{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T19:44:40Z","timestamp":1786045480163,"version":"3.56.0"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784073600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784073600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100007809","name":"Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100007809","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Estuaries and Coasts"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>\n                    There is a lot of anecdotal evidence that peer review takes too long, and that it is now taking longer than in the past. But what does the data say? To answer this question, an anonymized version of the peer-review database for the journal\n                    <jats:italic>Estuaries and Coasts<\/jats:italic>\n                    from 2007 to 2025 was downloaded and analyzed. Rejection happens quicker (mean 169 days, median 102 days) than acceptance (mean 250 days, median 223 days), because revisions require additional manuscript processing time. Thus, for change in review time, analysis was confined to first decisions only. It has become much harder to find reviewers over time. On average, only four invitations were required to obtain two reviews for manuscripts submitted in 2007, but this increased to eight invitations to obtain two reviews in 2025. Non-response to review invitations was relatively constant up to 2020 but increased 4-fold by 2025. Ironically, even though it is harder to find reviewers, total time to acceptance has dropped by about 50 days over 17 years. The shorter decision times are due to reviewers completing reviews much faster over time. So, while it takes longer to secure reviews, reviews are being performed faster, leading to a reduction in total time to a final decision. The lack of response by reviewers slows down the review process because of the time it takes to wait for invitation response and creating new invitations to review. The lack of response to invitations and the rejection of invitations creates a crisis in peer review.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1007\/s12237-026-01782-7","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]],"date-time":"2026-07-15T13:08:30Z","timestamp":1784120910000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Estuaries and Coasts Data Explains Why Peer Review is Slow and There is a Reviewing Crisis"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"49","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4199-3312","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Paul A.","family":"Montagna","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"1782_CR2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","unstructured":"Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., & Holcombe, A. O. (2021). A billion-dollar donation: Estimating the cost of researchers\u2019 time spent on peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6(14). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s41073-021-00118-2","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-021-00118-2"},{"issue":"5","key":"1782_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e2401232121","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2401232121","volume":"122","author":"B Aczel","year":"2025","unstructured":"Aczel, B., S Barwich, A., B Diekman, A., Fishbach, A., L Goldstone, R., Gomez, P., & P Ioannidis, J. (2025). The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(5), e2401232121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2401232121","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"5885","key":"1782_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"15","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1162115","volume":"321","author":"B Alberts","year":"2008","unstructured":"Alberts, B., Hanson, B., & Kelner, K. L. (2008). Reviewing peer review. Science, 321(5885), 15\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.1162115","journal-title":"Science"},{"key":"1782_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s12237-007-9033-4","volume":"31","author":"JA Bartholomew","year":"2008","unstructured":"Bartholomew, J. A. (2008). Welcome to the February 2008 issue of Estuaries and Coasts. Estuaries and Coasts, 31, 1\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12237-007-9033-4","journal-title":"Estuaries and Coasts"},{"key":"1782_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"109006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecss.2024.109006","volume":"310","author":"A Borja","year":"2024","unstructured":"Borja, A. & Elliott, M. (2024). Do you want your paper published? \u2013 Then referee others! The view from seasoned editors. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 310 109006 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ecss.2024.109006.","journal-title":"Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science"},{"issue":"10","key":"1782_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1323","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100023003","volume":"263","author":"JC Burnham","year":"1990","unstructured":"Burnham, J. C. (1990). The evolution of editorial peer review. Jama, 263(10), 1323\u20131329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100023003","journal-title":"Jama"},{"issue":"2023","key":"1782_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"799","DOI":"10.1002\/lol2.10353","volume":"8","author":"J Cloern","year":"2023","unstructured":"Cloern, J. (2023). Why should I submit my article to a scientific-society journal? Limnology and Oceanography Letters, 8(2023), 799\u2013803. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/lol2.10353","journal-title":"Limnology and Oceanography Letters"},{"key":"1782_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.3354\/esr00721","volume":"30","author":"SJ Cooke","year":"2016","unstructured":"Cooke, S. J., Nguyen, V. M., Wilson, A. D., Donaldson, M. R., Gallagher, A. J., Hammerschlag, N., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). The need for speed in a crisis discipline: perspectives on peer-review duration and implications for conservation science. Endangered Species Research, 30, 11\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3354\/esr00721","journal-title":"Endangered Species Research"},{"key":"1782_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"114454","DOI":"10.1016\/j.psychres.2022.114454","volume":"310","author":"LE DeLisi","year":"2022","unstructured":"DeLisi, L. E. (2022). Where have all the reviewers gone? Is the peer review concept in crisis? Psychiatry Research, 310, 114454. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.psychres.2022.114454","journal-title":"Psychiatry Research"},{"key":"1782_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"431","DOI":"10.1890\/0012-9623-95.4.431","volume":"95","author":"SA Glenn","year":"2014","unstructured":"Glenn, S. A. (2014). A new golden rule for peer review? Bulletin Ecological Society of America, 95, 431\u2013434. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/pdf\/bullecosociamer.95.4.431.pdf","journal-title":"Bulletin Ecological Society of America"},{"issue":"4","key":"1782_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"823","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00327","volume":"5","author":"MA Hanson","year":"2024","unstructured":"Hanson, M. A., Barreiro, P. G., Crosetto, P., & Brockington, D. (2024). The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 823\u2013843. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00327","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"issue":"10","key":"1782_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"957","DOI":"10.1177\/0004867420958077","volume":"54","author":"S Henderson","year":"2020","unstructured":"Henderson, S., Berk, M., Boyce, P., Jorm, A. F., Galletly, C., Porter, R. J., Mulder, R. T., & Malhi, G. S. (2020). Finding reviewers: A crisis for journals and their authors. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 54(10), 957\u2013959. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0004867420958077","journal-title":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry"},{"key":"1782_CR13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"E155","DOI":"10.1086\/598847","volume":"173","author":"MA McPeek","year":"2009","unstructured":"McPeek, M. A., DeAngelis, D. L., Shaw, R. G., Moore, A. J., Rausher, M. D., Strong, D. R., Ellison, A. M., Barrett, L., Rieseberg, L., Breed, M. D., Sullivan, J., Osenberg, C. W., Holyoak, M., & Elgar, M. A. (2009). The golden rule of reviewing. American Naturalist, 173, E155\u2013E158. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/598847","journal-title":"American Naturalist"},{"issue":"2","key":"1782_CR14","first-page":"22","volume":"51","author":"PA Montagna","year":"2025","unstructured":"Montagna, P. A., Cebrian, J., & Wong, M. (2025). Estuaries and Coasts Outstanding Reviewers. CERF\u2019s Up! 51(2), 22. https:\/\/cerf.memberclicks.net\/assets\/bulletin\/Bulletin_2025\/CERFs_UP_51_2.pdf","journal-title":"CERF\u2019s Up!"},{"key":"1782_CR15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"290","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-026-01973-z","volume":"655","author":"M Naddaf","year":"2026","unstructured":"Naddaf, M. (2026). Paying peer reviewers works, according to an editor-in-chief. Nature, 655, 290\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-026-01973-z","journal-title":"Nature"},{"key":"1782_CR16","unstructured":"National Academy of Sciences, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. (2009) On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research, Third Edition. National Academies Press. http:\/\/www.nap.edu\/catalog\/12192.html"},{"issue":"8","key":"1782_CR17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0132557","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0132557","volume":"10","author":"VM Nguyen","year":"2015","unstructured":"Nguyen, V. M., Haddaway, N. R., Gutowsky, L. F., Wilson, A. D., Gallagher, A. J., Donaldson, M. R., Hammerschlag, N., & Cooke, S. J. (2015). How long is too long in contemporary peer review? Perspectives from authors publishing in conservation biology journals. PloS one, 10(8), e0132557. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0132557","journal-title":"PloS one"},{"issue":"4","key":"1782_CR18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"619","DOI":"10.1080\/10437797.2024.2363167","volume":"58","author":"DE Parrish","year":"2022","unstructured":"Parrish, D. E. (2022). From the editor\u2014A peer review crisis or new normal? Journal of Social Work Education, 58(4), 619\u2013621. