{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,3]],"date-time":"2026-02-03T20:30:19Z","timestamp":1770150619965,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,27]],"date-time":"2023-04-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682553600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,27]],"date-time":"2023-04-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1682553600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["SFRH\/BPD\/108602\/2015"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SFRH\/BPD\/108602\/2015"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"ISPA \u2013 Instituto Universit\u00e1rio"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Crime Law Soc Change"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>This study examines judges\u2019 value judgments on their remarks during sentence pronouncements. We performed a content analysis of 93 sentence pronouncements from the 13 judges from a Portuguese criminal court. Within these discourses, 299 discourse units were codified as judges\u2019 value judgments, that is, personal contents beyond strict legal issues. From these 299, 107 were recommendations (comprehending advice to change, to not reoffend, to rethink life, and action instructions), and 192 were opinions about the individual, the society, and the judicial system. The existence of value judgments in sentence pronouncements carries important implications for the sentencing process. Namely, these value judgments allow the identification of judges\u2019 personal ideas, and issues particularly vulnerable for simplistic reasonings, as well as subjective considerations. This identification and the discussion on the powerful role of language in the context of sentencing are key features to strengthen judges\u2019 training and, consequently, to improve the implementation of penal justice.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s10611-023-10097-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,27]],"date-time":"2023-04-27T13:02:53Z","timestamp":1682600573000},"page":"455-477","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Words matter: judges\u2019 value judgments in sentence pronouncements remarks"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"80","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0992-8572","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andreia","family":"de Castro Rodrigues","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9747-2343","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Olga S.","family":"Cunha","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-5965-4517","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jorge Q.","family":"de Oliveira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5978-8141","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rui A.","family":"Gon\u00e7alves","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8459-8104","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ana","family":"Sacau-Fontenla","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"10097_CR1","volume-title":"Judicial conduct and ethics","author":"JJ Alfini","year":"2018","unstructured":"Alfini, J. J., Lubet, S., Shaman, J. M., & Geyh, C. G. (2018). Judicial conduct and ethics. LexisNexis."},{"key":"10097_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aub\u00e9, B., Ric, F. (2019). The Sociofunctional model of prejudice: Questioning the role of emotions in the threat-behavior link. International review of Social Psychology, 32(1): 1, 1\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/irsp.169.","DOI":"10.5334\/irsp.169"},{"key":"10097_CR3","unstructured":"Bandes, S. (2009). Empathetic judging and the rule of law. Cardozo Law Review De Novo, 133, 133\u2013148. Available at: https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1431230. Accessed 15Sept 2022."},{"key":"10097_CR4","unstructured":"Bardin, L. (2009). An\u00e1lise de conte\u00fado [Content Analysis]. Edi\u00e7\u00f5es 70."},{"key":"10097_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"749","DOI":"10.1177\/106591299404700311","volume":"47","author":"L Baum","year":"1994","unstructured":"Baum, L. (1994). What judges want: Judges\u2019 goals and judicial behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 749\u2013768. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/106591299404700311","journal-title":"Political Research Quarterly"},{"key":"10097_CR6","volume-title":"Judges and their audiences: A perspective on judicial behavior","author":"L Baum","year":"2009","unstructured":"Baum, L. (2009). Judges and their audiences: A perspective on judicial behavior. Princeton University Press."},{"key":"10097_CR7","volume-title":"The psychology of criminal conduct","author":"J Bonta","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct. Routledge."},{"key":"10097_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Castro Rodrigues, A., Sacau, A., Oliveira, J., & Gon\u00e7alves, R. (2019). Prison sentences: Last resort or the default sanction? Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(2), 171\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1068316X.2018.1511788","DOI":"10.1080\/1068316X.2018.1511788"},{"issue":"3","key":"10097_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1177\/1477370813500887","volume":"11","author":"A Castro-Rodrigues","year":"2014","unstructured":"Castro-Rodrigues, A., & Sacau, A. (2014). Sentence pronouncements: What judges say when sentencing. European Journal of Criminology, 11(3), 379\u2013397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1477370813500887","journal-title":"European Journal of Criminology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10097_CR10","first-page":"12","volume":"37","author":"D Chase","year":"2000","unstructured":"Chase, D., & Hora, P. (2000). The implications of therapeutic jurisprudence for judicial satisfaction. Court Review, 37(1), 12\u201320.","journal-title":"Court Review"},{"key":"10097_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"C\u00f4t\u00e9-Lussier, C., & David, J. (2022). Intuitive anger in the context of crime and punishment. Psychology, Crime & Law. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1068316X.2022.2027946","DOI":"10.1080\/1068316X.2022.2027946"},{"issue":"5","key":"10097_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"770","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.88.5.770","volume":"88","author":"CA Cottrell","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cottrell, C. A., & Neuberg, S. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A Sociofunctional threat-based approach to \u201cprejudice\u201d. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770\u2013789. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.88.5.770","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"key":"10097_CR13","volume-title":"Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions","author":"JW Creswell","year":"1998","unstructured":"Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Sage Publications."},{"key":"10097_CR14","first-page":"127","volume-title":"Partner violence: Risk factors, therapeutic interventions and psychological impact","author":"O Cunha","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cunha, O., & Gon\u00e7alves, R. (2014). How batterers change: Results from a qualitative research following a successful intervention. In E. Bellamy (Ed.), Partner violence: Risk factors, therapeutic interventions and psychological impact (pp. 127\u2013146). Nova Science Publishers."},{"key":"10097_CR15","unstructured":"de Sousa Santos, B. (1989). Introdu\u00e7\u00e3o a uma ci\u00eancia p\u00f3s-moderna [Introduction to a post-modern science] (6\u00aaed). Afrontamento."},{"key":"10097_CR16","unstructured":"de Sousa Santos, B. (2010). Pref\u00e1cio [Preface]. In D. Frigo, F. Prioste, & A. Escriv\u00e3o Filho (Orgs.). Justi\u00e7a e direitos humanos: Experi\u00eancias de assessoria jur\u00eddica popular 5 Terra de Direitos."},{"key":"10097_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Del Villar, K., Willmott, L. & White, B. (2022). Voluntary requests, or vulnerable adults? A critique of criminal sentencing in assisted suicide and \u2018mercy killing\u2019 cases. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 45(2), Available at SSRN: https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=4159023. Accessed 15 Sept 2022.","DOI":"10.53637\/SOSL1176"},{"key":"10097_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"367","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.619","volume":"23","author":"M Dhami","year":"2005","unstructured":"Dhami, M. (2005). From discretion to disagreement: Explaining disparities in judges\u2019 pretrial decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 367\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.619","journal-title":"Behavioral Sciences & the Law"},{"issue":"2","key":"10097_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"214","DOI":"10.1037\/tps0000115","volume":"3","author":"M Dhami","year":"2017","unstructured":"Dhami, M., & Belton, I. (2017). On getting inside the judge\u2019s mind. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(2), 214\u2013226. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/tps0000115","journal-title":"Translational Issues in Psychological Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"10097_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1157","DOI":"10.1086\/230635","volume":"100","author":"J Dixon","year":"1995","unstructured":"Dixon, J. (1995). The organizational context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1157\u20131198.","journal-title":"American Journal of Sociology"},{"key":"10097_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Engel, C. (2022). Judicial Decision-Making. A Survey of the Experimental Evidence (August 24, 2022). MPI Collective Goods Discussion Paper, 6 (August). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.4199122.","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4199122"},{"issue":"4","key":"10097_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9930.2006.00236.x","volume":"28","author":"B Englich","year":"2006","unstructured":"Englich, B. (2006). Blind or biased? Justitia\u2019s susceptibility to anchoring effects in the courtroom based on given numerical representations. Law and Policy, 28(4), 497\u2013514. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9930.2006.00236.x","journal-title":"Law and Policy"},{"issue":"4","key":"10097_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"529","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00152.x","volume":"32","author":"R Farrell","year":"1991","unstructured":"Farrell, R., & Holmes, M. (1991). The social and cognitive structure of legal decision-making. The Sociological Quarterly, 32(4), 529\u2013542. