{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,19]],"date-time":"2025-12-19T09:28:51Z","timestamp":1766136531128},"reference-count":83,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,11]],"date-time":"2014-10-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1412985600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Topoi"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-014-9271-6","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,10]],"date-time":"2014-10-10T05:58:12Z","timestamp":1412920692000},"page":"523-537","update-policy":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":17,"title":["Argumentation Theory in Education Studies: Coding and Improving Students\u2019 Argumentative Strategies"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Elisabeth","family":"Mayweg-Paus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Deanna","family":"Kuhn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"9271_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1099","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N","volume":"33","author":"E Alexopoulou","year":"1996","unstructured":"Alexopoulou E, Driver R (1996) Small-group discussion in physics: peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. J Res Sci Teach 33:1099\u20131114","journal-title":"J Res Sci Teach"},{"issue":"3","key":"9271_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-0663.84.3.261","volume":"84","author":"C Ames","year":"1992","unstructured":"Ames C (1992) Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. J Educ Psychol 84(3):261\u2013271","journal-title":"J Educ Psychol"},{"key":"9271_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1207\/S1532690XCI1901_1","volume":"19","author":"RC Anderson","year":"2001","unstructured":"Anderson RC, Nguyen-Jahiel K, McNurlen B, Archodidou A, Kim S, Reznitskaya A (2001) The snowball phenomenon: spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognit Instr 19:1\u201346","journal-title":"Cognit Instr"},{"key":"9271_CR4","first-page":"443","volume-title":"Handbook of the learning sciences","author":"J Andriessen","year":"2006","unstructured":"Andriessen J (2006) Arguing to learn. In: Sawyer K (ed) Handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 443\u2013459"},{"key":"9271_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"374","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x","volume":"33","author":"CSC Asterhan","year":"2009","unstructured":"Asterhan CSC, Schwarz BB (2009) Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognit Sci 33:374\u2013400","journal-title":"Cognit Sci"},{"key":"9271_CR6","first-page":"179","volume-title":"Foundations of argumentative text processing","author":"M Baker","year":"1999","unstructured":"Baker M (1999) Argumentation and constructive interaction. In: Rijlaarsdam G, Esp\u00e9ret E, Andriessen J, Coirier P (eds) Foundations of argumentative text processing. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp 179\u2013202"},{"issue":"1","key":"9271_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.1016\/S0193-3973(99)00046-5","volume":"21","author":"S Carey","year":"2000","unstructured":"Carey S (2000) Science education as conceptual change. J Appl Dev Psychol 21(1):13\u201319","journal-title":"J Appl Dev Psychol"},{"key":"9271_CR81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chi M (2005) Common sense conceptions of emergent processes: why some misconceptions are robust. J Learn Sci 14:161\u2013199","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327809jls1402_1"},{"key":"9271_CR80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chi M, Roscoe R (2002) The process and challenges of conceptual change. In Limon M, Mason L (eds) Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 3\u201327","DOI":"10.1007\/0-306-47637-1_1"},{"key":"9271_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1023429215151","volume":"15","author":"A-M Clark","year":"2003","unstructured":"Clark A-M, Anderson RC, Kuo L-J, Kim I-H, Archodidou A, Nguyen-Jahiel K (2003) Collaborative reasoning: expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educ Psychol Rev 15:181\u2013198","journal-title":"Educ Psychol Rev"},{"issue":"6","key":"9271_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"837","DOI":"10.1080\/09500690701411567","volume":"30","author":"D Cross","year":"2008","unstructured":"Cross D, Taasoobshirazi G, Hendricks S, Hickey DT (2008) Argumentation: a strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities. Int J Sci Educ 30(6):837\u2013861","journal-title":"Int J Sci Educ"},{"key":"9271_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Crowell A, Kuhn D (2014) Developing dialogic argumentation skills: a three-year intervention study. J Cognit Dev 15:363\u2013381","DOI":"10.1080\/15248372.2012.725187"},{"key":"9271_CR11","volume-title":"Attacking faulty reasoning\u2014a practical guide to fallacy-free arguments","author":"ET Damer","year":"2001","unstructured":"Damer ET (2001) Attacking faulty reasoning\u2014a practical guide to fallacy-free arguments. Wadsworth, Thomson Learning"},{"key":"9271_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1002\/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A","volume":"84","author":"R Driver","year":"2000","unstructured":"Driver R, Newton P, Osborne J (2000) Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Sci Educ 84:287\u2013312","journal-title":"Sci