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10437797.2024.2363167","journal-title":"Journal of Social Work Education"},{"issue":"5859","key":"1782_CR19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"32","DOI":"10.1126\/science.319.5859.32b","volume":"319","author":"WF Perrin","year":"2008","unstructured":"Perrin, W. F. (2008). In search of peer reviewers. Science, 319(5859), 32\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.319.5859.32b","journal-title":"Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"1782_CR20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1057\/s41270-022-00176-5","volume":"10","author":"M Petrescu","year":"2022","unstructured":"Petrescu, M., & Krishen, A. S. (2022). The evolving crisis of the peer-review process. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(3), 185\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1057\/s41270-022-00176-5","journal-title":"Journal of Marketing Analytics"},{"issue":"1\u20132","key":"1782_CR21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"36","DOI":"10.36094\/sc.v87.2021.Peer_Review_Process.Roy.36","volume":"87","author":"SC Roy","year":"2021","unstructured":"Roy, S. C. (2021). Peer review process\u2013its history and evolution. Science and Culture, 87(1\u20132), 36\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.36094\/sc.v87.2021.Peer_Review_Process.Roy.36","journal-title":"Science and Culture"},{"issue":"4","key":"1782_CR22","first-page":"2","volume":"48","author":"C Simenstad","year":"2022","unstructured":"Simenstad, C., & Montagna, P. A. (2022). How to review a journal article. CERF\u2019s Up! 48(4), 2\u20133. https:\/\/cerf.memberclicks.net\/assets\/bulletin\/Bulletin_2022\/12.2022_CERFs_UP_48.4_web.pdf","journal-title":"CERF\u2019s Up!"},{"issue":"4","key":"1782_CR23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1007\/s12109-022-09914-0","volume":"38","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2022","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2022). The role of Publons in the context of open peer review. Publishing Research Quarterly, 38(4), 760\u2013781. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12109-022-09914-0","journal-title":"Publishing Research Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"1782_CR24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"9","DOI":"10.1136\/jech.2006.049817","volume":"61","author":"L Tite","year":"2007","unstructured":"Tite, L., & Schroter, S. (2007). Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(1), 9\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/jech.2006.049817. Why do peer reviewers decline to review?.","journal-title":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health"},{"issue":"6","key":"1782_CR25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e01091","DOI":"10.1128\/mbio.01091-23","volume":"14","author":"C Tropini","year":"2023","unstructured":"Tropini, C., Finlay, B. B., Nichter, M., Melby, M. K., Metcalf, J. L., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., & Gilbert, J. A. (2023). Time to rethink academic publishing: the peer reviewer crisis. MBio, 14(6), e01091\u2013e01023. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1128\/mbio.01091-23","journal-title":"MBio"},{"key":"1782_CR26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"169","DOI":"10.3389\/fnins.2015.00169","volume":"9","author":"R Walker","year":"2015","unstructured":"Walker, R., & Rocha da Silva, P. (2015). Emerging trends in peer review\u2014a survey. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fnins.2015.00169","journal-title":"Frontiers in Neuroscience"}],"container-title":["Estuaries and Coasts"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12237-026-01782-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s12237-026-01782-7","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s12237-026-01782-7.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,6]],"date-time":"2026-08-06T17:10:53Z","timestamp":1786036253000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s12237-026-01782-7"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["1782"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12237-026-01782-7","relation":{},"ISSN":["1559-2723","1559-2731"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1559-2723","type":"print"},{"value":"1559-2731","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,15]]},"assertion":[{"value":"16 April 2026","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"6 July 2026","order":2,"name":"revised","label":"Revised","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 July 2026","order":3,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"15 July 2026","order":4,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Not applicable. No personal information was identified nor disclosed.","order":1,"name":"Ethics","label":"Ethics Approval","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"Montagna is Co-Editor in Chief for Estuaries and Coasts. There are no financial interests to disclose.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","label":"Competing Interests","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}}],"article-number":"155"}}