{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,27]],"date-time":"2026-03-27T03:54:57Z","timestamp":1774583697000,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":93,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,27]],"date-time":"2025-08-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756252800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,27]],"date-time":"2025-08-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1756252800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Minerva"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n          <jats:p>Through journal peer review, reviewers play a crucial role in ensuring the quality and integrity of published research. Most of the literature focuses on the challenges facing peer review, while limited research has been conducted on the engagement of academics with peer review and little to none has focused on the engagement of doctoral students. Considering that doctoral studies are pivotal in the training of independent researchers and peer review is a fundamental pillar of academic research, this study, guided by socialization theory, explored the socialization experiences of doctoral students as they engage in or refrain from engaging in peer review activities. To this end, we conducted 51 semi-structured interviews with STEM doctoral students from 11 research-intensive universities in China to investigate whether and how they engage in peer review. The analysis showed that most doctoral students engage in peer review by assisting their supervisors in the peer review process under supervisory mentoring, a process we termed \u201cauxiliary reviewing.\u201d Their participation in auxiliary reviewing is not recognized (by journals), with some students wishing it to be acknowledged and others not showing concern about it; students\u2019 attitudes depend on their views on work valorization. Most students underline the importance of mentoring for reviewing and the key role of supervisors in teaching and guiding them to do high-quality peer reviewing. Some students had been invited directly by journals to act as reviewers, but these students also stressed the role of prior mentor-reviewing experiences in building confidence to undergo the transition to become independent referees. The findings have implications for doctoral education and for the sustainability of peer review.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-025-09596-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,27]],"date-time":"2025-08-27T01:40:51Z","timestamp":1756258851000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Engagement in the Journal Peer Reviewing Process Among STEM Doctoral Students in China"],"prefix":"10.1007","author":[{"given":"Ting","family":"Zhou","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6814-1393","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hugo","family":"Horta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"9596_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aczel, Balazs, Barnabas Szaszi, and Alex O Holcombe. 2021. A Billion-Dollar Donation: Estimating the Cost of Researchers\u2019 Time Spent on Peer Review. Research Integrity and Peer Review 6(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-021-00118-2.","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-021-00118-2"},{"key":"9596_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"August, Ella T., and Andrew F. Brouwer. 2024. How to Write an Effective Journal Peer Review Using a Staged Writing Approach: A Best-Practice Guide for Early-Career Researchers. International Journal of Epidemiology 53(6). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ije\/dyae154.","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyae154"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1080\/0158037X.2010.515569","volume":"33","author":"Vicki L Baker","year":"2011","unstructured":"Baker, Vicki L., and Meghan J. Pifer. 2011. The Role of Relationships in the Transition from Doctoral Student to Independent Scholar. Studies in Continuing Education 33(1): 5\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0158037X.2010.515569.","journal-title":"Studies in Continuing Education"},{"key":"9596_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Bankovi\u0107, Milan, Vladimir Filipovi\u0107, Jelena Graovac, Jelena Had\u017ei-Puri\u0107, Ali R. Hurson, Aleksandar Kartelj, Jovana Kova\u010devi\u0107, Nenad Korolija, Milo\u0161 Kotlar, Nenad B. Krd\u017eavac, et al. 2020. Chapter One: Teaching Graduate Students How to Review Research Articles and Respond to Reviewer Comments. In Advances in Computers 116(1): 1\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/bs.adcom.2019.07.001.","DOI":"10.1016\/bs.adcom.2019.07.001"},{"issue":"3","key":"9596_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"383","DOI":"10.1080\/02103702.2017.1357250","volume":"40","author":"Alfredo Bautista","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bautista, Alfredo, and Montserrat Castell\u00f3. 2017. Fostering the Professional Development of Junior Authors and Reviewers in Scientific Journals \/ Contribuyendo al Desarrollo Profesional de Autores y Revisores Noveles En Revistas Cient\u00edficas. Infancia y Aprendizaje 40(3): 383\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02103702.2017.1357250.","journal-title":"Infancia y Aprendizaje"},{"key":"9596_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Beddoes, Kacey, Yu Xia, and Stephanie Cutler. 