{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,25]],"date-time":"2026-04-25T08:08:56Z","timestamp":1777104536738,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,1]],"date-time":"2005-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1125532800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,1]],"date-time":"2005-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1125532800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,1]],"date-time":"2005-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1125532800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,1]],"date-time":"2005-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1125532800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,1]],"date-time":"2005-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1125532800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,1]],"date-time":"2005-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1125532800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,1]],"date-time":"2005-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1125532800000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2005,9,11]],"date-time":"2005-09-11T11:04:24Z","timestamp":1126436664000},"page":"1243-1247","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"special_numbering":"S","title":["The impact of gestational age on the sonographic detection of aneuploidy"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"193","author":[{"given":"Amy H.","family":"Picklesimer","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"suffix":"Jr.","given":"Kenneth J.","family":"Moise","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Honor M.","family":"Wolfe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"775","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.215.3.r00ma36775","article-title":"The \u201cgenetic sonogram\u201d: comparison of the index scoring system with the age-adjusted US risk assessment","volume":"215","author":"Winter","year":"2000","journal-title":"Radiology"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"449","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1992.11.9.449","article-title":"Sonographic scoring index for prenatal detection of chromosomal abnormalities","volume":"11","author":"Benacerraf","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1998.12010008.x","article-title":"Age-adjusted ultrasound risk assessment for fetal Down's syndrome during the second trimester: description of the method and analysis of 142 cases","volume":"12","author":"Nyberg","year":"1998","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib4","first-page":"185","article-title":"Choroid plexus cysts in the fetus: a benign anatomic variant or pathologic entity? Report of 41 cases and review of the literature","volume":"72","author":"Chitkara","year":"1988","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"381","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1995.05060381.x","article-title":"Natural history of trisomy 21 fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness","volume":"5","author":"Pandya","year":"1995","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"253","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1995.14.3.253","article-title":"The resolving nuchal fold in second trimester fetuses: not necessarily reassuring","volume":"14","author":"Bromley","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1068","DOI":"10.1002\/pd.715","article-title":"Fetal karyotyping after 18 weeks of gestation for late ultrasound findings in a low risk population","volume":"23","author":"Drummond","year":"2003","journal-title":"Prenat Diagn"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"385","DOI":"10.1159\/000263856","article-title":"Comparison of intrapartum fetal monitor tracings of karyotypically abnormal and control infants","volume":"8","author":"Treadwell","year":"1993","journal-title":"Fetal Diagn Ther"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1087","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2002.21.10.1087","article-title":"The genetic sonogram: a method of risk assessment in the second trimester","volume":"21","author":"Bromley","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"297","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.1995.14.4.297","article-title":"Can the presumed risk of autosomal trisomy be decreased in fetuses of older women following a normal sonogram?","volume":"14","author":"Nadel","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib11","first-page":"523","article-title":"The incorporation of maternal age into the sonographic scoring index for the detection at 14-20 weeks of fetuses with Down's syndrome","volume":"18","author":"Bromley","year":"1999","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"514","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70388-6","article-title":"An alternative for women initially declining amniocentesis: individual Down syndrome odds on the basis of maternal age and multiple ultrasonographic markers","volume":"179","author":"Bahado-Singh","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"898","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70322-4","article-title":"Utility of minor ultrasonographic markers in the prediction of abnormal karyotype at a prenatal diagnostic center","volume":"181","author":"Sohl","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"639","DOI":"10.7863\/jum.2001.20.6.639","article-title":"Normal midtrimester (17-20 weeks) genetic sonogram decreases amniocentesis rate in a high-risk population","volume":"20","author":"Pinette","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Ultrasound Med"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937805007246?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937805007246?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,11]],"date-time":"2024-05-11T08:48:27Z","timestamp":1715417307000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937805007246"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2005,9]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2005,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937805007246"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2005,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"The impact of gestational age on the sonographic detection of aneuploidy","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2005.05.045","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2005 Mosby, Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}