{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,20]],"date-time":"2026-02-20T16:53:36Z","timestamp":1771606416195,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,1]],"date-time":"2016-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1456790400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000155","name":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["f Canada Insight Grant 435 - 2012 - 0104"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["f Canada Insight Grant 435 - 2012 - 0104"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000155","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Artif Intell Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,22]],"date-time":"2016-03-22T14:36:55Z","timestamp":1458657415000},"page":"51-91","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":33,"title":["An argumentation framework for contested cases of statutory interpretation"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"24","author":[{"given":"Douglas","family":"Walton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Giovanni","family":"Sartor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2016,3,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"9179_CR1","volume-title":"Interpreting statutes. A comparative study","author":"R Alexy","year":"1991","unstructured":"Alexy R, Dreier R (1991) Statutory interpretation in the Federal Republic of Germany. In: MacCormick N, Summers R (eds) Interpreting statutes. A comparative study. Aldershot, Dartmouth"},{"key":"9179_CR2","first-page":"15","volume-title":"Proceedings of JURIX 2014: the twenty-seventh annual conference on legal knowledge and information systems","author":"M Araszkiewicz","year":"2013","unstructured":"Araszkiewicz M (2013) Towards systematic research on statutory interpretation in AI and Law. In: Hoekstra R (ed) Proceedings of JURIX 2014: the twenty-seventh annual conference on legal knowledge and information systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 15\u201324"},{"key":"9179_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195133004.001.0001","volume-title":"Logic, meaning, and conversation: semantical underdeterminacy, implicature, and their interface","author":"JD Atlas","year":"2005","unstructured":"Atlas JD (2005) Logic, meaning, and conversation: semantical underdeterminacy, implicature, and their interface. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"9179_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Atlas JD (2008) Presupposition. In: The handbook of pragmatics, pp 29\u201352. doi: 10.1002\/9780470756959.ch2","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470756959.ch2"},{"key":"9179_CR5","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Radical pragmatics","author":"JD Atlas","year":"1981","unstructured":"Atlas JD, Levinson S (1981) It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: radical pragmatics (revised standard version). In: Cole P (ed) Radical pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, pp 1\u201362"},{"issue":"423","key":"9179_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"375","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/106.423.375","volume":"106","author":"A Bezuidenhout","year":"1997","unstructured":"Bezuidenhout A (1997) Pragmatics, semantic undetermination and the referential\/attributive distinction. Mind 106(423):375\u2013409. doi: 10.1093\/mind\/106.423.375","journal-title":"Mind"},{"issue":"1","key":"9179_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1515\/IPRG.2009.003","volume":"6","author":"A Capone","year":"2009","unstructured":"Capone A (2009) Are explicatures cancellable? Toward a theory of the speaker\u2019s intentionality. Intercult Pragmat 6(1):55\u201383. doi: 10.1515\/IPRG.2009.003","journal-title":"Intercult Pragmat"},{"key":"9179_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470754603","volume-title":"Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication","author":"R Carston","year":"2002","unstructured":"Carston R (2002) Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell, Oxford"},{"key":"9179_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199673667.003.0010","volume-title":"Law and language: current legal issues","author":"R Carston","year":"2013","unstructured":"Carston R (2013) Legal texts and canons of construction: a view from current pragmatic theory. In: Freeman M, Smith F (eds) Law and language: current legal issues, vol 15. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 8\u201333"},{"key":"9179_CR10","unstructured":"Cross R (2005) Statutory interpretation (Bell J, Engle G, eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"9179_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1075\/z.120","volume-title":"Interpretation and understanding","author":"M Dascal","year":"2003","unstructured":"Dascal M (2003) Interpretation and understanding. John Benjamins, Amsterdam"},{"issue":"2","key":"9179_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00144156","volume":"7","author":"M Dascal","year":"1988","unstructured":"Dascal M, Wr\u00f3blewski J (1988) Transparency and doubt: understanding and interpretation in pragmatics and in law. Law Philos 7(2):203\u2013224","journal-title":"Law Philos"},{"issue":"2","key":"9179_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","volume":"77","author":"PM Dung","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dung PM (1995) On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif Intell 77(2):321\u2013357","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"issue":"1","key":"9179_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"118","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9337.1990.tb00075.x","volume":"3","author":"T Gizbert-Studnicki","year":"1990","unstructured":"Gizbert-Studnicki T (1990) The burden of argumentation in legal disputes. Ratio Juris 3(1):118\u2013129","journal-title":"Ratio