{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,20]],"date-time":"2026-01-20T03:39:16Z","timestamp":1768880356389,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":65,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]],"date-time":"2015-12-23T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1450828800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"http:\/\/www.springer.com\/tdm"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005856","name":"Faculdade de Ci\u00eancias e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["SFRH\/BPD\/74541\/2010"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["SFRH\/BPD\/74541\/2010"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005856","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Topoi"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]},"DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-015-9361-0","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]],"date-time":"2015-12-23T05:25:32Z","timestamp":1450848332000},"page":"645-658","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Argumentative Discussion: The Rationality of What?"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"38","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7218-3948","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marcin","family":"Lewi\u0144ski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]]},"reference":[{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"112","DOI":"10.1080\/03637750701196383","volume":"74","author":"M Aakhus","year":"2007","unstructured":"Aakhus M (2007) Communication as design. Commun Monogr 74(1):112\u2013117","journal-title":"Commun Monogr"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.2.1.05aak","volume":"2","author":"M Aakhus","year":"2013","unstructured":"Aakhus M (2013) Deliberation digitized: designing disagreement space through communication information services. J Argum Context 2(1):101\u2013113","journal-title":"J Argum Context"},{"key":"9361_CR3","first-page":"1","volume-title":"The eighth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (ISSA)","author":"M Aakhus","year":"2015","unstructured":"Aakhus M, Lewi\u0144ski M (2015) Toward polylogical analysis of argumentation: disagreement space in the public controversy about fracking. In: Snoeck Henkemans AF, Garssen B, Godden D, Mitchell G (eds) The eighth conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (ISSA). SicSat, Amsterdam, pp 1\u201311"},{"key":"9361_CR4","first-page":"71","volume":"189","author":"O Alieva","year":"2010","unstructured":"Alieva O (2010) Elenchus and diairesis in Plato\u2019s Sophist. Hermathena 189:71\u201391","journal-title":"Hermathena"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR5","first-page":"3","volume":"28","author":"L Apostel","year":"1981","unstructured":"Apostel L (1981) Is pragmatics or praxeology the foundation of logic? Philosophica 28(2):3\u201345","journal-title":"Philosophica"},{"key":"9361_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aristotle (1997) Topics. Books I and VIII (trans: intr. and notes by R. Smith). Clarendon Press, Oxford","DOI":"10.1093\/oseo\/instance.00258598"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00003.x","volume":"1","author":"S Benhabib","year":"1994","unstructured":"Benhabib S (1994) Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy. Constellations 1(1):26\u201352","journal-title":"Constellations"},{"issue":"5","key":"9361_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"361","DOI":"10.1007\/s10988-012-9123-z","volume":"35","author":"M Biezma","year":"2012","unstructured":"Biezma M, Rawlins K (2012) Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguist Philos 35(5):361\u2013406","journal-title":"Linguist Philos"},{"issue":"3","key":"9361_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"325","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007768503175","volume":"12","author":"JA Blair","year":"1998","unstructured":"Blair JA (1998) The limits of the dialogue model of argument. Argumentation 12(3):325\u2013339","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9361_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.5325\/philrhet.45.2.0148","volume":"45","author":"JA Blair","year":"2012","unstructured":"Blair JA (2012) Rhetoric, dialectic, and logic as related to argument. Philos Rhetoric 45:148\u2013164","journal-title":"Philos Rhetoric"},{"key":"9361_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199564453.003.0005","volume-title":"Definition in Greek philosophy","author":"L Brown","year":"2010","unstructured":"Brown L (2010) Definition and division in Plato\u2019s Sophist. In: Charles DOM (ed) Definition in Greek philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151\u2013171"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR12","first-page":"19","volume":"23","author":"MA Finocchiaro","year":"2003","unstructured":"Finocchiaro MA (2003) Dialectics, evaluation, and argument. Inf Logic 23(1):19\u201349","journal-title":"Inf Logic"},{"key":"9361_CR13","volume-title":"Critical thinking: an introduction","author":"A Fisher","year":"2011","unstructured":"Fisher A (2011) Critical thinking: an introduction, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge","edition":"2"},{"key":"9361_CR14","volume-title":"Coalescent argumentation","author":"MA Gilbert","year":"1997","unstructured":"Gilbert MA (1997) Coalescent argumentation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah"},{"key":"9361_CR15","first-page":"1133","volume-title":"Handbook of logic and language","author":"J Ginzburg","year":"2011","unstructured":"Ginzburg J (2011) Questions: logic and interactions. In: van Benthem J, ter Meulen A (eds) Handbook of logic and language, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1133\u20131146","edition":"2"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR16","first-page":"151","volume":"25","author":"J Goodwin","year":"2005","unstructured":"Goodwin J (2005) The public sphere and the norms of transactional argument. Inf Logic 25(2):151\u2013165","journal-title":"Inf Logic"},{"key":"9361_CR17","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Dissensus and the search for common ground, proceedings of OSSA 8, CD-ROM","author":"T Govier","year":"2007","unstructured":"Govier T (2007) Two is a small number: false dichotomies revisited. In: Hansen HV et al (eds) Dissensus and the search for common ground, proceedings of OSSA 8, CD-ROM. OSSA, Windsor, pp 1\u201310"},{"key":"9361_CR18","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA 9, CD-ROM","author":"T Govier","year":"2009","unstructured":"Govier T (2009) More on dichotomization: flip-flops of two mistakes. In: Ritola J (ed) Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA 9, CD-ROM. OSSA, Windsor, pp 1\u201310"},{"key":"9361_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1059","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-444-53726-3.00025-6","volume-title":"Handbook of logic and language","author":"J Groenendijk","year":"2011","unstructured":"Groenendijk J, Stokhof M (2011) Questions. In: van Benthem J, ter Meulen A (eds) Handbook of logic and language, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1059\u20131131","edition":"2"},{"key":"9361_CR20","unstructured":"Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Vol. 1: reason and the rationalization of society (trans: T. McCarthy). Beacon, Boston"},{"key":"9361_CR21","unstructured":"Habermas J (1989) The structural transformation of the public sphere. (trans: T. Burger and F. Lawrence). MIT Press, Cambridge"},{"issue":"3","key":"9361_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1080\/00048405885200211","volume":"36","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1958","unstructured":"Hamblin CL (1958) Questions. Aust J Philos 36(3):159\u2013168","journal-title":"Aust J Philos"},{"key":"9361_CR23","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin CL (1970) Fallacies. Methuen, London"},{"key":"9361_CR24","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Handbook of philosophical logic","author":"D Harrah","year":"2002","unstructured":"Harrah D (2002) The logic of questions. In: Gabbay DM, Guenthner F (eds) Handbook of philosophical logic, vol 8, 2nd edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1\u201360","edition":"2"},{"key":"9361_CR25","first-page":"260","volume-title":"Argumentation illuminated","author":"S Jackson","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jackson S (1992) \u201cVirtual standpoints\u201d and the pragmatics of conversational argument. In: van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R, Blair JA, Willard CA (eds) Argumentation illuminated. SicSat, Amsterdam, pp 260\u2013269"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"183","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007743830491","volume":"12","author":"S Jackson","year":"1998","unstructured":"Jackson S (1998) Disputation by design. Argumentation 12(2):183\u2013198","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9361_CR27","first-page":"270","volume-title":"Argumentation illuminated","author":"S Jacobs","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jacobs S (1992) Argumentation without advocacy: strategies for case-building by dispute mediators. In: van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R, Blair JA, Willard CA (eds) Argumentation illuminated. SicSat, Amsterdam, pp 270\u2013280"},{"issue":"3","key":"9361_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007853013191","volume":"14","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2000","unstructured":"Jacobs S (2000) Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation 14(3):261\u2013286","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9361_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4020-9165-0_5","volume-title":"Pondering on problems of argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jacobs S (2009) Nonfallacious rhetorical design in argumentation. In: van Eemeren FH, Garssen B (eds) Pondering on problems of argumentation: Twenty essays on theoretical issues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 55\u201378"},{"issue":"4","key":"9361_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1002\/crq.3890200205","volume":"20","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2002","unstructured":"Jacobs S, Aakhus M (2002) What mediators do with words: implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation. Confl Resolut Q 20(4):177\u2013204","journal-title":"Confl Resolut Q"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00154323","volume":"6","author":"S Jacobs","year":"1992","unstructured":"Jacobs S, Jackson S (1992) Relevance and digressions in argumentative discussion: a pragmatic approach. Argumentation 6(2):161\u2013176","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9361_CR32","first-page":"121","volume-title":"Considering pragma-dialectics","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2006","unstructured":"Jacobs S, Jackson S (2006) Derailments of argumentation: it takes two to tango. In: Houtlosser P, van Rees MA (eds) Considering pragma-dialectics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 121\u2013133"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"115","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-007-9039-x","volume":"21","author":"D Jacquette","year":"2007","unstructured":"Jacquette D (2007) Two sides of any issue. Argumentation 21(2):115\u2013127","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9361_CR34","volume-title":"Manifest rationality","author":"R Johnson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Johnson R (2000) Manifest rationality. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00351935","volume":"1","author":"L Karttunen","year":"1977","unstructured":"Karttunen L (1977) Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguist Philos 1(1):3\u201344","journal-title":"Linguist Philos"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"51","DOI":"10.1163\/9789004310841_004","volume":"92","author":"Nils K\u00fcrbis","year":"2015","unstructured":"K\u00fcrbis N (2015) What is wrong with classical negation? Grazer Philosophische Studien\u00a092","journal-title":"Grazer Philosophische Studien"},{"key":"9361_CR37","first-page":"185","volume-title":"Considering pragma-dialectics","author":"ECW Krabbe","year":"2006","unstructured":"Krabbe ECW (2006) Logic and games. In: Houtlosser P, van Rees MA (eds) Considering pragma-dialectics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 185\u2013198"},{"key":"9361_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.5840\/ancientphil199414SpecialIssue77","volume":"14","author":"JG Lennox","year":"1994","unstructured":"Lennox JG (1994) Aristotelian problems. Ancient Philos 14:53\u201377","journal-title":"Ancient Philos"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"86","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.2010.11821740","volume":"47","author":"M Lewi\u0144ski","year":"2010","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski M (2010) Collective argumentative criticism in informal online discussion forums. Argum Advocacy 47(2):86\u2013105","journal-title":"Argum Advocacy"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"151","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.2.1.07lew","volume":"2","author":"M Lewi\u0144ski","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski M (2013) Debating multiple positions in multi-party online deliberation: sides, positions, and cases. J Argum Context 2(1):151\u2013177","journal-title":"J Argum Context"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"193","DOI":"10.2478\/slgr-2014-0010","volume":"36","author":"M Lewi\u0144ski","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski M (2014a) Argumentative polylogues: beyond dialectical understanding of fallacies. Stud Logic Gramm Rhetoric 36(1):193\u2013218","journal-title":"Stud Logic Gramm Rhetoric"},{"key":"9361_CR42","first-page":"1","volume":"8","author":"M Lewi\u0144ski","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski M (2014b) Practical reasoning in argumentative polylogues. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentaci\u00f3n 8:1\u201320","journal-title":"Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentaci\u00f3n"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-013-9307-x","volume":"28","author":"M Lewi\u0144ski","year":"2014","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski M, Aakhus M (2014) Argumentative polylogues in a dialectical framework: a methodological inquiry. Argumentation 28(2):161\u2013185","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9361_CR44","first-page":"291","volume-title":"Disturbing argument: selected works from the 18th NCA\/AFA Alta conference on argumentation","author":"M Lewi\u0144ski","year":"2015","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski M, Mohammed D (2015) Tweeting the Arab Spring: argumentative polylogues in digital media. In: Palczewski C (ed) Disturbing argument: selected works from the 18th NCA\/AFA Alta conference on argumentation. Routledge, New York, pp 291\u2013297"},{"key":"9361_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"123","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110877175-011","volume-title":"Norms of argumentation","author":"R Maier","year":"1989","unstructured":"Maier R (1989) Argumentation: a multiplicity of regulated rational interactions. In: Maier R (ed) Norms of argumentation. Foris, Dordrecht, pp 123\u2013141"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1086\/290973","volume":"65","author":"R McKeon","year":"1954","unstructured":"McKeon R (1954) Dialectic and political thought and action. Ethics 65(1):1\u201333","journal-title":"Ethics"},{"issue":"3","key":"9361_CR47","first-page":"121","volume":"13","author":"DJ O\u2019Keefe","year":"1977","unstructured":"O\u2019Keefe DJ (1977) Two concepts of argument. J Am Forensic Assoc 13(3):121\u2013128","journal-title":"J Am Forensic Assoc"},{"key":"9361_CR48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Plato (1921) Theaetetus. Sophist (transl. H. N. Fowler). Loeb Classical Library, 123. Harvard University Press, Cambridge","DOI":"10.4159\/DLCL.plato_philosopher-theaetetus.1921"},{"key":"9361_CR49","first-page":"1547","volume-title":"Proceedings of the seventh conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (ISSA)","author":"G Plumer","year":"2011","unstructured":"Plumer G (2011) Novels as arguments. In: van Eemeren FH, Garssen B, Godden D, Mitchell G (eds) Proceedings of the seventh conference of the international society for the study of argumentation (ISSA). SicSat, Amsterdam, pp 1547\u20131558"},{"issue":"1","key":"9361_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"20","DOI":"10.2307\/2181906","volume":"60","author":"WV Quine","year":"1951","unstructured":"Quine WV (1951) Two dogmas of empiricism. Philos Rev 60(1):20\u201343","journal-title":"Philos Rev"},{"key":"9361_CR51","volume-title":"The web of belief","author":"WV Quine","year":"1970","unstructured":"Quine WV, Ullian JS (1970) The web of belief. McGraw-Hill, New York"},{"key":"9361_CR52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"359","DOI":"10.1007\/1-4020-3167-X_17","volume-title":"Logic, thought and action","author":"S Rahwan","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rahwan S, Keiff L (2005) On how to be a dialogician. In: Vanderveken D (ed) Logic, thought and action. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 359\u2013408"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR53","first-page":"95","volume":"25","author":"W Rehg","year":"2005","unstructured":"Rehg W (2005) Assessing the cogency of arguments: three kinds of merits. Inf Logic 25(2):95\u2013115","journal-title":"Inf Logic"},{"key":"9361_CR54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1093\/mind\/109.436.781","volume":"109","author":"I Rumfitt","year":"2000","unstructured":"Rumfitt I (2000) \u201cYes\u201d and \u201cno\u201d. Mind 109:781\u2013823","journal-title":"Mind"},{"key":"9361_CR55","volume-title":"Rational choice and moral agency","author":"D Schmidtz","year":"1995","unstructured":"Schmidtz D (1995) Rational choice and moral agency. Princeton University Press, Princeton"},{"key":"9361_CR57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1075\/cvs.9","volume-title":"The art of dialectic between dialogue and rhetoric: The Aristotelian tradition","author":"M Spranzi","year":"2011","unstructured":"Spranzi M (2011) The art of dialectic between dialogue and rhetoric: The Aristotelian tradition. John Benjamins, Amsterdam"},{"key":"9361_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110846089","volume-title":"Speech acts in argumentative discussions: a theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1984","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1984) Speech acts in argumentative discussions: a theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Foris, Dordrecht"},{"issue":"2","key":"9361_CR59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"271","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00178026","volume":"2","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1988","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (1988) Rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. Argumentation 2(2):271\u2013291","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9361_CR60","volume-title":"A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"2004","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R (2004) A systematic theory of argumentation: the pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge"},{"key":"9361_CR61","volume-title":"Reconstructing argumentative discourse","author":"FH Eemeren van","year":"1993","unstructured":"van Eemeren FH, Grootendorst R, Jackson S, Jacobs S (1993) Reconstructing argumentative discourse. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa"},{"key":"9361_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.3138\/9781442681859","volume-title":"The new dialectic: conversational contexts of argument","author":"DN Walton","year":"1998","unstructured":"Walton DN (1998) The new dialectic: conversational contexts of argument. University of Toronto Press, Toronto"},{"issue":"3","key":"9361_CR63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-006-9025-x","volume":"14","author":"DN Walton","year":"2006","unstructured":"Walton DN (2006) How to make and defend a proposal in a deliberation dialogue. Artif Intell Law 14(3):177\u2013239","journal-title":"Artif Intell Law"},{"key":"9361_CR64","volume-title":"Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning","author":"DN Walton","year":"1995","unstructured":"Walton DN, Krabbe ECW (1995) Commitment in dialogue: basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany"},{"key":"9361_CR65","first-page":"83","volume":"16","author":"JW Wenzel","year":"1979","unstructured":"Wenzel JW (1979) J\u00fcrgen Habermas and the dialectical perspective on argumentation. J Am Forensic Assoc 16:83\u201394","journal-title":"J Am Forensic Assoc"},{"key":"9361_CR66","first-page":"9","volume-title":"Perspectives on argumentation: essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede","author":"JW Wenzel","year":"1990","unstructured":"Wenzel JW (1990) Three perspectives on argument: Rhetoric, dialectic, logic. In: Schuetz J, Trapp R (eds) Perspectives on argumentation: essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede. Waveland, Prospect Heights, pp 9\u201326"}],"container-title":["Topoi"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-015-9361-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11245-015-9361-0\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-015-9361-0","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"},{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-015-9361-0.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,13]],"date-time":"2020-09-13T04:40:01Z","timestamp":1599972001000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"http:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11245-015-9361-0"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]]},"references-count":65,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2019,12]]}},"alternative-id":["9361"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11245-015-9361-0","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-7411","1572-8749"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0167-7411","type":"print"},{"value":"1572-8749","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,12,23]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 December 2015","order":1,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}}]}}