{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,16]],"date-time":"2025-09-16T16:44:40Z","timestamp":1758041080468,"version":"3.44.0"},"reference-count":13,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,1]],"date-time":"2006-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1149120000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,1]],"date-time":"2006-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1149120000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,1]],"date-time":"2006-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1149120000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,1]],"date-time":"2006-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1149120000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,1]],"date-time":"2006-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1149120000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,1]],"date-time":"2006-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1149120000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2006,6,1]],"date-time":"2006-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1149120000000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2006,4,24]],"date-time":"2006-04-24T22:11:30Z","timestamp":1145916690000},"page":"1585-1590","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: A randomized, controlled trial"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"194","author":[{"given":"Nathalie","family":"Leroux","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Emmanuel","family":"Bujold","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"587","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.289.6445.587","article-title":"West Berkshire perineal management trial","volume":"289","author":"Sleep","year":"1984","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib2","series-title":"A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth","first-page":"40","article-title":"Repair of perineal trauma","author":"Grant","year":"1989"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1054\/midw.2002.0313","article-title":"A randomised trial, conducted by midwives, of perineal repairs comparing a polyglycolic suture material and chromic catgut","volume":"18","author":"Upton","year":"2002","journal-title":"Midwifery"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"441","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1998.tb10131.x","article-title":"The Ipswich Childbirth study: 2, a randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair","volume":"105","author":"Mackrodt","year":"1998","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib5","series-title":"The Cochrane Library, issue 2","article-title":"Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair (Cochrane Review)","author":"Kettle","year":"2005"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1272","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03224.x","article-title":"The Southmead perineal suture study: a randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal trauma","volume":"96","author":"Mahomed","year":"1989","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib7","series-title":"Williams obstetrics","first-page":"309","article-title":"Conduct of normal labor and delivery","year":"2001"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"277","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(75)90044-5","article-title":"The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods","volume":"1","author":"Melzack","year":"1975","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"191","DOI":"10.1016\/0304-3959(87)91074-8","article-title":"The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire","volume":"30","author":"Melzack","year":"1987","journal-title":"Pain"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib10","first-page":"30","article-title":"A comparison between chromic catgut and polyglycolic acid sutures in episiotomy repair","volume":"38","author":"Banninger","year":"1978","journal-title":"Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib11","first-page":"27","article-title":"Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide","volume":"69","author":"McElhinney","year":"2000","journal-title":"Ulster Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2217","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(02)09312-1","article-title":"Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial","volume":"359","author":"Kettle","year":"2002","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1308","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000128218.85151.43","article-title":"Randomized comparison of chromic versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 for postpartum perineal repair","volume":"103","author":"Greenberg","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937806000536?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937806000536?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:15:45Z","timestamp":1757585745000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937806000536"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2006,6]]},"references-count":13,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2006,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937806000536"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0002-9378"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2006,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: A randomized, controlled trial","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.011","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2006 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}