Juris"},{"key":"9179_CR14","first-page":"145","volume-title":"Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation An examination of Douglas Walton\u2019s theories of reasoning and argument","author":"T Gordon","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gordon T (2010) An overview of the Carneades argumentation support system. In: Reed C, Tindale CW (eds) Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation An examination of Douglas Walton\u2019s theories of reasoning and argument. College Publications, London, pp 145\u2013156"},{"key":"9179_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1145\/1568234.1568250","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law","author":"T Gordon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gordon T, Walton D (2009a) Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In: Hafner CD (ed) Proceedings of the 12th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM, New York, pp 137\u2013146"},{"key":"9179_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1007\/978-0-387-98197-0_12","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence","author":"T Gordon","year":"2009","unstructured":"Gordon T, Walton D (2009b) Proof burdens and standards. In: Rahwan I, Simari G (eds) Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 239\u2013258"},{"key":"9179_CR17","first-page":"644","volume-title":"7th conference on argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2010)","author":"T Gordon","year":"2011","unstructured":"Gordon T, Walton D (2011) A formal model of legal proof standards and burdens. In: van Eemeren F, Garssen B, Blair A, Mitchell G (eds) 7th conference on argumentation of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA 2010). Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp 644\u2013655"},{"issue":"3\u20134","key":"9179_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118493","volume":"4","author":"J Hage","year":"1996","unstructured":"Hage J (1996) A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to match. Artif Intell Law 4(3\u20134):199\u2013273","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9179_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-015-8873-7","volume-title":"Reasoning with rules","author":"J Hage","year":"1997","unstructured":"Hage J (1997) Reasoning with rules. Kluwer, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9179_CR20","first-page":"1145","volume":"73","author":"L Horn","year":"1995","unstructured":"Horn L (1995) Vehicles of meaning: unconventional semantics and unbearable interpretation. Wash Univ Law Q 73:1145\u20131152","journal-title":"Wash Univ Law Q"},{"key":"9179_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5526.001.0001","volume-title":"Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature","author":"S Levinson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Levinson S (2000) Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9179_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-21103-9_14","volume-title":"Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory","author":"F Macagno","year":"2015","unstructured":"Macagno F (2015) A means-end classification of argumentation schemes. In: van Eemeren F, Garssen B (eds) Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory. Springer, Cham, pp 183\u2013201"},{"key":"9179_CR23","author":"F Macagno","year":"2015","unstructured":"Macagno F, Capone A (2015) Interpretative disputes, explicatures, and argumentative reasoning. Argumentation. doi: 10.1007\/s10503-015-9347-5","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"issue":"1","key":"9179_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.19.1.04mac","volume":"19","author":"F Macagno","year":"2011","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D (2011) Reasoning from paradigms and negative evidence. Pragmat Cogn 19(1):92\u2013116. doi: 10.1075\/pc.19.1.04mac","journal-title":"Pragmat Cogn"},{"key":"9179_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139565776","volume-title":"Emotive language in argumentation","author":"F Macagno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D (2014) Emotive language in argumentation. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"issue":"1","key":"9179_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.5325\/philrhet.48.1.0026","volume":"48","author":"F Macagno","year":"2015","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D (2015) Classifying the patterns of natural arguments. Philos Rhetor 48(1):26\u201353. doi: 10.1353\/par.2015.0005","journal-title":"Philos Rhetor"},{"key":"9179_CR27","first-page":"63","volume-title":"ARGUMENTATION 2012. International conference on alternative methods of argumentation in law","author":"F Macagno","year":"2012","unstructured":"Macagno F, Sartor G, Walton D (2012) Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation. In: \u0160avelka J, Araszkiewicz M, My\u0161ka M, Smejkalov\u00e1 T, \u0160kop M (eds) ARGUMENTATION 2012. International conference on alternative methods of argumentation in law. Masarykova univerzita, Brno, pp 63\u201375"},{"key":"9179_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199571246.001.0001","volume-title":"Rhetoric and the rule of law: a theory of legal reasoning","author":"N MacCormick","year":"2005","unstructured":"MacCormick N (2005) Rhetoric and the rule of law: a theory of legal reasoning. Oxford University Press, Oxford"},{"key":"9179_CR29","volume-title":"Interpreting statutes: a comparative study","year":"1991","unstructured":"MacCormick N, Summers R (eds) (1991) Interpreting statutes: a comparative study. Dartmouth, Aldershot"},{"key":"9179_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/1887.001.0001","volume-title":"Cognitive carpentry","author":"J Pollock","year":"1995","unstructured":"Pollock J (1995) Cognitive carpentry. MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"2","key":"9179_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"93","DOI":"10.1080\/19462160903564592","volume":"1","author":"H