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00152.x","journal-title":"The Sociological Quarterly"},{"key":"10097_CR24","unstructured":"Foucault, M. (1999). A ordem do discurso [The order of the discourse]. Edi\u00e7\u00f5es Loyola."},{"key":"10097_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2010). Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: A research review of psychological sources of disparity. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42(1), 19\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00450610903391440","DOI":"10.1080\/00450610903391440"},{"issue":"1","key":"10097_CR26","first-page":"1","volume":"32","author":"R Graycar","year":"2008","unstructured":"Graycar, R. (2008). The gender of judgments: Some reflections on bias. University of British Columbia Law Review, 32(1), 1\u201321.","journal-title":"University of British Columbia Law Review"},{"key":"10097_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1111\/jels.12343","volume":"20","author":"J Grossman","year":"2023","unstructured":"Grossman, J., Nyarko, J., & Goel, S. (2023). Racial bias as a multi-stage, multi-actor problem: An analysis of pretrial detention. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 20, 86\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jels.12343","journal-title":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"10097_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.68.1.5","volume":"68","author":"DH Gruenfeld","year":"1995","unstructured":"Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 5\u201320.","journal-title":"Journal of Personality and Social Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10097_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-polisci-051617-090650","volume":"22","author":"AP Harris","year":"2019","unstructured":"Harris, A. P., & Sen, M. (2019). Bias and judging. Annual Review of Political Science. Annual Reviews, 22(1), 241\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-polisci-051617-090650","journal-title":"Annual Review of Political Science. Annual Reviews"},{"key":"10097_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Holste, L., & Spamann, H. (2023). Experimental investigations of judicial decision-making. The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.4375745","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4375745"},{"issue":"4","key":"10097_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"65","DOI":"10.1300\/J083v34n04_06","volume":"34","author":"C Johnston","year":"2001","unstructured":"Johnston, C., & Alozie, N. (2001). The effect of age on criminal processing - is there an advantage in being \u2018older\u2019? Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 34(4), 65\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1300\/J083v34n04_06","journal-title":"Journal of Gerontological Social Work"},{"key":"10097_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"xi","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195367584.002.0008","volume-title":"The psychology of judicial decision-making","author":"D Klein","year":"2010","unstructured":"Klein, D. (2010). Introduction. In D. Klein & G. Mitchell (Eds.), The psychology of judicial decision-making (pp. xi\u2013xv). Oxford University Press."},{"key":"10097_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1016\/0160-2527(84)90003-7","volume":"7","author":"V Konecni","year":"1984","unstructured":"Konecni, V., & Ebbesen, E. (1984). The mythology of legal decision making. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 5\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0160-2527(84)90003-7","journal-title":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry"},{"key":"10097_CR34","unstructured":"Krasnostein, S., & Freiberg, A. (2013). Pursuing consistency in an individualistic sentencing framework: If you know where you\u2019re going, how do you know when you\u2019ve got there? Law and Contemporary Problems, 76, 265\u2013288. https:\/\/scholarship.law.duke.edu\/lcp\/vol76\/iss1\/12. Accessed 16 Sept 2022."},{"issue":"1","key":"10097_CR35","first-page":"187","volume":"37","author":"K Mack","year":"2011","unstructured":"Mack, K., & Anleu, S. (2011). Opportunities for new approaches to judging in a conventional context: Attitudes, skills and practices. Monash University Law Review, 37(1), 187\u2013215.","journal-title":"Monash University Law Review"},{"key":"10097_CR36","unstructured":"Maguire, N. (2010). Consistency in sentencing. Judicial Studies Institute Journal, 2: 14\u201354. https:\/\/www.irishjudicialstudiesjournal.ie\/assets\/uploads\/documents\/pdfs\/2010-Edition-02\/article\/consistency-in-sentencing.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2022."},{"issue":"4","key":"10097_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"451","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167206297405","volume":"33","author":"JK Maner","year":"2007","unstructured":"Maner, J. K., Gailliot, M. T., Butz, D. A., & Peruche, B. M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 451\u2013462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167206297405","journal-title":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"},{"key":"10097_CR38","first-page":"509","volume-title":"Handbook of psychology in legal contexts","author":"J Michon","year":"1995","unstructured":"Michon, J., & Pakes, F. (1995). Judicial decision-making: A theoretical perspective. In R. Bull & D. Carson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (pp. 509\u2013527). Wiley."