{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,1]],"date-time":"2025-11-01T05:42:17Z","timestamp":1761975737597,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":48,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,9]],"date-time":"2019-04-09T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1554768000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"name":"Brazilian National Council of Technological and Scientific Development"},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002322","name":"Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002322","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Clin Pharm"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11096-019-00818-2","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,9]],"date-time":"2019-04-09T05:33:31Z","timestamp":1554788011000},"page":"785-792","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Usability and sensitivity of the risk of bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials of pharmacist interventions"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4262-8608","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fernanda S.","family":"Tonin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Livia A.","family":"Lopes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Inajara","family":"Rotta","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Aline F.","family":"Bonetti","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7049-4363","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Roberto","family":"Pontarolo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4676-5266","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Cassyano J.","family":"Correr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8529-9595","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fernando","family":"Fernandez-Llimos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,9]]},"reference":[{"key":"818_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"116","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-13-116","volume":"13","author":"S Armijo-Olivo","year":"2013","unstructured":"Armijo-Olivo S, Fuentes J, Ospina M, Saltaji H, Hartling L. Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:116.","journal-title":"BMC Med Res Methodol"},{"key":"818_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(16)31592-6","volume":"390","author":"B Djulbegovic","year":"2017","unstructured":"Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet. 2017;390:415\u201323.","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"818_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"b4012","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b4012","volume":"339","author":"L Hartling","year":"2009","unstructured":"Hartling L, Ospina M, Liang Y, Dryden DM, Hooton N, Krebs Seida J, et al. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2009;339:b4012.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"818_CR4","unstructured":"Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters M, et al. Assessing the risk of bias of individual studies in systematic reviews of health care interventions. In: Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ: Rockville, 2008."},{"key":"818_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.323.7303.42","volume":"323","author":"P Juni","year":"2001","unstructured":"Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42\u20136.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"818_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"811","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.11.023","volume":"71","author":"RJ Sylvester","year":"2017","unstructured":"Sylvester RJ, Canfield SE, Lam TB, Marconi L, MacLennan S, Yuan Y, et al. Conflict of evidence: resolving discrepancies when findings from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses disagree. Eur Urol. 2017;71:811\u20139.","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"818_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1111\/jebm.12141","volume":"8","author":"X Zeng","year":"2015","unstructured":"Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, et al. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2015;8:2\u201310.","journal-title":"J Evid Based Med"},{"key":"818_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"72","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.08.012","volume":"81","author":"VM Jordan","year":"2017","unstructured":"Jordan VM, Lensen SF, Farquhar CM. There were large discrepancies in risk of bias tool judgments when a randomized controlled trial appeared in more than one systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;81:72\u20136.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"818_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"54","DOI":"10.1097\/EDE.0000000000000564","volume":"28","author":"MA Mansournia","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mansournia MA, Higgins JP, Sterne JA, Hernan MA. Biases in randomized trials: a conversation between trialists and epidemiologists. Epidemiology. 2017;28:54\u20139.","journal-title":"Epidemiology"},{"key":"818_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"176","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2017.03.002","volume":"86","author":"TP Yamato","year":"2017","unstructured":"Yamato TP, Maher C, Koes B, Moseley A. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity and inter-rater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;86:176\u201381.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"818_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"107","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-2-107","volume":"2","author":"S Hempel","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hempel S, Miles JN, Booth MJ, Wang Z, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013;2:107.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"818_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"720","DOI":"10.1016\/j.adaj.2016.03.017","volume":"147","author":"H Saltaji","year":"2016","unstructured":"Saltaji H, Ospina MB, Armijo-Olivo S, Agarwal S, Cummings GG, Amin M, et al. Evaluation of risk of bias assessment of trials in systematic reviews of oral health interventions, 1991\u20132014: a methodology study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147:720\u20138.","journal-title":"J Am Dent Assoc"},{"key":"818_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"f1798","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.f1798","volume":"346","author":"CL Vale","year":"2013","unstructured":"Vale CL, Tierney JF, Burdett S. Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews. BMJ. 2013;346:f1798.