Educ"},{"key":"9271_CR13","volume-title":"Dire et ne pas dire","author":"O Ducrot","year":"1972","unstructured":"Ducrot O (1972) Dire et ne pas dire. Hermann, Paris"},{"key":"9271_CR14","first-page":"47","volume-title":"Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research","author":"S Erduran","year":"2007","unstructured":"Erduran S (2007) Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In: Erduran S, Jim\u00e9nez-Aleixandre MP (eds) Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47\u201369"},{"key":"9271_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"135","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2001.9651595","volume":"32","author":"M Felton","year":"2001","unstructured":"Felton M, Kuhn D (2001) The development of argumentive discourse skills. Discourse Process 32:135\u2013153","journal-title":"Discourse Process"},{"key":"9271_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"31","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-4041-9_3","volume-title":"Topical themes in argumentation theory","author":"M Finocchiaro","year":"2012","unstructured":"Finocchiaro M (2012) Meta-argumentation: prolegomena to a Dutch project. In: van Eemeren FH, Garssen B (eds) Topical themes in argumentation theory. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 31\u201348"},{"key":"9271_CR17","first-page":"3","volume":"25","author":"RJ Fogelin","year":"2005","unstructured":"Fogelin RJ (2005) The logic of deep disagreements. Informal Log 25:3\u201311","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"issue":"4","key":"9271_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"497","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.21057","volume":"97","author":"M Garcia-Mila","year":"2013","unstructured":"Garcia-Mila M, Gilabert S, Erduran S, Felton M (2013) The effect of argumentation task goal on the quality of argumentative discourse. Sci Educ 97(4):497\u2013523","journal-title":"Sci Educ"},{"key":"9271_CR19","first-page":"238","volume-title":"Social cognition: Studies of the development of understanding","author":"M Glachan","year":"1982","unstructured":"Glachan M, Light P (1982) Peer interaction and learning: Can two wrongs make a right? In: Butterworth G, Light P (eds) Social cognition: Studies of the development of understanding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 238\u2013262"},{"key":"9271_CR20","volume-title":"A practical study of argument","author":"T Govier","year":"1985","unstructured":"Govier T (1985) A practical study of argument. Wadsworth, Belmont"},{"key":"9271_CR21","unstructured":"Hewson P (1992) Conceptual change in science teaching and teacher education. Paper presented at a meeting on \u201cResearch and Curriculum Development in Science Teaching,\u201d National Center for Educational Research, Documentation, and Assessment, Ministry for Education and Science, Madrid, Spain"},{"issue":"4","key":"9271_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"379","DOI":"10.1207\/S1532690XCI1704_2","volume":"17","author":"K Hogan","year":"1999","unstructured":"Hogan K, Nastasi B, Pressley M (1999) Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognit Instr 17(4):379\u2013432","journal-title":"Cognit Instr"},{"key":"9271_CR23","first-page":"91","volume-title":"Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research","author":"MP Jim\u00e9nez-Aleixandre","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jim\u00e9nez-Aleixandre MP (2007) Designing argumentation learning environments. In: Erduran S, Jim\u00e9nez-Aleixandre MP (eds) Argumentation in science education. Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 91\u2013116"},{"key":"9271_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.1007\/s11409-011-9084-6","volume":"7","author":"R Jucks","year":"2012","unstructured":"Jucks R, Paus E (2012) What makes a word difficult? Insights into the mental representation of technical terms. Metacognit Learn 7:91\u2013111","journal-title":"Metacognit Learn"},{"issue":"2","key":"9271_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1080\/07370008.2013.769993","volume":"31","author":"R Jucks","year":"2013","unstructured":"Jucks R, Paus E (2013) Different words for the same concept: learning collaboratively from multiple documents. Cognit Instr 31(2):1\u201328","journal-title":"Cognit Instr"},{"issue":"3","key":"9271_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"333","DOI":"10.1080\/10508400701413419","volume":"16","author":"I Kim","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kim I, Anderson RC, Kim N-J, Archodidou A (2007) Discourse patterns during children\u2019s collaborative online discussions. J Learn Sci 16(3):333\u2013370","journal-title":"J Learn Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"9271_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.3660290107","volume":"29","author":"T Koballa","year":"1992","unstructured":"Koballa T (1992) Persuasion and attitude change in science education. J Res Sci Teach 29(1):63\u201380","journal-title":"J Res Sci Teach"},{"issue":"5","key":"9271_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1069","DOI":"10.1007\/s11191-012-9564-3","volume":"22","author":"K Konstantinidou","year":"2013","unstructured":"Konstantinidou K, Macagno F (2013) Understanding students\u2019 reasoning: argumentation schemes as an interpretation method in science education. Sci Educ 22(5):1069\u20131087","journal-title":"Sci