2023. The Influence of Disciplinary Origins on Peer Review Normativities in a New Discipline. Social Epistemology 37(3): 390\u2013404. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02691728.2022.2111669.","DOI":"10.1080\/02691728.2022.2111669"},{"key":"9596_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.caredit.aax9372","author":"Beryl Lieff Benderly","year":"2019","unstructured":"Benderly, Beryl Lieff. 2019. Early-Career Researchers Commonly Ghostwrite Peer Reviews. That\u2019s a Problem. Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.caredit.aax9372.","journal-title":"That\u2019s a Problem. Science."},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"245","DOI":"10.2214\/AJR.11.8230","volume":"198","author":"Thomas H Berquist","year":"2012","unstructured":"Berquist, Thomas H. 2012. Editors and Reviewers: Roles and Responsibilities. American Journal of Roentgenology 198(2): 245\u2013245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/AJR.11.8230.","journal-title":"American Journal of Roentgenology"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR9","first-page":"95","volume":"40","author":"Reginald A Blockett","year":"2016","unstructured":"Blockett, Reginald A., Pamela P. Felder, Walter Parrish, and Joan Collier. 2016. Pathways to the Professoriate: Exploring Black Doctoral Student Socialization and the Pipeline to the Academic Profession. The Western Journal of Black Studies 40(2): 95\u2013110.","journal-title":"The Western Journal of Black Studies"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR10","first-page":"23","volume":"6","author":"Lutz Bornmann","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bornmann, Lutz. 2008. Scientific Peer Review: An Analysis of the Peer Review Process from the Perspective of Sociology of Science Theories. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 6(2): 23\u201338.","journal-title":"Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa","volume":"3","author":"Virginia Braun","year":"2006","unstructured":"Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77\u2013101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1191\/1478088706qp063oa.","journal-title":"Qualitative Research in Psychology"},{"issue":"4","key":"9596_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"595","DOI":"10.1017\/S1049096515000827","volume":"48","author":"Marijke Breuning","year":"2015","unstructured":"Breuning, Marijke, Jeremy Backstrom, Jeremy Brannon, Benjamin Isaak Gross, and Michael Widmeier. 2015. Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars Decline to Review Their Peers\u2019 Work. Political Science & Politics 48(4): 595\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1049096515000827.","journal-title":"Political Science & Politics"},{"key":"9596_CR13","unstructured":"Brim, Orville G. 1966. Socialization through the life cycle. In Socialization after childhood. Two essays, eds. Orville G. Brim, Jr. and Stanton Wheeler, 1\u201349. New York: Wiley."},{"key":"9596_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Burns, C. Sean, and Charles W. Fox. 2017. Language and Socioeconomics Predict Geographic Variation in Peer Review Outcomes at an Ecology Journal. Scientometrics 113(2): 1113\u20131127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-017-2517-5.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2517-5"},{"issue":"3","key":"9596_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"534","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2023.2242888","volume":"49","author":"David Carless","year":"2024","unstructured":"Carless, David, Jisun Jung, and Yongyan Li. 2024. Feedback as Socialization in Doctoral Education: Towards the Enactment of Authentic Feedback. Studies in Higher Education 49(3): 534\u2013545. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2023.2242888.","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"89","DOI":"10.5194\/gc-3-89-2020","volume":"3","author":"Mathieu Casado","year":"2020","unstructured":"Casado, Mathieu, Gwena\u00eblle Gremion, Paul Rosenbaum, Jilda Alicia Caccavo, Kelsey Aho, Nicolas Champollion, Sarah L. Connors, et al. 2020. The Benefits to Climate Science of Including Early-Career Scientists as Reviewers. Geoscience Communication 3(1): 89\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5194\/gc-3-89-2020.","journal-title":"Geoscience Communication"},{"issue":"3","key":"9596_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"599","DOI":"10.1080\/02103702.2017.1357251","volume":"40","author":"Montserrat Castell\u00f3","year":"2017","unstructured":"Castell\u00f3, Montserrat, Anna Sala-Bubar\u00e9, and Alfredo Bautista. 2017. Being a Researcher Is Not Only a Matter of Publishing: Learning to Review Scientific Articles \/ No Solo de Publicar Viven Los Investigadores: Aprender a Revisar Art\u00edculos Cient\u00edficos. Infancia y Aprendizaje 40(3): 599\u2013656. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02103702.2017.1357251.","journal-title":"Infancia y Aprendizaje"},{"issue":"3","key":"9596_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-020-00557-8","volume":"81","author":"Montserrat Castell\u00f3","year":"2021","unstructured":"Castell\u00f3, Montserrat, Lynn McAlpine, Anna Sala-Bubar\u00e9, Kelsey Inouye, and Isabelle Skakni. 2021. What Perspectives Underlie \u201cResearcher Identity\u201d? A Review of Two Decades of Empirical Studies. Higher Education 81(3): 567\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10734-020-00557-8.","journal-title":"Higher Education"},{"key":"9596_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Chasokela, Doris. 