{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,17]],"date-time":"2026-02-17T12:37:12Z","timestamp":1771331832925,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,1]],"date-time":"2023-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1690848000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,1]],"date-time":"2023-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1690848000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o D. Anna de Sommer Champalimaud e Dr. Carlos Montez Champalimaud"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Robotic Surg"],"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title><jats:p>Urinary incontinence is one of the main concerns for patients after radical prostatectomy. Differences in surgical experience among surgeons could partly explain the wide range of frequencies observed. Our aim was to evaluate the association between the surgeons` experience and center caseload with relation to urinary continence recovery after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP). Prospective observational single-center study. Five surgeons consecutively operated 405 patients between July 2017 and February 2022. Continence recovery was evaluated with pad count and by employing the short form of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF), pre- and postoperatively at 1\u00a0year. Non-parametric tests were used. Median age was 63\u00a0years, 30% of patients presented with local advanced disease; the positive surgical margin rate (over 3\u00a0mm length) was 16%. Complication rate was 1% (Clavien\u2013Dindo\u2009&gt;\u2009II). One year after surgery, continence was assessed in 282 patients, of whom 87% were pad free and 51% never leaked (ICIQ-SF\u2009=\u20090). With respect to the mean annual number of procedures per surgeon, divided in\u2009&lt;\u200920, 20\u201339 and\u2009\u2265\u200940, pad-free rates were achieved in 93%, 85%, and 84% and absence of urine leak rates in 47%, 62% and 48% of patients, respectively. Postoperative median ICIQ-SF was five. We acknowledge the limitation of a 12-month follow-up and the fact that we are a medium-volume center. There is no statistically significant association between continence recovery, surgeon\u2019s experience and center caseload. Continence recovery at 1\u00a0year after surgery is adequate and robust to surgeon\u2019s experience.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-023-01687-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,1]],"date-time":"2023-08-01T17:02:20Z","timestamp":1690909340000},"page":"2503-2511","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":7,"title":["Urinary continence recovery after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in relation to surgeon experience"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"17","author":[{"given":"Jorge","family":"Fonseca","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Gon\u00e7alo","family":"Froes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Maria Francisca","family":"Moraes-Fontes","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jorge","family":"Rebola","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Rui","family":"L\u00facio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Miguel","family":"Almeida","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ciprian","family":"Muresan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Artur","family":"Palmas","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ana","family":"Gaiv\u00e3o","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Celso","family":"Matos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Tiago","family":"Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Daniela","family":"Dias","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"In\u00eas","family":"Sousa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Francisco","family":"Oliveira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Ricardo","family":"Ribeiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Antonio","family":"Lopez-Beltran","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Avelino","family":"Fraga","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"1687_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"243","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2020.09.042","volume":"79","author":"N Mottet","year":"2021","unstructured":"Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 79(2):243\u2013262","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"7","key":"1687_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1038\/bjc.2017.30","volume":"116","author":"US Lehto","year":"2017","unstructured":"Lehto US, Tenhola H, Taari K, Aromaa A (2017) Patients\u2019 perceptions of the negative effects following different prostate cancer treatments and the impact on psychological well-being: a nationwide survey. Br J Cancer 116(7):864\u2013873","journal-title":"Br J Cancer"},{"issue":"4","key":"1687_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"521","DOI":"10.1111\/ans.16491","volume":"91","author":"D Trieu","year":"2021","unstructured":"Trieu D, Ju IE, Chang SB, Mungovan SF, Patel MI (2021) Surgeon case volume and continence recovery following radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg 91(4):521\u2013529","journal-title":"ANZ J Surg"},{"issue":"9","key":"1687_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"872","DOI":"10.1089\/end.2017.0085","volume":"31","author":"N Fossati","year":"2017","unstructured":"Fossati N, Di Trapani E, Gandaglia G, Dell\u2019Oglio P, Umari P, Buffi NM et al (2017) Assessing the impact of surgeon experience on urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results of four high-volume surgeons. J Endourol 31(9):872\u2013877","journal-title":"J Endourol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1687_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"607","DOI":"10.23736\/S2724-6051.22.04857-1","volume":"74","author":"A Galfano","year":"2022","unstructured":"Galfano A, Tappero S, Eden C, Dell\u2019oglio P, Fransis K, Guo H et al (2022) Multicentric experience in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by expert surgeons for high-risk prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol 74(5):607\u2013614","journal-title":"Minerva Urol Nephrol"},{"issue":"6","key":"1687_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1419","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-022-01383-z","volume":"16","author":"H Kadhim","year":"2022","unstructured":"Kadhim H, Ang KM, Tan WS, Nathan A, Pavan N, Mazzon G et al (2022) Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg 16(6):1419\u20131426","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"1","key":"1687_CR7","first-page":"52","volume":"60","author":"K Hikita","year":"2017","unstructured":"Hikita K, Honda M, Kawamoto B, Tsounapi P, Muraoka K, Sejima T et al (2017) Evaluation of incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: using the international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire short form and noting the number of safety pads needed by Japanese patients. Yonago Acta Med 60(1):52\u201355","journal-title":"Yonago Acta Med"},{"issue":"4","key":"1687_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"322","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20041","volume":"23","author":"K Avery","year":"2004","unstructured":"Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P (2004) ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 23(4):322\u2013330","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"2","key":"1687_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"726","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.23907","volume":"38","author":"K Machioka","year":"2019","unstructured":"Machioka K, Kadono Y, Naito R, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Kawaguchi S et al (2019) Evaluating urinary incontinence before and after radical prostatectomy using