{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,8]],"date-time":"2026-02-08T01:57:35Z","timestamp":1770515855093,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]],"date-time":"2023-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1673481600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]],"date-time":"2023-01-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1673481600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o D. Anna de Sommer Champalimaud e Dr. Carlos Montez Champalimaud"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) has emerged as a surgical option for patients with prostatic cancer in high-volume centers. The objective is to assess oncological and functional outcomes when implementing RS-RARP in a medium-volume center without previous experience of robotic surgery. This is a prospective observational single-center study. Patients operated between July 2017 and April 2020 were divided into two consecutive groups, A and B, each with 104 patients. The surgeons had prior experience in laparoscopic surgery and underwent robotic training. Positive surgical margin (PSM) status, urinary continence, and erectile function projected by Kaplan\u2013Meier curves, together with patient reported quality of life outcomes at 12\u00a0months post-surgery were documented. Median patient age was 63\u00a0years (IQR\u2009=\u200959\u201367), overall PSM rate were 33%, 28% for pT2 disease. Pre-operative values showed no significant difference between both groups. The rate of urinary continence dropped from 81 to 78% (SE\u2009=\u20095.7) (Group A) and from 90 to 72% (SE\u2009=\u20096.3) (Group B) using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form. Baseline sexual function was regained in 41% (Group A) and 47% (Group B) of patients. The median Expanded Prostate Index Composite-26 total score decreased from 86 to 82. These outcomes relate favorably to prior reports. There was a clinically significant decrease in median operative time in the successive groups with post-operative complications occurring in less than 2% of surgical procedures overall. A 12-month follow-up suggests that RS-RARP may be safely introduced in a medium-volume center without previous experience of robotic surgery.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-022-01517-3","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]],"date-time":"2023-01-12T15:03:17Z","timestamp":1673535797000},"page":"1133-1142","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":5,"title":["Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a medium size oncological center holds adequate oncological and functional outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Jorge","family":"Fonseca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Maria Francisca","family":"Moraes-Fontes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jorge","family":"Rebola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Rui","family":"L\u00facio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Miguel","family":"Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ciprian","family":"Muresan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Artur","family":"Palmas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ana","family":"Gaiv\u00e3o","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Celso","family":"Matos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tiago","family":"Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Daniela","family":"Dias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"In\u00eas","family":"Sousa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Francisco","family":"Oliveira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ricardo","family":"Ribeiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Antonio","family":"Lopez-Beltran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Avelino","family":"Fraga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"1517_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"209","DOI":"10.3322\/caac.21660","volume":"71","author":"H Sung","year":"2021","unstructured":"Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al (2021) Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71:209\u2013249","journal-title":"CA Cancer J Clin"},{"key":"1517_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"618","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2016.08.003","volume":"71","author":"N Mottet","year":"2017","unstructured":"Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618\u2013629","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1794","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x","volume":"109","author":"R Savdie","year":"2012","unstructured":"Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M et al (2012) High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. BJU Int 109:1794\u20131800","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"1517_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2005.06.108","volume":"66","author":"PI Karakiewicz","year":"2005","unstructured":"Karakiewicz PI, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Cagiannos I, Stricker PD, Klein E et al (2005) Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients. Urology 66:1245\u20131250","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"1517_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"473","DOI":"10.1002\/pros.2990040506","volume":"4","author":"PC Walsh","year":"1983","unstructured":"Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473\u2013485","journal-title":"Prostate"},{"key":"1517_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1643","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5347(05)67512-X","volume":"163","author":"B