2025. Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Educational Research. In Qualitative Approaches to Pedagogical Engineering, ed. Driss Elomari, 51-76. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/979-8-3693-6021-7.ch003.","DOI":"10.4018\/979-8-3693-6021-7.ch003"},{"issue":"7895","key":"9596_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-022-00216-1","volume":"602","author":"Amber Dance","year":"2022","unstructured":"Dance, Amber. 2022. Why Early-Career Researchers Should Step up to the Peer-Review Plate. Nature 602(7895): 169\u2013171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-022-00216-1.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"9596_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Donaldson, Michael R, Kyle C. Hanson, Caleb T. Hasler, Timothy D. Clark, Scott G. Hinch, and Steven J. Cooke. 2010. Injecting Youth into Peer-Review to Increase Its Sustainability: A Case Study of Ecology Journals. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4033\/iee.2010.3.1.c.","DOI":"10.4033\/iee.2010.3.1.c"},{"key":"9596_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Douglas, Heather. 2022. Sampling Techniques for\u00a0Qualitative Research. In Principles of Social Research Methodology, eds. Islam M. Rezaul, Khan Niaz Ahmed, and Baikady Rajendra, 415\u201326. Singapore: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-981-19-5441-2_29.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-19-5441-2_29"},{"key":"9596_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"East, Amy E, Mikael Attal, A. J. F. (Ton) Hoitink, and Olga V Sergienko. 2022. Thank You to Our 2021 Reviewers, and a New Co\u2010Reviewing Protocol. Journal of Geophysical Research. Earth Surface 127(4). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1029\/2022JF006687.","DOI":"10.1029\/2022JF006687"},{"key":"9596_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ellwanger, Joel Henrique, and Jos\u00e9 Artur Bogo. Chies. 2020. We Need to Talk about Peer-Review\u2014Experienced Reviewers Are Not Endangered Species, but They Need Motivation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 125: 201\u2013205. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.02.001.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2020.02.001"},{"issue":"3","key":"9596_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1080\/00221546.2008.11772101","volume":"79","author":"Susan K Gardner","year":"2008","unstructured":"Gardner, Susan K. 2008. \u201cWhat\u2019s Too Much and What\u2019s Too Little?\u201d: The Process of Becoming an Independent Researcher in Doctoral Education. The Journal of Higher Education 79(3): 326\u2013350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00221546.2008.11772101.","journal-title":"The Journal of Higher Education"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"61","DOI":"10.1080\/00221546.2010.11778970","volume":"81","author":"Susan K Gardner","year":"2010","unstructured":"Gardner, Susan K. 2010. Contrasting the Socialization Experiences of Doctoral Students in High- and Low-Completing Departments: A Qualitative Analysis of Disciplinary Contexts at One Institution. The Journal of Higher Education 81(1): 61\u201381. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00221546.2010.11778970.","journal-title":"The Journal of Higher Education"},{"key":"9596_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Gardner, Susan K., and Stacy A. Doore. 2020. Doctoral Student Socialization and Professional Pathways. In Socialization in Higher Education and the Early Career, eds. John C. Weidman and Linda DeAngelo, 113\u201327. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_7.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_7"},{"key":"9596_CR28","unstructured":"Garisto, Dan. 2020. Diversifying Peer Review by Adding Junior Scientists.\u00a0Nature Index, 777-84. https:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature-index\/news\/diversifying-peer-review-by-adding-junior-scientists. Accessed 26 August 2024."},{"issue":"101","key":"9596_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1002\/he.10105","volume":"1998","author":"Chris M Golde","year":"1998","unstructured":"Golde, Chris M. 1998. Beginning Graduate School: Explaining First-Year Doctoral Attrition. New Directions for Higher Education 1998(101): 55\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/he.10105.","journal-title":"New Directions for Higher Education"},{"key":"9596_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Guo, Fei, Huafeng Zhang, and Xi Hong. 2020. Understanding Graduate Student Socialization in China: A Theoretical Framework. In Socialization in Higher Education and the Early Career, eds. Linda DeAngelo and John C Weidman, 175\u201395. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_11.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_11"},{"key":"9596_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ho, David Yau Fai, and Rainbow Tin Hung Ho. 2008. Knowledge Is a Dangerous Thing: Authority Relations, Ideological Conservatism, and Creativity in Confucian-Heritage Cultures. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38(1): 67\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1468-5914.2008.00357.x.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-5914.2008.00357.x"},{"key":"9596_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Horbach, Serge P. J. M., and Willem Halffman. 