{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,20]],"date-time":"2025-12-20T10:39:07Z","timestamp":1766227147074,"version":"3.48.0"},"reference-count":72,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,12]],"date-time":"2025-08-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754956800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,12]],"date-time":"2025-08-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1754956800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100005765","name":"Universidade de Lisboa","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100005765","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Topoi"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Argument interpretation and reconstruction are two necessary presuppositions of argument analysis and evaluation, constituting a cornerstone of argumentation theory. One of the most used, and at the same time most controversial, principles underlying this interpretative practice is the Principle of Charity (CP), recommending a \u201ccharitable\u201d (i.e., the strongest, or a strong within certain limits) reconstruction of the arguments expressed in a text. Grounded on \u201cethical,\u201d \u201cpractical,\u201d or \u201cstrategic\u201d considerations, criticized, rejected, or replaced by criteria seen as inherently charitable, the various versions of CP advanced in argumentation theory raise the basic questions of where charity comes from, and how in the history of argumentation the problem of argument reconstruction was addressed before the concept of charity. This paper aims to provide a historical overview of the Charity Principles, evaluating them in light of some challenging cases. Such accounts will be compared with the Aristotelian principles used for reconstructing enthymematic arguments, which can be regarded as the predecessors of the modern CP. The Aristotelian texts suggest hermeneutic and logical guidelines grounded on the pragmatic and dialectical dimensions of rhetorical arguments, which avoid some pitfalls of charity and complement some fundamental insights of the CP tradition.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-025-10235-y","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,12]],"date-time":"2025-08-12T17:38:42Z","timestamp":1755020322000},"page":"1375-1388","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Argument Interpretation and the Implicit Side of Enthymemes, Beyond and Before the Charity Principle"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"44","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0712-421X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Fabrizio","family":"Macagno","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"10235_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1007\/s11245-015-9308-5","volume":"35","author":"SF Aikin","year":"2016","unstructured":"Aikin SF, Casey JP (2016) Straw men, iron men, and argumentative virtue. Topoi 35:431\u2013440. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11245-015-9308-5","journal-title":"Topoi"},{"key":"10235_CR2","volume-title":"On sophistical refutations. On coming-to-be and passing away. On the cosmos","author":"Aristotle","year":"1955","unstructured":"Aristotle (1955) On Sophistical Refutations. In: Forster E (ed) On Sophistical Refutations. On coming-to-be and passing away. On the cosmos. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA"},{"key":"10235_CR3","volume-title":"The complete works of Aristotle","author":"Aristotle","year":"1991","unstructured":"Aristotle (1991a) Rhetoric. In: Barnes J (ed) The complete works of Aristotle, vol II. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ"},{"key":"10235_CR4","unstructured":"Aristotle (1991b) Prior Analytics. In: Barnes J (ed) The complete works of Aristotle, vol I. Princeton University Press, Princeton. NJ"},{"key":"10235_CR5","volume-title":"The complete works of Aristotle","author":"Aristotle","year":"1991","unstructured":"Aristotle (1991c) Topics. In: Barnes J (ed) The complete works of Aristotle, vol I. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ"},{"key":"10235_CR6","volume-title":"De doctrina Christiana","author":"Augustine","year":"2014","unstructured":"Augustine (2014) De Doctrina Christiana. Clarendon, Oxford, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470754603","volume-title":"Thoughts and utterances: the pragmatics of explicit communication","author":"R Carston","year":"2002","unstructured":"Carston R (2002) Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR8","first-page":"65","volume":"2","author":"O Ducrot","year":"1982","unstructured":"Ducrot O (1982) La notion de sujet parlant. Rech Sur La Philos Le Lang 2:65\u201393","journal-title":"Rech Sur La Philos Le Lang"},{"key":"10235_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"593","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2018-0021","volume":"15","author":"C-H Elder","year":"2018","unstructured":"Elder C-H, Haugh M (2018) The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal account of conversational inference. Intercult Pragmat 15:593\u2013625. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2018-0021","journal-title":"Intercult Pragmat"},{"key":"10235_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Ennis RH (1982) Identifying implicit assumptions. Synthese 51: 61\u201386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00413849 class=\"oxeins_1\" id=\"oxe_insert_1_1752129604123_12201869372899343\">","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00413849"},{"key":"10235_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frede D (2012) The endoxon mystique: What endoxa are and what they are not. In: Inwood B (ed) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 184\u2013215","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199666164.003.0007"},{"key":"10235_CR12","unstructured":"Gadamer H-G (1989) Truth and method. Continuum, New York, NY"},{"key":"10235_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v13i3.2565","volume":"13","author":"MA Gilbert","year":"1991","unstructured":"Gilbert MA (1991) The enthymeme buster: A heuristic procedure for position exploration in dialogic dispute. Informal Log 13:159\u2013166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v13i3.2565","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"key":"#cr-split#-10235_CR14.1","unstructured":"Goodwin J (2001) The noncooperative pragmatics of arguing. In: Nemeth E"},{"key":"#cr-split#-10235_CR14.2","unstructured":"(ed) Pragmatics in 2000: Selected papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference. International Pragmatics Association, Antwerp, Belgium, pp. 263-277"},{"key":"10235_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"99","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v7i2.2708","volume":"7","author":"J Gough","year":"1985","unstructured":"Gough J, Tindale C (1985) Hidden or missing premises. Informal Log 7:99. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v7i2.2708","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"key":"10235_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v4i1.2761","volume":"4","author":"T Govier","year":"1981","unstructured":"Govier T (1981) Uncharitable thoughts about charity. Informal Log 4:5\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v4i1.2761","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"key":"10235_CR16","volume-title":"Problems in argument analysis and evaluation","author":"T Govier","year":"2018","unstructured":"Govier T (2018) Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Windsor Studies in Argumentation, Windsor, ON"},{"key":"10235_CR18","first-page":"41","volume-title":"Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts","author":"P Grice","year":"1975","unstructured":"Grice P (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J (eds) Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 41\u201358"},{"key":"10235_CR19","volume-title":"Fallacies","author":"CL Hamblin","year":"1970","unstructured":"Hamblin CL (1970) Fallacies. Methuen, London, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1007738519694","volume":"12","author":"D Hitchcock","year":"1998","unstructured":"Hitchcock D (1998) Does the traditional treatment of enthymemes rest on a mistake? Argumentation 12:15\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/A:1007738519694","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"10235_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1163\/187731009X455820","volume":"1","author":"L Horn","year":"2009","unstructured":"Horn L (2009) Implicature, truth, and meaning. Int Rev Pragmat 1:3\u201334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/187731009X455820","journal-title":"Int Rev Pragmat"},{"key":"10235_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"251","DOI":"10.1080\/00335638009383524","volume":"66","author":"S Jackson","year":"1980","unstructured":"Jackson S, Jacobs S (1980) Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. Q J Speech 66:251\u2013265","journal-title":"Q J Speech"},{"key":"10235_CR23","first-page":"121","volume-title":"Considering pragma-dialectics","author":"S Jacobs","year":"2006","unstructured":"Jacobs S, Jackson S (2006) Derailments of argumentation: It takes two to tango. In: Houtlosser P, van Rees A (eds) Considering pragma-dialectics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 121\u2013133"},{"key":"10235_CR24","first-page":"128","volume-title":"Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of Language and linguistics","author":"K Jaszczolt","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jaszczolt K (2005) Default semantics. In: Barber A, Stainton R (eds) Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of language and linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 128\u2013130"},{"key":"10235_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Johnson R (1984) Charity begins at home. Informal Log 3: 4-9. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v3i3.2791","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v3i3.2791"},{"key":"10235_CR26","volume-title":"Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument","author":"R Johnson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Johnson R (2000) Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ"},{"key":"10235_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004","volume":"40","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2008","unstructured":"Kecskes I (2008) Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. J Pragmat 40:385\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2007.12.004","journal-title":"J Pragmat"},{"key":"10235_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1515\/9781614513735","volume-title":"Intercultural pragmatics","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kecskes I (2013) Intercultural pragmatics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec","volume":"17","author":"I Kecskes","year":"2009","unstructured":"Kecskes I, Zhang F (2009) Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: A socio-cognitive approach. Pragmat Cogn 17:331\u2013355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pc.17.2.06kec","journal-title":"Pragmat Cogn"},{"key":"10235_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.5325\/philrhet.46.4.0437","volume":"46","author":"C Kock","year":"2013","unstructured":"Kock C (2013) Defining rhetorical argumentation. Philos Rhetor 46:437\u2013464","journal-title":"Philos Rhetor"},{"key":"10235_CR31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"324","DOI":"10.1093\/oso\/9780197636916.003.0015","volume-title":"Reason, bias, and inquiry","author":"D Kuhn","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kuhn D, Iordanou K (2022) Why do people argue past one another rather than with one another? In: Ballantyne N, Dunning D (eds) Reason, bias, and inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 324\u2013338"},{"key":"10235_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/5526.001.0001","volume-title":"Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalized conversational implicature","author":"S Levinson","year":"2000","unstructured":"Levinson S (2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA"},{"key":"10235_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"403","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v32i4.3620","volume":"32","author":"M Lewi\u0144ski","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lewi\u0144ski M (2012) The paradox of charity. Informal Log 32:403\u2013439. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v32i4.3620","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"key":"10235_CR34","volume-title":"Substance and predication in Aristotle","author":"F Lewis","year":"1991","unstructured":"Lewis F (1991) Substance and predication in Aristotle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR37","first-page":"465","volume-title":"Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society","author":"F Macagno","year":"2015","unstructured":"Macagno F (2015) Presupposition as argumentative reasoning. In: Capone A, Mey J (eds) Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 465\u2013487"},{"key":"10235_CR41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2017.06.005","volume":"117","author":"F Macagno","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macagno F (2017) Defaults and inferences in interpretation. J Pragmat 117:280\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.pragma.2017.06.005","journal-title":"J Pragmat"},{"key":"10235_CR42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1515\/ip-2018-0008","volume":"15","author":"F Macagno","year":"2018","unstructured":"Macagno F (2018) A dialectical approach to presupposition. Intercult Pragmat 15:291\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ip-2018-0008","journal-title":"Intercult Pragmat"},{"key":"10235_CR35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"13","DOI":"10.3390\/languages7010013","volume":"7","author":"F Macagno","year":"2022","unstructured":"Macagno F (2022a) Ignoring qualifications as a pragmatic fallacy: Enrichments and their use for manipulating commitments. Languages 7:13. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/languages7010013","journal-title":"Languages"},{"key":"10235_CR36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"317","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-022-09568-4","volume":"36","author":"F Macagno","year":"2022","unstructured":"Macagno F (2022b) Secundum quid and the pragmatics of arguments. The challenges of the dialectical tradition. Argumentation 36:317\u2013343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-022-09568-4","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"10235_CR38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1515\/9783110766752-005","volume-title":"Common ground in first Language and intercultural interaction","author":"F Macagno","year":"2023","unstructured":"Macagno F (2023) Presupposition failures and the negotiation of the common ground. In: Kecskes I (ed) Common ground in first language and intercultural interaction. De Gruyter, Berlin, Germany, and Boston, MA, pp 81\u2013102"},{"key":"10235_CR39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-023-09625-6","volume":"38","author":"F Macagno","year":"2024","unstructured":"Macagno F (2024) Presuppositional fallacies. Argumentation 38:109\u2013140. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-023-09625-6","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"10235_CR43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"148","DOI":"10.1177\/1461445617691702","volume":"19","author":"F Macagno","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macagno F, Bigi S (2017) Analyzing the pragmatic structure of dialogues. Discourse Stud 19:148\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1461445617691702","journal-title":"Discourse Stud"},{"key":"10235_CR44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-62545-4","volume-title":"Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotation and reporting","author":"F Macagno","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D (2017) Interpreting straw man argumentation. The pragmatics of quotation and reporting. Springer, Amsterdam, Netherlands"},{"key":"10235_CR45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"221","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-016-9406-6","volume":"31","author":"F Macagno","year":"2017","unstructured":"Macagno F, Walton D, Tindale C (2017) Analogical arguments: Inferential structures and defeasibility conditions. Argumentation 31:221\u2013243. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-016-9406-6","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"10235_CR46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"577","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-023-09615-8","volume":"37","author":"J Pru\u015b","year":"2023","unstructured":"Pru\u015b J, Sikora P (2023) The dialectical principle of charity: A procedure for a critical discussion. Argumentation 37:577\u2013600. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10503-023-09615-8","journal-title":"Argumentation"},{"key":"10235_CR47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1017\/9781107477674.015","volume-title":"The Cambridge companion to ancient logic","author":"C Rapp","year":"2023","unstructured":"Rapp C (2023) Logic in ancient rhetoric. In: Castagnoli L, Fait P (eds) The Cambridge companion to ancient logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 263\u2013282"},{"key":"10235_CR50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"105","DOI":"10.1111\/1468-0017.00191","volume":"17","author":"F Recanati","year":"2002","unstructured":"Recanati F (2002) Does linguistic communication rest on inference?? Mind Lang 17:105\u2013126. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1468-0017.00191","journal-title":"Mind Lang"},{"key":"10235_CR49","volume-title":"Literal meaning","author":"F Recanati","year":"2004","unstructured":"Recanati F (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR48","first-page":"67","volume-title":"Routledge companion to philosophy of Language","author":"F Recanati","year":"2012","unstructured":"Recanati F (2012) Pragmatic enrichment. In: Russell G, Graff Fara D (eds) Routledge companion to philosophy of language. Routledge, New York, NY, and London, UK, pp 67\u201378"},{"key":"10235_CR51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1353\/book4640","volume-title":"Aristotle on false reasoning: Language and the world in the sophistical refutations","author":"S Schreiber","year":"2003","unstructured":"Schreiber S (2003) Aristotle on false reasoning: Language and the world in the Sophistical Refutations. SUNY, Albany, NY"},{"key":"10235_CR52","volume-title":"Reasoning","author":"M Scriven","year":"1976","unstructured":"Scriven M (1976) Reasoning. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY"},{"key":"10235_CR53","first-page":"373","volume":"46","author":"M Sinclair","year":"1985","unstructured":"Sinclair M (1985) Law and language: The role of pragmatics in statutory interpretation. Univ Pittsburgh Law Rev 46:373\u2013420","journal-title":"Univ Pittsburgh Law Rev"},{"key":"10235_CR54","first-page":"191","volume-title":"How things are: A science toolkit for the min","author":"D Sperber","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sperber D (1995) How do we communicate? In: Brockman J, Matson K (eds) How things are: A science toolkit for the mind. Morrow, New York, NY, pp 191\u2013199"},{"key":"10235_CR55","volume-title":"Relevance: communication and cognition","author":"D Sperber","year":"1995","unstructured":"Sperber D, Wilson D (1995) Relevance: communication and cognition. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"67","DOI":"10.1080\/10511431.2021.1897327","volume":"57","author":"K Stevens","year":"2021","unstructured":"Stevens K (2021) Charity for moral reasons?\u2013 A defense of the principle of charity in argumentation. Argumentation Advocacy 57:67\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511431.2021.1897327","journal-title":"Argumentation Advocacy"},{"key":"10235_CR57","volume-title":"Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics","author":"M Stubbs","year":"2001","unstructured":"Stubbs M (2001) Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"250","DOI":"10.1086\/289108","volume":"50","author":"P Thagard","year":"1983","unstructured":"Thagard P, Nisbett RE (1983) Rationality and charity. Philos Sci 50:250\u2013267. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/289108","journal-title":"Philos Sci"},{"key":"10235_CR59","volume-title":"Practical reasoning in natural Language","author":"SN Thomas","year":"1973","unstructured":"Thomas SN (1973) Practical reasoning in natural language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ"},{"key":"10235_CR60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"254","DOI":"10.12987\/9780300146448-014","volume-title":"Rhetoric and hermeneutics in our time","author":"D Tracy","year":"2017","unstructured":"Tracy D (2017) Charity, obscurity, clarity: Augustine\u2019s search for rhetoric and hermeneutics. In: Kunitz S, Levy J (eds) Rhetoric and hermeneutics in our time. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp 254\u2013274"},{"key":"10235_CR61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"97","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.1982.11951231","volume":"19","author":"F van Eemeren","year":"1982","unstructured":"van Eemeren F, Grootendorst R (1982) Unexpected premisses: Part I. Argumentation Advocacy 19:97\u2013106. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00028533.1982.11951231","journal-title":"Argumentation Advocacy"},{"key":"10235_CR62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"215","DOI":"10.1080\/00028533.1983.11951243","volume":"19","author":"F van Eemeren","year":"1983","unstructured":"van Eemeren F, Grootendorst R (1983) Unexpressed premisses: Part II. Argumentation Advocacy 19:215\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00028533.1983.11951243","journal-title":"Argumentation Advocacy"},{"key":"10235_CR63","volume-title":"Alexander of aphrodisias: on Aristotle topics 1","author":"J Van Ophuijsen","year":"2014","unstructured":"Van Ophuijsen J (2014) Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Topics 1. Bloomsbury, London, UK"},{"key":"10235_CR64","first-page":"395","volume":"26","author":"D Walton","year":"1983","unstructured":"Walton D (1983) Enthymemes Log Anal 26:395\u2013410","journal-title":"Enthymemes Log Anal"},{"key":"10235_CR66","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"399","DOI":"10.2307\/2026735","volume":"87","author":"D Walton","year":"1990","unstructured":"Walton D (1990) What is reasoning? What is an argument? J Philos 87:399\u2013419. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2026735","journal-title":"J Philos"},{"key":"10235_CR67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"125","DOI":"10.1075\/pc.1.1.08wal","volume":"1","author":"D Walton","year":"1993","unstructured":"Walton D (1993) The speech act of presumption. Pragmat Cogn 1:125\u2013148. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1075\/pc.1.1.08wal","journal-title":"Pragmat Cogn"},{"key":"10235_CR68","volume-title":"Arguments from ignorance","author":"D Walton","year":"1996","unstructured":"Walton D (1996) Arguments from ignorance. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA"},{"key":"10235_CR65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v20i3.2280","volume":"20","author":"D Walton","year":"2000","unstructured":"Walton D (2000) New dialectical rules for ambiguity. Informal Log 20:261\u2013274. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v20i3.2280","journal-title":"Informal Log"},{"key":"10235_CR69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"71","DOI":"10.1080\/1386979032000186863","volume":"7","author":"D Walton","year":"2004","unstructured":"Walton D (2004) A new dialectical theory of explanation. Philos Explor 7:71\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1386979032000186863","journal-title":"Philos Explor"},{"key":"10235_CR70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"339","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-005-6198-x","volume":"145","author":"D Walton","year":"2005","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C (2005) Argumentation schemes and enthymemes. Synthese 145:339\u2013370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-005-6198-x","journal-title":"Synthese"},{"key":"10235_CR71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511802034","volume-title":"Argumentation schemes","author":"D Walton","year":"2008","unstructured":"Walton D, Reed C, Macagno F (2008) Argumentation schemes. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY"},{"key":"10235_CR72","volume-title":"Better reasoning: techniques for handling argument, evidence, and abstraction","author":"L Wright","year":"1982","unstructured":"Wright L (1982) Better reasoning: Techniques for handling argument, evidence, and abstraction. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, NY"}],"container-title":["Topoi"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-025-10235-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11245-025-10235-y","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11245-025-10235-y.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,12,20]],"date-time":"2025-12-20T10:34:37Z","timestamp":1766226877000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11245-025-10235-y"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,12]]},"references-count":72,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10235"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11245-025-10235-y","relation":{},"ISSN":["0167-7411","1572-8749"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0167-7411"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1572-8749"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"2 July 2025","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 August 2025","order":2,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"None.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}