Guillonneau","year":"2000","unstructured":"Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163:1643\u20131649","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"569","DOI":"10.1016\/S0090-4295(02)01852-6","volume":"60","author":"A Tewari","year":"2002","unstructured":"Tewari A, Peabody J, Sarle R, Balakrishnan G, Hemal A, Shrivastava A et al (2002) Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urology 60:569\u2013572","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"1517_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"974","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2013.06.046","volume":"64","author":"A Galfano","year":"2013","unstructured":"Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, Bramerio M et al (2013) Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with >\/= 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 64:974\u2013980","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.06.008","volume":"58","author":"A Galfano","year":"2010","unstructured":"Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM (2010) A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 58:457\u2013461","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"174","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajur.2018.02.001","volume":"6","author":"NI Dirie","year":"2019","unstructured":"Dirie NI, Pokhrel G, Guan W, Mumin MA, Yang J, Masau JF et al (2019) Is Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy associated with better functional and oncological outcomes? Literature review and meta-analysis. Asian J Urol 6:174\u2013182","journal-title":"Asian J Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1123","DOI":"10.1007\/s00345-019-02798-4","volume":"38","author":"C Phukan","year":"2020","unstructured":"Phukan C, McLean A, Nambiar A, Mukherjee A, Somani B, Krishnamoorthy R et al (2020) Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 38:1123\u20131134","journal-title":"World J Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"16","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2015.08.052","volume":"69","author":"JC Weinreb","year":"2016","unstructured":"Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Haider MA, Macura KJ et al (2016) PI-RADS Prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16\u201340","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20041","volume":"23","author":"K Avery","year":"2004","unstructured":"Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23:322\u2013330","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"1517_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"307","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.ijir.3901327","volume":"17","author":"JC Cappelleri","year":"2005","unstructured":"Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC (2005) The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM): a 5\u00a0year review of research and clinical experience. Int J Impot Res 17:307\u2013319","journal-title":"Int J Impot Res"},{"key":"1517_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.01.027","volume":"76","author":"KM Szymanski","year":"2010","unstructured":"Szymanski KM, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sanda MG (2010) Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. Urology 76:1245\u20131250","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"1517_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"101","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2014.08.044","volume":"85","author":"TA Skolarus","year":"2015","unstructured":"Skolarus TA, Dunn RL, Sanda MG, Chang P, Greenfield TK, Litwin MS et al (2015) Minimally important difference for the expanded prostate cancer index composite short form. Urology 85:101\u2013105","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"1517_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1798","DOI":"10.1097\/01.ju.0000091805.98960.13","volume":"170","author":"I Cagiannos","year":"2003","unstructured":"Cagiannos I, Karakiewicz P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Rabbani F, Gerigk C et al (2003) A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol 170:1798\u20131803","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"345","DOI":"10.1080\/21681805.2017.1332680","volume":"51","author":"S Cimino","year":"2017","unstructured":"Cimino S, Reale G, Castelli T, Favilla V, Giardina R, Russo GI et al (2017) Comparison between Briganti, Partin and MSKCC tools in predicting positive lymph nodes in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 51:345\u2013350","journal-title":"Scand J Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"341","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2011.10.033","volume":"61","author":"D Mitropoulos","year":"2012","unstructured":"Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Roupret M, Truss M et al (2012) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. Eur Urol 61:341\u2013349","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"926","DOI":"10.1097\/JU.0000000000000698","volume":"203","author":"L Xia","year":"2020","unstructured":"Xia L, Sperling CD, Taylor BL, Talwar R, Chelluri RR, Raman JD et al (2020) Associations between hospital volume and outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 203:926\u2013932","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1097\/PAS.0000000000000530","volume":"40","author":"JI Epstein","year":"2016","unstructured":"Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA et al (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 40:244\u2013252","journal-title":"Am J Surg Pathol"},{"key":"1517_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"772","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2020.03.002","volume":"7","author":"A Olivero","year":"2021","unstructured":"Olivero A, Galfano A, Piccinelli M, Secco S, Di Trapani D, Petralia