Educ"},{"key":"9271_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"83","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-1078-8_7","volume-title":"Anyone who has a view: theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"2003","unstructured":"Krabbe ECW (2003) Metadialogues. In: van Eemeren FH, Blair JA, Willard CA, Snoek Henkemans AF (eds) Anyone who has a view: theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 83\u201390"},{"key":"9271_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"233","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9052-0","volume":"21","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"2007","unstructured":"Krabbe ECW (2007) On how to get beyond the opening stage. Argumentation 21:233\u2013242","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9271_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CHOL9780521226059","volume-title":"The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy","author":"N Kretzmann","year":"1982","unstructured":"Kretzmann N, Kenny A, Pinborg J (1982) The Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"key":"9271_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krippendorf K (2004) Reliability in content analysis. Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Hum Commun Res 30:411\u2013433. http:\/\/www.wiley.com\/bw\/journal.asp?ref=0360-3989","DOI":"10.1093\/hcr\/30.3.411"},{"key":"9271_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511571350","volume-title":"The skills of argument","author":"D Kuhn","year":"1991","unstructured":"Kuhn D (1991) The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"3","key":"9271_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"319","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.3730770306","volume":"77","author":"D Kuhn","year":"1993","unstructured":"Kuhn D (1993) Science as argument: implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Sci Educ 77(3):319\u2013337","journal-title":"Sci Educ"},{"key":"9271_CR82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuhn D (2010) Teaching and learning science as argument. Sci Educ 94:810\u2013824","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.20395"},{"key":"9271_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797611402512","volume":"22","author":"D Kuhn","year":"2011","unstructured":"Kuhn D, Crowell A (2011) Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents\u2019 thinking. Psychol Sci 22:545\u2013552","journal-title":"Psychol Sci"},{"key":"9271_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-8624.00605","volume":"74","author":"D Kuhn","year":"2003","unstructured":"Kuhn D, Udell W (2003) The development of argumentation skills. Child Dev 74:1245\u20131260","journal-title":"Child Dev"},{"issue":"2","key":"9271_CR37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"90","DOI":"10.1080\/13546780600625447","volume":"13","author":"D Kuhn","year":"2007","unstructured":"Kuhn D, Udell W (2007) Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument. Think Reason 13(2):90\u2013104","journal-title":"Think Reason"},{"key":"9271_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"287","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci1503_1","volume":"15","author":"D Kuhn","year":"1997","unstructured":"Kuhn D, Shaw V, Felton M (1997) Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognit Instr 15:287\u2013315","journal-title":"Cognit Instr"},{"key":"9271_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"456","DOI":"10.1080\/07370008.2013.830618","volume":"31","author":"D Kuhn","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kuhn D, Zillmer N, Crowell A, Zavala J (2013) Developing norms of argumentation: metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognit Instr 31:456\u2013496","journal-title":"Cognit Instr"},{"key":"9271_CR40","volume-title":"Argue with me","author":"D Kuhn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Kuhn D, Hemberger L, Khait V (2014) Argue with me. Wessex, New York"},{"key":"9271_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"332","DOI":"10.1159\/000022695","volume":"43","author":"S Leit\u00e3o","year":"2000","unstructured":"Leit\u00e3o S (2000) The potential of argument in knowledge building. Hum Dev 43:332\u2013360","journal-title":"Hum Dev"},{"key":"9271_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"357","DOI":"10.1016\/S0959-4752(00)00037-2","volume":"11","author":"M Lim\u00f3n","year":"2001","unstructured":"Lim\u00f3n M (2001) On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: a critical appraisal. Learn Instr 11:357\u2013380","journal-title":"Learn Instr"},{"issue":"2","key":"9271_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v28i2.542","volume":"28","author":"F Macagno","year":"2008","unstructured":"Macagno F (2008) Dialectical relevance and dialogical context in Walton\u2019s pragmatic theory. Informal Log 28(2):102\u2013128","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"key":"9271_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139565776","volume-title":"Emotive language in argumentation","author":"F Macagno","year":"2014","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D (2014) Emotive language in argumentation. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"key":"9271_CR45","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D (forthcoming) Classifying the patterns of natural arguments. Philos Rhetor"},{"key":"9271_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Macagno F, Zavatta B (2014) Reconstructing metaphorical meaning. Argumentation. doi: 10.1007\/s10503-014-9329-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-014-9329-z"},{"key":"9271_CR47","first-page":"121","volume-title":"Science as inquiry in the secondary setting","author":"KL McNeill","year":"2008","unstructured":"McNeill KL, Krajcik J (2008) Inquiry and scientific explanations: helping students use evidence and reasoning. In: Luft J, Bell R, Gess-Newsome J (eds) Science as inquiry in the secondary setting. National Science Teachers Association Press, Arlington, VA, pp 121\u2013134"},{"key":"9271_CR48","volume-title":"Argumentation and education. Theoretical foundations and practices","year":"2009","unstructured":"Mirza Muller N, Perret-Clermont A-N (eds) (2009) Argumentation and education. Theoretical foundations and practices. Springer, Amsterdam"},{"key":"9271_CR49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1016\/0361-476X(82)90031-5","volume":"7","author":"FB Murray","year":"1982","unstructured":"Murray FB (1982) Teaching through social conflict. Contemp Educ Psychol 7:257\u2013271","journal-title":"Contemp Educ Psychol"},{"key":"9271_CR50","volume-title":"Communication and Argument","author":"A Naess","year":"1966","unstructured":"Naess A (1966) Communication and Argument. Allen & Unwin LTD, London"},{"key":"9271_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"549","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-0663.100.3.549","volume":"100","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nussbaum EM (2008a) Using argumentation vee diagrams (AVDs) for promoting argument\/counterargument integration in reflective writing. J Educ Psychol 100:549\u2013565","journal-title":"J Educ Psychol"},{"key":"9271_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001","volume":"33","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2008","unstructured":"Nussbaum EM (2008b) Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: preface and literature review. Contemp Educ Psychol 33:345\u2013359","journal-title":"Contemp Educ Psychol"},{"key":"9271_CR53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"443","DOI":"10.1080\/10508406.2011.564567","volume":"20","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2011","unstructured":"Nussbaum EM, Edwards OV (2011) Argumentation, critical questions, and integrative stratagem: enhancing young adolescents\u2019 reasoning about current events. J Learn Sci 20:443\u2013488","journal-title":"J Learn Sci"},{"key":"9271_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.3200\/JEXE.76.1.59-92","volume":"76","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2007","unstructured":"Nussbaum EM, Schraw G (2007) Promoting argument-counterargument integration in students\u2019 writing. J Exp Educ 76:59\u201392","journal-title":"J Exp Educ"},{"issue":"3","key":"9271_CR55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"384","DOI":"10.1016\/S0361-476X(02)00038-3","volume":"28","author":"EM Nussbaum","year":"2003","unstructured":"Nussbaum EM, Sinatra GM (2003) Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemp Educ Psychol 28(3):384\u2013395","journal-title":"Contemp Educ Psychol"},{"key":"9271_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"463","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1183944","volume":"328","author":"J Osborne","year":"2010","unstructured":"Osborne J (2010) Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science 328:463\u2013466","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"10","key":"9271_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"994","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.20035","volume":"41","author":"J Osborne","year":"2004","unstructured":"Osborne J, Erduran S, Simon S (2004) Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. J Res Sci Teach 41(10):994\u20131020","journal-title":"J Res Sci Teach"},{"key":"9271_CR58","first-page":"51","volume":"11","author":"E Paus","year":"2011","unstructured":"Paus E, Jucks R (2011) Depressive or just in a bad mood? Laypersons\u2019 assumptions about their knowledge of medical vocabulary. Stud Commun Sci 11:51\u201370","journal-title":"Stud Commun Sci"},{"issue":"7","key":"9271_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2012.711671","volume":"49","author":"E Paus","year":"2012","unstructured":"Paus E, Jucks R (2012) Common ground? How the encoding of specialist vocabulary impacts on Peer-to-Peer Online Discourse. Discourse Process 49(7):565\u2013598","journal-title":"Discourse Process"},{"key":"9271_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2011.12.008","volume":"58","author":"E Paus","year":"2012","unstructured":"Paus E, Werner CS, Jucks R (2012) Learning through online peer discourse: structural equation modeling points to the role of discourse activities in individual understanding. Comput Educ 58:1127\u20131137","journal-title":"Comput Educ"},{"key":"9271_CR61","unstructured":"Paus E, Macagno F, Kuhn D (submitted) Development of argumentation strategies via modeling. Discourse Process"},{"key":"9271_CR62","volume-title":"Persuading science","author":"M Pera","year":"1991","unstructured":"Pera M, Sahea W (1991) Persuading science. Science History Publications, Canton, MA"},{"key":"9271_CR63","volume-title":"Knowledge and justification","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1974","unstructured":"Pollock