Prakken","year":"2010","unstructured":"Prakken H (2010) An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Argum Comput 1(2):93\u2013124. doi: 10.1080\/19462160903564592","journal-title":"Argum Comput"},{"key":"9179_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","volume":"4","author":"H Prakken","year":"1996","unstructured":"Prakken H, Sartor G (1996) A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artif Intell Law 4:331\u2013368","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"9179_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90014-4","volume":"13","author":"R Reiter","year":"1980","unstructured":"Reiter R (1980) A logic for default reasoning. Artif Intell 13(1\u20132):81\u2013132. doi: 10.1016\/0004-3702(80)90014-4","journal-title":"Artif Intell"},{"key":"9179_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.1145\/2746090.2746100","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law","author":"A Rotolo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rotolo A, Governatori G, Sartor G (2015) Deontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation: two options for modelling interpretive arguments. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence and law. ACM, New York, pp 99\u2013108"},{"key":"9179_CR35","first-page":"11","volume-title":"Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2014: the twenty-seventh annual conference","author":"G Sartor","year":"2014","unstructured":"Sartor G, Walton D, Macagno F, Rotolo A (2014) Argumentation schemes for statutory interpretation: A logical analysis. In: Hoekstra R (ed) Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2014: the twenty-seventh annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 11\u201320"},{"key":"9179_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.2307\/1228760","volume":"39","author":"F Schauer","year":"1987","unstructured":"Schauer F (1987) Precedent. Stanf Law Rev 39:571\u2013605","journal-title":"Stanf Law Rev"},{"key":"9179_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9781400837847","volume-title":"Philosophical essays, volume 1: Natural language: what it means and how we use it","author":"S Soames","year":"2008","unstructured":"Soames S (2008) Philosophical essays, volume 1: Natural language: what it means and how we use it. Princeton University Press, Princeton"},{"key":"9179_CR38","volume-title":"Relevance: communication and cognition","author":"D Sperber","year":"1986","unstructured":"Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell, Oxford"},{"key":"9179_CR39","volume-title":"L\u2019interpretazione della legge","author":"G Tarello","year":"1980","unstructured":"Tarello G (1980) L\u2019interpretazione della legge. Giuffr\u00e8, Milano"},{"key":"9179_CR40","first-page":"21","volume-title":"Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2008: the twenty-first annual conference","author":"B Verheij","year":"2008","unstructured":"Verheij B (2008) About the logical relations between cases and rules. In: Francesconi E, Sartor G, Tiscornia D (eds) Legal knowledge and information systems. JURIX 2008: the twenty-first annual conference. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 21\u201332"},{"key":"9179_CR41","volume-title":"Abductive reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"2004","unstructured":"Walton D (2004) Abductive reasoning. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa"},{"issue":"3","key":"9179_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9102-z","volume":"18","author":"D Walton","year":"2010","unstructured":"Walton D (2010) Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy. Artif Intell Law 18(3):217\u2013246. doi: 10.1007\/s10506-010-9102-z","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9179_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203811160","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"2013","unstructured":"Walton D (2013) Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah"},{"key":"9179_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781316340554","volume-title":"Goal-based reasoning for argumentation","author":"D Walton","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walton D (2015) Goal-based reasoning for argumentation. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"key":"9179_CR45","first-page":"103","volume-title":"Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law, IAAIL workshop series","author":"D Walton","year":"2005","unstructured":"Walton D, Gordon T (2005) Critical questions in computational models of legal argument. In: Dunne P, Bench-Capon T (eds) Argumentation in artificial intelligence and law, IAAIL workshop series. Wolf Legal, Nijmegen, pp 103\u2013111"},{"key":"9179_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"key":"9179_CR47","unstructured":"Walton D, Macagno F, Sartor G (2014) Interpretative argumentation schemes. JURIX-2014. IOS, pp 21\u201322"},{"key":"9179_CR48","first-page":"607","volume-title":"Handbook of pragmatics","author":"D Wilson","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wilson D, Sperber D (2004) Relevance theory. In: Horn L, Ward G (eds) Handbook of pragmatics. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 607\u2013632. doi: 10.1016\/j.pragma.2009.09.021"}],"container-title":["Artificial Intelligence and Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,6,15]],"date-time":"2022-06-15T23:24:10Z","timestamp":1655335450000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]}},"alternative-id":["9179"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10506-016-9179-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0924-8463","1572-8382"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0924-8463","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8382","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,3]]}}}