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"818_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x","volume":"18","author":"S Armijo-Olivo","year":"2012","unstructured":"Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool and the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18:12\u20138.","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"key":"818_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"156","DOI":"10.2522\/ptj.20070147","volume":"88","author":"SA Olivo","year":"2008","unstructured":"Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ. Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88:156\u201375.","journal-title":"Phys Ther"},{"key":"818_CR16","unstructured":"Higgins JPT, Green S. In: Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. http:\/\/handbook-5-1.cochrane.org\/ . Accessed 09 Jan 2019."},{"key":"818_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"44","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-017-0441-7","volume":"6","author":"BR Costa da","year":"2017","unstructured":"da Costa BR, Beckett B, Diaz A, Resta NM, Johnston BC, Egger M, et al. Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study. Syst Rev. 2017;6:44.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"818_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"973","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2012.07.005","volume":"66","author":"L Hartling","year":"2013","unstructured":"Hartling L, Hamm MP, Milne A, Vandermeer B, Santaguida PL, Ansari M, et al. Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:973\u201381.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"818_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"E263","DOI":"10.36076\/ppj.2014\/17\/E263","volume":"17","author":"L Manchikanti","year":"2014","unstructured":"Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA, Cohen SP, Heavner JE, Falco FJ, Diwan S, et al. Assessment of methodologic quality of randomized trials of interventional techniques: development of an interventional pain management specific instrument. Pain Physician. 2014;17:E263\u201390.","journal-title":"Pain Physician"},{"key":"818_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1186\/s13643-016-0259-8","volume":"5","author":"L Jorgensen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Jorgensen L, Paludan-Muller AS, Laursen DR, Savovic J, Boutron I, Sterne JA, et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:80.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"818_CR21","first-page":"30","volume":"10","author":"J Higgins","year":"2016","unstructured":"Higgins J, Sterne J, Savovi\u0107 J, Page M, Hr\u00f3bjartsson A, Boutron I, et al. A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10:30\u20131.","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"818_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"131","DOI":"10.1007\/s40264-015-0370-0","volume":"39","author":"TH Vo","year":"2016","unstructured":"Vo TH, Charpiat B, Catoire C, Juste M, Roubille R, Rose FX, et al. Tools for assessing potential significance of pharmacist interventions: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2016;39:131\u201346.","journal-title":"Drug Saf"},{"key":"818_CR23","first-page":"226","volume":"67","author":"RT Tsuyuki","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tsuyuki RT. Designing pharmacy practice research trials. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014;67:226\u20139.","journal-title":"Can J Hosp Pharm"},{"key":"818_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1345\/aph.1S006","volume":"47","author":"CJ Correr","year":"2013","unstructured":"Correr CJ, Melchiors AC, de Souza TT, Rotta I, Salgado TM, Fernandez-Llimos F. A tool to characterize the components of pharmacist interventions in clinical pharmacy services: the DEPICT project. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47:946\u201352.","journal-title":"Ann Pharmacother"},{"key":"818_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"584","DOI":"10.1111\/jep.12339","volume":"21","author":"I Rotta","year":"2015","unstructured":"Rotta I, Salgado TM, Felix DC, Souza TT, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Ensuring consistent reporting of clinical pharmacy services to enhance reproducibility in practice: an improved version of DEPICT. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:584\u201390.","journal-title":"J Eval Clin Pract"},{"key":"818_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"201","DOI":"10.1016\/j.sapharm.2016.01.003","volume":"13","author":"I Rotta","year":"2017","unstructured":"Rotta I, Souza TT, Salgado TM, Correr CJ, Fernandez-Llimos F. Characterization of published randomized controlled trials assessing clinical pharmacy services around the world. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2017;13:201\u20138.","journal-title":"Res Soc Adm Pharm"},{"issue":"3","key":"818_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1186\/2046-4053-3-144","volume":"13","author":"BR Costa da","year":"2014","unstructured":"da Costa BR, Resta NM, Beckett B, Israel-Stahre N, Diaz A, Johnston BC, et al. Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a study protocol. Syst Rev. 2014;13(3):144.","journal-title":"Syst Rev"},{"key":"818_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1327","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.06.020","volume":"67","author":"H Moustgaard","year":"2014","unstructured":"Moustgaard H, Bello S, Miller FG, Hrobjartsson A. Subjective and objective outcomes in randomized clinical trials: definitions differed in methods publications and were often absent from trial reports. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1327\u201334.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"818_CR29","first-page":"227","volume":"24","author":"JI Hoffman","year":"1976","unstructured":"Hoffman JI. The incorrect use of Chi square analysis for paired data. Clin Exp Immunol. 1976;24:227\u20139.","journal-title":"Clin Exp Immunol"},{"key":"818_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"494","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.114.3.494","volume":"114","author":"N Cliff","year":"1993","unstructured":"Cliff N. Dominance statistics: ordinal analyses to answer ordinal questions. Psychol Bull. 1993;114:494\u2013509.","journal-title":"Psychol Bull"},{"key":"818_CR31","first-page":"Doc07","volume":"6","author":"M Dreier","year":"2010","unstructured":"Dreier M, Borutta B, Stahmeyer J, Krauth C, Walter U. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany. GMS Health Technol Assess. 2010;6:Doc07.","journal-title":"GMS Health Technol Assess"},{"key":"818_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0132634","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0132634","volume":"10","author":"S Armijo-Olivo","year":"2015","unstructured":"Armijo-Olivo S, da Costa BR, Cummings GG, Ha C, Fuentes J, Saltaji H, et al. PEDro or Cochrane to assess the quality of clinical trials? A meta-epidemiological study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0132634.