{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,26]],"date-time":"2026-09-26T16:20:35Z","timestamp":1790439635933,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":44,"publisher":"Elsevier BV","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/tdm\/userlicense\/1.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.elsevier.com\/legal\/tdmrep-license"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-017"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-037"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-012"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-029"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,1]],"date-time":"2009-09-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1251763200000},"content-version":"stm-asf","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15223\/policy-004"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["ajog.org","clinicalkey.com","clinicalkey.com.au","clinicalkey.es","clinicalkey.fr","clinicalkey.jp","elsevier.com","sciencedirect.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]},"DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,9,4]],"date-time":"2009-09-04T06:05:05Z","timestamp":1252044305000},"page":"308.e1-308.e8","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/elsevier_cm_policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":161,"title":["Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor"],"prefix":"10.1016","volume":"201","author":[{"given":"Donal J.","family":"Brennan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Michael S.","family":"Robson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Martina","family":"Murphy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Colm","family":"O'Herlihy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"78","reference":[{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib1","first-page":"436","article-title":"Appropriate technology for birth","volume":"2","year":"1985","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"293","DOI":"10.1016\/j.clp.2008.03.007","article-title":"Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes","volume":"35","author":"MacDorman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Clin Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"203","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00105.x","article-title":"Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004","volume":"33","author":"Denk","year":"2006","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"316","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2007.00753.x","article-title":"A new way of looking at caesarean section births","volume":"47","author":"McCarthy","year":"2007","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"891","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.05.072","article-title":"The continuing effectiveness of active management of first labor, despite a doubling in overall nulliparous cesarean delivery","volume":"191","author":"Foley","year":"2004","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"415","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2008.00867.x","article-title":"Elective caesarean delivery at maternal request: a preliminary study of motivations influencing women's decision-making","volume":"48","author":"Robson","year":"2008","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"601","DOI":"10.1097\/01.OGX.0000133942.76239.57","article-title":"Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review","volume":"59","author":"Wax","year":"2004","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol Surv"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"946","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMsb022734","article-title":"Elective primary cesarean delivery","volume":"348","author":"Minkoff","year":"2003","journal-title":"N Engl J Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"28","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-789X.2008.00537.x","article-title":"Obesity as an independent risk factor for elective and emergency caesarean delivery in nulliparous women\u2014systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies","volume":"10","author":"Poobalan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Obes Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2008-1061496","article-title":"Obesity and mode of delivery in primigravid and multigravid women","volume":"25","author":"Lynch","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Perinatol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340701762975","article-title":"Maternal body mass index at delivery and risk of caesarean due to dystocia in low risk pregnancies","volume":"87","author":"Roman","year":"2008","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"894","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.322.7291.894","article-title":"Do obstetric complications explain high caesarean section rates among women over 30?","volume":"322","author":"Bell","year":"2001","journal-title":"BMJ"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1178","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0001-6349.2004.00506.x","article-title":"Association between maternal age and the likelihood of a cesarean section: a population-based multivariate logistic regression analysis","volume":"83","author":"Lin","year":"2004","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"12","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1479-828X.2005.00333.x","article-title":"Pregnancy outcomes in women of very advanced maternal age","volume":"45","author":"Callaway","year":"2005","journal-title":"Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"694.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.03.026","article-title":"Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors","volume":"198","author":"Coonrod","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"621","DOI":"10.1080\/00016340902818196","article-title":"No correlation between cesarean section rates and perinatal mortality of singleton infants over 2,500 g","volume":"88","author":"Jonsdottir","year":"2009","journal-title":"Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"102","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2004.06.102","article-title":"Term neonatal asphyxial seizures and peripartum deaths: lack of correlation with a rising cesarean delivery rate","volume":"192","author":"Foley","year":"2005","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"395","DOI":"10.1016\/S0002-9378(97)70505-2","article-title":"Multivariate analysis of risk factors for operative delivery in nulliparous women","volume":"176","author":"Turcot","year":"1997","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"579","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13296.x","article-title":"The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit","volume":"107","author":"Thomas","year":"2000","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib20","first-page":"1352","article-title":"Risk factors for cesarean delivery at presentation of nulliparous patients in labor","volume":"102","author":"Wilkes","year":"2003","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"53","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1523-536X.2006.00146.x","article-title":"Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: a