{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,8]],"date-time":"2026-04-08T20:48:33Z","timestamp":1775681313076,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":29,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"9596","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,1]],"date-time":"2007-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1191196800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,1]],"date-time":"2007-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1191196800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000782","name":"European Science Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000782","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","em-consulte.com","thelancet.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Lancet"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/s0140-6736(07)61602-x","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2007,10,22]],"date-time":"2007-10-22T10:53:59Z","timestamp":1193050439000},"page":"1453-1457","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15666,"title":["The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"370","author":[{"given":"Erik","family":"von Elm","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Douglas G","family":"Altman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Matthias","family":"Egger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Stuart J","family":"Pocock","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Peter C","family":"G\u00f8tzsche","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Jan P","family":"Vandenbroucke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7430.39","article-title":"Assessing the quality of research","volume":"328","author":"Glasziou","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1215","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.312.7040.1215","article-title":"Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care","volume":"312","author":"Black","year":"1996","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"635","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.050873","article-title":"Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies","volume":"174","author":"Papanikolaou","year":"2006","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"42","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.323.7303.42","article-title":"Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials","volume":"323","author":"J\u00fcni","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.316.7125.140","article-title":"Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies","volume":"316","author":"Egger","year":"1998","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"883","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.38250.571088.55","article-title":"Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice","volume":"329","author":"Pocock","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"204","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.bp.106.027250","article-title":"Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: literature survey","volume":"190","author":"Lee","year":"2007","journal-title":"Br J Psychiatry"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"280","DOI":"10.1093\/aje\/kwi042","article-title":"Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research","volume":"161","author":"Tooth","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1919","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.281.20.1919","article-title":"Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research: the need for methodological standards","volume":"281","author":"Bogardus","year":"1999","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"609","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a113231","article-title":"Guidelines for documentation of epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology Work Group of the Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group","volume":"114","year":"1981","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2006","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.285.15.2006","article-title":"CONSORT revised \u2013 improving the reporting of randomized trials","volume":"285","author":"Rennie","year":"2001","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1191","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)04337-3","article-title":"The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials","volume":"357","author":"Moher","year":"2001","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"349","DOI":"10.1503\/cmaj.1040031","article-title":"Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond","volume":"171","author":"Moher","year":"2004","journal-title":"CMAJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.5694\/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x","article-title":"Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review","volume":"185","author":"Plint","year":"2006","journal-title":"Med J Aust"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1996","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.285.15.1996","article-title":"Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials","volume":"285","author":"Egger","year":"2001","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)04149-5","article-title":"Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses","volume":"354","author":"Moher","year":"1999","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"40","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-138-1-200301070-00010","article-title":"Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative","volume":"138","author":"Bossuyt","year":"2003","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e297","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040297","article-title":"Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration","volume":"4","author":"Vandenbroucke","year":"2007","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib19","unstructured":"Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. for the STROBE initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med (in press)."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib20","unstructured":"Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. for the STROBE initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology (in press)."},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"781","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00009","article-title":"Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement","volume":"141","author":"Ioannidis","year":"2004","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"702","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.328.7441.702","article-title":"CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials","volume":"328","author":"Campbell","year":"2004","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1152","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.295.10.1152","article-title":"Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement","volume":"295","author":"Piaggio","year":"2006","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"364","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013","article-title":"Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement","volume":"144","author":"Gagnier","year":"2006","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.1038\/ng0106-3","article-title":"A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology","volume":"38","author":"Ioannidis","year":"2006","journal-title":"Nat Genet"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"378","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1365-2133.2001.04404.x","article-title":"CONSORT your submissions: an update for authors","volume":"145","author":"Ormerod","year":"2001","journal-title":"Br J Dermatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"437","DOI":"10.1016\/j.annemergmed.2004.09.022","article-title":"Suggestions for improving the reporting of clinical research: the role of narrative","volume":"45","author":"Schriger","year":"2005","journal-title":"Ann Emerg Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"666","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dym018","article-title":"Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography","volume":"36","author":"Sanderson","year":"2007","journal-title":"Int J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"81","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.325.7355.81","article-title":"What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers","volume":"325","author":"Bartlett","year":"2002","journal-title":"BMJ"}],"container-title":["The Lancet"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S014067360761602X?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S014067360761602X?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,25]],"date-time":"2025-09-25T23:55:03Z","timestamp":1758844503000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S014067360761602X"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2007,10]]},"references-count":29,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9596","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2007,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S014067360761602X"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s0140-6736(07)61602-x","relation":{},"ISSN":["0140-6736"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0140-6736","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2007,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"The Lancet","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(07)61602-X","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"simple-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2007  Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}