2020. Journal Peer Review and Editorial Evaluation: Cautious Innovator or Sleepy Giant? Minerva 58(2): 139\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11024-019-09388-z.","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-019-09388-z"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2022.2131764","volume":"48","author":"Hugo Horta","year":"2023","unstructured":"Horta, Hugo, and Huan Li. 2023. Nothing but Publishing: The Overriding Goal of PhD Students in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau. Studies in Higher Education 48(2): 263\u2013282. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2022.2131764.","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"key":"9596_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Horta, Hugo, and Jisun Jung. 2024. The Crisis of Peer Review: Part of the Evolution of Science. Higher Education Quarterly 78(4). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/hequ.12511.","DOI":"10.1111\/hequ.12511"},{"key":"9596_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Horta, Hugo, and Jo\u00e3o M. Santos. 2023. Determinants of Peer Review Engagement and Quality in Scientific Journals: Insights for Academic Research and the Sustainability of the Peer-Review System. Studies in Higher Education 49(9): 1553\u20131568. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2023.2270488.","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2023.2270488"},{"key":"9596_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jiang, Xiaohua, and Di Wang. 2023. Enhancing Journal Reputation and Academic Socialization: Review Feedback Matters beyond Its Gatekeeping Function. Learned Publishing 36(4): 506\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1577.","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1577"},{"key":"9596_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Jung, Jisun, Hugo Horta, Li-fang Zhang, and Gerard A. Postiglione. 2021. Factors Fostering and Hindering Research Collaboration with Doctoral Students among Academics in Hong Kong. Higher Education 82(3): 519\u2013540. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10734-020-00664-6.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-020-00664-6"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1023\/a:1002946922952","volume":"34","author":"Booi Hon Kam","year":"1997","unstructured":"Kam, Booi Hon. 1997. Style and Quality in Research Supervision: The Supervisor Dependency Factor. Higher Education 34(1): 81\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/a:1002946922952.","journal-title":"Higher Education"},{"key":"9596_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Katz, J. Sylvan, and Ben R. Martin. 1997. What Is Research Collaboration? Research Policy 26(1): 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0048-7333(96)00917-1.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0048-7333(96)00917-1"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1002\/jts.22647","volume":"34","author":"Patricia K Kerig","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kerig, Patricia K. 2021. Why Participate in Peer Review? Journal of Traumatic Stress 34(1): 5\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jts.22647.","journal-title":"Journal of Traumatic Stress"},{"issue":"6","key":"9596_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1731","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.184.6.01841731","volume":"184","author":"Mark A Kliewer","year":"2005","unstructured":"Kliewer, Mark A., Kelly S. Freed, David M. DeLong, Perry J. Pickhardt, and James M. Provenzale. 2005. Reviewing the Reviewers: Comparison of Review Quality and Reviewer Characteristics at the American Journal of Roentgenology. American Journal of Roentgenology 184(6): 1731\u20131735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2214\/ajr.184.6.01841731.","journal-title":"American Journal of Roentgenology"},{"issue":"11","key":"9596_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0166387","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387","volume":"11","author":"Michail Kovanis","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kovanis, Michail, Rapha\u00ebl Porcher, Philippe Ravaud, and Ludovic Trinquart. 2016. The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0166387\u2013e0166387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0166387.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"265","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-021-04176-7","volume":"127","author":"Marta Kowal","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kowal, Marta, Piotr Sorokowski, Emanuel Kulczycki, and Agnieszka \u017bela\u017aniewicz. 2022. The Impact of Geographical Bias When Judging Scientific Studies. Scientometrics 127(1): 265\u2013273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-021-04176-7.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"9596_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Krauth, Nigel, Christopher Bowman, and Zoe Fraser. 2017. The Exegesis and Co-Authorship: Collaboration between Supervisors and Research Students. TEXT 21(44): 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.52086\/001c.25866.","DOI":"10.52086\/001c.25866"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"111","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00097","volume":"2","author":"Vincent Larivi\u00e8re","year":"2021","unstructured":"Larivi\u00e8re, Vincent, David Pontille, and Cassidy R. Sugimoto. 