the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form. Neurourol Urodyn 38(2):726\u2013733","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"4","key":"1687_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1155","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2014.03.113","volume":"192","author":"HV Holm","year":"2014","unstructured":"Holm HV, Fossa SD, Hedlund H, Schultz A, Dahl AA (2014) How should continence and incontinence after radical prostatectomy be evaluated? A prospective study of patient ratings and changes with time. J Urol 192(4):1155\u20131161","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"18","key":"1687_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4350","DOI":"10.3390\/cancers14184350","volume":"14","author":"N d'Altilia","year":"2022","unstructured":"d\u2019Altilia N, Mancini V, Falagario UG, Martino L, Di Nauta M, Calo B et al (2022) A matched-pair analysis after robotic and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a new definition of continence and the impact of different surgical techniques. Cancers (Basel) 14(18):4350","journal-title":"Cancers (Basel)"},{"issue":"4","key":"1687_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"239","DOI":"10.1097\/00000542-197810000-00003","volume":"49","author":"WD Owens","year":"1978","unstructured":"Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49(4):239\u2013243","journal-title":"Anesthesiology"},{"issue":"2","key":"1687_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"244","DOI":"10.1097\/PAS.0000000000000530","volume":"40","author":"JI Epstein","year":"2016","unstructured":"Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA et al (2016) The 2014 international society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 40(2):244\u2013252","journal-title":"Am J Surg Pathol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1687_CR14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"340","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2019.02.033","volume":"76","author":"B Turkbey","year":"2019","unstructured":"Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76(3):340\u2013351","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1687_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1245","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2010.01.027","volume":"76","author":"KM Szymanski","year":"2010","unstructured":"Szymanski KM, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sanda MG (2010) Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. Urology 76(5):1245\u20131250","journal-title":"Urology"},{"issue":"5","key":"1687_CR16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"411","DOI":"10.1002\/nau.20674","volume":"28","author":"A Klovning","year":"2009","unstructured":"Klovning A, Avery K, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2009) Comparison of two questionnaires for assessing the severity of urinary incontinence: the ICIQ-UI SF versus the incontinence severity index. Neurourol Urodyn 28(5):411\u2013415","journal-title":"Neurourol Urodyn"},{"issue":"3","key":"1687_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"457","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2010.06.008","volume":"58","author":"A Galfano","year":"2010","unstructured":"Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM (2010) A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 58(3):457\u2013461","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1687_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1133","DOI":"10.1007\/s11701-022-01517-3","volume":"17","author":"J Fonseca","year":"2023","unstructured":"Fonseca J, Moraes-Fontes MF, Rebola J, Lucio R, Almeida M, Muresan C et al (2023) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a medium size oncological center holds adequate oncological and functional outcomes. J Robot Surg 17(3):1133\u20131142","journal-title":"J Robot Surg"},{"issue":"986","key":"1687_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"777","DOI":"10.1136\/pgmj.2007.057190","volume":"83","author":"AN Hopper","year":"2007","unstructured":"Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG (2007) Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J 83(986):777\u2013779","journal-title":"Postgrad Med J"},{"issue":"3","key":"1687_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"405","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eururo.2012.05.045","volume":"62","author":"V Ficarra","year":"2012","unstructured":"Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405\u2013417","journal-title":"Eur Urol"},{"issue":"5","key":"1687_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.juro.2017.11.115","volume":"199","author":"M Menon","year":"2018","unstructured":"Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, Diaz M, Tallman C, Abdollah F et al (2018) Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 199(5):1210\u20131217","journal-title":"J Urol"},{"issue":"8","key":"1687_CR22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"773","DOI":"10.1002\/pros.24516","volume":"83","author":"Y Kadono","year":"2023","unstructured":"Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, Kadomoto S, Iwamoto H, Yaegashi H et al (2023) Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching. Prostate 83(8):773\u2013780","journal-title":"Prostate"},{"issue":"6","key":"1687_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1016\/j.euf.2017.03.008","volume":"4","author":"JJ Leow","year":"2018","unstructured":"Leow JJ, Leong EK, Serrell EC, Chang SL, Gruen RL, Png KS et al (2018) Systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Focus 4(6):775\u2013789","journal-title":"Eur Urol Focus"},{"issue":"3","key":"1687_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109.e7","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urolonc.2014.11.005","volume":"33","author":"HS Dev","year":"2015","unstructured":"Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V, Parashar D, Palmer K, Nyberg T et al (2015) Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 33(3):109.e7\u201313","journal-title":"Urol Oncol"},{"issue":"1","key":"1687_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"113","DOI":"10.1186\/s12894-019-0550-9","volume":"19","author":"JN Nyarangi-Dix","year":"2019","unstructured":"Nyarangi-Dix JN, Gortz M, Gradinarov G, Hofer L, Schutz V, Gasch C et al (2019) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer. BMC Urol 19(1):113","journal-title":"BMC Urol"},{"issue":"3","key":"1687_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"149","DOI":"10.3109\/21681805.2016.1142471","volume":"50","author":"J Riikonen","year":"2016","unstructured":"Riikonen J, Kaipia A, Petas A, Horte A, Koskimaki J, Kahkonen E et al (2016) Initiation of robot-assisted radical prostatectomies in Finland: impact on centralization and quality of care. Scand J Urol 50(3):149\u2013154","journal-title":"Scand J Urol"}],"container-title":["Journal of Robotic Surgery"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01687-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01687-8\/fulltext.html","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01687-8.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,9,9]],"date-time":"2023-09-09T05:14:15Z","timestamp":1694236455000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01687-8"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,1]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,10]]}},"alternative-id":["1687"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11701-023-01687-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["1863-2491"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1863-2491","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,1]]},"assertion":[{"value":"19 June 2023","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"23 July 2023","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"1 August 2023","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no competing interests.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}]}}