{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,15]],"date-time":"2026-05-15T16:16:36Z","timestamp":1778861796173,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":77,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,8,1]],"date-time":"2008-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1217548800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2008,8,1]],"date-time":"2008-08-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1217548800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,8]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2008,7,30]],"date-time":"2008-07-30T04:16:23Z","timestamp":1217391383000},"page":"177-188","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":96,"title":["Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"199","author":[{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Heinemann","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Geoff","family":"Gillen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Luis","family":"Sanchez-Ramos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andrew M.","family":"Kaunitz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib1","first-page":"21","article-title":"Role of the cervix in the induction of labor","volume":"59","author":"Jagani","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"3259","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1990.03440240043010","article-title":"Vaginal prostaglandin E2 and fatal amniotic fluid embolus","volume":"263","author":"Less","year":"1990","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"598","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1984.tb04811.x","article-title":"Neonatal death associated with induction of labor with intravaginal prostaglandin E2: case report","volume":"91","author":"Simmons","year":"1984","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"941","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1978.tb15858.x","article-title":"A comparison of four methods of ripening the unfavorable cervix","volume":"85","author":"Wilson","year":"1978","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib5","first-page":"598","article-title":"Ripening of the human cervix and induction of labor with intracervical purified porcine relaxin","volume":"68","author":"MacLennan","year":"1986","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib6","first-page":"440","article-title":"Efficacy and safety of Laminaria digitata for preinduction ripening of the cervix","volume":"60","author":"Kazzi","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"263","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.02.010","article-title":"Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"89","author":"Afolabi","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500040737","article-title":"Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical Foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol","volume":"25","author":"Adeniji","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1632","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.03.033","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"191","author":"Levy","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2003.12.039","article-title":"Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion","volume":"191","author":"Guinn","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"211","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(03)00266-2","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and saline infusion vs cervical dinoprostone","volume":"83","author":"Moini","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1896","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)04149-5","article-title":"Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials: the QUOROM statement: quality of reporting meta-analyses","volume":"354","author":"Moher","year":"1999","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib13","first-page":"719","article-title":"Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease","volume":"22","author":"Mantel","year":"1959","journal-title":"J Natl Cancer Inst"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"177","DOI":"10.1016\/0197-2456(86)90046-2","article-title":"Meta-analyses in clinical trials","volume":"7","author":"DerSimonian","year":"1986","journal-title":"Control Clin Trials"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"629","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.315.7109.629","article-title":"Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test","volume":"315","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib16","first-page":"5","article-title":"Statistical methods in cancer research: vol 1: the analysis of case control studies","volume":"32","author":"Breslow","year":"1980","journal-title":"IARC Sci Publ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"224","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-107-2-224","article-title":"Meta-analysis in clinical research","volume":"107","author":"L'Abbe","year":"1987","journal-title":"Ann Intern Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"234","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000198629.44186.c8","article-title":"Induction of labor using a Foley balloon, with and without extra-amniotic saline infusion","volume":"107","author":"Karjane","year":"2006","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"138","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000128947.31887.94","article-title":"Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction","volume":"104","author":"Ramsey","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib20","first-page":"751","article-title":"Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting","volume":"98","author":"Sciscione","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib21","first-page":"323","article-title":"Extra-amniotic prostaglandin E2 gel vs amniotomy for elective induction of labour","volume":"185","author":"Thiery","year":"1981","journal-title":"Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"545","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00234-I","article-title":"A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion versus Laminaria for cervical ripening","volume":"86","author":"Lin","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2001.112903","article-title":"Laminaria versus extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening in second-trimester labor inductions","volume":"184","author":"Hogg","year":"2001","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1058","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.1997.tb12067.x","article-title":"Extra-amniotic saline infusion for induction of labour in antepartum fetal death: a cost effective method worthy of wider use","volume":"104","author":"Mahomed","year":"1997","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"35","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(98)00174-X","article-title":"Extra-amniotic saline infusion versus extra-amniotic