2021. Investigating the Division of Scientific Labor Using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT). Quantitative Science Studies 2(1): 111\u2013128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00097.","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"key":"9596_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Lauer, Sabine, and Uwe Wilkesmann. 2025. Determinants of Peer Review Acceptance: Motivational Insights From German Academia. Higher Education Quarterly 79(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/hequ.12575.","DOI":"10.1111\/hequ.12575"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"421","DOI":"10.1111\/hequ.12452","volume":"78","author":"Huan Li","year":"2024","unstructured":"Li, Huan, and Hugo Horta. 2024. Exploring the Identity Development of PhD Graduates Transitioning to Non-researcher Roles. Higher Education Quarterly 78(2): 421\u2013435. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/hequ.12452.","journal-title":"Higher Education Quarterly"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"199","DOI":"10.1177\/14413582241264619","volume":"33","author":"Weng Marc Lim","year":"2024","unstructured":"Lim, Weng Marc. 2024. What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal 33(2): 199\u2013229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/14413582241264619.","journal-title":"Australasian Marketing Journal"},{"issue":"12","key":"9596_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2808","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2020.1861596","volume":"46","author":"Jonas Lindahl","year":"2021","unstructured":"Lindahl, Jonas, Cristian Colliander, and Rickard Danell. 2021. The Importance of Collaboration and Supervisor Behaviour for Gender Differences in Doctoral Student Performance and Early Career Development. Studies in Higher Education 46(12): 2808\u20132831. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2020.1861596.","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"396","DOI":"10.1177\/13505084211051047","volume":"30","author":"Dirk Lindebaum","year":"2023","unstructured":"Lindebaum, Dirk, and Peter J. Jordan. 2023. Publishing More than Reviewing? Some Ethical Musings on the Sustainability of the Peer Review Process. Organization 30(2): 396\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/13505084211051047.","journal-title":"Organization"},{"key":"9596_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.6017\/895b9e0d.66ab1296","author":"Yingxin Liu","year":"2025","unstructured":"Liu, Yingxin, and Hugo Horta. 2025. Academic Publication Drive, Games, and Consequences. International Higher Education. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6017\/895b9e0d.66ab1296.","journal-title":"International Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"9596_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"636","DOI":"10.1080\/03075079.2015.1067603","volume":"42","author":"Lilia Mantai","year":"2015","unstructured":"Mantai, Lilia. 2015. Feeling like a Researcher: Experiences of Early Doctoral Students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education 42(4): 636\u2013650. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/03075079.2015.1067603.","journal-title":"Studies in Higher Education"},{"issue":"4","key":"9596_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"881","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-021-00712-9","volume":"83","author":"Simon Marginson","year":"2022","unstructured":"Marginson, Simon. 2022. \u201cAll Things Are in Flux\u201d: China in Global Science. Higher Education 83(4): 881\u2013910. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10734-021-00712-9.","journal-title":"Higher Education"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1080\/01580370902927378","volume":"31","author":"Lynn McAlpine","year":"2009","unstructured":"McAlpine, Lynn, and Cheryl Amundsen. 2009. Identity and Agency: Pleasures and Collegiality among the Challenges of the Doctoral Journey. Studies in Continuing Education 31(2): 109\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01580370902927378.","journal-title":"Studies in Continuing Education"},{"key":"9596_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McDowell, Gary S., John D. Knutsen, June M. Graham, Sarah K. Oelker, and Rebeccah S. Lijek. 2019. Co-Reviewing and Ghostwriting by Early-Career Researchers in the Peer Review of Manuscripts. eLife 8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.48425.","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.48425"},{"key":"9596_CR56","unstructured":"McDowell, Gary. 2018. Early-career researchers and their involvement in peer review. ASAPbio. https:\/\/asapbio.org\/mcdowell-ecrs\/. Accessed 2 August 2024."},{"key":"9596_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"McNair, Robert, Hai Anh Le Phuong, Levente Cseri, and Gyorgy Szekely. 2019. Peer Review of Manuscripts: A Valuable yet Neglected Educational Tool for Early-Career Researchers. Education Research International 2019:1\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1155\/2019\/1359362.","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/1359362"},{"key":"9596_CR58","unstructured":"Merry, Lisa, Kimberly Jarvis, Joseph Kupoluyi, and Jomama One Jomama Lual. 2017. Doing Peer Review: Reflections From an International Group of Postdoctoral Fellows. Journal of Research Practice 13(2)."