meta-analysis","volume":"34","author":"Chaillet","year":"2007","journal-title":"Birth"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e8","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.09.004","article-title":"Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates","volume":"200","author":"Brennan","year":"2009","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"23","DOI":"10.1017\/S0965539501000122","article-title":"Classification of caesarean sections","volume":"12","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Fetal Matern Med Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1053\/beog.2000.0156","article-title":"Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?","volume":"15","author":"Robson","year":"2001","journal-title":"Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"181","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijgo.2005.10.016","article-title":"Indications associated with increased cesarean section rates in a Swedish hospital","volume":"92","author":"Florica","year":"2006","journal-title":"Int J Gynaecol Obstet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"864","DOI":"10.1067\/mob.2003.217","article-title":"Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway","volume":"188","author":"Kol\u00e5s","year":"2003","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"690","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000152338.76759.38","article-title":"Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women","volume":"105","author":"Vrouenraets","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"698","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000157436.68847.3b","article-title":"Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas","volume":"105","author":"Vahratian","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD006794.pub2","article-title":"Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for prevention of, or therapy for, delay in first stage spontaneous labour compared with routine care","author":"Wei","year":"2009","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1644","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.03.013","article-title":"Is there a useful cesarean birth measure?","volume":"194","author":"Main","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"77","DOI":"10.1097\/01.AOG.0000147843.12196.00","article-title":"Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor","volume":"105","author":"Bailit","year":"2005","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"50","DOI":"10.1080\/jmf.11.1.50.53","article-title":"Post-term pregnancy: should induction of labor be considered before 42 weeks?","volume":"11","author":"Treger","year":"2002","journal-title":"J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD004907.pub2","article-title":"Package of care for active management in labour for reducing caesarean section rates in low-risk women","author":"Brown","year":"2008","journal-title":"Cochrane Database Syst Rev"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"760","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.05.052","article-title":"Dystocia increases with advancing maternal age","volume":"195","author":"Treacy","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1235","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31818ce092","article-title":"Primary cesarean delivery among parous women in the United States, 1990-2003","volume":"112","author":"Ford","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"382.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2008.06.073","article-title":"Perinatal outcomes among different Asian-American subgroups","volume":"199","author":"Wong","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"301","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e318160d65d","article-title":"Twin chorionicity and the risk of stillbirth","volume":"111","author":"Lee","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"e180","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020180","article-title":"Uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins and the timing of delivery","volume":"2","author":"Cleary-Goldman","year":"2005","journal-title":"PLoS Med"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"134","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2006.01.099","article-title":"Prospective risk of intrauterine death of monochorionic-diamniotic twins","volume":"195","author":"Simoes","year":"2006","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"604","DOI":"10.1046\/j.1471-0528.2003.01507.x","article-title":"Term breech presentation in The Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants","volume":"110","author":"Rietberg","year":"2003","journal-title":"BJOG"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1375","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(00)02840-3","article-title":"Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial","volume":"356","author":"Hannah","year":"2000","journal-title":"Lancet"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"640.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.12.038","article-title":"Method of delivery and neonatal outcome in very low-birthweight vertex-presenting fetuses","volume":"198","author":"Wylie","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"289.e1","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2007.10.794","article-title":"Early preterm breech delivery: is a policy of planned vaginal delivery associated with increased risk of neonatal death?","volume":"198","author":"Kayem","year":"2008","journal-title":"Am J Obstet Gynecol"},{"key":"10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"21","DOI":"10.1097\/AOG.0b013e31817cfdf1","article-title":"Delivery mode and severe intraventricular hemorrhage in single, very low birth weight, vertex infants","volume":"112","author":"Riskin","year":"2008","journal-title":"Obstet Gynecol"}],"container-title":["American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937809006437?httpAccept=text\/xml","content-type":"text\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/api.elsevier.com\/content\/article\/PII:S0002937809006437?httpAccept=text\/plain","content-type":"text\/plain","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,11]],"date-time":"2025-09-11T10:31:39Z","timestamp":1757586699000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/linkinghub.elsevier.com\/retrieve\/pii\/S0002937809006437"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]},"references-count":44,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]}},"alternative-id":["S0002937809006437"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021","relation":{},"ISSN":["0002-9378"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0002-9378","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,9]]},"assertion":[{"value":"Elsevier","name":"publisher","label":"This article is maintained by"},{"value":"Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor","name":"articletitle","label":"Article Title"},{"value":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","name":"journaltitle","label":"Journal Title"},{"value":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ajog.2009.06.021","name":"articlelink","label":"CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version"},{"value":"article","name":"content_type","label":"Content Type"},{"value":"Copyright \u00a9 2009 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.","name":"copyright","label":"Copyright"}]}}