{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,23]],"date-time":"2023-04-23T22:10:44Z","timestamp":1682287844625},"reference-count":53,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1985,3,1]],"date-time":"1985-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":478483200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Information & Management"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1985,3]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2002,10,11]],"date-time":"2002-10-11T12:17:17Z","timestamp":1034338637000},"page":"147-153","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Re-examining the proprietary software protection issue in the U.S.A. for the 1980s"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"8","author":[{"given":"Charles R.","family":"Franz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB1","first-page":"165","volume":"188","year":"1951"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB2_1","first-page":"920","volume":"68","year":"1982","journal-title":"American Bar Association Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB2_2","first-page":"923","volume":"68","year":"1982","journal-title":"American Bar Association Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB3","volume":"297","author":"Anomaly in Computer Software Systems","year":"1981","journal-title":"8 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1879).","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM187910161011613"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB5","first-page":"152","article-title":"Copyright, Computers and Confusion","volume":"148","author":"Boorstyn","year":"1981","journal-title":"56 California State Bar Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB6","unstructured":"Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U.S. 780, 787\u2013788 (1877)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB7","unstructured":"Congress created the Commission by the Act of December 31, 1974, Pub. L. 93\u2013573, 88 Stat. 1873."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB8","series-title":"Final Report of the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works","year":"1978"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB9","series-title":"Final Report of the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works","year":"1978"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB10","unstructured":"Data Cash Systems, Inc. v. JS&A Group, Inc., 480 F. Supp 1063 (N.D. Ill. 1979), Affirmed on other grounds, 628 F. 2d 1038 (7th Cir. 1980)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB11","unstructured":"Diamond v. Bradley, 450 U.S. 381 (C.C.P.A. 1981)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB12","unstructured":"Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (C.C.P.A. 1981)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB13","unstructured":"Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. at 185, quoting Leroy v. Tatham, 14 How. 156, 175 (1853)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB14","unstructured":"Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. at 185, quoting Rubber-Tip Pencil Co. v. Howard, 20 Wall. 498, 507 (1874)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB15","series-title":"Final Report of the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works","year":"1978"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-7206(81)90002-1","article-title":"A Critical Review of Proprietary Software Protection","volume":"4","author":"Franz","year":"1981","journal-title":"Information & Management"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB17","first-page":"1237","volume":"573","year":"1978"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB18","unstructured":"GCA Corp. v. Chance, Copyright Law Reports (CCH) TP 25, 464 (N.D. Cal. August 31, 1982)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goldstein v. California, 412 U.S. 546 (1973).","DOI":"10.1259\/0007-1285-46-546-470"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972).","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-2836(72)90437-8"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB21","volume":"54","year":"1976","journal-title":"H.R. Rep. No. 1476"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB22","first-page":"127","article-title":"Patentability of Computer Programs","volume":"125","author":"Longhofer","year":"1982","journal-title":"Baylor L. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB23_1","first-page":"135","article-title":"Patentability of Computer Programs","volume":"125","author":"Longhofer","year":"1982","journal-title":"Baylor L. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB23_2","first-page":"302","article-title":"An anomaly in the Patent System: The Uncertain Status of Computer Software","volume":"273","year":"1981","journal-title":"8 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB24_1","first-page":"1397","volume":"442","year":"1971"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB24_2","first-page":"1398","volume":"442","year":"1971"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB24_3","first-page":"872","volume":"575","year":"1978"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB25","first-page":"882","volume":"431","year":"1970"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB26","article-title":"Diamond v. Diehr: A Turning Point","volume":"271","author":"Nimtz","year":"1981","journal-title":"8 Rutgers Computer and Technology Law Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB27","first-page":"912","volume":"684","year":"1982"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB28","unstructured":"Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584 (1978)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB29","first-page":"30","volume":"529","author":"Pope","year":"1979","journal-title":"Protection of Proprietary Interests in Computer Software"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB30_1","first-page":"1378","volume":"415","year":"1968"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB30_2","first-page":"1389","volume":"415","year":"1968"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pub. L. 96\u2013517, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 3028.","DOI":"10.3406\/lsoc.1980.1307"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB32","article-title":"The Legal Protection of Software Products","volume":"8","author":"Reiling","year":"1982","journal-title":"Patent Law Annuall"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB33","first-page":"95","volume":"14","author":"Rilee","year":"1980","journal-title":"The Protection of Property Rights in Computer Software"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB34","first-page":"558","article-title":"Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Computers and Computer Programs: Recent Developments","volume":"547","author":"Rose","year":"1982","journal-title":"9 Pepperdine L. Rev."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB35","first-page":"12","article-title":"protection pf Proprietary Software: Evolving Needs for Legal Protection in Modern Day Business","volume":"11","author":"Selinger","year":"1982","journal-title":"45 Texas Bar Journal"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB36","unstructured":"Tandy Corporation v. Personal Micro-Computers, Inc., 524 F. Supp 171 (N.D. Calif. 1981)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB37","unstructured":"United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB38","first-page":"758","volume":"618","year":"1980"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB39","unstructured":"White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co., 209 U.S. 1 (1908)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB40","unstructured":"17 U.S.C. #101 (1970)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB41","unstructured":"17 U.S.C. #102(b) (1976)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB42","unstructured":"17 U.S.C. #401(a) (1976)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB43","unstructured":"35 U.S.C. #101 (1970)."},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"37 C.F.R. #201.20(g) (1982).","DOI":"10.1016\/0041-624X(82)90019-1"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"33 Fed. Reg. 15, 609 (1968).","DOI":"10.1016\/0039-9140(68)80146-8"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"34 Fed. Reg. 15, 724 (1969).","DOI":"10.1177\/0019556119690411"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB47","first-page":"19","article-title":"Experts Say Apple Franklin Issue Undecided","year":"1984","journal-title":"Computer World"},{"key":"10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8_BIB48","first-page":"59","year":"1983","journal-title":"Computer World"}],"container-title":["Information & Management"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:0378720685900448?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:0378720685900448?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2023,4,23]],"date-time":"2023-04-23T21:48:16Z","timestamp":1682286496000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/0378720685900448"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1985,3]]},"references-count":53,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1985,3]]}},"alternative-id":["0378720685900448"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0378-7206(85)90044-8","relation":{},"ISSN":["0378-7206"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0378-7206","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1985,3]]}}}