{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,1,13]],"date-time":"2026-01-13T07:12:58Z","timestamp":1768288378756,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":19,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,1]],"date-time":"2008-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1212278400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,1]],"date-time":"2008-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1212278400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,1]],"date-time":"2008-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1212278400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,1]],"date-time":"2008-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1212278400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,1]],"date-time":"2008-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1212278400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,1]],"date-time":"2008-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1212278400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,1]],"date-time":"2008-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1212278400000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,6,5]],"date-time":"2008-06-05T08:07:55Z","timestamp":1212653275000},"page":"703.e1-703.e6","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":68,"title":["First- vs second-trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"198","author":[{"given":"Aaron B.","family":"Caughey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"James M.","family":"Nicholson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"A. Eugene","family":"Washington","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib1","series-title":"Management of postterm pregnancy","year":"2004"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib2","first-page":"467","article-title":"Post-term pregnancy","volume":"56","author":"Hauth","year":"1980","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"241","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(65)90207-3","article-title":"The problem of postterm pregnancy","volume":"91","author":"Lucas","year":"1965","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"429","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a112641","article-title":"Causes of perinatal mortality excess in prolonged gestations","volume":"108","author":"Naeye","year":"1978","journal-title":"Am J Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109216.24211.D4","article-title":"Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation","volume":"103","author":"Caughey","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"392","DOI":"10.1038\/sj.jp.7211528","article-title":"The impact of the interaction between increasing gestational age and obstetrical risk on birth outcomes: Evidence of a varying optimal time of delivery","volume":"26","author":"Nicholson","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.068","article-title":"Neonatal complications of term pregnancies: Rates increase in a continuous, not threshold fashion","volume":"192","author":"Caughey","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib8","first-page":"189","article-title":"Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation","volume":"97","author":"Taipale","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1660","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.127601","article-title":"Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination","volume":"187","author":"Savitz","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1077","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.09.065","article-title":"First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: A randomized controlled trial","volume":"190","author":"Bennett","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1587","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM199206113262402","article-title":"Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy","volume":"326","author":"Hannah","year":"1992","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib12","first-page":"1312","article-title":"Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: A systematic review with meta-analysis","volume":"101","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"550","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(88)80005-X","article-title":"The efficacy of starting postterm antenatal testing at 41 weeks as compared with 42 weeks of gestational age","volume":"159","author":"Bochner","year":"1988","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004945.pub2","article-title":"Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term","author":"G\u00fclmezoglu","year":"2006","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_fr1","series-title":"ACOG Technical Bulletin No. 130","year":"1989"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_fr2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"476","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(15)31849-4","article-title":"Studies in prolonged pregnancies","volume":"103","author":"Beischer","year":"1969","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_fr3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"178","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1469-0705.1996.08030178.x","article-title":"A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations","volume":"8","author":"Tunon","year":"1996","journal-title":"Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_fr4","first-page":"189","article-title":"Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last Menstrual period in early gestation","volume":"97","author":"Taipale","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034_fr5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"57","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000109216.24211.D4","article-title":"Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation","volume":"103","author":"Caughey","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937808002986?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937808002986?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:27:20Z","timestamp":1757586440000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937808002986"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"references-count":19,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937808002986"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,6]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"First- vs second-trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.034","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}