{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,5]],"date-time":"2026-09-05T06:05:53Z","timestamp":1788588353440,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"Springer Science and Business Media LLC","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762992000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]],"date-time":"2025-11-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1762992000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.springernature.com\/gp\/researchers\/text-and-data-mining"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["link.springer.com"],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["DARU J Pharm Sci"],"DOI":"10.1007\/s40199-025-00580-z","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,14]],"date-time":"2025-11-14T01:25:43Z","timestamp":1763083543000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/springer_crossmark_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["An expert criticism on post-publication peer review platforms: the case of pubpeer"],"prefix":"10.1007","volume":"34","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3824-2462","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Aristidis","family":"Tsatsakis","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2619-1656","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michael","family":"Aschner","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2514-314X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dimosthenis","family":"Sarigiannis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8162-5955","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anca Oana","family":"Docea","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7567-6142","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Ramin","family":"Rezaee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9577-8840","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seyed Mojtaba","family":"Daghighi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1592-5703","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Andrey A.","family":"Svistunov","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6647-9470","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jos\u00e9 L.","family":"Domingo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0123-1209","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mohammad","family":"Abdollahi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"297","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"580_CR1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fncom.2012.00063","volume":"6","author":"J Hunter","year":"2012","unstructured":"Hunter J. Post-publication peer review: opening up scientific conversation. Front Comput Neurosci. 2012;6:63. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fncom.2012.00063.","journal-title":"Front Comput Neurosci"},{"key":"580_CR2","unstructured":"Bik EM, STAT News. The dark side of post-publication peer review. 2016. Available from: https:\/\/www.statnews.com\/2016\/11\/22\/post-publication-peer-review-pubpeer\/"},{"key":"580_CR3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"7","DOI":"10.1038\/d41586-019-02054-z","volume":"571","author":"I Oransky","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oransky I. A new kind of watchdog is shaking up research. Nature. 2019;571:7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/d41586-019-02054-z.","journal-title":"Nature"},{"issue":"5","key":"580_CR4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1511","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-016-9831-2","volume":"23","author":"JA Teixeira da Silva","year":"2017","unstructured":"Teixeira da Silva JA. The weaponization of publishing: a case study of a predatory vigilante (PubPeer). Sci Eng Ethics. 2017;23(5):1511\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-016-9831-2.","journal-title":"Sci Eng Ethics"},{"issue":"4","key":"580_CR5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1177\/014107680609900414","volume":"99","author":"R Smith","year":"2006","unstructured":"Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med. 2006;99(4):178\u201382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/014107680609900414.","journal-title":"J R Soc Med"},{"issue":"10","key":"580_CR6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1438","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100128022","volume":"263","author":"DF Horrobin","year":"1990","unstructured":"Horrobin DF. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. JAMA. 1990;263(10):1438\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.1990.03440100128022.","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"issue":"1","key":"580_CR7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"2","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.22784","volume":"64","author":"CJ Lee","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lee CJ, Sugimoto CR, Zhang G, Cronin B. Bias in peer review. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;64(1):2\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.22784.","journal-title":"J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol"},{"issue":"1","key":"580_CR8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.24888","volume":"39","author":"JPA Ioannidis","year":"2021","unstructured":"Ioannidis JPA. A new era of hyper-skepticism in science. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(1):1\u20133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jor.24888.","journal-title":"J Orthop Res"},{"key":"580_CR9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/j.ctvfjczxx","volume-title":"Why trust science?","author":"N Oreskes","year":"2019","unstructured":"Oreskes N. Why trust science? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2019."},{"issue":"3","key":"580_CR10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"571","DOI":"10.1111\/febs.16646","volume":"290","author":"VAUX DL","year":"2023","unstructured":"VAUX DL. Scientific misconduct: the elephant in the room. FEBS J. 2023;290(3):571\u20139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/febs.16646.","journal-title":"FEBS J"},{"key":"580_CR11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lfs.2020.117969","volume":"256","author":"M Baeeri","year":"2020","unstructured":"Baeeri M, Rahimifard M, Daghighi SM, Khan F, Salami SA, Moini-Nodeh S, et al. Retracted: Cannabinoids as anti-ROS in aged pancreatic islet cells. Life Sci. 2020;256:117969. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lfs.2020.117969.","journal-title":"Life Sci"},{"issue":"5","key":"580_CR12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"64","DOI":"10.1177\/1556264614552421","volume":"9","author":"JK Tijdink","year":"2014","unstructured":"Tijdink JK, Verbeke R, Smulders YM. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014;9(5):64\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1556264614552421.","journal-title":"J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics"},{"key":"580_CR13","unstructured":"Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). COPE Guidelines: Best practice for journal editors and retraction procedures. 2025. Available from: https:\/\/publicationethics.org"},{"key":"580_CR14","unstructured":"COPE Council. COPE Ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. Committee on Publication Ethics. 2017. Available from: https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/resources\/guidelines-new\/cope-ethical-guidelines-peer-reviewers"},{"key":"580_CR15","volume-title":"The principles of humane experimental technique","author":"WMS Russell","year":"1959","unstructured":"Russell WMS, Burch RL. The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen; 1959."},{"key":"580_CR16","unstructured":"Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Responding to anonymous whistleblowers. COPE Forum. 2018. Available from: https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/case\/responding-anonymous-whistleblowers"},{"key":"580_CR17","unstructured":"Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Facilitation and Integrity Subcommittee. 2023. Available from: https:\/\/publicationethics.org\/about\/subcommittees\/facilitation"}],"container-title":["DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40199-025-00580-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s40199-025-00580-z","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/content\/pdf\/10.1007\/s40199-025-00580-z.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,30]],"date-time":"2026-05-30T04:05:46Z","timestamp":1780113946000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/link.springer.com\/10.1007\/s40199-025-00580-z"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6]]}},"alternative-id":["580"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40199-025-00580-z","relation":{},"ISSN":["2008-2231"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2008-2231","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,11,13]]},"assertion":[{"value":"26 July 2025","order":1,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"8 October 2025","order":2,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"13 November 2025","order":3,"name":"first_online","label":"First Online","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"19 November 2025","order":5,"name":"change_date","label":"Change Date","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"Clarification","order":6,"name":"change_type","label":"Change Type","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"value":"The Editor-in-Chief has become of aware of concerns with this article. Action will be taken as appropriate following further investigation and discussion with the relevant stakeholders.","order":7,"name":"change_details","label":"Change Details","group":{"name":"ArticleHistory","label":"Article History"}},{"order":1,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Declarations"}},{"value":"All authors approved the final version of this article for publication.","order":2,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Consent for publication"}},{"value":"This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.","order":3,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Ethical approval"}},{"value":"The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.","order":4,"name":"Ethics","group":{"name":"EthicsHeading","label":"Conflict of interest"}}],"article-number":"1"}}