},{"issue":"6","key":"9596_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"653","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2010.487199","volume":"29","author":"Susan Mowbray","year":"2010","unstructured":"Mowbray, Susan, and Christine Halse. 2010. The Purpose of the PhD: Theorising the Skills Acquired by Students. Higher Education Research and Development 29(6): 653\u2013664. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07294360.2010.487199.","journal-title":"Higher Education Research and Development"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"132","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22798","volume":"64","author":"Adrian Mulligan","year":"2013","unstructured":"Mulligan, Adrian, Louise Hall, and Ellen Raphael. 2013. Peer Review in a Changing World: An International Study Measuring the Attitudes of Researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64(1): 132\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22798.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"10","key":"9596_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e30341","DOI":"10.7759\/cureus.30341","volume":"14","author":"BM Munasinghe","year":"2022","unstructured":"Munasinghe, B. M., Champa Chapman, Chinthaka Hewavitharane, Gayathri Hewawasam, and T. G. Dissanayakege. 2022. Investing in the Academic Writing: Training Future Reviewers and Sustaining Efficient and Quality Peer Review. Cur\u0113us 14(10): e30341\u2013e30341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7759\/cureus.30341.","journal-title":"Cur\u0113us"},{"key":"9596_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Nicholas, David, Anthony Watkinson, Abdullah Abrizah, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Xu Jie, Blanca Rodr\u00edguez-Bravo, Marzena \u015awigo\u0144, and Eti Herman. 2018. What Publishers Can Take Away from the Latest Early Career Researcher Research. Learned Publishing 31(3): 249\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1165.","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1165"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"217","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-020-09430-5","volume":"59","author":"Sandra Ohly","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ohly, Sandra, and Christian Schneijderberg. 2021. German Professors\u2019 Motivation to Act as Peer Reviewers in Accreditation and Evaluation Procedures. Minerva 59(2): 217\u2013236. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11024-020-09430-5.","journal-title":"Minerva"},{"key":"9596_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Paltridge, Brian. 2017. Peer Review in\u00a0Academic Settings. In The Discourse of Peer Review, 1\u201329. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/978-1-137-48736-0_1.","DOI":"10.1057\/978-1-137-48736-0_1"},{"issue":"2","key":"9596_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"171","DOI":"10.1080\/10437797.2024.2363167","volume":"60","author":"Danielle E Parrish","year":"2024","unstructured":"Parrish, Danielle E. 2024. The Peer Review Crisis Continues: What Comes Next? Journal of Social Work Education 60(2): 171\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10437797.2024.2363167.","journal-title":"Journal of Social Work Education"},{"key":"9596_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Patterson, Mark, and Randy Schekman. 2018. How Early-Career Researchers Are Shaping eLife. eLife 7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7554\/eLife.36263.","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.36263"},{"issue":"4","key":"9596_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1080\/02103702.2014.977531","volume":"37","author":"Ana Pedrazzini","year":"2014","unstructured":"Pedrazzini, Ana, Alfredo Bautista, Nora Scheuer, and Carles Monereo. 2014. Review by (Non)Peers as an Opportunity for Learning: A Case Study on the Editorial Process of Papers by Junior Researchers \/ La Revisi\u00f3n Por (Im)Pares Como Instancia de Aprendizaje: Un Estudio de Casos Del Proceso Editorial de Art\u00edculos de Investigadoras Noveles. Infancia y Aprendizaje 37(4): 851\u2013901. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02103702.2014.977531.","journal-title":"Infancia y Aprendizaje"},{"key":"9596_CR68","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Schmidt, Cindy, Grace Thiel, and Celeste Murtha. 2023. Teaching Peer Reviewing to Medical Students through Authentic Peer Reviews: How to Build the next Generation of Scholars. Canadian Medical Education Journal 14(4): 129\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.36834\/cmej.76489.","DOI":"10.36834\/cmej.76489"},{"key":"9596_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Seeber, Marco, and Hugo Horta. 2021. No Road Is Long with Good Company. What Factors Affect Ph.D. Student\u2019s Satisfaction with Their Supervisor? Higher Education Evaluation and Development 15(1): 2\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/HEED-10-2020-0044.","DOI":"10.1108\/HEED-10-2020-0044"},{"issue":"4","key":"9596_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"537","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1392","volume":"34","author":"Anna Severin","year":"2021","unstructured":"Severin, Anna, and Joanna Chataway. 2021. Overburdening of Peer Reviewers: A Multi-stakeholder Perspective on Causes and Effects. Learned Publishing 34(4): 537\u2013546. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1392.","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"9596_CR71","first-page":"41","volume-title":"Changing identities in higher education","author":"Peter Taylor","year":"2007","unstructured":"Taylor, Peter. 2007. Being an academic today. In Changing identities in higher education, ed. Ronald Barnett and Roberto Di Napoli, 41\u201353. London: Routledge."},{"key":"9596_CR72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Teachman, Gail, Martine C. L\u00e9vesque, Mark Tambe Keboa, Basem Adel Danish, Konstantinos Mastorakis, Crystal Noronha, Raissa Passos dos Santos, Harprit K Singh, and Mary Ellen Macdonald. 2018. Group Peer Review: Reflections on a Model for Teaching and Learning Qualitative Inquiry. International Review of Qualitative Research 11(4): 452\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/irqr.2018.11.4.452.","DOI":"10.1525\/irqr.2018.11.4.452"},{"key":"9596_CR73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Tennant, Jonathan P. 2018. The State of the Art in Peer Review. FEMS Microbiology Letters 365(19). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/femsle\/fny204.","DOI":"10.1093\/femsle\/fny204"},{"issue":"3","key":"9596_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"295","DOI":"10.1080\/1353832032000151157","volume":"9","author":"Malcolm Tight","year":"2003","unstructured":"Tight, Malcolm. 2003. Reviewing the Reviewers. Quality in Higher Education 9(3): 295\u2013303. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1353832032000151157.","journal-title":"Quality in Higher Education"},{"issue":"48","key":"9596_CR75","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12708","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1707323114","volume":"114","author":"Andrew Tomkins","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tomkins, Andrew, Min Zhang, and William D. Heavlin. 2017. Reviewer Bias in Single- versus Double-Blind Peer Review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 114(48): 12708\u201312713. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1707323114.","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"73","DOI":"10.6087\/kcse.331","volume":"11","author":"Thong Minh Trinh","year":"2024","unstructured":"Trinh, Thong Minh. 2024. Can Training Doctoral Students to Participate in Peer Review Alleviate the Shortage of Peer Reviewers in Academic Publishing? Science Editing 11(1): 73\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.6087\/kcse.331.","journal-title":"Science Editing"},{"key":"9596_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"V\u00e9liz, Daniela. 2020. The Socialization of International Doctoral Students in the USA. In Socialization in Higher Education and the Early Career, eds. Linda DeAngelo and John C. Weidman, 149\u2013160. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_9.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_9"},{"key":"9596_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-018-06602-y","author":"Inga Vesper","year":"2018","unstructured":"Vesper, Inga. 2018. Peer Reviewers Unmasked: Largest Global Survey Reveals Trends. Nature. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-018-06602-y.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"7","key":"9596_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1615","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2024.2354253","volume":"43","author":"Jiayu Wang","year":"2024","unstructured":"Wang, Jiayu, Cassi Liard\u00e9t, Juliet Lum, and Mehdi Riazi. 2024. Co-Authorship between Doctoral Students and Supervisors: Motivations, Reservations, and Challenges. Higher Education Research and Development 43(7): 1615\u20131631. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07294360.2024.2354253.","journal-title":"Higher Education Research and Development"},{"key":"9596_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Wang, Yu, Liangbin Zhao, Yuanxiang Zeng, and Mengyao Cheng. 2022. Comparison of Early Career Researchers and Senior Career Researchers as Peer Reviewers: A Questionnaire Survey in China. Learned Publishing 35(3): 350\u2013360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1465.","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1465"},{"key":"9596_CR81","volume-title":"Peer Review: Benefits, Perceptions, and Alternatives","author":"Mark Ware","year":"2008","unstructured":"Ware, Mark. 2008. Peer Review: Benefits, Perceptions, and Alternatives. London: Publishing Research Consortium."},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"41","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1002","volume":"29","author":"Verity Warne","year":"2016","unstructured":"Warne, Verity. 2016. Rewarding Reviewers-Sense or Sensibility? A Wiley Study Explained. Learned Publishing 29(1): 41\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/leap.1002.","journal-title":"A Wiley Study Explained. Learned Publishing"},{"key":"9596_CR83","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weidman, John C, and Linda DeAngelo. 2020. Toward a 21st Century Socialization Model of Higher Education\u2019s Impact on Students. In Socialization in Higher Education and the Early Career, eds. Linda DeAngelo and John C. Weidman, 311\u201323. Cham: Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_17.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-33350-8_17"},{"key":"9596_CR84","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Weidman, John C. 2010. Doctoral Student Socialization for Research. In On Becoming A Scholar, eds. Susan K. Gardner and Pilar Mendoza, 45\u201355. Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781003446187-6.","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003446187-6"},{"key":"9596_CR85","volume-title":"Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education: A Perilous Passage?","author":"John Weidman","year":"2001","unstructured":"Weidman, John, Darla Twale, and Elizabeth Stein. 2001. Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education: A Perilous Passage? San Francisco: Jossey Bass."},{"issue":"3","key":"9596_CR86","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1353\/rhe.2021.0001","volume":"44","author":"Annie M Wofford","year":"2021","unstructured":"Wofford, Annie M., and Jennifer M. Blaney. 2021. (Re)Shaping the Socialization of Scientific Labs: Understanding Women\u2019s Doctoral Experiences in STEM Lab Rotations. Review of Higher Education 44(3): 357\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/rhe.2021.0001.","journal-title":"Review of Higher Education"},{"key":"9596_CR87","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Xu, Yanru, and Ji\u2019an Liu. 2023. Exploring and Understanding Perceived Relationships between Doctoral Students and Their Supervisors in China. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications 10(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/s41599-023-02360-z.","DOI":"10.1057\/s41599-023-02360-z"},{"key":"9596_CR88","first-page":"154","volume":"1","author":"Bentao Yuan","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yuan, Bentao, Chuanyi Wang, and Wu. Qing. 2015. \u6211\u56fd\u5728\u6821\u7814\u7a76\u751f\u7684\u5b66\u672f\u8d21\u732e\u6709\u591a\u5927? [How Much are Chinese Postgraduate Students\u2019 academic contributions?]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering 1:154\u2013160.","journal-title":"Research in Higher Education of Engineering"},{"key":"9596_CR89","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Yuan, Bentao, Chuanyi Wang, Xuan Hu, and Liuqing Feng. 2014. \u6211\u56fd\u5728\u6821\u7814\u7a76\u751f\u5bf9\u56fd\u9645\u9ad8\u6c34\u5e73\u5b66\u672f\u8bba\u6587\u53d1\u8868\u7684\u8d21\u732e\u6709\u591a\u5927?\u2014\u57fa\u4e8eESI\u70ed\u70b9\u8bba\u6587\u7684\u5b9e\u8bc1\u5206\u6790(2011~2012) [How Much Do Graduate Students in China Contribute to the Publication of International High-Impact Academic Papers? An Empirical Analysis Based on ESI Papers (2011\u20132012)]. Academic Degrees & Graduate Education 2: 57\u201361. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.16750\/j.adge.2014.02.013","DOI":"10.16750\/j.adge.2014.02.013"},{"issue":"1","key":"9596_CR90","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"69","DOI":"10.1016\/j.emj.2015.12.004","volume":"34","author":"Monica Aniela Zaharie","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zaharie, Monica Aniela, and Codru\u0163a Lumini\u0163a. Osoian. 2016. Peer Review Motivation Frames: A Qualitative Approach. European Management Journal 34(1): 69\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.emj.2015.12.004.","journal-title":"European Management Journal"},{"issue":"5","key":"9596_CR91","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"409","DOI":"10.1631\/jzus.B1600174","volume":"17","author":"Chun-jie Zhang","year":"2016","unstructured":"Zhang, Chun-jie, and Yuan Zhu. 2016. China\u2019s Graduate Students Need Better Education in Scientific Writing and Publishing. Journal of Zhejiang University-Science 17(5): 409\u2013412. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1631\/jzus.B1600174.","journal-title":"Journal of Zhejiang University-Science"},{"issue":"5","key":"9596_CR92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"753","DOI":"10.1007\/s10734-018-0236-3","volume":"76","author":"Gaoming Zheng","year":"2018","unstructured":"Zheng, Gaoming, Wenqin Shen, and Yuzhuo Cai. 2018. Institutional Logics of Chinese Doctoral Education System. Higher Education 76(5): 753\u2013770. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10734-018-0236-3.","journal-title":"Higher Education"},{"key":"9596_CR93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00358","volume":"6","author":"Xiang Zheng","year":"2025","unstructured":"Zheng, Xiang, and Chaoqun Ni. 2025. Dissecting the Global Peer Review Ecosystem: Skewness, Homophily, and Diversity Dynamics. Quantitative Science Studies 6:463\u2013482. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00358.","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"}],"container-title":["Minerva"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11024-025-09596-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11024-025-09596-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11024-025-09596-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,27]],"date-time":"2025-08-27T01:40:55Z","timestamp":1756258855000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11024-025-09596-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,27]]},"references-count":93,"alternative-id":["9596"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11024-025-09596-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0026-4695","1573-1871"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0026-4695","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-1871","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,27]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 July 2025","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 August 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}