},{"key":"10097_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3998\/mpub.15205","volume-title":"A penchant for prejudice: Unraveling bias in judicial decision making","author":"L Mills","year":"1999","unstructured":"Mills, L. (1999). A penchant for prejudice: Unraveling bias in judicial decision making. The University of Michigan Press."},{"key":"10097_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"126","DOI":"10.1348\/135532510X490183","volume":"16","author":"J Murray","year":"2011","unstructured":"Murray, J., Thomson, M., Cooke, D., & Charles, K. (2011). Influencing expert judgment: Attributions of crime causality. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 126\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1348\/135532510X490183","journal-title":"Legal and Criminological Psychology"},{"key":"10097_CR41","first-page":"177","volume-title":"M\u00e9todos y t\u00e9cnicas qualitativas de investigaci\u00f3n en ciencias sociales","author":"P Navarro","year":"2007","unstructured":"Navarro, P., & D\u00edaz, C. (2007). An\u00e1lisis de contenido [Content Analysis]. In I. J. M. Delgado & J. Guti\u00e9rrez (Coords.). (Eds.), M\u00e9todos y t\u00e9cnicas qualitativas de investigaci\u00f3n en ciencias sociales (pp. 177\u2013225). Editorial S\u00edntesis."},{"key":"10097_CR42","unstructured":"Oldfather CM (2007) Judges as humans: interdisciplinary research and the problems of institutional design 36. Hofstra L Rev 125-147. http:\/\/scholarship.law.marquette.edu\/facpub\/93"},{"issue":"23","key":"10097_CR43","first-page":"91","volume":"22","author":"LG Pais","year":"2001","unstructured":"Pais, L. G. (2001). Acerca da avalia\u00e7\u00e3o psicol\u00f3gica em contexto forense: Notas sobre a \"racionalidade\" dos magistrados [On psychologic assessment in forensic context: notes about magistrates\u2019 racionality]. Sub Judice: Justi\u00e7a e Sociedade., 22(23), 91\u201397.","journal-title":"Sub Judice: Justi\u00e7a e Sociedade."},{"key":"10097_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780195113402.001.0001","volume-title":"Ideology in the language of judges: How judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control","author":"SU Philips","year":"1998","unstructured":"Philips, S. U. (1998). Ideology in the language of judges: How judges practice law, politics, and courtroom control. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"10097_CR45","volume-title":"How judges think","author":"R Posner","year":"2008","unstructured":"Posner, R. (2008). How judges think. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"10097_CR46","first-page":"99","volume-title":"Objectivity in law and morals","author":"GJ Postema","year":"2001","unstructured":"Postema, G. J. (2001). Objectivity fit for law. In B. Leiter (Ed.), Objectivity in law and morals (pp. 99\u2013143). Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"10097_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1080\/10463280601055772","volume":"17","author":"F Pratto","year":"2006","unstructured":"Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271\u2013320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10463280601055772","journal-title":"European Review of Social Psychology"},{"issue":"1","key":"10097_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.5964\/jspp.v1i1.97","volume":"1","author":"F Pratto","year":"2013","unstructured":"Pratto, F., Stewart, A. L., & Bou Zeineddine, F. (2013). When inequality fails: Power, group dominance, and societal change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 132\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5964\/jspp.v1i1.97","journal-title":"Journal of Social and Political Psychology"},{"key":"10097_CR49","first-page":"32","volume":"12","author":"A Sacau","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sacau, A., & Castro-Rodrigues, A. (2011). A cidadania e a (des)identifica\u00e7\u00e3o dos cidad\u00e3os com a justi\u00e7a \u2013 Um contributo da psicologia [citizenship and the (un)identification of citizens with the justice system \u2013 A psychological input]. Antropol\u00f3gicas, 12, 32\u201337.","journal-title":"Antropol\u00f3gicas"},{"key":"10097_CR50","first-page":"155","volume":"8","author":"A Sacau","year":"2009","unstructured":"Sacau, A., & Rodrigues, A. (2009). Reflex\u00f5es sobre o papel da experi\u00eancia do juiz na tomada de decis\u00f5es judiciais [Reflexions about the role of the judge experience in sentencing decision making]. Julgar, 8, 155\u2013160.","journal-title":"Julgar"},{"key":"10097_CR51","first-page":"65","volume-title":"Manual de psicologia forense","author":"A Sacau","year":"2011","unstructured":"Sacau, A., J\u00f3lluskin, G., Sani, A., Rodrigues, A., & Gon\u00e7alves, S. (2011). A tomada de decis\u00e3o judicial em contexto criminal: a constru\u00e7\u00e3o te\u00f3rica e o debate emp\u00edrico em torno do objecto [Sentencing decision making in criminal context: the theoretical construction and the empirical debate]. In C. Poiares (Ed.), Manual de psicologia forense (pp. 65\u201388). Ed. Universit\u00e1rias Lus\u00f3fonas."