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"818_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1054","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.282.11.1054","volume":"282","author":"P Juni","year":"1999","unstructured":"Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999;282:1054\u201360.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"818_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"22","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7430.22","volume":"328","author":"HP Soares","year":"2004","unstructured":"Soares HP, Daniels S, Kumar A, Clarke M, Scott C, Swann S, et al. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. BMJ. 2004;328:22\u20134.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"issue":"340","key":"818_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"c332","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.c332","volume":"2010","author":"KF Schulz","year":"2010","unstructured":"Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;2010(340):c332.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"818_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2016.04.005","volume":"77","author":"A Dechartres","year":"2016","unstructured":"Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Faber T, Ravaud P. Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;77:24\u201337.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"818_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e476","DOI":"10.3399\/bjgp10X544113","volume":"60","author":"LG Glynn","year":"2010","unstructured":"Glynn LG, Murphy AW, Smith SM, Schroeder K, Fahey T. Self-monitoring and other non-pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:e476\u201388.","journal-title":"Br J Gen Pract"},{"key":"818_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"953","DOI":"10.1111\/bcp.13200","volume":"83","author":"JM Bos","year":"2017","unstructured":"Bos JM, van den Bemt PM, de Smet PA, Kramers C. The effect of prescriber education on medication-related patient harm in the hospital: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83:953\u201361.","journal-title":"Br J Clin Pharmacol"},{"key":"818_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"i5663","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i5663","volume":"355","author":"L Clark","year":"2016","unstructured":"Clark L, Fairhurst C, Torgerson DJ. Allocation concealment in randomised controlled trials: Are we getting better? BMJ. 2016;355:i5663.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"818_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"286","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-15-286","volume":"15","author":"T Clark","year":"2014","unstructured":"Clark T, Davies H, Mansmann U. Five questions that need answering when considering the design of clinical trials. Trials. 2014;15:286.","journal-title":"Trials"},{"key":"818_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1153","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.131353","volume":"186","author":"RH Groenwold","year":"2014","unstructured":"Groenwold RH, Moons KG, Vandenbroucke JP. Randomized trials with missing outcome data: how to analyze and what to report. CMAJ. 2014;186:1153\u20137.","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"818_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2977","DOI":"10.1007\/s11136-016-1411-6","volume":"25","author":"S Fielding","year":"2016","unstructured":"Fielding S, Ogbuagu A, Sivasubramaniam S, MacLennan G, Ramsay CR. Reporting and dealing with missing quality of life data in RCTs: has the picture changed in the last decade? Qual Life Res. 2016;25:2977\u201383.","journal-title":"Qual Life Res"},{"key":"818_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"368","DOI":"10.1191\/1740774504cn032oa","volume":"1","author":"AM Wood","year":"2004","unstructured":"Wood AM, White IR, Thompson SG. Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals. Clin Trials. 2004;1:368\u201376.","journal-title":"Clin Trials"},{"key":"818_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"h391","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.h391","volume":"350","author":"K Hemming","year":"2015","unstructured":"Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015;350:h391.","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"818_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2010.01.010","volume":"63","author":"CE Hewitt","year":"2010","unstructured":"Hewitt CE, Kumaravel B, Dumville JC, Torgerson DJ, Trial attrition study group. Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:1264\u201370.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"818_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"769","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2013.11.011","volume":"67","author":"TL Jarvinen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Jarvinen TL, Sihvonen R, Bhandari M, Sprague S, Malmivaara A, Paavola M, et al. Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:769\u201372.","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"818_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e96920","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0096920","volume":"9","author":"S Armijo-Olivo","year":"2014","unstructured":"Armijo-Olivo S, Ospina M, da Costa BR, Egger M, Saltaji H, Fuentes J, et al. Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96920.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"key":"818_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a114229","volume":"123","author":"S Greenland","year":"1986","unstructured":"Greenland S, Schlesselman JJ, Criqui MH. The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123:203\u20138.","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"}],"container-title":["International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11096-019-00818-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11096-019-00818-2\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11096-019-00818-2.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,15]],"date-time":"2022-09-15T14:40:32Z","timestamp":1663252832000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11096-019-00818-2"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,9]]},"references-count":48,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,6]]}},"alternative-id":["818"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11096-019-00818-2","relation":{},"ISSN":["2210-7703","2210-7711"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"2210-7703"},{"type":"electronic","value":"2210-7711"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,4,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"3 July 2018","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"27 March 2019","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"9 April 2019","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}