peter. 1964. Intention and convention in speech acts. The Philosophical Review 73:439\u2013460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2183301","journal-title":"The Philosophical Review"},{"key":"9667_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion","author":"Frans van Eemeren","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Eemeren, and Frans, Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Floris."},{"key":"9667_CR60","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective","author":"Frans van Eemeren","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates."},{"key":"9667_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"van Eemeren, Frans. 2011. In Context: Giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. Argumentation 25: 141\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-011-9211-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9211-1"},{"key":"9667_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-20955-5_17","volume-title":"Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse: Fifty contributions to the development of Pragma-Dialectics","author":"Frans van Eemeren","year":"2015","unstructured":"van Eemeren, Frans. 2015. For reason\u2019s sake: Maximal argumentative analysis of discourse. In Reasonableness and effectiveness in argumentative discourse: Fifty contributions to the development of Pragma-Dialectics, ed. Frans Van Eemeren. 331\u2013345. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-20955-5_17"},{"key":"9667_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-95381-6","volume-title":"Argumentation theory: A Pragma-Dialectical perspective","author":"Frans van Eemeren","year":"2018","unstructured":"van Eemeren, Frans. 2018. Argumentation theory: A Pragma-Dialectical perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer."},{"key":"9667_CR64","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach","author":"Frans van Eemeren","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1075\/aic.1","volume-title":"Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering","author":"Frans van Eemeren","year":"2009","unstructured":"van Eemeren, Frans, and Peter Houtlosser. 2009. Strategic maneuvering. Examining argumentation in context. In Examining argumentation in context: Fifteen studies on strategic maneuvering, ed. Frans van Eemeren. 1\u201324. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins."},{"key":"9667_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v21i3.2248","volume":"21","author":"Jan Albert Van Laar","year":"2001","unstructured":"Van Laar, Jan Albert. 2001. Ambiguity in a dialectical perspective. Informal Logic 21:245\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v21i3.2248","journal-title":"Informal Logic"},{"key":"9667_CR67","volume-title":"The dialectic of ambiguity","author":"Jan Albert van Laar","year":"2003","unstructured":"van Laar, Jan Albert. 2003. The dialectic of ambiguity. Groningen, Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen."},{"key":"9667_CR68","volume-title":"Informal logic","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1989","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1989. Informal logic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198239253.001.0001","volume-title":"Slippery slope arguments","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1992","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1992. Slippery slope arguments. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00126158","volume":"10","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1996a. Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof. Argumentation 10:47\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00126158","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9667_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8632-0","volume-title":"Fallacies arising from ambiguity","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1996b. Fallacies arising from ambiguity. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer."},{"key":"9667_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3138\/9781442681859","volume-title":"The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1998","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1998. The new dialectic. Conversational contexts of argument. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto."},{"key":"9667_CR73","volume-title":"One-sided arguments: A dialectical analysis of bias","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"1999","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 1999. One-sided arguments: A dialectical analysis of bias. Albany, NY: SUNY."},{"key":"9667_CR74","volume-title":"Fundamentals of critical argumentation","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 2006. Fundamentals of critical argumentation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511619311","volume-title":"Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas. 2007. Media argumentation: Dialectic, persuasion and rhetoric. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"Douglas Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton, Douglas, Christopher Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9667_CR77","first-page":"607","volume-title":"Handbook of pragmatics","author":"Deirdre Wilson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wilson, Deirdre, Dan Sperber. 2004. Relevance theory. In Handbook of pragmatics, ed. Laurence Horn, and Gregory Ward. 607\u2013632. Oxford, UK: Blackwell."},{"key":"9667_CR78","volume-title":"Better reasoning: Techniques for handling argument, evidence, and abstraction","author":"Larry Wright","year":"1982","unstructured":"Wright, Larry. 1982. Better reasoning: Techniques for handling argument, evidence, and abstraction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston."}],"container-title":["Argumentation"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09667-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09667-y\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09667-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]],"date-time":"2025-07-01T07:52:13Z","timestamp":1751356333000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09667-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]]},"references-count":78,"alternative-id":["9667"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-025-09667-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0920-427X","1572-8374"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0920-427X","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8374","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"5 August 2024","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 June 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 July 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The author declares no conflict of interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}