G et al (2021) Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy for surgeons in the learning curve: a propensity score-matching analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7:772\u2013778","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"1517_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"92","DOI":"10.3109\/00365599.2012.707684","volume":"47","author":"EA Steinsvik","year":"2013","unstructured":"Steinsvik EA, Axcrona K, Angelsen A, Beisland C, Dahl A, Eri LM et al (2013) Does a surgeon\u2019s annual radical prostatectomy volume predict the risk of positive surgical margins and urinary incontinence at one-year follow-up? Findings from a prospective national study. Scand J Urol 47:92\u2013100","journal-title":"Scand J Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.03.008","volume":"4","author":"JJ Leow","year":"2018","unstructured":"Leow JJ, Leong EK, Serrell EC, Chang SL, Gruen RL, Png KS et al (2018) Systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 4:775\u2013789","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"key":"1517_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2013.01.017","volume":"81","author":"V Berge","year":"2013","unstructured":"Berge V, Berg RE, Hoff JR, Wessel N, Diep LM, Karlsen SJ et al (2013) A prospective study of transition from laparoscopic to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes after 36-month follow-up. Urology 81:781\u2013786","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"1517_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"161","DOI":"10.5489\/cuaj.10085","volume":"5","author":"N Lawrentschuk","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lawrentschuk N, Evans A, Srigley J, Chin JL, Bora B, Hunter A et al (2011) Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study. Can Urol Assoc J 5:161\u2013166","journal-title":"Can Urol Assoc J"},{"key":"1517_CR27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"346","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1464-410X.2011.10334.x","volume":"109","author":"SG Vesey","year":"2012","unstructured":"Vesey SG, McCabe JE, Hounsome L, Fowler S (2012) UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database. BJU Int 109:346\u2013354","journal-title":"BJU Int"},{"key":"1517_CR28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"80","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2012.0262","volume":"27","author":"JU Stolzenburg","year":"2013","unstructured":"Stolzenburg JU, Qazi HA, Holze S, Mende M, Nicolaus M, Franz T et al (2013) Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 27:80\u201385","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"key":"1517_CR29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2008.08.482","volume":"73","author":"J Jaffe","year":"2009","unstructured":"Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X, Harmon J, Rozet F, Barret E et al (2009) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urology 73:127\u2013133","journal-title":"Urology"},{"key":"1517_CR30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"586","DOI":"10.23736\/S0393-2249.20.03830-8","volume":"72","author":"A Abdel Raheem","year":"2020","unstructured":"Abdel Raheem A, Hagras A, Ghaith A, Alenzi MJ, Elghiaty A, Gameel T et al (2020) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up. Minerva Urol Nefrol 72:586\u2013594","journal-title":"Minerva Urol Nefrol"},{"key":"1517_CR31","first-page":"4293","volume":"36","author":"Y Kadono","year":"2016","unstructured":"Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kadomoto S, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K et al (2016) Investigating urinary conditions prior to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in search of a desirable method for evaluating post-prostatectomy incontinence. Anticancer Res 36:4293\u20134298","journal-title":"Anticancer Res"},{"key":"1517_CR32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.045","volume":"62","author":"V Ficarra","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:405\u2013417","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"key":"1517_CR33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23907","volume":"38","author":"K Machioka","year":"2019","unstructured":"Machioka K, Kadono Y, Naito R, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Kawaguchi S et al (2019) Evaluating urinary incontinence before and after radical prostatectomy using the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form. Neurourol Urodyn 38:726\u2013733","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"key":"1517_CR34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.11.115","volume":"199","author":"M Menon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, Diaz M, Tallman C, Abdollah F et al (2018) Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 199:1210\u20131217","journal-title":"J Urol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-022-01517-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-022-01517-3\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-022-01517-3.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,5,24]],"date-time":"2023-05-24T05:24:06Z","timestamp":1684905846000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-022-01517-3"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,6]]}},"alternative-id":["1517"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-022-01517-3","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,1,12]]},"assertion":[{"value":"31 May 2022","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"31 December 2022","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"12 January 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Competing interests"}},{"value":"None.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}