{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,26]],"date-time":"2026-04-26T08:44:48Z","timestamp":1777193088860,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":37,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,12]],"date-time":"2020-08-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597190400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,12]],"date-time":"2020-08-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597190400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100008530","name":"European Regional Development Fund","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100008530","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031821"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031821"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Scientometrics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03660-w","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,12]],"date-time":"2020-08-12T06:02:35Z","timestamp":1597212155000},"page":"909-924","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":36,"title":["Assessing the publication impact using citation data from both Scopus and WoS databases: an approach validated in 15 research fields"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"125","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7228-1241","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gerson","family":"Pech","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1494-0517","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Catarina","family":"Delgado","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,12]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101023","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2020.101023","volume":"14","author":"G Abramo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abramo, G., Aksnes, D. W., & D\u2019Angelo, C. A. (2020). Comparison of research performance of Italian and Norwegian professors and universities. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2), 101023.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"100986","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2019.100986","volume":"14","author":"G Abramo","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abramo, G., & D\u2019Angelo, C. A. (2020). A novel methodology to assess the scientific standing of nations at field level. Journal of Informetrics, 14(1), 100986.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-008-0216-y","volume":"74","author":"J Bar-Ilan","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?\u2014A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257\u2013271.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"3660_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22792","volume":"64","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bornmann, L. (2013). How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics: The statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(3), 587\u2013595.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2012.10.001","volume":"7","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Mutz, R. (2013a). The use of percentiles and percentile rank classes in the analysis of bibliometric data: Opportunities and limits. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 158\u2013165.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"3660_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2013.09.003","volume":"7","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2013","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., Leydesdorff, L., & Wang, J. (2013b). Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100). Journal of Informetrics, 7, 933\u2013944.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1457","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03512-7","volume":"124","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2020","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Williams, R. (2020). An evaluation of percentile measures of citation impact, and a proposal for making them better. Scientometrics, 124(2), 1457\u20131478.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"841","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03140-w","volume":"120","author":"L Bornmann","year":"2019","unstructured":"Bornmann, L., & Wohlrabe, K. (2019). Normalisation of citation impact in economics. Scientometrics, 120(2), 841\u2013884. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03140-w.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"315","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2018.01.011","volume":"12","author":"R Brito","year":"2018","unstructured":"Brito, R., & Rodr\u00edguez-Navarro, A. (2018). Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 315\u2013329.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1107","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2680-3","volume":"115","author":"JAT da Silva","year":"2018","unstructured":"da Silva, J. A. T., & Dobr\u00e1nszki, J. (2018). Multiple versions of the h-index: Cautionary use for formal academic purposes. Scientometrics, 115(2), 1107\u20131113.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"219","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2483-y","volume":"113","author":"P Donner","year":"2017","unstructured":"Donner, P. (2017). Document type assignment accuracy in the journal citation index data of Web of Science. Scientometrics, 113(1), 219\u2013236.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"3660_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"895","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2015.09.005","volume":"9","author":"R Fairclough","year":"2015","unstructured":"Fairclough, R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 895\u2013906.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"3660_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"296","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2017.05.018","volume":"158","author":"Y Feng","year":"2017","unstructured":"Feng, Y., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K.-H. (2017). Corporate social responsibility for supply chain management: A literature review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 158, 296\u2013307.","journal-title":"Journal of Cleaner Production"},{"issue":"4","key":"3660_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"933","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.07.003","volume":"10","author":"F Franceschini","year":"2016","unstructured":"Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016). Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 933\u2013953.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"4060","key":"3660_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"471","DOI":"10.1126\/science.178.4060.471","volume":"178","author":"E Garfield","year":"1972","unstructured":"Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471\u2013479.","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03114-y","volume":"120","author":"A-W Harzing","year":"2019","unstructured":"Harzing, A.-W. (2019). Two new kids on the block: How do Crossref and Dimensions compare with Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus and the Web of Science? Scientometrics, 120(1), 341\u2013349.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"787","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1798-9","volume":"106","author":"A-W Harzing","year":"2016","unstructured":"Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106(2), 787\u2013804.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"62","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2015.11.003","volume":"10","author":"R Haunschild","year":"2016","unstructured":"Haunschild, R., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Normalization of Mendeley reader counts for impact assessment. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 62\u201373.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"3660_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1395","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2703-0","volume":"115","author":"VD Kosteas","year":"2018","unstructured":"Kosteas, V. D. (2018). Predicting long-run citation counts for articles in top economics journals. Scientometrics, 115, 1395\u20131412.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.2307\/2532051","volume":"45","author":"LI-K Lin","year":"1989","unstructured":"Lin, L. I.-K. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45(1), 255\u2013268.","journal-title":"Biometrics"},{"issue":"4","key":"3660_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1160","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2018.09.002","volume":"12","author":"A Mart\u00edn-Mart\u00edn","year":"2018","unstructured":"Mart\u00edn-Mart\u00edn, A., Orduna-Malea, E., Thelwall, M., & L\u00f3pez-C\u00f3zar, E. D. (2018). Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1160\u20131177.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"3660_CR22","unstructured":"McBride, G. B. (2005). A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin\u2019s concordance correlation coefficient. NIWA Client Report, HAM2005-062."},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.12.006","volume":"11","author":"S Milojevi\u0107","year":"2017","unstructured":"Milojevi\u0107, S., Radicchi, F., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Citation success index\u2014An intuitive pair-wise journal comparison metric. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 223\u2013231.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1781-5","volume":"106","author":"HF Moed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moed, H. F. (2016). Comprehensive indicator comparisons intelligible to non-experts: The case of two SNIP versions. Scientometrics, 106(1), 51\u201365.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"533","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.04.017","volume":"10","author":"HF Moed","year":"2016","unstructured":"Moed, H. F., Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2016). A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 533\u2013551.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"213","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-015-1765-5","volume":"106","author":"P Mongeon","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213\u2013228.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"3660_CR27","unstructured":"Pech, G., & Delgado, C. (2019). Method for comparison of the number of citations from papers in different databases. In 17th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, ISSI 2019\u2014Proceedings 2 (pp. 2419\u20132429)."},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03386-9","volume":"123","author":"G Pech","year":"2020","unstructured":"Pech, G., & Delgado, C. (2020). Percentile and stochastic-based approach to the comparison of the number of citations of articles indexed in different bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 123(1), 223\u2013252.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"3660_CR29","unstructured":"Pech, G., Delgado, C., & Vieira, N. (2019). Percentile citation-based method for screening the most highly cited papers in longitudinal bibliometric studies and systematic literature reviews. In 12th annual conference and proceedings of the EuroMed academy of business, EUROMED 2019 (pp. 911\u2013923)."},{"issue":"7","key":"3660_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1855","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2019.04.009","volume":"48","author":"AM Petersen","year":"2019","unstructured":"Petersen, A. M., Pan, R. K., Pammolli, F., & Fortunato, S. (2019). Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation. Research Policy, 48(7), 1855\u20131865.","journal-title":"Research Policy"},{"issue":"3","key":"3660_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e33833","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0033833","volume":"7","author":"F Radicchi","year":"2012","unstructured":"Radicchi, F., & Castellano, C. (2012). A reverse engineering approach to the suppression of citation biases reveals universal properties of citation distributions. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e33833.","journal-title":"PLoS ONE"},{"issue":"1","key":"3660_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2017.11.004","volume":"12","author":"A Rodr\u00edguez-Navarro","year":"2018","unstructured":"Rodr\u00edguez-Navarro, A., & Brito, R. (2018). Double rank analysis for research assessment. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 31\u201341.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"487","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2013.01.011","volume":"7","author":"K Sangwal","year":"2013","unstructured":"Sangwal, K. (2013). Citation and impact factor distributions of scientific journals published in individual countries. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 487\u2013504.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"3","key":"3660_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"570","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2015.05.002","volume":"9","author":"J-C Valderrama-Zuri\u00e1n","year":"2015","unstructured":"Valderrama-Zuri\u00e1n, J.-C., Aguilar-Moya, R., Melero-Fuentes, D., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2015). A systematic analysis of duplicate records in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 570\u2013576.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"key":"3660_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"365","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2016.02.007","volume":"10","author":"L Waltman","year":"2016","unstructured":"Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10, 365\u2013391.","journal-title":"Journal of Informetrics"},{"issue":"2","key":"3660_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"372","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22775","volume":"64","author":"L Waltman","year":"2013","unstructured":"Waltman, L., & Schreiber, M. (2013). On the calculation of percentile-based bibliometric indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 372\u2013379.","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"issue":"3","key":"3660_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1427","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03162-4","volume":"120","author":"S Xu","year":"2019","unstructured":"Xu, S., Hao, L., An, X., et al. (2019). Types of DOI errors of cited references in Web of Science with a cleaning method. Scientometrics, 120(3), 1427\u20131437.","journal-title":"Scientometrics"}],"container-title":["Scientometrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03660-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03660-w\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03660-w.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,8,11]],"date-time":"2021-08-11T23:20:40Z","timestamp":1628724040000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03660-w"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,12]]},"references-count":37,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11]]}},"alternative-id":["3660"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03660-w","relation":{},"ISSN":["0138-9130","1588-2861"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0138-9130","type":"print"},{"value":"1588-2861","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"15 December 2019","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 August 2020","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}