},{"key":"10097_CR52","unstructured":"Shaman, J. (1996). The impartial judge: detachment or passion? DePaul Law Review, https:\/\/via.library.depaul.edu\/law-review\/vol45\/iss3\/2. Accessed 22 Sept 2022."},{"key":"10097_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"121","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195367584.003.0008","volume-title":"The psychology of judicial decision-making","author":"E Sherwin","year":"2010","unstructured":"Sherwin, E. (2010). Features of judicial reasoning. In D. E. Klein & G. Mitchell (Eds.), The psychology of judicial decision-making (pp. 121\u2013130). Oxford University Press."},{"issue":"4","key":"10097_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"420","DOI":"10.1037\/lhb0000190","volume":"40","author":"L Smalarz","year":"2016","unstructured":"Smalarz, L., Madon, S., Yang, Y., Guyll, M., & Buck, S. (2016). The perfect match: Do criminal stereotypes bias forensic evidence analysis? Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 420\u2013429. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/lhb0000190","journal-title":"Law and Human Behavior"},{"issue":"1","key":"10097_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00919.x","volume":"39","author":"D Steffensmeier","year":"2001","unstructured":"Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. (2001). Ethnicity and judges\u2019 sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons. Criminology, 39(1), 145\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2001.tb00919.x","journal-title":"Criminology"},{"key":"10097_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-01060-7","volume-title":"Sentencing: A social process - re-thinking research and policy","author":"C Tata","year":"2020","unstructured":"Tata, C. (2020). Sentencing: A social process - re-thinking research and policy. Palgrave Macmillan."},{"key":"10097_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1002\/bdm.529","volume":"19","author":"D Weiss","year":"2006","unstructured":"Weiss, D., Shanteau, J., & Harries, P. (2006). People who judge people. The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 441\u2013454. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bdm.529","journal-title":"The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making"},{"key":"10097_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4615-4807-2","volume-title":"Judicial decision-making: Is psychology relevant?. Perspectives in law and psychology","author":"LS Wrightsman","year":"1999","unstructured":"Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Judicial decision-making: Is psychology relevant?. Perspectives in law and psychology (Vol. 11). Plenum Publishers."},{"key":"10097_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"34","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cobeha.2019.10.016","volume":"34","author":"L Zmigrod","year":"2020","unstructured":"Zmigrod, L. (2020). The role of cognitive rigidity in political ideologies: Theory, evidence, and future directions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 34\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cobeha.2019.10.016","journal-title":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences"}],"container-title":["Crime, Law and Social Change"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10611-023-10097-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10611-023-10097-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s10611-023-10097-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,12,11]],"date-time":"2023-12-11T16:12:53Z","timestamp":1702311173000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s10611-023-10097-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,27]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,11]]}},"alternative-id":["10097"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10611-023-10097-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0925-4994","1573-0751"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0925-4994","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-0751","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"17 April 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 April 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"This paper fulfills all the ethical concerns, regarding human participation and data use and preservation, as the funding from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education ensures.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"After the approval from the Superior Council of Magistrature, each judge signed an informed consent, agreeing to participate in the study, where all the relevant information about the study was available, namely the confidential and anonymous nature, and the conditions of data preservation.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Informed consent"}},{"value":"The research involved Human participation, but no harm or direct benefit should be expected, since we only analyzed their sentencing remarks.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Statement regarding research involving human participants and\/or animals"}},{"value":"The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.","order":5,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}}]}}