prostaglandin F2\u03b1 for cervical ripening and induction of labor","volume":"64","author":"Mawire","year":"1999","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib26","first-page":"375","article-title":"Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study","volume":"97","author":"Sherman","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1145","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70031-0","article-title":"Induction of labor with use of a Foley catheter and extraamniotic corticosteroids","volume":"177","author":"Barkai","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib28","first-page":"98","article-title":"Foley catheter under traction versus extra-amniotic prostaglandin gel in pre-treatment of unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"34","author":"Mahomed","year":"1988","journal-title":"Cent Afr J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib29","first-page":"146","article-title":"Nonpharmaceutical ripening of the unfavorable cervix and induction of labor by a novel double balloon device","volume":"77","author":"Atad","year":"1991","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib30","first-page":"3379","article-title":"The effect of induction of labor with endocervical balloon catheter with or without estradiol therapy","volume":"143","author":"Pedersen","year":"1981","journal-title":"Ugeskr Laeger"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1108","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70090-6","article-title":"A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term","volume":"181","author":"Abramovici","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"223","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00389-4","article-title":"A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor","volume":"87","author":"Atad","year":"1996","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib33","first-page":"938","article-title":"Ripening the highly unfavorable cervix with extra-amniotic saline instillation or vaginal prostaglandin E2 application","volume":"73","author":"Schreyer","year":"1989","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"issue":"suppl","key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib34","first-page":"S57","article-title":"A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley for labor induction","volume":"187","author":"Huang","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib35","article-title":"Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction","volume":"4","author":"Kashanian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib36","first-page":"11","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared","volume":"46","author":"Greybush","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"55","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(99)70149-3","article-title":"A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"180","author":"Sciscione","year":"1999","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"30","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1986.tb01524.x","article-title":"Preparation for induction of labour of the unfavorable cervix with Foley catheter compared with vaginal prostaglandin","volume":"26","author":"Thomas","year":"1986","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"119","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(95)80009-H","article-title":"Induction of labour at term in primigravidae with low Bishop's score a comparison of three methods","volume":"58","author":"Orhue","year":"1995","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib40","first-page":"603","article-title":"A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"97","author":"Sciscione","year":"2001","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib41","first-page":"106","article-title":"Extra-amniotic saline, Laminaria, or prostaglandin E2 gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"96","author":"Guinn","year":"2000","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib42","first-page":"899","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized trail of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol","volume":"46","author":"Rust","year":"2001","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"164","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013","article-title":"Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores","volume":"120","author":"Gelisen","year":"2005","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib44","first-page":"317","article-title":"Trial of extra amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin versus prostaglandin E2 pessary for induction of labor","volume":"13","author":"Mazhar","year":"2003","journal-title":"J Coll Physicians Surg Pak"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"45","DOI":"10.1080\/00016349808565810","article-title":"Extramniotic saline infusion is promising in preparing the cervix for induction of labor","volume":"77","author":"Hemlin","year":"1998","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib46","first-page":"290","article-title":"A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices","volume":"82","author":"Rouben","year":"1993","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1016\/S0020-7292(02)00392-2","article-title":"Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"81","author":"Niromanesh","year":"2003","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"687","DOI":"10.1016\/0002-9378(95)90594-4","article-title":"Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter","volume":"172","author":"St. Onge","year":"1995","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1031","DOI":"10.1067\/S0002-9378(03)00842-1","article-title":"A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction","volume":"189","author":"Chung","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib50","first-page":"271","article-title":"A randomized comparison of extra-amniotic saline infusion and intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening","volume":"93","author":"Goldman","year":"1999","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"258","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2004.12.006","article-title":"Hyaluronidase versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening in high-risk term and post term pregnancies","volume":"88","author":"Surita","year":"2005","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"565","DOI":"10.1080\/01443610500231450","article-title":"Randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour","volume":"25","author":"Owolabi","year":"2005","journal-title":"J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib53","first-page":"91","article-title":"Low dose intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening","volume":"80","author":"Tabowei","year":"2003","journal-title":"East Afr Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"189","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(94)90118-X","article-title":"Induction