{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,5]],"date-time":"2025-12-05T12:25:44Z","timestamp":1764937544347,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,1]],"date-time":"2023-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1680307200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,5]],"date-time":"2023-04-05T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1680652800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":4,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001871","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o para a Ci\u00eancia e a Tecnologia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["UIDB\/00183\/2020"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["UIDB\/00183\/2020"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001871","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005855","name":"Universidade Nova de Lisboa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005855","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Topoi"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>In this paper, I examine the question of commitment transmissibility in public political arguments. I explore the idea that under certain conditions, arguers become accountable for the commitments of their \u201cargumentative associates\u201d (Mohammed 2019a). I present cases where arguers make discursive effort to distance themselves from an undesirable associate in order to avoid acquiring the associate\u2019s commitments, as well as cases where arguers fail to do so and face the consequences. I discuss the concept of commitment in argumentation (e.g. Hamblin 1970, Walton &amp; Krabbe 1995), and I build on the scheme of guilt and honour by association (Groarke and Tindale 2004). The result is a nuanced normative view of arguments by association: the transmissibility of commitments between argumentative associates is a way to hold arguers accountable for the argumentative potential (Mohammed 2019b; see also Kjeldsen 2017; Serafis 2022) of their discourse, and yet, commitment transmissibility remains defeasible to avoid the over-attribution of commitment by association.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-023-09914-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,5]],"date-time":"2023-04-05T17:02:06Z","timestamp":1680714126000},"page":"625-634","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Argument by Association: On the Transmissibility of Commitment in Public Political Arguments"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1322-6597","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dima","family":"Mohammed","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,5]]},"reference":[{"key":"9914_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Amossy, R. (2009). Argumentation in Discourse: A Socio-discursive Approach to Arguments. Informal Logic, 29(3), 252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v29i3.2843","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v29i3.2843"},{"key":"9914_CR1","unstructured":"Anscombre J-C, Ducrot O (1983) L\u2019argumentation dans la langue. Pierre Mardaga"},{"issue":"2","key":"9914_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-020-09521-3","volume":"35","author":"R Boogaart","year":"2021","unstructured":"Boogaart R, Jansen H, van Leeuwen M (2021) \u201cThose are your words, not mine!\u201d Defence strategies for denying Speaker Commitment. Argumentation 35(2):209\u2013235. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-020-09521-3","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9914_CR3","unstructured":"Groarke L, Tindale CW (2004) Good reasoning matters! A constructive Approach to critical thinking. Oxford University Press"},{"key":"9914_CR4","unstructured":"Hamblin CL (1970) Fallacies. Methuen"},{"key":"9914_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Kjeldsen JE (2017) Chapter 2. The rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photography (pp.\u00a052\u201380). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/aic.14.03kje","DOI":"10.1075\/aic.14.03kje"},{"key":"9914_CR22","unstructured":"Le Monde. (2018). \u00abNous d\u00e9fendons une libert\u00e9 d\u2019importuner, indispensable \u00e0 la libert\u00e9 sexuelle\u00bb. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.lemonde.fr\/idees\/article\/2018\/01\/09\/nous-defendons-une-liberte-d-importuner-indispensable-a-la-liberte-sexuelle_5239134_3232.html"},{"key":"9914_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lerman A (2022) Whatever happened to Antisemitism? Redefinition and the myth of the \u201cCollective Jew.\u201d Pluto Press","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctv2n7j16s"},{"key":"9914_CR23","unstructured":"Liberation. (2018). Catherine Deneuve: \u00abRien dans le texte ne pr\u00e9tend que le harc\u00e8lement a du bon, sans quoi je ne l\u2019aurais pas sign\u00e9\u00bb. Retrieved from https:\/\/www.liberation.fr\/debats\/2018\/01\/14\/catherine-deneuve- rien-dans-le-texte-ne-pretend-que-le-harcelement-a-du-bon-sans-quoi-je-ne-l-aurais_1622399"},{"key":"9914_CR7","unstructured":"Mohammed D (2019a) Managing Argumentative Potential in the Networked Public Sphere: The Anti-#MeToo Manifesto as a Case in Point. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp.\u00a0813\u2013822). Sic Sat"},{"key":"9914_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohammed D (2019b) Standing Standpoints and Argumentative Associates: what is at Stake in a public political argument? Argumentation 33(3). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-018-9473-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-018-9473-y"},{"key":"9914_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohammed D (2022) Negative campaigning the argumentative potential of attacks in political election campaigns. J Argumentation Context 11(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/jaic.21025.moh","DOI":"10.1075\/jaic.21025.moh"},{"key":"9914_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Mohammed D, Rossi MG (2022) The Argumentative Potential of Doubt: From Legitimate Concerns to Conspiracy Theories About COVID-19 Vaccines. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 43). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-030-91017-4_7","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-91017-4_7"},{"key":"9914_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"197","DOI":"10.1075\/bjl.22.10mor","volume":"22","author":"P Morency","year":"2008","unstructured":"Morency P, Oswald S, de Saussure L (2008) Explicitness, implicitness and commitment attribution: a cognitive pragmatic approach. Belg J Linguistics 22:197\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/bjl.22.10mor","journal-title":"Belg J Linguistics"},{"key":"9914_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"158","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.07.006","volume":"198","author":"S Oswald","year":"2022","unstructured":"Oswald S (2022) Insinuation is committing. J Pragmat 198:158\u2013170. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2022.07.006","journal-title":"J Pragmat"},{"key":"9914_CR13","unstructured":"Oswald S (2015) Commitment attribution and the reconstruction of arguments. In: Paglieri F (ed) The psychology of argument: cognitive approaches to argumentation and persuasion (studies in Logic and Argumentation). College Publications"},{"key":"9914_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Saul J (2018) Dogwhistles, Political Manipulation, and Philosophy of Language (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198738831.003.0013","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780198738831.003.0013"},{"key":"9914_CR15","unstructured":"Searle JR (1995) The construction of social reality. Free Press"},{"key":"9914_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1558\/jld.22363","author":"D Serafis","year":"2022","unstructured":"Serafis D (2022) Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts. J Lang Discrimination. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1558\/jld.22363","journal-title":"J Lang Discrimination"},{"issue":"5","key":"9914_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1080\/17405904.2019.1701509","volume":"17","author":"D Serafis","year":"2020","unstructured":"Serafis D, Greco S, Pollaroli C, Jermini-Martinez Soria C (2020) Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in greek newspapers. Crit Discourse Stud 17(5):545\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17405904.2019.1701509","journal-title":"Crit Discourse Stud"},{"key":"9914_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tindale CW (2007) Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge University Press","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511806544"},{"key":"9914_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walton D (2010) Formalization of the ad hominem argumentation scheme.Journal of Applied Logic. https:\/\/scholar.uwindsor.ca\/crrarpub\/7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jal.2008.07.002"},{"issue":"1","key":"9914_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"47","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00126158","volume":"10","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton D (1996) Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof. Argumentation 10(1):47\u201358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00126158","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"9914_CR21","unstructured":"Walton DN, Krabbe ECW (1995) Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. State University of New York Press"}],"container-title":["Topoi"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-023-09914-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11245-023-09914-5\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-023-09914-5.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,25]],"date-time":"2023-05-25T08:37:41Z","timestamp":1685003861000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11245-023-09914-5"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]}},"alternative-id":["9914"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11245-023-09914-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-7411","1572-8749"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0167-7411"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8749"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,4]]},"assertion":[{"value":"23 March 2023","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"5 April 2023","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"NA","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of Interest"}}]}}