JL (1974) Knowledge and justification. Princeton University Press, Princeton"},{"key":"9271_CR64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"481","DOI":"10.1207\/s15516709cog1104_4","volume":"11","author":"JL Pollock","year":"1987","unstructured":"Pollock JL (1987) Defeasible reasoning. Cognit Sci 11:481\u2013518","journal-title":"Cognit Sci"},{"issue":"1","key":"9271_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1207\/s1532690xci2301_2","volume":"23","author":"WA Sandoval","year":"2005","unstructured":"Sandoval WA, Millwood K (2005) The quality of students\u2019 use of evidence inwritten scientific explanations. Cognit Instr 23(1):23\u201355","journal-title":"Cognit Instr"},{"key":"9271_CR83","unstructured":"Simons H, Morreale J, Gronbeck B (2001) Persuasion in society. Sage, Thousand Oaks"},{"key":"9271_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turner D (2006) Critical thinking and intractable disagreement. Philos Educ 224\u2013232","DOI":"10.47925\/2006.224"},{"key":"9271_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech acts in argumentative discussions: a theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions: a theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Floris Publications, Dordrecht"},{"key":"9271_CR68","volume-title":"Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1992","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1992) Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: a pragma-dialectical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ"},{"key":"9271_CR69","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (2004) A systematic theory of argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9271_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Laar JA (2014) Criticism in need of clarification. Argumentation. doi: 10.1007\/s10503-013-9309-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-013-9309-8"},{"key":"9271_CR71","volume-title":"Logical dialogue-games and fallacies","author":"D Walton","year":"1984","unstructured":"Walton D (1984) Logical dialogue-games and fallacies. University Press of America, Lanham, MD"},{"key":"9271_CR72","unstructured":"Walton D (2005) How to evaluate argumentation using schemes, diagrams, critical questions and dialogues. Stud Commun Sci Argum Dialog Interact 51\u201374"},{"key":"9271_CR73","volume-title":"Fundamentals of critical argumentation","author":"DN Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton DN (2006) Fundamentals of critical argumentation. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"key":"9271_CR74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9056-9","volume":"21","author":"D Walton","year":"2007","unstructured":"Walton D (2007) Metadialogues for resolving burden of proof disputes. Argumentation 21:291\u2013316","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9271_CR75","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue. basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning","author":"D Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton D, Krabbe E (1995) Commitment in dialogue. basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany"},{"key":"9271_CR76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, New York"},{"key":"9271_CR77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-2132-6_9","volume-title":"Metacognition in science education. Contemporary trends and issues in science education","author":"A Zohar","year":"2012","unstructured":"Zohar A (2012) Explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge: definitions, students\u2019 learning, and teachers\u2019. Professional development. In: Zohar A, Dori YJ (eds) Metacognition in science education. Contemporary trends and issues in science education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 197\u2013223"},{"issue":"1","key":"9271_CR79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1002\/tea.10008","volume":"39","author":"A Zohar","year":"2002","unstructured":"Zohar A, Nemet F (2002) Fostering students\u2019 knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. J Res Sci Teach 39(1):35\u201362","journal-title":"J Res Sci Teach"},{"key":"9271_CR78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"59","DOI":"10.1007\/s11409-007-9019-4","volume":"3","author":"A Zohar","year":"2008","unstructured":"Zohar A, Ben David A (2008) Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognit Learn 3:59\u201382","journal-title":"Metacognit Learn"}],"container-title":["Topoi"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-014-9271-6.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11245-014-9271-6\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-014-9271-6","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,7,17]],"date-time":"2023-07-17T05:25:28Z","timestamp":1689571528000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11245-014-9271-6"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,11]]},"references-count":83,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,10]]}},"alternative-id":["9271"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11245-014-9271-6","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-7411","1572-8749"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0167-7411","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8749","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2014,10,11]]}}}