of labour by balloon catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion (BCEAS): a randomized comparison with PGE2 vaginal pessaries","volume":"53","author":"Lyndrup","year":"1994","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib55","first-page":"492","article-title":"Maturations cervicales: comparaison de trios m\u00e9thodes","volume":"88","author":"Allouche","year":"1993","journal-title":"Rev Fr Gyn\u00e9col Obst\u00e9t"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1039","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2000.106052","article-title":"A randomized trial of misoprostol versus extra-amniotic sodium chloride infusion with oxytocin for induction of labor","volume":"182","author":"Buccellato","year":"2000","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2004-823777","article-title":"A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women","volume":"21","author":"Culver","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vengalil SR, Guinn DA, Olabi NF, Burd LI, Owen J. A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 91:774\u20139.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0029-7844(98)00013-1"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"847","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.126976","article-title":"A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction","volume":"187","author":"Mullin","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1124","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2002.123821","article-title":"Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: a randomized trial of 3 techniques","volume":"186","author":"Barrileaux","year":"2002","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1333","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(98)70340-0","article-title":"Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an Intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone","volume":"178","author":"Perry","year":"1998","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib62","first-page":"362","article-title":"Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"84","author":"Dalui","year":"2005","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib63","first-page":"381","article-title":"A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening","volume":"11","author":"Sharami","year":"2005","journal-title":"Med Sci Monit"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib64","first-page":"375","article-title":"Labour induction at term: a randomized trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone","volume":"93","author":"Matonhodze","year":"2003","journal-title":"S Afr Med J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib65","first-page":"823","article-title":"Combining medical and mechanical methods of cervical ripening: does it increase the likelihood of successful induction of labor?","volume":"41","author":"Sullivan","year":"1996","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"547","DOI":"10.26719\/2004.10.4-5.547","article-title":"Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas","volume":"10","author":"Al-Taani","year":"2004","journal-title":"East Mediterr Health J"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"291","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.1996.tb02713.x","article-title":"Cervical ripening before induction of labour in patients with an unfavorable cervix: a comparative randomized study of the Atad Ripener Device, prostaglandin E2 vaginal pessary, and prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel","volume":"36","author":"Yuen","year":"1996","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obster Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"145","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(96)70264-8","article-title":"A prospective randomized evaluation of a hygroscopic dilator, Dilapan, in the preinduction ripening of patients undergoing induction of labor","volume":"175","author":"Gilson","year":"1996","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib69","first-page":"18","article-title":"Cervical ripening with prostaglandin gel and hygroscopic dilators","volume":"6","author":"Hibbard","year":"1998","journal-title":"Infect Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"614","DOI":"10.1016\/0029-7844(95)00013-H","article-title":"Pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of two methods","volume":"85","author":"Krammer","year":"1995","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib71","first-page":"355","article-title":"Hygroscopic cervical dilators and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening a randomized, prospective comparison","volume":"37","author":"Sanchez-Ramos","year":"1992","journal-title":"J Reprod Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib72","first-page":"617","article-title":"Laminaria for preinduction cervical ripening","volume":"60","author":"Gower","year":"1982","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib73","first-page":"260","article-title":"Cervical ripening: randomized comparison of intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel with prostaglandin E2 gel plus Laminaria tents","volume":"6","author":"Turnquest","year":"1997","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"205","DOI":"10.1016\/0028-2243(89)90002-6","article-title":"Lamicel does not promote induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial","volume":"30","author":"Lyndrup","year":"1989","journal-title":"Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"363","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(96)90538-3","article-title":"Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews","volume":"347","author":"Moher","year":"1996","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"159","DOI":"10.1016\/0895-4356(94)00098-B","article-title":"Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a Tower of Babel bias?","volume":"48","author":"Gregoire","year":"1995","journal-title":"J Clin Epidemiol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"326","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(97)02419-7","article-title":"Language bias in randomized controlled trials published in English and German","volume":"350","author":"Egger","year":"1997","journal-title":"Lancet"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937808005450?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937808005450?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:28:14Z","timestamp":1757586494000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937808005450"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2008,8]]},"references-count":77,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2008,8]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937808005450"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2008,8]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.05.005","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2008 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}