{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,31]],"date-time":"2025-12-31T01:01:18Z","timestamp":1767142878274,"version":"build-2238731810"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,8]],"date-time":"2019-11-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573171200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,8]],"date-time":"2019-11-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1573171200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Int J Semiot Law"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The chief concern of the paper is to initiate discussion on the difference between the private and public power of judgement. The inspiration comes from Kant and his conception of the power of judgement, customs, morality and provisional law.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11196-019-09659-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,8]],"date-time":"2019-11-08T10:35:55Z","timestamp":1573209355000},"page":"3-15","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Public Power of Judgement: Reasonableness Versus Rationality\u2014Setting the Ball Rolling"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3162-6906","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Karolina M.","family":"Cern","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1380-5396","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jos\u00e9 Manuel","family":"Aroso Linhares","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4271-7056","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bartosz","family":"Wojciechowski","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"9659_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3726\/978-3-653-04738-7","volume-title":"The counterfactual yardstick. Normativity, self-constitutionalisation and the public sphere","author":"Karolina M Cern","year":"2014","unstructured":"Cern, Karolina M. 2014. The counterfactual yardstick. Normativity, self-constitutionalisation and the public sphere. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition."},{"key":"9659_CR2","volume-title":"Provisional politics. Kantian arguments in policy context","author":"Elisabeth Ellis","year":"2014","unstructured":"Ellis, Elisabeth. 2014. Provisional politics. Kantian arguments in policy context. New Haven and London: Yale University Press."},{"issue":"3","key":"9659_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"292","DOI":"10.1111\/eulj.12049","volume":"20","author":"Rob van Gestel","year":"2014","unstructured":"Gestel, Rob van, and Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz. 2014. Why methods matter in European legal scholarship. European Law Journal 20 (3): 292\u2013316.","journal-title":"European Law Journal"},{"key":"9659_CR4","series-title":"Law and philosophy library","volume-title":"Law and democracy in Neil MacCormick\u2019s legal and political philosophy, the post-sovereign constellation","author":"Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes","year":"2011","unstructured":"Hitzel-Cassagnes, Tanja. 2011. Are we beyond sovereignty? The sovereignty of process and democratic legitimacy of the European Union. In Law and democracy in Neil MacCormick\u2019s legal and political philosophy, the post-sovereign constellation, vol. 93, ed. Jos\u00e9 Men\u00e9ndez and Erik Fossum John., Law and philosophy library Dordrecht: Springer."},{"key":"9659_CR5","unstructured":"Heidegger, Martin. 2001. Sein und Zeit. Achtzente Auflage. Max Niemeyer Verlag."},{"key":"9659_CR6","volume-title":"Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik","author":"Martin Heidegger","year":"2010","unstructured":"Heidegger, Martin. 2010. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH."},{"key":"9659_CR7","unstructured":"Kant, Immanuel. 2008. Critique of practical reason. Trans. Mary J. Gregor, In Practical philosophy, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 12th printing, 133\u2013271."},{"key":"9659_CR8","unstructured":"Kant, Immanuel. 2008. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Trans. Mary J. Gregor. In Practical philosophy, The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 12th printing, 37\u2013108."},{"key":"9659_CR9","unstructured":"Kant, Immanuel. 1995. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. In Werke in sechs B\u00e4nden, Band 3. K\u00f6ln K\u00f6nemann, 171\u2013269."},{"key":"9659_CR10","unstructured":"Kant, Immanuel. 1995. Kritik der praktischen Vernuft. In Werke in sechs B\u00e4nden, Band 3. K\u00f6ln K\u00f6nemann, 271\u2013483."},{"key":"9659_CR11","volume-title":"Kant and cosmopolitanism. The philosophical ideal of world citizenship","author":"Pauline Kleingeld","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kleingeld, Pauline. 2013. Kant and cosmopolitanism. The philosophical ideal of world citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"9659_CR12","volume-title":"Questioning sovereignty. Law, state, and nation in the European Commonwealth","author":"Neil MacCormick","year":"2001","unstructured":"MacCormick, Neil. 2001. Questioning sovereignty. Law, state, and nation in the European Commonwealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9659_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199571246.001.0001","volume-title":"Rhetoric and the rule of law","author":"Neil MacCormick","year":"2005","unstructured":"MacCormick, Neil. 2005. Rhetoric and the rule of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press."},{"key":"9659_CR14","volume-title":"Metodologia jur\u00eddica. Problemas fundamentais","author":"A Castanheira Neves","year":"1993","unstructured":"Neves, A.Castanheira. 1993. Metodologia jur\u00eddica. Problemas fundamentais. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora."},{"key":"9659_CR15","unstructured":"Rawls, John. 1999. Kantian constructivism in moral theory. In John Rawls, Collected Papers. ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass., London: Harvard University Press, 303\u2013358."},{"key":"9659_CR16","unstructured":"Rawls, John. 2000. Lectures on the history of moral philosophy. ed. Barbara Herman., Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press."},{"key":"9659_CR17","volume-title":"Heracles\u2019 Bow. Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law","author":"James Boyd White","year":"1985","unstructured":"White, James Boyd. 1985. Heracles\u2019 Bow. Essays on the rhetoric and poetics of the law. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press."}],"updated-by":[{"DOI":"10.1007\/s11196-019-09678-5","type":"correction","label":"Correction","source":"publisher","updated":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,8]],"date-time":"2020-01-08T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1578441600000}}],"container-title":["International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de S\u00e9miotique juridique"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11196-019-09659-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11196-019-09659-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11196-019-09659-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,6]],"date-time":"2020-11-06T19:22:52Z","timestamp":1604690572000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11196-019-09659-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,8]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,3]]}},"alternative-id":["9659"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11196-019-09659-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0952-8059","1572-8722"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0952-8059","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8722","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"8 November 2019","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 January 2020","order":2,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Correction","order":3,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"In the original publication of the article, the paragraph beginning \u201cWe begin with two steps or lawyers\u2026\u201d should read as \u201cWe begin with two steps or layers privileging jurisdictio as potestas.","order":4,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}