{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T00:09:47Z","timestamp":1761610187894,"version":"build-2065373602"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2002,10,1]],"date-time":"2002-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1033430400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2002,10,1]],"date-time":"2002-10-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1033430400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,7,29]],"date-time":"2013-07-29T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1375056000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":3954,"URL":"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/3.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2002,10]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/s1571-0661(04)80587-5","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2004,9,29]],"date-time":"2004-09-29T12:47:47Z","timestamp":1096462067000},"page":"39-53","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Argumentative Agent Deliberation, Roles and Context"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"70","author":[{"given":"Antonis C.","family":"Kakas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Pavlos","family":"Mora\u00eftis","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB1","first-page":"31","article-title":"Modelling dialogues using argumentation","author":"Amgoud","year":"2000","journal-title":"ICMZS-00"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"L. Amgoud and S. Parsons. Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences. In ATAL01, 2001.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45448-9_14"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB3","first-page":"338","article-title":"Arguments, dialogue and negotiation","author":"Amgoud","year":"2000","journal-title":"ECAI-00"},{"issue":"1-2","key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"63","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(97)00015-5","article-title":"An abstract, argumentation-theoretic framework for default reasoning","volume":"93","author":"Bondarenko","year":"1997","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"issue":"2","key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"257","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/11.2.257","article-title":"Dynamic argument systems: a formal model of argumentation process based on situation calculus","volume":"11","author":"Brewka","year":"2001","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB6","unstructured":"Y. Dimopoulos and A. C. Kakas. Logic programming without negation as failure. In Proc. ILPS'95, pp. 369\u2013384, 1995."},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"321","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X","article-title":"On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games","volume":"77","author":"Dung","year":"1995","journal-title":"Artificial Intelligence"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB8","unstructured":"P.M. Dung, A. C. Kakas, and P. Mancarella. Negation as failure revisited. In University of Pisa Technical Report, 1992."},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB9","unstructured":"A. C. Kakas, P. Mancarella, and P.M. Dung. The acceptability semantics for logic programs. In Proc. ICLP'94, pp. 504\u2013519, 1994."},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB10","first-page":"160","article-title":"Default reasoning via negation as failure","volume":"Vol. 810","author":"Kakas","year":"1994","journal-title":"LNAI"},{"issue":"6","key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"719","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/2.6.719","article-title":"Abductive logic programming","volume":"2","author":"Kakas","year":"1992","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB12","first-page":"254","article-title":"E-res: Reasoning about actions, events and observations","author":"Kakas","year":"2001","journal-title":"LPNMR '01"},{"issue":"4","key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB13","first-page":"515","article-title":"Computing argumentation in logic programming","volume":"9","author":"Kakas","year":"1999","journal-title":"JLC"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB14","unstructured":"N. Karacapilidis and P. Moraitis. Engineering issues in inter-agent dialogues. In Proc. of 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligent (ECAI02), Lyon, France, 2002."},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0004-3702(98)00078-2","article-title":"Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation","volume":"104","author":"Kraus","year":"1998","journal-title":"Artificial Intelliegence"},{"issue":"1","key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB16","article-title":"Formalising collaborative decision-making and practical reasoning in multi-agent systems","volume":"12","author":"Panzarasa","year":"2002","journal-title":"Journal of Logic and Computation, to appear"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"261","DOI":"10.1093\/logcom\/8.3.261","article-title":"Agents that reason and negotiate by arguying","volume":"8","author":"Parsons","year":"1998","journal-title":"Logic and Computation"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"377","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)90057-4","article-title":"Justification and defeat","volume":"Vol 67","author":"Pollock","year":"1994","journal-title":"Artficial Intelligence"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"331","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00118496","article-title":"A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning","volume":"4","author":"Prakken","year":"1996","journal-title":"Artficial Intelligence and Law"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"F. Sadri, F. Toni, and P. Torroni. Dialogues for negotiation: agent varieties and dialogue sequences. In ATAL01, 2001.","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45448-9_30"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB21","first-page":"167","article-title":"A framework for argumentation-based negotiation","author":"Sierra","year":"1997","journal-title":"ATAL-97"},{"key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB22","first-page":"517","article-title":"Argumentation: Planning other agents' plans","author":"Sycara","year":"1989","journal-title":"IJCAI-89"},{"issue":"3","key":"10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5_NEWBIB23","first-page":"285","article-title":"The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design","volume":"3","author":"Wooldridge","year":"2000","journal-title":"JAAMAS"}],"container-title":["Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1571066104805875?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S1571066104805875?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,28]],"date-time":"2025-10-28T00:05:35Z","timestamp":1761609935000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S1571066104805875"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2002,10]]},"references-count":23,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2002,10]]}},"alternative-id":["S1571066104805875"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/s1571-0661(04)80587-5","relation":{},"ISSN":["1571-0661"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1571-0661"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2002,10]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Argumentative Agent Deliberation, Roles and Context","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1571-0661(04)80587-5","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"converted-article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2002 Published by Elsevier B.V.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}